Elsevier

Geoforum

Volume 62, June 2015, Pages 105-120
Geoforum

Accessibility to sport facilities in Wales: A GIS-based analysis of socio-economic variations in provision

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Enhanced FCA approaches to measure access to sport facilities.

  • Uses a national database of sport facilities.

  • Tools developed are available for wider use.

  • Accessibility scores are compared to variations in Townsend Index.

  • Deprived areas greater access to publicly available sport facilities.

Abstract

Previous studies concerned with investigating the relationship between levels of physical activity and aspects of the built environment have often led to inconsistent and mixed findings concerning associations between the availability of recreational or sport facilities and area socio-economic status. Further complications may arise when analysis is conducted separately for access to either publicly available or private facilities or where alternative methodological approaches to measuring accessibility are adopted. This paper provides a review of such research before exploring the potential use of methods for examining variations in accessibility based on enhanced floating catchment area (FCA) models which are increasingly being advocated in medical geography applications. Using bespoke tools developed within a commercial GIS package, which are being made publicly available by the authors, and a national database of sport facilities, variations in accessibility are investigated in relation to a widely used measure of deprivation in the UK. Findings from this analysis suggest that whilst those living in deprived areas of Wales have greater potential access to publicly available sporting opportunities, associations with privately owned facilities are reversed for some distance thresholds and at different spatial scales. The paper concludes by drawing attention to the implications of such findings given current financial pressures on local government and other sport and leisure providers and highlights how spatial analytical techniques can be used to monitor such trends.

Section snippets

1. Introduction

Previous reviews of the factors that might promote or hinder engagement in, or levels of, physical activity have examined the relative importance of the local geographical environment. This includes access to sport facilities and their interaction with individual level characteristics such as age, income, ethnic group and gender, as well as a variety of socio-economic and behavioural variables (see for example Humpel et al., 2002, Davison and Lawson, 2006, Ding et al., 2011, Lee and Moudon, 2004

2. Access to sport facilities and deprivation: review of the literature

Previous studies using GIS to investigate potential consequences of health-promoting or health-damaging influences tend to adopt either density or proximity type metrics of resource availability. The former are area-based measures that typically count the number of facilities in a given administrative area (or within a spatial buffer around a residential address or area centroid) standardised by a population count (total or sub-group) to calculate a provider-to-population ratio. In contrast,

3. Floating catchment area (FCA) models

Previous studies have reviewed conceptual and methodological issues related to alternative approaches to measuring spatial accessibility using GIS (e.g. Apparicio et al., 2008, Higgs, 2004, Koppen et al., 2014a, Neutens, 2015, Wang, 2012, Yang et al., 2006). Yang et al. (2006) amongst others have compared the use of different approaches to measuring accessibility in the context of measuring social inequities in health care provision. Neutens (2015) highlights the shortcomings associated with a

4. Aims and objectives

This study aims to provide a descriptive analysis of trends in the provision of sporting facilities in relation to a well-established measure of disadvantage in the UK (the Townsend Index). Using a national database of facility locations and small area socio-economic data drawn from the UK Census of Population the paper describes the potential for E2SFCA models to investigate spatial patterns in service provision in relation to socio-economic characteristics in Wales. It presents several

5.1. Database of sport facilities

A database of all privately and publicly-owned sport facilities in Wales as of January 2014 was provided by Sport Wales (Fig. 1). It included information on owner type (e.g. commercial, local authority, higher education establishment), usage status (e.g. registered membership use, pay and play, private use), physical availability (disabled access and parking) and facility type descriptions (e.g. health and fitness, sports hall, swimming pools, tennis courts). In total this covered 2276

6.1. All facilities and private/public split and variations in threshold distance

Firstly when all facilities are considered there is a general pattern of FCA scores being low for those areas in Townsend quintile 1 (least deprived) and high in the most deprived quintiles (quintile 3–5). However for at least the ‘all facilities’ and ‘public facilities’ categories, the highest mean scores are in quintile 3 (Fig. 5). At the 1000 m threshold level, patterns for all three categorisations are consistent. However, as expected given that larger threshold distances capture spatial

7. Discussion

Previous studies of the relationship between levels of physical activity and different aspects of the built environment have often led to inconsistent and mixed findings concerning trends in the availability of sport facilities and variations in socio-economic geography. The main strength of the present study is that it outlines the first attempt to use floating catchment area (FCA) techniques to provide a measure of potential accessibility to sport facilities using a high quality nation-wide

8. Conclusion

The research reported here shows how GIS-based analysis can be used to identify variations in accessibility to the network of sporting facilities as part of wider studies concerned with exploring variations in sport participation rates and levels of physical activity. The study has shown how floating catchment area (FCA) approaches, widely used to examine variations in accessibility to a range of predominantly health services to date, can be used in conjunction with a nation-wide database of

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on research supported by the Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research, Data and Methods (WISERD). WISERD is a collaborative venture between the Universities of Aberystwyth, Bangor, Cardiff, South Wales and Swansea. The research that this publication relates to was funded by the ESRC (Grant number: ES/L009099/1). We thank Sport Wales for the provision of data on facilities within Wales. Census data were downloaded from NOMIS, a service provided by the Office for

References (97)

  • S. Farber et al.

    Temporal variability in transit-based accessibility to supermarkets

    Appl. Geogr.

    (2014)
  • K. Fransen et al.

    A commuter-based two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility of day care centres

    Health Place

    (2015)
  • B. Giles-Corti et al.

    Socio-economic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment

    Prevent. Med.

    (2002)
  • B. Giles-Corti et al.

    The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2002)
  • R. Haynes et al.

    Modifiable neighbourhood units, zone design and residents perceptions

    Health Place

    (2007)
  • B. Hill et al.

    Repeat participation as a function of program attractiveness, socializing opportunities, loyalty and the sportscape across three sport facility contexts

    Sport Manage. Rev.

    (2012)
  • M. Hillsdon et al.

    Equitable access to exercise facilities

    Am. J. Prevent. Med.

    (2007)
  • D. Houston

    Implications of the modifiable areal unit problem for assessing built environment correlates of moderate and vigorous physical activity

    Appl. Geogr.

    (2014)
  • N. Humpel et al.

    Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: a review

    Am. J. Prevent. Med.

    (2002)
  • P. James et al.

    Effects of buffer size and shape on associations between the built environment and energy balance

    Health Place

    (2014)
  • N. Kawakami et al.

    Differences in neighbourhood accessibility to health-related resources: a nationwide comparison between deprived and affluent neighbourhoods in Sweden

    Health Place

    (2011)
  • G. Koppen et al.

    Managing the potential for outdoor recreation: adequate mapping and measuring of accessibility to urban recreational landscapes

    Urban Forest. Urban Green.

    (2014)
  • W. Luo

    Using a GIS-based floating catchment method to assess areas with shortage of physicians

    Health Place

    (2004)
  • W. Luo et al.

    An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians

    Health Place

    (2009)
  • S. Macintyre et al.

    Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2008)
  • L. Mao et al.

    Measuring spatial accessibility to healthcare for populations with multiple transportation modes

    Health Place

    (2013)
  • G.R. McCormack et al.

    An update of recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-report measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviours

    J. Sci. Med. Sport

    (2004)
  • M.R. McGrail et al.

    Measuring spatial accessibility to primary care in rural areas: improving the effectiveness of the two-step floating catchment area method

    Appl. Geogr.

    (2009)
  • H. Millward et al.

    Active transport walking behaviour: destinations, durations, distances

    J. Transp. Geogr.

    (2013)
  • L.V. Moore et al.

    Availability of recreational resources in minority and low socio-economic status areas

    Am. J. Prevent. Med.

    (2008)
  • T. Neutens

    Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers

    J. Transp. Geogr.

    (2015)
  • D. Ogilvie et al.

    Recreational physical activity facilities within walking and cycling distance: sociospatial patterning of access in Scotland

    Health Place

    (2011)
  • J. Panter et al.

    Associations between physical activity, perceptions of the neighbourhood environment and access to facilities in an English city

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2008)
  • C. Pascual et al.

    Socioeconomic environment, availability of sports facilities and jogging, swimming and gym use

    Health Place

    (2009)
  • R.G. Prins et al.

    Associations between availability of facilities within three different neighbourhood buffer sizes and objectively assessed physical activity in adolescents

    Health Place

    (2011)
  • R.G. Prins et al.

    How many walking and cycling trips made by elderly are beyond commonly used buffer sizes: Results from a GPS Study

    Health Place

    (2014)
  • J.F. Sallis

    Measuring physical activity environments: a brief history

    Am. J. Prevent. Med.

    (2009)
  • J.F. Sallis et al.

    Income disparities in perceived neighbourhood built and social environment attributes

    Health Place

    (2011)
  • S.E. Spielman et al.

    The spatial dimensions of neighbourhood effects

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2009)
  • F.J. van Lenthe et al.

    Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2005)
  • J. van Loon et al.

    Youth physical activity and the neighbourhood environment: examining correlates and the role of neighbourhood definition

    Soc. Sci. Med.

    (2014)
  • F. Wang et al.

    Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas

    Health Place

    (2005)
  • P. Wicker et al.

    Analysing the impact of sport infrastructure on sport participation using geo-coded data: evidence from multi-level models

    Sport Manage. Rev.

    (2013)
  • P. Apparicio et al.

    Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: distance types and aggregation-error issues

    Int. J. Health Geogr.

    (2008)
  • A.H. Auchincloss et al.

    A review of spatial methods in epidemiology

    Annu. Rev. Public Health

    (2012)
  • R.C. Brownson et al.

    Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the Science

    Am. J. Prevent. Med.

    (2009)
  • R. Casey et al.

    Spatial accessibility to physical activity facilities and to food outlets and overweight in French youth

    Int. J. Obesity

    (2012)
  • S. Cockings et al.

    Maintaining existing zoning systems using automated zone-design techniques: methods for creating the 2011 Census output geographies for England and Wales

    Environ. Plan. A

    (2011)
  • Cited by (66)

    • The right mix: Residential urban green-blue space combinations are correlated with physical exercise in a tropical city-state

      2021, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening
      Citation Excerpt :

      To investigate the relationship between NOE proximity and outdoor physical exercise, the amount of residential NOE cover within 250 m, 500 m, 1 km, and 1.5 km radial buffers around each respondent’s dwelling was extracted. These buffer sizes were informed by previous studies showing that these are the distances that people might travel to exercise (Halonen et al., 2015; Higgs et al., 2015) and/or to visit parks to conduct physical activity (Kaczynski et al., 2014; Schipperijn et al., 2017). They also correspond to Singapore’s green space targets: the 250 m distance buffer corresponds to the minimum recommended distance between the furthest residence along a public pedestrian walkway to the nearest public NOE according to the guidelines on greenery provision for Singapore’s developments (National Parks Board, 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text