ReviewAttitudes of emergency care staff towards young people who self-harm: A scoping review
Introduction
The number of patients (adult and adolescents) who access emergency services in England following self-harm increased by 11% between 2007 and 2010 (Fernandes, 2011). The increasing prevalence of adolescent self-harm and the association of self-harm with premature death (Bergen et al., 2012) means that young people with a history of self-harm are identified as a high-risk group in the UK’s suicide prevention strategy (H.M. Government, 2012). Adolescent self-harm, while sharing some commonality with self-harm in adults, has distinct features; there is an association with timing of self-harm and the school year, with exam stress and bullying evident as risk factors (Fox and Hawton, 2004). Difficult relationships with peers and family are also risk factors for young people (Evans et al., 2004), who are less likely to be serious in their suicide intent (Hawton and Harriss, 2008, Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010).
Interest in attitudes of A&E staff towards self-harm has arisen as historically patients who overdose have been cited as ‘unpopular’, an observation made in Jeffery’s (1979) study and further conceptualised in a review by Cresswell and Karimova (2010), which draws attention to the discriminatory treatment of patients who self-harm in both in-patient psychiatric units and A&E departments. The National Institute Health and Clinical Effectiveness (NICE, 2004) acknowledged that the level of care provided in emergency services following an episode of self-harm was ‘often unacceptable’ (National Institute Health and Clinical Effectiveness, 2004, p. 7). Moreover, studies which have ascertained service users’ perspectives of their care as adolescents reveal less satisfaction with care received in A&E departments than in other services (Harris, 2000, Nada-Raja et al., 2003, Brophy, 2006), with a graphic account of the poor quality care as experienced by a young person in an A&E department evident in McDougall et al.’s book (2010, p. 175).
Nevertheless, recent research indicates that attitudes held by A&E practitioners towards patients who self-harm are now more benign (Sun et al., 2007, Suokas et al., 2008, McCarthy and Gijbels, 2010, Conlon and O’Tuathail, 2012), but while there has been a fairly substantive interest in attitudes towards self-harm, the extent to which these attitudes have been examined in relation to adolescent self-harm is comparatively minimal. As A&E departments fulfil a key role in the care of young people who self-harm and the concomitant prevention of suicide (H.M. Government, 2012), this scoping review aims to determine whether reported attitudes towards patients attending A&E services following an episode of self-harm extend to young people.
Section snippets
Design
An initial search of databases revealed that although there is a body of research that has examined attitudes of A&E practitioners towards self-harm, there is comparatively little research that has examined attitudes towards young people who self-harm, consequently a scoping review was the method adopted. The Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (2008) advise that a scoping review is appropriate to gauge the size and nature of the evidence base for a particular topic area with a view to
Methods
A search of the following databases was conducted, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, Medline, Psychology and Behavioural Science Collection, and PsychINFO. Google Scholar was also used to follow up on specific papers using the facility of ‘cited by’ and ‘related articles’. The search was limited to English language publications; no limits were placed on country of publication. In order to capture a range of papers, studies were included that had been published over a 12-year period (2000–2012);
Search results
Having excluded duplication across the searches, 302 abstracts were reviewed; nine papers met the inclusion criteria. A further two papers were located by following up references on these papers. Following critical appraisal 11 papers, derived from nine studies were included in the analysis (Anderson et al., 2000, Anderson et al., 2003, Anderson et al., 2005, Crawford et al., 2003, Anderson and Standen, 2007, Dickinson et al., 2009, Law et al., 2009, Wheatley and Austin-Payne, 2009, Dickinson
A note on terminology – suicide, attempted suicide and self-harm
Scholars working in the field of suicide have for over 50 years been trying to gain consensus on satisfactory terminology to describe various suicidal behaviours (Skegg, 2005). This is evident in the papers reviewed which variously used ‘self-mutilation’ (Rissanen et al., 2011), ‘suicidal behaviours’ (Anderson et al., 2000, Anderson et al., 2003, Anderson et al., 2005) ‘deliberate self-harm’ (Crawford et al., 2003) and ‘self-harm’ (Dickinson et al., 2009, Law et al., 2009, Wheatley and
Methodological considerations
With the exception of four studies, (Anderson et al., 2000, Anderson et al., 2003, Anderson et al., 2005, Rissanen et al., 2011), all the studies drew on quantitative methodology using a survey approach. Two studies adopted a mixed methods approach (Anderson et al., 2000, Dickinson et al., 2009); Dickinson and Hurley’s (2011) subsequent paper reported only on the quantitative components of their data set. The qualitative studies undertaken by Anderson et al., 2003, Anderson et al., 2005 reports
Overview of findings
Overall the studies revealed inconsistent findings in relation to the influence of gender, occupation and length of experience (see Table 1). Two studies examined whether there was a relationship between practitioners’ age and attitudes, with no association found (Anderson et al., 2000 Dickinson and Hurley, 2011).
In terms of education and occupation, doctors were more knowledgeable in Crawford et al.’s (2003) study, with psychiatric doctors demonstrating highest level of knowledge. It is
Themes
Following thematic analysis, three themes were identified, the ‘setting/service’, ‘patient characteristics’ and ‘education makes a difference’. Table 2 provides a tabular summary.
Discussion
Eleven papers derived from nine studies provided the basis for this review; each study adopted a different approach to the measurement and analysis of attitudes, thus a definitive picture of attitudes towards young people who self-harm has not been possible to ascertain at this stage. Moreover, only five of the papers included practitioners working in accident and emergency care within their study population. Nevertheless as per the remit of a scoping review, gaps in the literature are
Conclusion
Studies that have examined attitudes towards young people who self-harm are to date limited in scope, and thus it is unclear as to whether the more benign attitudes reported in recently published studies (Sun et al., 2007, Suokas et al., 2008, McCarthy and Gijbels, 2010, Conlon and O’Tuathail, 2012) extend to young people. Given the limited number of studies specific to emergency care, further research is required which considers attitudes towards young people who self-harm within the context
References (58)
- et al.
Nurses and doctors attitudes towards suicidal behaviour in young people
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2000) - et al.
Nurses’ and doctors’ perceptions of young people who engage in suicidal behaviour: a contemporary grounded theory analysis
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2003) - et al.
Premature death after self-harm, a multicentre cohort study
The Lancet
(2012) - et al.
Clinical risk and collective competence in the hospital emergency department in the UK
Social Science and Medicine
(2000) - et al.
Measuring emergency department nurses’ attitudes towards deliberate self-harm using the self-antipathy scale
International Emergency Nursing
(2012) - et al.
Staff knowledge and attitudes towards deliberate self-harm in adolescents
Journal of Adolescence
(2003) - et al.
Factors associated with suicidal phenomena in adolescents: a systematic review of population based studies
Clinical Psychology Review
(2004) - et al.
Predictors of A&E staff attitudes to self-harm patients who use self laceration: influence of previous training and experience
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
(2006) - et al.
Public stigma in health and non-healthcare students: attributions, emotions and willingness to help with adolescent self-harm
International Journal of Nursing Studies
(2009) - et al.
Accident and emergency nurses’ attitudes towards patients who self-harm
Accident and Emergency Nursing
(2006)
An examination of emergency department nurses’ attitudes towards deliberate self-harm in an Irish teaching hospital
International Emergency Nursing
Self-harm
The Lancet
Adolescents who self-harm: professional staff knowledge, attitudes and training needs
Journal of Adolescence
Re-reading nursing and re-writing practice: towards an empirically based reformulation of the nursing mandate
Nursing Inquiry
What do you do at work? Profession building and doing nursing
International Nursing Review
Nurses’ attitudes towards suicidal behaviour – a comparative study of community mental health nurses and nurses working in accident and emergency departments
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Attitudes towards suicide among nurses and doctors working with children and young people who self harm
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
A social semiotic interpretation of suicidal behaviour in young people
Journal of Health Psychology
Asking the right questions: scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services
Health Research Policy and Systems
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Qualitative Research in Psychology
Truth Hurts, Report of the National Inquiry into Self-Harm among Young People
Stories, moral judgment, and medical care in an intensive care unit
Qualitative Health Research
Self-harm and medicine’s moral code: a historical perspective, 1950–2000
Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry
Exploring the antipathy of nursing staff who work within secure healthcare facilities across the United Kingdom to young people who self-harm
Journal of Advanced Nursing
The attitudes of nursing staff in secure environments to young people who self-harm
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Openness and specialisation, dealing with patients in a hospital emergency service
Sociology of Health & Illness
Cited by (19)
Perceptions of paramedic and emergency care workers of those who self harm: A systematic review of the quantitative literature
2014, Journal of Psychosomatic ResearchCitation Excerpt :Recent studies reported more positive attitudes from emergency staff which contrasts with a recent systematic review [22], and studies investigating the patients' perspective [10,12,21,39]. A recent scoping review of attitudes of emergency care staff towards young people who self harm [39] recognised benign attitudes towards self harm in recently published studies which reflects the mixed picture of our findings. The findings of more positive attitudes towards self harm from emergency staff is unclear, it may demonstrate the influence of education, policy, guidelines or media reporting, but this has yet to be examined.
A mixed method study to determine the attitude of Australian emergency health professionals towards patients who present with deliberate self-poisoning
2014, International Emergency NursingCitation Excerpt :In addition, a negative emergency department experience may participate in the inducement of the cyclic behaviour of self-harm for this population (NICE:CG16, 2004). As DSH has been associated with premature death including future suicide (Gairin et al., 2003; Cooper et al., 2005; Bergen et al., 2012; Cleaver, 2014), then the attitude of emergency staff, towards a person who deliberately self-harms, plays an important part in the treatment and care of these patient’s (Sun et al., 2007). Studies investigating health care worker’s attitudes toward patients who deliberately self-harm have shown conflicting results.
General practitioners' clinical expertise in managing suicidal young people: Implications for continued education
2017, Primary Health Care Research and DevelopmentCountertransference towards suicidal patients: a systematic review
2023, Current Psychology