Oral treatments of Echinococcus multilocularis-infected mice with the antimalarial drug mefloquine that potentially interacts with parasite ferritin and cystatin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.016Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of oral treatments of Echinococcus multilocularis-infected mice with the antimalarial drug mefloquine (MEF) and identified proteins that bind to MEF in parasite extracts and human cells by affinity chromatography. In a pilot experiment, MEF treatment was applied 5 days per week and was intensified by increasing the dosage stepwise from 12.5 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg during 4 weeks followed by treatments of 100 mg/kg during the last 7 weeks. This resulted in a highly significant reduction of parasite weight in MEF-treated mice compared with mock-treated mice, but the reduction was significantly less efficacious compared with the standard treatment regimen of albendazole (ABZ). In a second experiment, MEF was applied orally in three different treatment groups at dosages of 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg, but only twice a week, for a period of 12 weeks. Treatment at 100 mg/kg had a profound impact on the parasite, similar to ABZ treatment at 200 mg/kg/day (5 days/week for 12 weeks). No adverse side effects were noted. To identify proteins in E. multilocularis metacestodes that physically interact with MEF, affinity chromatography of metacestode extracts was performed on MEF coupled to epoxy-activated Sepharose®, followed by SDS-PAGE and in-gel digestion LC–MS/MS. This resulted in the identification of E. multilocularis ferritin and cystatin as MEF-binding proteins. In contrast, when human cells were exposed to MEF affinity chromatography, nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase was identified as a MEF-binding protein. This indicates that MEF could potentially interact with different proteins in parasites and human cells.

Introduction

The parasite Echinococcus multilocularis is an endoparasitic flatworm of the family Taeniidae. The life cycle of E. multilocularis is based on a predator–prey relationship. The definitive hosts are wild carnivores such as the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and the arctic fox (Alopex lagopus), but the tapeworm also infects, and develops within the intestine of, domestic dogs and cats, increasing the infection pressure for humans [1], [2]. The definitive host sheds eggs that contain a first larval stage, the oncosphere. When taken up orally, oncospheres hatch as they reach the intestine, penetrate the intestinal wall and use the blood and lymphatic system for dissemination. They typically invade the liver, where they develop into the metacestode stage, which causes human alveolar echinococcosis (AE). AE is distributed in the Northern hemisphere, with endemic areas stretching from Northern America through Central and Eastern Europe to Central and East Asia including Northern parts of Japan [1]. The increase in the urban fox populations in Central Europe, together with the high prevalence rate of E. multilocularis in foxes, has resulted in increased environmental contamination with Echinococcus eggs and, as a consequence, has led to an increased risk of transmission to humans [2].

Human AE manifests itself by tumour-like infiltrative growth of metacestodes mainly in the liver, but other organs may also be affected. AE is often compared with a slow-growing liver cancer and, if untreated, the disease is usually lethal. The current strategy for treatment consists of surgical measures complemented by chemotherapy with mebendazole or albendazole (ABZ). In inoperable cases, chemotherapy has been shown to inhibit parasite proliferation with a parasitostatic effect, but benzimidazoles are rarely curative, resulting in a life-long duration of treatment, high costs and an elevated risk of side effects [3]. However, benzimidazoles have prolonged the average life expectancy of European patients at diagnosis from 3 years to 20 years [3]. Nevertheless, alternative options for chemotherapy with parasiticidal activity are needed [4].

Mefloquine (MEF) is a synthetic analogue of quinine commonly used in the treatment and prophylaxis of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria [5], [6]. The mechanism of action of MEF against Plasmodium spp. has not been completely elucidated, but several investigations indicated a disturbance of haemoglobin metabolism. Degradation of haemoglobin is usually followed by the formation of an insoluble polymer, hemozoin. However, MEF binds to haem, inhibits hemozoin formation and the oxidative and glutathione-dependent degradation of haem. The resulting MEF–haem complexes are toxic for the parasite, just like free haem is, causing parasite death [5]. It is not known whether a haem-related mode of action is relevant for the anti-echinococcal activity of MEF in vitro.

MEF also exhibits considerable efficacy against other helminths such as Schistosoma mansoni, Schistosoma japonicum, Opisthorchis viverrini, Brugia patei and Brugia malayi [6], [7], [8]. We have previously demonstrated the efficacy of MEF against AE in experimentally infected mice when the drug was applied intraperitoneally but not when applied orally [9]. In this study, we present two distinct oral MEF treatment protocols in E. multilocularis-infected mice and show that MEF treatment, when applied orally as a suspension in honey at a dosage of 100 mg/kg twice a week, exhibits anti-echinococcal activity comparable with ABZ applied orally at 200 mg/kg/day. We also show that (i) the iron-binding protein ferritin and (ii) cystatin, a potential immunomodulator in parasite infections, bind to MEF and thus possibly could be targeted by MEF in E. multilocularis metacestodes. In contrast, MEF affinity chromatography of the human cancer cell line Caco2 results in binding of the enzyme nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAPRT).

Section snippets

Biochemicals and compounds

Unless stated otherwise, all culture media and reagents were purchased from Gibco BRL (Zürich, Switzerland) and biochemical reagents were from Sigma (St Louis, MO). MEF was kindly supplied by Mepha Pharma AG (Aesch, Switzerland).

In vitro culture

Culture of E. multilocularis isolate H95 was carried out as previously described [10]. The human colon carcinoma cell line Caco2 was maintained as previously described by Müller et al. [11].

Experimental infection of mice and treatments with mefloquine or albendazole

Female BALB/c mice (age 9 weeks; mean body weight 25 g) were housed in a

Oral application of mefloquine acts against Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes in experimentally infected mice

Initial experiments carried out previously had shown that MEF treatment of E. multilocularis-infected mice at 25 mg/kg twice a week by the oral route did not lead to a reduction in parasite weight, whilst intraperitoneal application had a profound effect [9].

In a pilot experiment, an intensified MEF treatment protocol characterised by a stepwise increase of drug concentration (see Supplementary Fig. S1) was applied. During an initial period of 9 days, 12.5 mg/kg MEF was applied five times,

Discussion

As the pilot study showed, a stepwise increase of oral MEF input was significantly effective but had detrimental effects, resulting in a lower efficacy of MEF compared with ABZ as well as obvious adverse side effects once concentrations >100 mg/kg were applied.

The second study demonstrated that oral application of MEF at 100 mg/kg twice a week for 12 weeks in experimentally infected mice acts against E. multilocularis metacestodes in a similar manner as oral application of ABZ (200 mg/kg on 5 days

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Myriam Siffert (University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland) for responsibly taking care of the animals, and Sophie Lagache (Core Facility of Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry, University of Bern) for careful analysis of protein samples.

Funding: This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation [grant no. 31003A_160108/1], the Fondation Sana and the Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethical approval: Animal studies were performed in strict

References (30)

  • A. Hemphill et al.

    Treatment of echinococcosis: albendazole and mebendazole—what else?

    Parasite

    (2014)
  • D.J. Sullivan et al.

    On the molecular mechanism of chloroquine's antimalarial action

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1996)
  • T. Manneck et al.

    Morphological effects and tegumental alterations induced by mefloquine on schistosomula and adult flukes of Schistosoma mansoni

    Parasitology

    (2010)
  • J. Keiser et al.

    Dose–response relationships and tegumental surface alterations in Opisthorchis viverrini following treatment with mefloquine in vivo and in vitro

    Parasitol Res

    (2009)
  • R. Walter et al.

    Filaricidal effect of mefloquine on adults and microfilariae of Brugia patei and Brugia malayi

    Trop Med Parasitol

    (1987)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Laparoscopic or open treatment for hepatic alveolar echinococcosis: A single-institution experience

      2021, International Journal of Infectious Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, the expert consensus is that patients diagnosed with hepatic AE should be given prompt and effective treatment (Brunetti et al., 2010). Radical surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for hepatic AE, despite the increased interest in non-surgical techniques (Ambregna et al., 2017; Aji et al., 2018; Bresson-Hadni et al., 2005; Kuster et al., 2015; Rufener et al., 2018; Stadelmann et al., 2011; Tamarozzi et al., 2014; Vuitton and Bresson-Hadni, 2014; Vuitton et al., 2016; Wen et al., 2016). With the developments made laparoscopic technology, the laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has been introduced for the surgical treatment of hepatic AE.

    • Drug repurposing applied: Activity of the anti-malarial mefloquine against Echinococcus multilocularis

      2020, International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These two authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text