Auricular reconstruction with modified expanded two-flap method in Goldenhar Syndrome: 7-Year experiences
Introduction
Goldenhar syndrome, also called as Oculo-auriculo-vertebral (OAV) dysplasia, which was first described by Dr. Goldenhar in 1952 [1]. This congenital deformity is arising from the defects of the first and second branchial arches [2]. Exact etiology of this defect is not yet well established now. The incidence of the syndrome was reported to be 1:35,000–1:56,00 and often affects unilateral organs [3]. Goldenhar syndrome encompassed a series of congenital malformations with varying in severity [4,5]. Typical dysplasia of this syndrome included hemifacial microsomia, microtia, preauricular skin tags, ocular deformities, epibulbar dermoids and vertebral column anomalies [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]]. Cardiovascular and pulmonary hypoplasias were also been reported [1,[8], [9], [10]]. Rib and rib cartilages deformities were always considered to be the associated symptoms of vertebral anomalies in Goldenhar syndrome [[5], [6], [7]] (see Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5).
Congenital malformations of Goldenhar syndrome brought severe physical and mental stress to the patients. Auricular reconstruction means great significance for the psychological and physiological development of the patients with Goldenhar syndrome. Reconstruct an external ear and achieve a better facial balance and harmony had always been the primary appeal of the patients who resort to the doctors. However, multiple deformities made it a great challenge and increased difficulty to reconstruct the auricle in Goldenhar syndrome. There are several clinical characteristics of patients with Goldenhar syndrome in the application of auricular reconstruction, which are as follows: i) severe facial asymmetry and depressed temporal bone, ii) tight retroauricular skin and stunted retroauricular fascia, iii) skeleton asymmetry and neck movement restriction due to vertebral malformations, iv) low hairline of the affected side, v) low and anterior site of the remnant ear. Due to these features, a particularly modified auricular reconstruction technique is essential for patients with Goldenhar syndrome.
Several surgical techniques of auricular reconstruction have been reported in the literature and autologous rib cartilage is the consensus best choice for ear framework fabrication. The expanded two-flap method was first described by Neumann in 1957. Tissue expansion provided well-vascularized skin coverage with appropriate thickness and area. In this study, the authors introduced a particularly modified expanded two-flap method for auricular reconstruction in details for patients with Goldenhar syndrome.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
Between January of 2012 and September of 2019, 69 cases with Goldenhar syndrome underwent auricular reconstruction using modified expanded two-flap method and autologous costal cartilages. The age of the patients ranged from 7 to 17 years (mean age, 10.45 years). All the patients suffered variable extent of unilateral microtia, hemifacial microsomia, ocular malformations, vertebral deformities and rib anomalies. Patients with Cardiovascular and pulmonary hypoplasias were excluded from this
Results
From January of 2012 and September of 2019, auricular reconstruction with the modified expanded two-flap method was performed in 69 cases of Goldenhar Syndrome. The patients were followed up for 6 months to 7years by outpatient appointments, telephone calls and communication Apps. The patients and their families evaluated the outcomes of the reconstruction according to the criteria listed in Table 1. The outcomes was defined as “satisfactory” (scored 10 to 15), “partially satisfactory” (scored
Case report
An 11-year-old female patient was recruited to our study with the major complaint of left side microtia through outpatient visiting. She was the first child of her parents and her younger sister did not suffer any congenital abnormalities. Parents of this patient are both healthy without congenital diseases and the girl was born through normal delivery and there was no history of diseases, teratogenic agents or drugs exposure during the pregnancy. Furthermore, there was no any history of
Discussion
Goldenhar syndrome was first defined by Maurice Goldenhar in a review of 3 patients with epibulbar dermoids, preauricular appendages, and mandibular hypoplasia [11]. After that, Gorlin et al. were first to recognize the relationship between the craniofacial deformities and the congenital anomalies of the vertebrate [12]. So, Goldenhar syndrome is also called oculo-auriculo-vertebral syndrome (OAVS), facioauriculovertebral syndrome, and Goldenhar-Golin syndrome. The exact etiology of this
Conclusions
In this study, we shared the experiences in details of the modified expanded two-flap method applied in auricular reconstruction of Goldenhar syndrome. The modified expanded two-flap method is safe and effective for patients with Goldenhar syndrome. The patients and their families responded satisfactory about the size, shape, projection, clear outline and limited scarring of the outcomes of auricular reconstruction. This modified technique could be a proper approach for auricular reconstruction
Ethical approval
All the procedures of this study were in accordance with ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethical board.
Informed consent
Written consent forms were received from all individuals.
Funding
The article was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81571924, 81701930).
Author's role/participation
Wenshan Xing, Jintian Hu, Yue Wang, Jin Qian, Bingqing Wang, and Qingguo Zhang participated in the clinical application of the technique. Wenshan Xing participated in the follow-up of the patients and analysis of data for the work. All authors participated in the conception and design of the study. Wenshan Xing drafted the article. Yue Wang, Jin Qian, Bingqing Wang and Qingguo Zhang revised it critically for important intellectual content. All the authors approved the version to be submitted.
Declaration of competing interest
The article was sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81571924, 81701930). The authors declare that they have no commercial associations or financial disclosures with regard to this article.
References (26)
- et al.
A microanatomic abnormality of the lacrimal gland associated with Goldenhar syndrome
Surv. Ophthalmol.
(2016) - et al.
Oculoauriculovertebral. dysplasia
J. Pediatr.
(1963) - et al.
Novel deformity of the mandible in oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum: case report and literature review
J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(2006) Microtia repair with rib cartilage grafts: a review of personal experience with 1000 cases
Clin. Plast. Surg.
(2002)- et al.
Goldenhar syndrome with dextrocardia and right pulmonary hypoplasia: an unusual association
Case. Rep. Genet.
(2017) - et al.
Goldenhar syndrome: a case report with review
Int. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent.
(2016) - et al.
Goldenhar syndrome-review with case series
J. Clin. Diagn. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Mandibular reconstruction in Goldenhar syndrome using temporalis muscle osteofascial flap
J. Craniofac. Surg.
(2008) - et al.
Spinal anomalies in Goldenhar syndrome
Cleft. Palate. Craniofac. J.
(2005) - et al.
Cervicovertebral anomalies and basilar impression in Goldenhar syndrome
Plast. Reconstr. Surg.
(1994)
Vertebral anomalies associated with Goldenhar syndrome
J. Clin. Rheumatol.
Goldenhar syndrome with contralateral pulmonary aplasia: a rare association
J. Radiol. Case Rep.
First description of unilateral lung agenesis and anomalous pulmonary venous connection in a newborn with Goldenhar syndrome
Cardiol. Young
Cited by (9)
Vascular variation of temporoparietal fascia in microtia associated with hemifacial microsomia
2024, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgeryHearing impairment and ear anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: a systematic review
2022, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :External ear malformations were described in 50 records (Supplementary Material Table S2)5,12–15,18,20–22,24,26–30,32–45,48–50,52–63,65–67,69,71,72. Microtia, reported in 52–100% of patients, was described in 31 records5,12,14,15,18,20–22,27–30,32–34,38,39,41,42,45,50,52,53,55,56,60,65–67,69,73, and anotia, reported in 2.8–6.7% of patients, was described in five records18,28,33,39,66; five records did not distinguish between microtia and anotia24,37,40,59,71, reporting a prevalence of 52–100%. Two records did not distinguish between the presence of microtia, anotia, and/or pre-auricular tags, which were reported in 98–100% of patients35,36.
A decade of clinical research on clinical characteristics, medical treatments, and surgical treatments for individuals with craniofacial microsomia: What have we learned?
2022, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic SurgeryCitation Excerpt :An expanded scalp flap without skin graft can be an effective procedure for patients with a low hairline.85 Qian et al. and Xing et al. describe the use of a retroauricular tissue expander in an expanded two-flap reconstruction method with costal cartilage.86,87 Outcomes of autologous reconstruction with rib was studied in 60 patients with auricular anomalies.88
Reconstructive Techniques in Pediatric Congenital Microtia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
2024, Facial Plastic SurgeryPatient-Reported Satisfaction After Autologous Auricular Reconstruction in Patients with Microtia: A Systematic Review
2022, Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic MedicineSurgical Microtia Reconstruction in Hemifacial Microsomia Patients: Current State and Future Directions
2022, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open