International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Illumination of parameter contributions on uneven break phenomenon in underground stoping mines
Introduction
In underground metalliferous mining, stoping is the most commonly utilised mining method among various others. Adoption of stoping method has been steadily increased due to the ability to mechanisation into larger scale and the flexible applicability to various ground conditions. Many researchers have been reporting the popularity of stoping method. According to Pakalnis et al. [1], open stoping method accounts for half of underground metalliferous mine production in Canada. Once again, Pakalnis and Hughes [2] noted that in excess of 60% of underground mine production in North America relies on sublevel stoping method. Additionally, after investigation on major metalliferous underground mines in Australia, Jang et al. [3] reported that over 85% are operating by various stoping methods.
In spite of the popularity of stoping method, most of the mines are suffering from excessive dilution and ore-loss. Dilution and ore-loss can be simply defined as unwanted influx and remaining materials into planned ore production and in stope even after the production. These phenomena can be broadly classified into planned and unplanned which have been illustrated along with the stope production procedures in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1b and d, planned dilution and ore-loss are determined at the stope planning stage while unplanned dilution and ore-loss can be confirmed after stope production.
Both planned and unplanned dilutions are basically unavoidable. Indeed, planned dilution and ore-loss can be minimised on the stope planning stage by thorough consideration to maximise net profit but not completely eliminated. Likewise, unplanned dilution and ore-loss are inevitable as long as stope is excavated by drilling and blasting method. In fact, the most important task to maximise the productivity of stope production is reducing unplanned dilution and ore-loss. To minimise the unplanned dilution and ore-loss, the causing mechanism and contributions of influencing parameters must be comprehensively investigated in preference.
The aim of this study is to illuminate the causing mechanism of unplanned dilution and ore-loss (uneven break: UB) based on a published uneven break prediction artificial neural network (ANN) model by Jang et al. [3]. The ANN model has been developed through comprehensive investigations on 1067 stope production results from underground mines in Western Australia. Justifications of choosing the uneven break prediction ANN model are; the model achieves the statistical significant with the correlation coefficient of 0.719 with ten major UB causative factors and is the unique model that covers both unplanned dilution and ore-loss simultaneously.
The remainder of this paper is divided into four sections. Section 2 reviews previous studies on uneven break phenomenon. Section 3 expounds the published UB prediction ANN and analyse the parameter contributions with representing essential findings. Subsequently in Section 4, the study will be concluded with comments on proper UB management system in underground stoping mines, and future works.
Section snippets
Uneven break management in underground stoping mines
Minimising uneven break (UB) in stope production is one of the most challenging tasks but cannot be abandoned. Because it is directly influencing not only to the productivity of stope production but also the profitability throughout whole mining operations. For instance, the inflexed low grade and waste material contaminate and downgrade the planned ore stream that burdens production cycles with extra mucking and hauling. Also, the remaining ore-loss in stope directly causes a diminution in
UB predicting ANN model and parameter contribution analysis
As mentioned in Section 1, a reliable UB predicting ANN model was introduced by Jang [14]. The model is comprised of ten UB causative factors under three categories, i.e., blasting, stope design, and geology. Five stope production blasting related factors were collected, i.e., average length of blasthole (Blen), powder factor (Pf), angle difference between the hole and wall (AHW), blasthole diameter (Bdia), and space and burden ratio (SbR). Three representative stope design factors, such as the
Conclusions
Uneven break (UB), unplanned dilution and ore-loss, is one of the most adverse phenomenon in underground stope production. It is often considered as an unavoidable and unpredictable phenomenon due to complexity of accruing mechanism. To minimise the unfavourable uneven break, a thorough examination on the causing mechanism and contributions of the influencing parameters to UB must be conducted. In this study, contributions of ten major UB causative factors and their general trends have been
References (19)
- et al.
Decision support system of unplanned dilution and ore-loss in underground stoping operations using a neuro-fuzzy system
Appl Soft Comput
(2015) - et al.
Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks
Ecol Model
(2002) - et al.
An accurate comparison of methods for quantifying variable importance in artificial neural networks using simulated data
Ecol Model
(2004) - et al.
Quantifying the cost of dilution in underground mines
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts
(1996) - Pakalnis RCT, Hughes PB. Sublevel stoping. SME mining engineering handbook. United States of America: Society for...
- et al.
Influence of stope geometry and blasting patterns on recorded overbreak
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(1997) - et al.
Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support
Rock Mech Rock Eng
(1974) - et al.
The effect of stress damage on dilution in narrow vein mines
Empirical stope design at Ruttan mine
(1986)