Changes in sour rotten grape berry microbiota during ripening and wine fermentation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.029Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigated the microbiota of sour rotten wine grapes and its impact on wine fermentations. Yeasts, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) were enumerated and identified on sound and sour rot grapes during the ripening stage. The alteration of the ecological balance induced by sour rot was particularly evidenced by the unequivocal increase of yeast and AAB counts on rotten grapes, since the beginning of ripening. Yeast and AAB species diversity in rotten grape samples were much higher than those found in sound grapes. LAB populations were low detected from both healthy and sour rotten grapes. The yeast species Issatchenkia occidentalis, Zygoascus hellenicus and Zygosaccharomyces bailii and the AAB species Gluconacetobacter hansenii, Gluconacetobacter intermedius and Acetobacter malorum, were recovered from damaged grapes and resulting grape juices in the winery. Acetobacter orleaniensis and Acetobacter syzygii were only recovered from sour rotten grapes.

Dekkera bruxellensis and Oenococcus oeni were only recovered after wine fermentation induced by starter inoculation, irrespective of grape health, probably originating from cellar environment. After malolactic fermentation, racking and sulphur dioxide addition the only remaining species were the yeast Trigonopsis cantarellii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, independently of the grape health status.

Highlights

► Grape damage is the main driving force altering berry microbiota. ► Rotting process induced deep changes on yeasts and acetic acid bacteria populations. ► Zygoascus hellenicus and Issatchenkia spp. may be regarded as markers of sour rot. ► Acetobacter orleaniensis and A. syzygii were only recovered from sour rotten grapes.

Introduction

Grape quality may be affected by a wide range of rots. Among them, sour rot is an emergent grapevine disease affecting late ripening cultivars with tightly-packed, thin-skinned and dense bunches close to harvesting, causing heavy crop losses and being detrimental to juice and wine quality (Bisiach et al., 1986, Wolf et al., 1990, Zoecklein et al., 1992). Rotten bunches have a strong and pungent odour of vinegar as a result of the production of high levels of acetic acid, accompanied by high concentrations of glycerol, ethyl acetate, ethanol, acetaldehyde and galacturonic and gluconic acids (Marchetti et al., 1984, Zoecklein et al., 2001). These products are the result of a mixed population of yeasts and acetic acid bacteria (AAB) (Acetobacter spp. and Gluconobacter spp.) (Bisiach et al., 1986, Blancard et al., 2000, Gravot et al., 2001).

Berry rupture is associated with a sudden increase in yeast load up to about 106–108 CFU/g and deep alterations in species diversity occur when compared with sound grapes (Barata et al., 2008a, Barata et al., 2008b). The main yeast species recovered from sour rotten grapes are Candida krusei, Issatchenkia orientalis, Kloeckera apiculata/Hanseniaspora uvarum, Saccharomycopsis vini, Candida steatolytica (syn. Zygoascus hellenicus), Torulaspora delbrueckii, Issatchenkia terricola and Zygosaccharomyces bailii (Barata et al., 2008a, Barata et al., 2008b, Bisiach et al., 1982, Bisiach et al., 1986, Guerzoni and Marchetti, 1987, Guerzoni and Marchetti, 1982, Marchetti et al., 1984). The population size of AAB on healthy grapes is typically low (102–103 cells/g) and Gluconobacter oxydans is the species most represented, while in grapes damaged by Botrytis cinerea (grey rot), AAB populations can reach up to 105–106 cells/g, comprising Gluconobacter spp. and Acetobacter spp., mainly A. aceti and A. pasteurianus (Barbe et al., 2001). Undamaged grapes contains low populations of LAB, not exceeding 103 CFU/g and the initial titer in must is low (Bae et al., 2006, Fugelsang, 1997, Lafon-Lafourcade et al., 1983). Only a few LAB species of the genera Lactobacillus spp. (Lb.), Leuconostoc spp. (Lc.), Pediococcus spp. (P.), Oenococcus spp. (O.) and Weissella spp. (W.) can grow in must and wine (König and Fröhlich, 2009). The species Oenococcus oeni, regarded as the main agent of malolactic fermentation (Henick-Kling, 1993, Lonvaud-Funel, 1995, Lonvaud-Funel, 1999) has been seldom isolated from grapes in the vineyard (Renouf et al., 2007). Several other bacterial species have also been isolated from sound and grey rotten grapes (Nisiotou et al., 2011). However, these species have no technological significance in winemaking, being probably only a result of environmental contamination of berry surfaces.

Previous work from our laboratory, based on accurate berry sampling, has shown that grape damage by sour rot induced dramatic increases on yeast counts and number of species since the beginning of grape ripening (Barata et al., 2008a, Barata et al., 2008b). However, the knowledge of the complex microbial changes that lead to sour rot disease has not yet been completed and clearly understood, particularly in regard to the role and evolution of bacterial populations. Therefore, the purposes of this work were (i) to investigate the changes of the overall grape contaminants including yeasts, AAB and LAB populations present on healthy and sour rotten berries surfaces during different stages of ripening, and (ii) to study the fate of these populations during winemaking at winery level. For that, a careful berry sampling followed by isolation and enumeration on both general purpose media and selective and differential media, together with identification by molecular methods, were performed.

Section snippets

Grape samples

During the 2007 vintage, healthy and sour rot affected bunches of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Trincadeira red grape variety were selected from a experimental vineyard of Instituto Superior de Agronomia, located in Tapada da Ajuda, Lisbon, Portugal (latitude 38° 42′31.57″ N and longitude 9° 11′14.01″ W). Just after the veraison period, the Trincadeira parcels were visually inspected and vines containing bunches with sour rot symptoms were marked. Two sets of three different vines (duplicates) were

Isolation and identification of yeasts, AAB and LAB

A total of 203 yeasts isolates, recovered from sound and rotten grape samples during the 3 ripening phases, and 97 yeast isolates obtained from grape musts and wine samples throughout the 3 winemaking phases, were selected for identification. A total of 15 species were successfully identified by comparison of the CfoI, HaeIII and HinfI restriction profiles contained in the Yeast-id database (see Table S1 in supplementary material). The DraI endonuclease enabled the identification of C.

Conclusions

The results obtained in this work support our view that grape damage is the main driving force altering berry microbiota. Grape damage increases sugar accessibility and creates opportunities for new species to become established. Moreover, we believe that many of the apparently contradictory results found on literature regarding the factors affecting yeast diversity on grapes, may be explained by using grape bunches without separating damaged berries. Undoubtedly, deep changes on the yeast

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) and by POCI 2010, participated by the European fund FEDER under the projects POCI/AGR/56771/2004 and PTDC/AGR-ALI/101393/2008. A. Barata was the recipient of a PhD grant (Ref. SFRH/BD/28451/2006) from the FCT.

References (84)

  • A. Lonvaud-Funel

    Microbiology of the malolactic fermentation: molecular aspects

    FEMS Microbiology Letters

    (1995)
  • V. Loureiro et al.

    Spoilage yeasts in the wine industry

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2003)
  • V. Loureiro et al.

    Detecting spoilage yeasts

  • Á. Marcobal et al.

    The tyrosine decarboxylation test does not differentiate Enterococcus faecalis from Enterococcus faecium

    Systematic and Applied Microbiology

    (2004)
  • P. Martorell et al.

    Molecular typing of the yeast species Dekkera bruxellensis and Pichia guilliermondii recovered from wine related sources

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2006)
  • R. Mortimer et al.

    On the origins of wine yeast

    Research in Microbiology

    (1999)
  • A.A. Nisiotou et al.

    Bacterial species associated with sound and Botrytis-infected grapes from a Greek vineyard

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2011)
  • C.J. Prakitchaiwattana et al.

    Application and evaluation of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to analyse the yeast ecology of wine grapes

    FEMS Yeast Research

    (2004)
  • C. Prieto et al.

    Application of molecular methods for analysing the distribution and diversity of acetic acid bacteria in Chilean vineyards

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2007)
  • P. Raspor et al.

    Yeasts isolated from three varieties of grapes cultivated in different locations of the Dolenjska vine-growing region, Slovenia

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2006)
  • V. Renouf et al.

    Development of an enrichment medium to detect Dekkera/Brettanomyces bruxellensis, a spoilage wine yeast, on the surface of grape berries

    Microbiological Research

    (2007)
  • A.M. Rodas et al.

    16S-ARDRA, a tool for identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from grape must and wine

    Systematic and Applied Microbiology

    (2003)
  • M. Sievers et al.

    16S–23S ribosomal RNA spacer regions of Acetobacter europaeus and A. xylinum, tRNA genes and antitermination sequences

    FEMS Microbiology Letters

    (1996)
  • M. Sievers et al.

    Acetobacter europaeus sp. nov., a main component of industrial vinegar fermenters in central Europe

    Systematic and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

    (1992)
  • M.T. Smith

    Hanseniaspora Zikes

  • M. Valera et al.

    Diversity of acetic acid bacteria present in healthy grapes from the Canary Islands

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2011)
  • C. Vegas et al.

    Population dynamics of acetic acid bacteria during traditional wine vinegar production

    International Journal of Food Microbiology

    (2010)
  • J.H. Andrews et al.

    Morphogenesis and adhesion of Aureobasidium pullulans

    Canadian Journal of Microbiology

    (1994)
  • I.P. Babjeva et al.

    Geographic aspects of yeast ecology

    Physiology and General Biology Reviews

    (1995)
  • S. Bae et al.

    Lactic acid bacteria associated with wine grapes from several Australian vineyards

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (2006)
  • A. Barata et al.

    Sour rot-damaged grapes are sources of wine spoilage yeasts

    FEMS Yeast Research

    (2008)
  • A. Barata et al.

    Ascomycetous yeast species recovered from grapes damaged by honeydew and sour rot

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (2008)
  • J.C. Barbe et al.

    Role of botrytized grape micro-organisms in SO2 binding phenomena

    Journal of Applied Microbiology

    (2001)
  • M. Bisiach et al.

    Possible integrated control of grapevine sour rot

    Vitis

    (1986)
  • M. Bisiach et al.

    Recherches expérimentales sur la pourriture acide de la grappe et sur rapports avec la pourriture grise

    EPPO Bulletin

    (1982)
  • D. Blancard et al.

    Etiology of sour rot in vineyards located in South-West of France

    IOBC/wprs Bulletin “Integrated Control in Viticulture”

    (2000)
  • N. Čadež et al.

    The effect of fungicides on yeast communities associated with grape berries

    FEMS Yeast Research

    (2010)
  • Y.S. Chen et al.

    Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from soil using an enrichment procedure

    Letters in Applied Microbiology

    (2005)
  • I. Cleenwerck et al.

    Re-examination of the genus Acetobacter, with descriptions of Acetobacter cerevisiae sp. nov. and Acetobacter malorum sp. nov

    International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

    (2002)
  • M. De la Torre et al.

    Indigenous yeasts associated with two Vitis vinifera grape varieties cultured in southern Spain

    Microbios

    (1999)
  • J. De Ley et al.

    Family VI. Acetobacteriaceae Gillis and De Ley, 1980

  • G.S. Drysdale et al.

    Acetic acid bacteria in winemaking: a review

    American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

    (1988)
  • Cited by (87)

    • Advances in microbiological quality control

      2021, Managing Wine Quality: Volume One: Viticulture and Wine Quality
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text