Original Article
Prevention versus treatment of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus with ondansetron

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.04.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We assessed the efficacy of ondansetron for either treatment or prophylaxis of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.

  • We found no difference in postoperative pruritus between ondansetron for prophylaxis or treatment when compared to placebo.

  • Our data do not support the use of ondansetron for prevention or treatment of morphine-induced pruritus.

Abstract

Background

Intrathecal morphine is used for post-cesarean analgesia, but pruritus is a common side effect. Ondansetron would be an attractive treatment because it prevents nausea, is non-sedative or has no anti-analgesic effect. We undertook a study to assess the efficacy of ondansetron for treatment or prophylaxis of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus.

Methods

Healthy paturients undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine 250 μg and fentanyl 25 μg were randomized to receive: prophylaxis (ondansetron 8 mg at cord clamping, normal saline 4 mL for treatment of pruritus in the post-anaesthesia care unit); treatment (normal saline 4 mL at cord clamping, ondansetron 8 mg as required in the post-anesthesia care unit) or control (normal saline 4 mL in both). Visual analogue scale scores for pruritus, nausea and pain were recorded preoperatively, on arrival to, at 30, 60, and 120 min and on discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit. The primary outcome was the peak pruritus score. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction or Fisher’s exact test were used to analyze data; P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The study was terminated early when interim analysis indicated no effect. Eighty-two of the intended 180 paturients completed the protocol (26 in control group, 32 in treatment group and 24 in prophylaxis). There were no differences in the rate or severity of pruritus at any assessment point, or the request for treatment. Pruritus was reduced after administration of treatment syringe.

Conclusion

Prophylactic ondansetron did not reduce pruritus when compared with placebo. The use of ondansetron as a treatment did not decrease the severity of pruritus when compared with placebo.

Introduction

Intrathecal morphine is a highly effective analgesic following cesarean delivery. A common side effect is pruritus which occurs in 60–93% of patients. Pruritus is most commonly mild and localized to the face and trunk, but it can be severe and cause significant maternal discomfort.1 The mechanism remains uncertain. Animal studies suggest the presence of an itch center in the lower medulla, with the trigeminal nucleus involved in the itch reflex.2 Activation of the mu-opioid receptor is believed to cause pruritus, while the kappa-opioid receptor attenuates this side effect. Thus, naloxone, a mu receptor antagonist, is effective in treating opioid-induced pruritus, but carries the risk of reversing analgesia. Several other medications with variable efficacy and side-effect profiles have been studied, including propofol, gabapentin, pentazocine, nalbuphine, diphenhydramine.3

Opioids interact closely in the central nervous system with the 5-HT receptor, which plays a role in both pain transmission and nausea and vomiting. A possible interaction between the opioid and serotonergic systems has been suggested in the pathogenesis of pruritus in cholestatic jaundice.4 5-HT antagonists developed for the treatment of nausea and vomiting have also been described as prophylactic or rescue treatment of opioid-induced pruritus. Ondansetron has been reported to be effective when administered for treatment of opioid-induced pruritus, but has been less likely to prevent pruritus when administered as a prophylactic agent.4 Theoretically, if the effectiveness of ondansetron were related to its serum concentration, early prophylactic administration would result in lower serum concentrations due to redistribution and decreased effectiveness compared to symptomatic treatment. We hypothesized that ondansetron would be more effective as treatment than as prophylaxis for pruritus caused by intrathecal morphine used for cesarean delivery.

Section snippets

Methods

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was approved by the hospital institutional review board. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II patients who presented for elective cesarean delivery between April 2008 and December 2009 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included patients of ASA Class III or IV, those with chronic pain requiring opioids, chronic nausea or vomiting, pre-existing pruritus, preeclampsia, diabetes mellitus or neurologic disease.

After written informed

Statistical analysis

We had performed a pilot survey of 20 parturients to determine sample size. Of these patients, 75% reported post-cesarean pruritus; the mean VAS-pruritus score was 47/100, and 25% of these patients received treatment for pruritus. This is consistent with other published data. Using a significance of 0.05 and a power of 0.80, we determined that 50 patients per group would be needed to demonstrate a 35% reduction in pruritus scores. Enrollment was increased by 20% to account for unexpected

Results

Interim data analysis was performed after enrolment of 90 patients. The study was terminated at this point due to futility (i.e. lack of effect in either the prophylaxis or the treatment group compared to placebo). Of the 90 patients enrolled, there were eight protocol violations resulting in a final sample of 82: five patients were disqualified because they received non-study medications; one patient disclosed after enrolment that she had received ondansetron for nausea and vomiting throughout

Discussion

No effect of ondansetron when administered for either prevention or treatment of pruritus caused by intrathecal morphine after cesarean delivery was found. Patients in all three groups had similar VAS pruritus scores after the prophylactic dose was administered. A similar percentage requested treatment for pruritus, and had a similar, minimal change in VAS pruritus scores after the treatment was administered.

Lack of prophylactic effect was not completely unexpected from the previous literature.

Disclosure

This study was supported by departmental funds only. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (13)

  • Medications for the prevention of pruritus in women undergoing cesarean delivery with Intrathecal morphine: A systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    2021, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    The full text of each of the remaining 28 abstracts was then reviewed, and 7 articles were further excluded, as they reported on the medications to treat pruritus, rather than for prophylaxis, and did not satisfy the eligibility criteria [41–47], leaving 21 relevant articles reporting on the prevention of pruritus for the systematic review. Five more studies [17–19,25,26] were added, when the literature was updated in October 2019 during the revision process, leaving a total of 26 studies to be included in the systematic review and 21 studies in the network meta-analysis [7–32]. Of the 26 studies included in the systematic review, 5 were excluded for network meta-analysis as they varied considerably either in the routes of drug administration or due to absence of control group [20,24,28–30].

  • Monitoring, prevention and treatment of side effects of long-acting neuraxial opioids for post-cesarean analgesia

    2019, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    The recurrence of pruritus following treatment with either drug was also similar, and up to 50% of patients in the study required rescue treatment with 0.04 mg IV naloxone because of either treatment failure or the recurrence of pruritus.52 Another study by Kung et al. randomized parturients into three groups: prophylaxis, treatment or control.53 The prophylaxis group received ondansetron 8 mg IV bolus at cord clamping and normal saline 4 mL IV bolus for treatment of pruritus in the post-anesthesia care unit; the treatment group received normal saline 4 mL IV bolus at cord clamping and ondansetron 8 mg IV bolus as required in the post-anesthesia care unit; the control group received normal saline 4 mL IV bolus at both time points.

  • Neurocutaneous disease: Cutaneous neuroanatomy and mechanisms of itch and pain

    2016, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text