Elsevier

Global and Planetary Change

Volumes 82–83, February 2012, Pages 74-85
Global and Planetary Change

Comparison of modeled and geodetically-derived glacier mass balance for Tiedemann and Klinaklini glaciers, southern Coast Mountains, British Columbia, Canada

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Predicting the fate of mountain glaciers requires reliable observational data to test models of glacier mass balance. Using glacier extents and digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from aerial photographs and ASTER satellite imagery, we calculate changes in area, elevation, and volume of Tiedemann and Klinaklini glaciers. Between 1949 and 2009, Tiedemann and Klinaklini glaciers lost approximately 10% of their area. The total area-averaged thinning of Klinaklini was 40.1 ± 1.5 m water equivalent (w.e.) and total mass loss equaled 20.24 ± 1.36 km3 w.e., whereas Tiedemann Glacier thinned by 25.7 ± 1.9 m w.e. and lost 1.69 ± 0.17 km3 w.e. of ice. We attribute lower observed rates of thinning at Tiedemann Glacier to thick debris cover in the ablation area. Both glaciers thickened at mid-elevations after the year 2000. Glacier mass balance and volume change were modeled using temperature, precipitation and evapotranspiration fields dynamically downscaled to the mesoscale (8 km resolution) using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) model and further statistically downscaled to the glacier scale (100 m elevation bands) using modeled surface lapse rates. The mass balance model over-predicts total volume loss by 1.1 and 6.3 times the geodetic loss for Klinaklini and Tiedemann glaciers respectively. Differences in modeled and observed total ice loss are due to (1) the coarse resolution of the downscaled climate fields, and (2) extensive debris cover in the ablation area of Tiedemann Glacier. Future modeling efforts should dynamically downscale at resolutions that capture the topographic complexity of a region and employ strategies to account for time-evolving debris cover.

Highlights

► Rates of glacier downwasting under debris cover quantified. ► Early twenty-first century thickening observed on glacier in western Canada. ► Complex topography hinders high-resolution downscaling of glacier mass balance fields.

Introduction

Glaciers are integral to many natural and human systems, making them important targets for monitoring and prediction. Although mountain glaciers only constitute 3–4% of global glacierized area, their recent recession significantly contributes to sea level rise (Arendt et al., 2002, Dyurgerov, 2003, Berthier et al., 2004, Larsen et al., 2007, Meier et al., 2007, Berthier et al., 2010). Mountain glaciers are the second largest contributor to recent sea-level rise (Cazenave and Nerem, 2004), and the total volume of glaciers in western Canada and Alaska has been estimated to contain a sea-level equivalence of 5 and 68 mm, respectively (Radić and Hock, 2010). Changes in glacier thickness and volume can also influence the magnitude and timing of surface runoff, affecting water supply for agriculture, consumption, and hydropower generation (Barry, 2006, Stahl and Moore, 2006, Moore et al., 2009). Given recent trends in mean global surface temperatures, and projections of continued warming, glaciers in western North America and throughout the world are expected to continue to retreat. To estimate future changes in volume and area, methods to estimate the mass balance of glaciers under a given climate scenario are required.

Glacier mass balance models to predict the fate of glaciers vary from simple ones that use accumulated air temperature anomalies (positive degree days) to those that employ a full energy balance (Braithwaite and Zhang, 1999, Casal et al., 2004, Hock and Holmgren, 2005). Positive degree day models empirically relate glacier melt and air temperature; these empirical models assume that air temperature integrates the individual fluxes of the surface energy balance. Melt factors for snow and ice have been shown to be similar among glaciers within a region (Shea et al., 2009), but can vary temporally at inter-annual to inter-decadal time scales (Huss et al., 2009, Shea et al., 2009). Temporally varying melt factors introduce uncertainty in mass balance modeling using a PDD approach, but the magnitude of this error is difficult to quantify in data-poor regions. In the current study, the lack of available input data to drive a melt model using an energy balance approach is limited by the lack of required input data. Snow accumulation is typically calculated from the total precipitation that falls as snow, and must be melted before ice melt can occur (Braithwaite and Zhang, 1999, Shea et al., 2009).

Predicting the fate of mountain glaciers requires reliable melt modeling strategies and temporally and spatially distributed data that can be used to test these approaches. The use of remote sensing has increased the number of glaciers monitored and extended the mass balance record in regions where few traditional mass balance records exist (Berthier et al., 2004, Luthcke et al., 2008). While glacier length and area are commonly measured, changes in volume and mass balance provide a more direct, reliable indicator of climate change and can be used to verify the results of mass balance models (Kääb, 2002, Berthier et al., 2004, Barry, 2006).

The objectives of this paper are to determine change in area, elevation, and volume at Klinaklini and Tiedemann glaciers in the southern Coast Mountains British Columbia using digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from multiple sets of aerial photographs and satellite images. We expand on the results of VanLooy and Forster (2008) by incorporating DEMs that post-date the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), and also extend our analysis back in time to include pre-1970 data. In addition, we explore the climatic and site-specific factors that explain observed differences in area and volume change for these two glaciers. Finally, we test whether glacier mass balance estimates obtained from a hybrid modeling strategy agrees with geodetically-derived changes in glacier volume.

Section snippets

Study area

Tiedemann and Klinaklini glaciers are located in the southern Coast Mountains, approximately 300 km northwest of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (Fig. 1). The southern Coast Mountains are primarily influenced by moist maritime air masses, and large precipitation amounts occur as a result of orographic forcing. The winters are wet and the summers are dry with most precipitation occurring between October and March in the form of snow (Koch et al., 2009).

Both glaciers lie in close proximity to

Geomatic data

We used DEMs and glacier extents derived from aerial photographs and satellite images to determine area, volume, and elevation change of Tiedemann and Klinaklini glaciers over the past 60 years (Table 1). The National Topographic Database (NTDB) data includes glacier extents and contours derived from photographs acquired in 1970. The geometric accuracy is ±25 m in rural areas and ±125 m in isolated areas, and the contour interval is approximately 40 m (Geomatics Canada, 1996). We also used data

Area change

From 1949 to 2009, Tiedemann Glacier lost an area of 5.98 ± 0.57 km2 while Klinaklini Glacier shrank by 42.07 ± 0.29 km2 over the period 1949 to 2006. These area changes equate to percentage and rate losses of 9.03 ± 0.60% (0.150 ± 0.010% a−1) and 8.32 ± 0.05% (0.146 ± 0.001% a−1) respectively for Tiedemann and Klinaklini glaciers (Table 2). Over shorter time periods, however, these rates vary between glaciers and may indicate differences in the response times of the glaciers (Fig. 4).

The terminus of Tiedemann

Glacier comparison

The areas of Klinaklini and Tiedemann glaciers decreased by ~10% between 1949 and 2006/2009. The pattern of thinning through time was also similar, in that the glaciers reached a peak thinning rate at the turn of the century followed by a reduction in the thinning rate, or increased thickening in Tiedemann's case. Our results suggest that regional climate variability is responsible for observed long-term dimensional changes of both glaciers. Short-term differences between the glaciers, such as

Conclusions

We used aerial photographs, ASTER imagery, and digital elevation data to estimate area, elevation and volume changes of Klinaklini and Tiedemann glaciers from 1949 to 2009. Over this period, both glaciers lost approximately 10% of their area. While Klinaklini consistently shrank, Tiedemann advanced 300 m in the 1970s. Klinaklini Glacier's thinning rates accelerated between 1986 and 2000, and the glacier lost a total volume of 20.24 ± 1.36 km3 w.e. during the period 1946–2006. Tiedemann Glacier's

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank BC Hydro for access to digital aerial photographs from 1989. Tyler Sylvestre and Caillin Smith scanned aerial photographs from the National Air Photo Library and the BC Photo Library, respectively. Cardinal Systems, LLC provided licensing and support for their VR Mapping photogrammetry software. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (Western Canadian Cryospheric Network) funded our

References (50)

  • R.G. Barry

    The status of research on glaciers and global glacier recession: a review

    Progress in Physical Geography

    (2006)
  • BC Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks

    British Columbia Specifications and Guidelines for Geomatics, Release 2.0

    (2002)
  • E. Berthier et al.

    Recent rapid thinning of the “Mer de Glace” glacier derived from satellite optical images

    Geophysical Research Letters

    (2004)
  • E. Berthier et al.

    Contribution of Alaskan glaciers to sea-level rise derived from satellite imagery

    Nature Geoscience

    (2010)
  • C.M. Bitz et al.

    Interannual to decadal variability in climate and the glacier mass balance in Washington, Western Canada, and Alaska

    Journal of Climate

    (1999)
  • R.J. Braithwaite et al.

    Modelling changes in glacier mass balance that may occur as a result of climate changes

    Geografiska Annaler

    (1999)
  • T.G.D. Casal et al.

    Present and past ice-sheet mass balance simulations for Greenland and the Tibetan Plateau

    Climate Dynamics

    (2004)
  • A. Cazenave et al.

    Present-day sea level change: observations and causes

    Reviews of Geophysics

    (2004)
  • M.B. Dyurgerov

    Glacier mass balance and regime: data of measurements and analysis

    Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Occasional Paper 55

    (2002)
  • Geomatics Canada

    Standards and Specifications of the National Topographic Data Base

    (1996)
  • F.D. Granshaw et al.

    Glacier change (1958–1998) in the North Cascades National Park Complex, Washington, USA

    Journal of Glaciology

    (2006)
  • D.A. Griffith

    Effective geographic sample size in the presence of spatial autocorrelation

    Annals of the Association of American Geographers

    (2005)
  • R. Hock et al.

    A distributed surface energy-balance model for complex topography and its application to Storglaciären, Sweden

    Journal of Glaciology

    (2005)
  • S.M. Hodge et al.

    Climate variations and changes in mass of three glaciers in Western North America

    Journal of Climate

    (1998)
  • M. Huss et al.

    Strong Alpine glacier melt in the 1940s due to enhanced solar radiation

    Geophysical Research Letters

    (2009)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Holocene glacier activity in the British Columbia Coast Mountains, Canada

      2015, Quaternary Science Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Ha-Iltzuk Icefield is located 110 km south of Bella Coola and covers an area of 850 km2 (Fig. 7B). Klinaklini Glacier flows southward from the icefield and has down wasted significantly since the LIA, losing over 20 km3 of ice from 1949 to 2006 (VanLooy and Forster, 2008; Tennant et al., 2012). Exposed detrital wood remains indicate Klinaklini glacier was advancing down valley at ca. 0.8 and 0.4 ka (Ryder and Thomson, 1986).

    • Did rock avalanche deposits modulate the late Holocene advance of Tiedemann Glacier, southern Coast Mountains, British Columbia, Canada?

      2013, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Today, Tiedemann Glacier is heavily debris-covered, and dramatic thinning over the past 60 years has allowed debris delivered both by mass wasting of the lateral moraines and that emerging from the ice to be concentrated on its surface. This debris cover slowed the observed thinning rates for the glacier during the past 60 years (Tennant et al., 2012), but the strongly negative mass balance over this period of time compensated for the insulating effect of the debris cover. Empirical and modeling studies suggest that a sudden introduction of debris to a glacier surface can cause the glacier to advance (Gardner and Hewitt, 1990; Shulmeister et al., 2009; Vacco et al., 2010; Shugar et al., 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text