Scaling laws for convection and jet speeds in the giant planets
Research highlights
► Jet speeds in rotating spherical convection depend on viscosity and heat flux. ► Scaling arguments can explain jet speeds over a wide range of parameters. ► The scalings suggest that interior wind speeds are weak in the giant planets.
Introduction
At the cloud levels near ∼1 bar pressure, numerous east–west (zonal) jet streams dominate the meteorology of the giant planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, but the depth to which these jets extend into the interior remains unknown. Endpoint theoretical scenarios range from weather-layer models where the jets are confined to a layer several scale heights deep to models where the jets extend throughout the molecular envelope (∼104 km thick) on cylinders parallel to the rotation axis (for a review see Vasavada and Showman, 2005). For Jupiter, in situ observations by the Galileo probe at 7°N latitude show that the equatorial jet extends to at least ∼20 bars (∼150 km below the visible clouds) (Atkinson et al., 1997), and indirect inferences suggest that the jets at other latitudes extend to at least ∼5–10 bars pressure (e.g., Dowling, 1995, Morales-Juberias and Dowling, 2005, Legarreta and Sánchez-Lavega, 2008, Sánchez-Lavega et al., 2008). At Neptune, gravity data suggest that the fast jets are confined to the outermost few percent of the planet’s mass (Hubbard et al., 1991). Comparable data are currently lacking for Jupiter and Saturn but will be obtained by NASA’s Juno and Cassini missions, respectively, in coming years.
Three-dimensional (3D) numerical simulations of convection in rotating spherical shells have been performed by several groups to investigate the possibility that the jets on the giant planets result from convection in the interior. Both free-slip and no-slip momentum boundary conditions at the inner and outer boundaries have been explored; of these, the free-slip case—which allows the development of strong zonal flows—is most relevant to giant planets. So far, such studies have neglected the high electrical conductivity and coupling to magnetic fields expected to occur in the deep (≳1 Mbar) planetary interior.
In this line of inquiry, most studies to date make the Boussinesq assumption in which the basic-state density, thermal expansivity, and other background properties are assumed constant with planetary radius; the convection is driven by a constant temperature difference imposed between the bottom hot boundary and top cold boundary (Aurnou and Olson, 2001, Christensen, 2001, Christensen, 2002, Aurnou and Heimpel, 2004, Heimpel et al., 2005, Heimpel and Aurnou, 2007, Aurnou et al., 2008). These studies show that convection with free-slip boundaries can drive multiple jets with speeds greatly exceeding the convective speeds. Studies using thick shells tend to produce ∼3–5 jets (Aurnou and Olson, 2001, Christensen, 2001, Christensen, 2002). When the shell thickness is only ∼10% of the planetary radius, then at least under some parameter combinations, ∼15–20 jets can occur, similar to the number observed on Jupiter and Saturn (Heimpel et al., 2005, Heimpel and Aurnou, 2007). Nevertheless, many factors in addition to shell thickness can affect the number of jets.
In real giant planets, the density and thermal expansivity each vary by several orders of magnitude from the cloud layer to the deep interior, and a new generation of convection models is emerging to account for this strong radial variation in basic-state properties. Using the anelastic approximation, which accounts for this layering, Evonuk and Glatzmaier, 2006, Evonuk and Glatzmaier, 2007, Evonuk, 2008, Glatzmaier et al., 2009 present idealized two-dimensional (2D) simulations in the equatorial plane exploring hypothetical basic-state density profiles, with density varying by up to a factor of 55 across the convection zone. In contrast, Jones and Kuzanyan (2009) present 3D simulations using an idealized basic-state density structure, with density varying by a factor of up to 148, while Kaspi et al., 2009, Kaspi et al., 2010 present 3D simulations with a realistic jovian interior structure, with density varying by nearly a factor of 104 from the deep interior to the 1-bar level. These anelastic studies likewise suggest that the jets could penetrate deeply through the molecular envelope.
A challenge with all of the above-described simulations is that, for computational reasons, they must be performed using heat fluxes and viscosities that differ greatly from those on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune (Fig. 1). Thus, while simulations can produce jets with speeds similar to the observed values of ∼100–200 m s−1 for some combinations of parameters (e.g., Christensen, 2001, Christensen, 2002, Aurnou and Olson, 2001, Heimpel et al., 2005, Heimpel and Aurnou, 2007, Aurnou et al., 2007, Aurnou et al., 2008, Kaspi et al., 2009, Jones and Kuzanyan, 2009), this does not imply that convection in the interior of real giant planets would necessarily produce jets with such speeds. In fact, depending on the parameter combinations, simulations with free-slip boundary conditions can produce jets that equilibrate to mean speeds2 ranging over many orders of magnitude, from arbitrarily small (less than 1 m s−1) to 1000 m s−1 or more. Assessing the likely wind speeds in the molecular envelopes of the real giant planets—and determining whether their observed jets can be pumped by convection in their interiors—requires the development of a theory that can be extrapolated from the simulation regime to the planetary regime.
Currently, however, there is no published theory that can explain the jet speeds obtained in simulations with free-slip boundaries nor their dependence on heat flux, viscosity, and other parameters. Several investigations have presented scaling laws describing how the mean zonal-wind speeds vary with control parameters when no-slip boundary conditions are used, as potentially relevant to Earth’s outer core (e.g., Aurnou et al., 2003, Aubert, 2005). These are essentially theories for the magnitude of wind shear in the fluid interior for cases where the zonal velocity is pinned to zero at the boundaries. However, these scaling laws are not applicable to the giant planets, where the fluid at the outer boundary can move freely, lacks a frictional Ekman layer, and exhibits strong jets. Several attempts have also been made to quantify how the convective velocities scale with parameters, but—regardless of the boundary conditions—these relationships cannot be applied to the jet speeds because the convective and jet speeds can differ greatly and their ratio may depend on the heat flux and other parameters.
The goal of this paper, therefore, is to develop scaling laws for how the jet speeds depend on heat flux and viscosity that explain the simulated behavior within the simulated regime and, ideally, allow an extrapolation to real planets. The simulations themselves make a number of simplifications (e.g., ignoring magnetohydrodynamics in the deep interior at pressures exceeding ∼1 Mbar), but in our view building a theory of this idealized case is a prerequisite for understanding more realistic systems.
We first quantify the degree of overforcing in current studies, since this issue has received little attention in the literature (Section 2). Next, we quantify the dependence of the convective speeds on planetary parameters and compare them to results from an anelastic general circulation model from Kaspi et al. (2009) (Section 3). Armed with this information, we construct simple scalings for the characteristic jet speeds in three regimes. In the first two regimes (Section 4), the viscosity is large enough so that viscous damping of the jets provides the dominant kinetic-energy loss mechanism. Christensen (2002) suggested the existence of a third regime where the jet speeds become independent of the viscosity; we construct possible scalings for this regime in Section 5. In Section 6, we combine the three regimes and discuss extrapolations to Jupiter. Section 7 concludes.
Section snippets
Degree of overforcing
For numerical reasons, current 3D simulations of convection in the giant planets must use viscosities many orders of magnitude larger than the molecular viscosities. This results from the coarse grid resolution in the models: to be numerically converged, such a model must have convective boundary layer and convective plume thicknesses of at least a gridpoint, and this requires very large viscosities. Given the enhanced damping of the kinetic energy implied by this constraint, such simulations
Convective velocities and buoyancies
In a giant planet, convection in the interior transports the interior heat flux. To order of magnitude, one thus expects thatwhere F is the convected heat flux, w is the characteristic magnitude of the vertical convective velocity, and δT is the characteristic magnitude of the temperature difference between a convective plume and the surrounding fluid.
In a rapidly rotating, low-viscosity fluid, the scaling for convective velocities is typically written (e.g., Stevenson, 1979, Golitsyn,
Experimental data
Our goal is to understand the physical processes governing the global-mean jet speeds as a function of heat flux and viscosity (i.e., Rossby number as a function of Ekman and Rayleigh numbers) for low-viscosity, rapidly rotating convection in spherical shells. To characterize this functional dependence requires numerous (∼100 or more) numerical integrations so that the available parameter space is adequately sampled. While it is numerically possible in three-dimensional simulations to reach
Scaling for the jet speeds in Regime III: the asymptotic regime
The simulated behavior in Fig. 3 is reasonably well explained by the theory presented in Section 4, where Rossby numbers scale approximately with at low Rayleigh numbers (Regime II) and as at high Rayleigh numbers (Regime I). However, Christensen (2002) argued that at the highest he explored for each value of E (or equivalently the lowest E values explored for each value of ) his simulations approached an asymptotic regime where the mean equilibrated jet
Combining the three scalings
We have derived scalings for the jet speeds in three regimes: two regimes in which the numerical viscosity dominates the damping (Regimes I and II in Sections 4.1 Experimental data, 4.2 Regime I: strongly nonlinear regime, respectively) and another in which the viscosity is determined by turbulence, i.e., an eddy viscosity (Regime III in Section 5). Here, we combine the scalings.
Our basic approach in deriving the scalings was to balance forcing against damping; the damping represents a
Conclusions
Over the past two decades, several authors have performed three-dimensional numerical simulations of low-viscosity convection in rapidly rotating spherical shells to test the hypothesis that convection in the molecular interiors pumps the fast zonal jet streams observed on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. These studies show that the zonal jet speeds can range over many orders of magnitude depending on the heat flux, viscosity, and other parameters (e.g., Christensen, 2002, Kaspi et al.,
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NSF Grant AST-0708698 and NASA Grants NNX07AF35G and NNX10AB91G to A.P.S., NSF Grant AST-0708106 to GRF, and a NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship to Y.K. administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.
References (55)
- et al.
A systematic experimental study of rapidly rotating spherical convection in water and liquid gallium
Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.
(2001) - et al.
Zonal jets in rotating convection with mixed mechanical boundary conditions
Icarus
(2004) - et al.
Experiments on convection in Earth’s core tangent cylinder
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(2003) - et al.
The effects of vigorous mixing in a convective model of zonal flow on the ice giants
Icarus
(2007) - et al.
Chaotic thermal convection in a rapidly rotating spherical shell: Consequences for flow in the outer core
Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.
(1994) Estimate of Jupiter’s deep zonal-wind profile from Shoemaker–Levy 9 data and Arnol’d’s second stability criterion
Icarus
(1995)- et al.
A 2D study of the effects of the size of a solid core on the equatorial flow in giant planets
Icarus
(2006) - et al.
The effects of rotation rate on deep convection in giant planets with small solid cores
Planets
(2007) A note on “Constraints on deep-seated zonal winds inside Jupiter and Saturn”
Icarus
(2008)- et al.
Turbulent convection in rapidly rotating spherical shells: A model for equatorial and high latitude jets on Jupiter and Saturn
Icarus
(2007)
Motion in the interiors and atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn – Scale analysis, anelastic equations, barotropic stability criterion
Icarus
Compressible convection in the deep atmospheres of giant planets
Icarus
The deep wind structure of the giant planets: Results from an anelastic general circulation model
Icarus
Vertical structure of Jupiter’s troposphere from nonlinear simulations of long-lived vortices
Icarus
Deep jets on gas-giant planets
Icarus
Generation of equatorial jets by large-scale latent heating on the giant planets
Icarus
Constraints on deep-seated zonal winds inside Jupiter and Saturn
Icarus
Simulations of high-latitude spots on Jupiter: Constraints on vortex strength and the deep wind
Planet. Space Sci.
Typical velocities and magnetic field strengths in planetary interiors
Icarus
Planetary magnetic fields
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
Deep zonal winds on Jupiter: Update of Doppler tracking the Galileo probe from the orbiter
Nature
Steady zonal flows in spherical shell dynamos
J. Fluid Mech.
Strong zonal winds from thermal convection in a rotating spherical shell
Geophys. Res. Lett.
Convective heat transfer and the pattern of thermal emission on the gas giants
Geophys. J. Int.
Temperature and velocity field regimes of convective motions in a rotating plane fluid layer
J. Fluid Mech.
Thermal instabilities in rapidly rotating systems
J. Fluid Mech.
Convection-driven zonal flows in the major planets
Pure Appl. Geophys.
Cited by (47)
Depth Dependent Dynamics Explain the Equatorial Jet Difference Between Jupiter and Saturn
2024, Geophysical Research LettersAsymptotic scaling relations for rotating spherical convection with strong zonal flows
2024, Journal of Fluid MechanicsJupiter’s cloud-level variability triggered by torsional oscillations in the interior
2023, Nature Astronomy
- 1
Part of the work was completed while APS was on sabbatical at Columbia University, Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, New York, NY 10027, United States.