Original contributionGenomic analysis in myeloid sarcoma and comparison with paired acute myeloid leukemia☆,☆☆
Introduction
Myeloid sarcoma (MS), also termed granulocytic sarcoma or chloroma [1], is a rare extramedullary tumor consisting of proliferation of myeloblasts, with or without maturation [2]. MS can occur in any organ, but occurs most commonly in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lymph nodes, and bone [3]. The clinical history of patients with MS is variable, with MS occurring either in isolation, or concurrently with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or as extramedullary relapse of AML [1,4]. MS can also develop concomitantly with other myeloid neoplasms such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm [2].
There are only limited studies on the cytogenetic and molecular features of MS. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of MS cases has shown clonal abnormalities including monosomy 7, trisomy 8, t(8; 21) [5], and KMT2A (MLL) gene rearrangement [6,7]. Comparative genomic hybridization of MS cases has shown chromosome 8 abnormalities, loss of 4q, 6q, and 12p, gain of 11q, 13q, 19, and 21 [2,8], and isochromosome 17q [2]. One next-generation sequencing (NGS) study [3] of 21 AML-associated genes using DNA from six MS cases showed genetic overlap between AML and MS, with mutations found in the tyrosine kinases FLT3 and KIT, the WT1 tumor suppressor gene, the epigenetic regulators TET1, ASXL1, and EZH2, and the RNA spliceosome protein SF3B1. However, the prognostic and therapeutic implications of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in MS are not as well studied as in AML.
The prognosis of MS has not been well understood in part owing to the rarity of this disorder. MS is generally associated with a poor outcome [[9], [10], [11]], but in other studies, isolated MS may demonstrate better survival outcomes than AML [12]. Given the distinct biologic behavior of MS compared with conventional AML, we hypothesized that MS may demonstrate a genetic profile different from conventional AML. Identification of these abnormalities could potentially improve prognostic classification and identify new therapeutic targets for this rare aggressive tumor.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at University of California San Francisco (UCSF). The UCSF pathology database was searched for MS cases with paired AML diagnosed between 2007 and 2017. Cases with available paired normal tissue, with available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) MS tissue and available clot sections or unstained marrow aspirate smears, were selected. Seven trios of MS, AML pairs, and additional normal tissues were available. All slides were
Clinical, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic features of MS
The clinical, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic features of the seven patients are listed in Table 1. The patients' age ranged from 19 to 84 years. Four of the patients were men, and three were women. MS presented concurrently with AML as the initial presentation in three patients and presented as relapse with or without concurrent AML in four patients. The location of MS was broad, including the kidney, lung, liver, small intestine, cutaneous, bone, testicle, soft tissue, and lymph nodes. The
Discussion
The molecular pathogenesis of MS and the genetic alterations within this entity are not well characterized, with only a few reported studies available using smaller gene panels [3,9,13,14]. In this report, we used a large NGS gene panel targeting 479 cancer genes to identify single-nucleotide variants and CNVs in seven patients with MS with paired AML samples and normal tissue. Germ line variants were explicitly excluded from this analysis by also analyzing normal tissue in the same patient as
Acknowledgments
S.P. and L.W. contributed to conceptualization; N.Y.G. and L.W. contributed to data curation; N.Y.G., J.A.V.Z., and L.W. contributed to formal analysis; N.Y.G., J.A.V.Z., Y.-C.L., Z.Q., S.P., and L.W. contributed to investigation; N.Y.G. and L.W. contributed to original draft preparation; N.Y.G., J.A.V.Z., Y.-C.L., Z.Q., S.P., and L.W. contributed to review and editing.
References (21)
- et al.
Dermal myeloid sarcoma as an initial presentation of acute myeloid leukemia
Blood
(2017) - et al.
Myeloid sarcoma: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment
Clin Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia
(2017) - et al.
Molecular discordance between myeloid sarcomas and concurrent bone marrows occurs in actionable genes and is associated with worse overall survival
J Mol Diagn
(2020) - et al.
Myeloid sarcoma: extramedullary manifestation of myeloid disorders
Am J Clin Pathol
(2009) - et al.
Isochromosome 17q; A novel finding in myeloid sarcoma
J Clin Exp Hematop
(2016) - et al.
Next-generation sequencing reveals clinically actionable molecular markers in myeloid sarcoma
Leukemia
(2015) - et al.
Granulocytic sarcoma in children with acute myeloblastic leukemia and t(8;21
Med Pediatr Oncol
(1998) - et al.
Extramedullary manifestations of myeloid neoplasms
Am J Clin Pathol
(2015) - et al.
Myeloid sarcoma: clinico-pathologic, phenotypic and cytogenetic analysis of 92 adult patients
Leukemia
(2007) - et al.
Genomic profiling of myeloid sarcoma by array comparative genomic hybridization
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
(2005)
Cited by (19)
Myeloid sarcoma: An overview
2023, Seminars in Diagnostic PathologyProgression in Myeloid Neoplasms: Beyond the Myeloblast
2024, Pathobiology
- ☆
Competing interests: None.
- ☆☆
Funding/Support: This study was supported by intramural funding from the Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco.