Trends in admissions for chest pain after the introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T☆
Introduction
Clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading causes of hospital admissions in Europe and the USA [1]. The evaluation of patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department (ED) is based on clinical signs and symptoms, electrocardiograms (ECG), and cardiac biomarkers to determine if they should be admitted for observation or discharged to their homes [2]. The recent clinical introduction of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays has enabled an earlier detection of cardiac ischemia in chest pain patients, leading to a shorter evaluation time in the ED [3], [4].
The sensitivity improvement offered by the hs-cTn assays does not come without a cost. More patients without MI will have elevated troponin levels (above the so called 99th percentile) given the lower specificity [5], [6]. Introduction of the hs-cTn assays may increase hospital admissions for chest pain as well as the downstream resource utilization, which has raised some concerns [7].
The effects of hs-cTn assays on admission rates for chest pain during the first few years of introduction are largely unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine temporal trends of admission rates. Additionally, we evaluated the effect on coronary angiographies, revascularizations, and outcomes after the introduction of the hs-cTnT assay in December 2010, at our hospital.
Section snippets
Study population
From the hospital's local emergency attendance register, we identified all patients aged above 25 years, who visited the ED at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden with chest pain as the principal complaint from 1 January 2011 to 20 October 2014. During the study period, the ED had around 75,000 yearly visits by adult patients. Abdominal pain was the most common reason for the visit, followed by chest pain and dyspnea.
Study design
Through the hospital's technical department, we combined
Patient characteristics
Characteristics of the study population and number of visits were similar during the whole study period (Table 1). Patients had a similar age, and only small differences in comorbidities, as well as cardiovascular medication over time. The proportion of patients with undetectable hs-cTnT levels changed substantially from 62% in 2011 to 42% in 2014 owing to the lower sensitivity of the early batches of reagents that were used for the hs-cTnT assay until April 2012 [10]. The change in the
Discussion
In a cohort of 15,472 patients who visited the ED with chest pain as the principal complaint, we found that the hospital admission rate was reduced by 36% during the 4 years following the introduction of hs-cTnT. There was an increase in resource utilization in terms of coronary angiographies and cardiac revascularizations. Additionally, we found an increased risk of non-cardiovascular mortality, but cardiovascular mortality was unchanged during the study period.
Conclusions
We found that during the first 4 years after the introduction of hs-cTnT, there was a 36% decrease in hospital admissions for chest pain. This decrease was associated with an increase in non-cardiovascular mortality, which was only significant in patients with hs-cTnT levels > 14 ng/l. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the rate of coronary angiographies performed.
The following are the supplementary data related to this article.
Contributors
All authors had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. MJH and RL contributed to the study design while MJH and NB contributed to the acquisition of data. All authors contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. NB and MJH drafted the manuscript. MJH obtained funding for the study and provided administrative,
Funding
The study was funded by the Swedish Society of Medicine (grant, SLS-409991), the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (grants, 20150594 and 20150603), and the Stockholm County Council (grant, 20150265). The sponsors had no role in the design or conduct of this study.
Disclosures
None.
Conflict of interest
There was no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
We wish to express our gratitude to Fredrik Mattsson at FM Statistikkonsult for his assistance with data management and statistical analyses.
References (31)
- et al.
Third universal definition of MI
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
(2012) - et al.
Effect of population selection on 99th percentile values for a high sensitivity cardiac troponin i and t assays
Clin. Biochem.
(2013) - et al.
Undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T level in the emergency department and risk of MI
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
(2014) - et al.
Long-time quality assessment of the Elecsys troponin t hs assay
Clin. Biochem.
(2013) - et al.
Cardiac biomarkers - a short biography
Clin. Biochem.
(2015) - et al.
The economics of cardiac biomarker testing in suspected MI
Clin. Biochem.
(2015) Avoiding the imminent plague of troponinitis: the need for reference limits for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin t
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
(2014)- et al.
Risk of revisits to the emergency department in admitted versus discharged patients with chest pain but without MI in relation to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels
Int. J. Cardiol.
(2016) - et al.
Rapid exclusion of acute MI in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
(2011) - et al.
Rapid rule out of acute MI using undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin
Int. J. Cardiol.
(2013)
Characterization of the observe zone of the ESC 2015 high-sensitivity cardiac troponin 0 h/1 h-algorithm for the early diagnosis of acute MI
Int. J. Cardiol.
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study
Lancet
Analytical characteristics of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays
Clin. Chem.
Change to costs and lengths of stay in the emergency department and the Brisbane protocol: an observational study
BMJ Open
Cited by (0)
- ☆
All authors take full responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.