Use of geosynthetics to improve seismic performance of earth structures☆
Introduction
Fig. 1 shows global distribution of earthquake epicenters that took place during a ten-year period from 1990 to 2000 with magnitudes equal to or exceeding 4.0 and epicentral depths of 50 km or less. As indicated by an arrow in the figure, Japan is located in a very highly active zone of such seismic events.
Table 1 summarizes the peak values of horizontal ground accelerations (PGAs) and velocities (PGVs) that were recorded during recent major earthquakes in Japan. After the 1995 Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake, the availability of strong motion data recorded near the epicenter was improved significantly. Therefore, at some of these sites the PGA approached or exceeded 800 gals and/or the PGV exceeded 100 kines.
On the other hand, earth structures, such as embankments as schematically shown in Fig. 2a & b, have been widely employed to construct highways, railways, river dikes and housing lots. In addition, in order to reduce the area to be occupied by the construction of embankments and thus the volume of fill material, retaining walls (RWs) have also been frequently adopted, as schematically shown in Fig. 2c & d.
If we convert the horizontal seismic inertia and vertical gravity vector into a resultant pseudo-static force as schematically shown in Fig. 3a, the direction of apparent gravity will be inclined. Then, the driving moment to trigger the sliding failure along a potential failure plane will be increased, as shown in Fig. 3b. Under such circumstances, adding reinforcements in the embankment with their tensile forces mobilized effectively will increase the resisting moment, as shown in Fig. 3c.
In view of the above, by addressing the following questions in this paper, attempts are made to share Japanese experiences on the use of geosynthetic-reinforcement to improve seismic performance of earth structures:
- Q1:
How different are the seismic performances of earth retaining structures with/without geosynthetic-reinforcement?
- Q2:
What are the influential factors in improving effectively the seismic performance of earth retaining structures using geosynthetics?
- Q3:
How can we extend the application of geosynthetic-reinforcement technologies to other types of earth structure?
In order to answer the above questions, the paper begins with a review of seismic performance of earth structures in Japan. Next, influential factors in improving seismic performance of retaining walls using geosynthetics are discussed. Some of further applications of geosynthetic-reinforcement are briefly reviewed as well, which are followed by conclusions.
Section snippets
Seismic performance of earth structures
In order to answer the question 1 raised in Introduction, the following two sub-topics are reviewed in this chapter, while updating the summary made by Koseki et al. (2007):
How earth structures with/without geosynthetic-reinforcement behaved in
- -
case histories, and
- -
model tests?
Influential factors in improving seismic performance of retaining walls using geosynthetics
In order to answer the question 2 raised in Introduction, the following four sub-topics on the seismic performance of GRS RWs are reviewed in this chapter:
How their seismic performance is affected by
- -
facing rigidity,
- -
arrangement of reinforcement,
- -
properties of reinforcement, and
- -
backfill and subsoil conditions?
Further applications of geosynthetic-reinforcement
In order to answer the question 3 raised in Introduction, the following three sub-topics are reviewed in this chapter:
How geosynthetics are used for
- -
combination with other reinforcement methods,
- -
application to bridge abutments and piers, and
- -
application to ballasted railway tracks?
Conclusions
The contents of the present paper on the use of geosynthetic-reinforcement to improve seismic performance of earth structures can be summarized as follows.
- 1)
As compared to unreinforced earth structures, geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls (GRS RWs) performed satisfactorily during past large earthquakes in Japan. Their ductile behavior under large earthquake loads was also confirmed by relevant model tests. Thus, geosynthetic-reinforced earth structures have been adopted for new
Acknowledgments
The author appreciates Tensar International Limited for sponsoring the lecture.
The author wishes to express his sincere respects to Prof. F. Tatsuoka (Tokyo University of Science) and Dr. M. Tateyama (Railway Technical Research Institute) who initiated with the author immediately after the 1995 Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake the long-lasting series of researches on seismic performance of GRS RWs as well as conventional type RWs, which were referred to extensively in this paper. Prof. Tatsuoka
References (45)
- et al.
Damage to earth structures for national highways by the 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu earthquake
Soils and Foundations
(2006) - et al.
New earth reinforcement method by soilbags (“donow”)
Soils and Foundations
(2003) - et al.
Improving the dynamic performance of preloaded and prestressed mechanically reinforced backfill by using a ratchet connection
Soils and Foundations
(2003) - et al.
Performance of soil retaining walls for railway embankments
Soils and Foundations
(1996) - et al.
Remedial treatment of soil structures using geosynthetic-reinforcing technology
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
(2007) - et al.
Validation of high seismic stability of a new type integral bridge consisting of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
- Aoki, H., Watanabe, K., Tateyama, M., Yonezawa, T., 2003. Shaking table tests on earthquake resistant bridge abutment....
- Aoki, H., Yonezawa, T., Tateyama, M., Shinoda, M., Watanabe, K., 2005. Development of aseismic abutment with...
- et al.
Effects of the tensile resistance of reinforcement in the backfill on seismic stability of GRS integral bridge
Damage to toll road due to Notohanto earthquake and its rehabilitation
Official Bulletin
(2007)
Development of rational seismic design method for geogrid-reinforced soil wall combined with fibre-mixed soil-cement and its applications
Geosynthetics International
Compiled Data on Damage to Highways Due to the 2007 Noto-hanto Earthquake
Report of Damage Survey Committee on the Niigata-ken Chuetsu Earthquake
Shaking and tilt table tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil and conventional-type retaining walls
Geosynthetics International
Preliminary report on damage to retaining walls caused by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake
Bulletin of ERS
Cited by (70)
Influence of reinforcement design on seismic stability of full-height panel MSE walls
2023, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringCentrifuge shaking table tests on tiered reinforced soil retaining walls subjected to the excitations of near-field ground motions
2023, Geotextiles and GeomembranesPerformance of the multi-tiered GMSE walls under seismic conditions: Comparison of physical and numerical simulations
2022, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringStress distribution in reinforced railway structures
2022, Transportation GeotechnicsStochastic seismic analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil slopes using the probability density evolution method
2021, Computers and Geotechnics
- ☆
This paper is the written version of the Mercer Lecture 2011.