Elsevier

International Journal of Fatigue

Volume 29, Issues 9–11, September–November 2007, Pages 1668-1680
International Journal of Fatigue

Sensors for monitoring early stage fatigue cracking

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Three sensor systems were evaluated for their ability to detect early stage fatigue cracking in open holes. The sensor systems were (1) a Meandering Winding Magnetometer Array sensor system that induces eddy currents to monitor conductivity changes; (2) a through-transmission ultrasonic technique that monitors energy loss, and (3) the Electrochemical Fatigue Sensor which detects fatigue-induced changes in a metal surface through their effects on the electrochemical double layer. The sensors were mounted individually or in tandem in samples of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy which were then fatigued using a spectrum loading sequence. The samples were also examined at various stages during fatigue cycling using optical or scanning electron microscopy. Detection thresholds of approximately 100 μm were observed, and calibration curves for crack size in terms of the sensor outputs were obtained.

Introduction

Interest in early stage fatigue has continued to increase with each new generation of observational techniques and with the recognition that short fatigue cracks do not always follow the same laws as long cracks [1]. Likewise, the importance of fatigue cracking to the structural safety of aircraft has become an increasingly serious preoccupation of the world’s aircraft fleet managers, as evidenced by the yearly conferences devoted to this issue (e.g. [2], [3]). As part of this interest, the sensing of fatigue cracks for use as a nondestructive inspection technique and for potential use in health monitoring systems is also the subject of much current research [4], [5]. Piotrowski et al. [4] recently tested 20 different sensor systems for their ability to detect subsurface cracks in lap joint structures. They chose a threshold value of 3.8 mm at which to compare the techniques, and found that the probability of detection was “quite low” at this value [4].

In the Safe Life approach to aircraft fatigue, the US Navy considers that a primary aircraft structure with a crack of 250 μm has reached the end of its fatigue life [6]. Thus, the Navy threshold is more than an order of magnitude smaller than the threshold used in the Piotrowski study. This comparison is not strictly valid because the Piotrowski study examined cracks in the subsurface layer of lap joints, which are not usually of primary interest in naval aircraft. However, the comparison serves to highlight the gap between current NDI techniques and the need to detect smaller cracks.

For naval aircraft, fastener holes are often prime locations for fatigue crack initiation, and some fatigue life tracking is focused on the surveillance of several fastener hole “hot spots.” Inspection for 250 μm cracks in fastener holes, particularly holes with the fastener in place, is not possible with current technology. However, next generation health monitoring systems, e.g., “prognosis” approaches, will require detailed information about fatigue cracking at this length scale and below.

In an attempt to address the need for early stage fatigue crack detection at fastener holes, a series of laboratory experiments was undertaken to evaluate the state-of-the-art of currently available sensor systems for cracks in holes. Recent reviews have catalogued most of the available techniques for early stage fatigue crack detection, [7], [8], [9] and several of the most applicable and promising of them were selected for evaluation in this study. It was decided to restrict the work to laboratory testing of open-hole 7075-T651 aluminum coupons that were designed to be representative of current US Navy interest. The idea was to provide an optimum environment for sensor operation in order to establish the current lower limit for crack detection. The sensor systems were also chosen with an eye toward their potential for eventual use in a fielded system. The three chosen techniques were based on measurements of eddy currents, ultrasonic energy and electrochemical behavior.

Section snippets

Experimental procedure

The general approach to these experiments involved mounting the individual sensors on a two-hole coupon of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy and subjecting the coupon to a spectrum fatigue test that resulted in development of fatigue cracks at the 3 and 9 o’clock positions in the holes, where the primary loading direction was along the 12 to 6 o’clock axis. The coupon was a flat, straight sided, rectangular cross section bar, 47.4 mm wide × 350 mm long × 5.7 mm thick. The dimensions were chosen to be

Sensor systems

Three sensor systems were evaluated. They are described below.

Fatigue testing

Several series of fatigue tests were performed. The initial tests were run with only one type of sensor installed in the test coupon, while subsequent tests used two types of sensors mounted on the same coupon concurrently. The objective of these tests was to establish calibration curves for crack length versus sensor signal for each sensor and to get, in a qualitative manner, an understanding of the validity of each sensor in terms of its rate of false positive and false negative indications.

Multiple sensor tests

Several series of fatigue tests were performed in which two types of sensors were mounted on the coupon at the same time, such as can be seen in Fig. 4. The sensor pairs that were examined included the ultrasonic and eddy current sensors as seen in Fig. 4, and the ultrasonic and electrochemical sensors. It was not possible to use the eddy current and electrochemical sensors together because they both need access to the bore of the hole. Note that the various methods were calibrated

Discussion

These tests showed that under laboratory conditions with unrestricted access to a hole and with the ability to monitor cracking continuously during cycling from the beginning of a fatigue test, both the MWM-Array eddy current and the electrochemical sensor systems can detect fatigue cracks in the 100–125 μm range. With the appropriate calibration, these sensors are reasonably accurate, and can follow the increase of crack length as the test progresses. The ultrasonic technique employed in these

Acknowledgements

This work is partially sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency under contract HR0011-04-C-0003. Dr. Leo Christodoulou is the DARPA Program Manager. It is a pleasure to acknowledge the valuable contributions of Robert Fidnarick, and Robert Christ, Jr. of Northrop Grumman Corp.

References (20)

  • V. Zilberstein et al.

    Early detection and monitoring of fatigue in high strength steels with MWM-Arrays

    Int J Fatigue

    (2005)
  • S. Suresh

    Fatigue of materials

    (2001)
  • ASIP 2006. Aircraft Structural Integrity Program, San Antonio (TX);...
  • Aging Aircraft 2006. Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Aging Aircraft Conference, Atlanta (GA);...
  • Piotrowski D, Bohler J, Bode M, Moore D, Bakuckas J, Gallella D, et al. Assessment of capabilities and readiness of...
  • Ramakrishnan R, Jury D. Characterization of defects and damage in rivet holes in a crown lap joint of a commercial...
  • M.E. Hoffman et al.

    Current and future fatigue life prediction methods for aircraft structures

    Naval Res Rev

    (1998)
  • V. Zilberstein et al.

    MWM eddy current for monitoring of crack initiation and growth during fatigue tests and in service

    Int J Fatigue

    (2001)
  • B. Mi et al.

    An ultrasonic method for dynamic monitoring of fatigue crack initiation and growth

    J Acoust Soc Am

    (2006)
  • J.E. Michaels et al.

    An ultrasonic angle beam method for in situ sizing of fastener hole cracks

    J Nondestruct Eval

    (2006)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text