Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Over the past half century economists have responded to the challenges of Allais [Econometrica (1953) 53], Ellsberg [Quart. J. Econ. (1961) 643] and others raised to neoclassicism either by bounding the reach of economic theory or by turning to descriptive approaches. While both of these strategies have been enormously fruitful, neither has provided a clear programmatic approach that aspires to a complete understanding of human decision making as did neoclassicism. There is, however, growing evidence that economists and neurobiologists are now beginning to reveal the physical mechanisms by which the human neuroarchitecture accomplishes decision making. Although in their infancy, these studies suggest both a single unified framework for understanding human decision making and a methodology for constraining the scope and structure of economic theory. Indeed, there is already evidence that these studies place mathematical constraints on existing economic models. This article reviews some of those constraints and suggests the outline of a neuroeconomic theory of decision.

References (70)

  • D.J. Barraclough et al.

    Stochastic decision-making in a two-player competitive game

    Society for Neuroscience Abstracts

    (2002)
  • D. Bernoulli

    Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk

    Econometrica

    (1954)
  • C.M. Bradshaw et al.

    Quantitative analysis of human operant behavior

  • K.H. Britten et al.

    A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque area MT

    Visual Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D., 2003. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. In...
  • C.L. Colby et al.

    Space and attention in parietal cortex

    Annual Rev. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • J.D. Connolly et al.

    Human fMRI evidence for the neural correlates of preparatory set

    Nature Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • C.E. Curtis et al.

    Success and failure suppressing reflexive behavior

    J. Cognitive Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • A.R. Damasio

    Descartes Error: Emotion Reason and the Human Brain

    (1995)
  • A.F. Dean

    The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex

    Exper. Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • P.A. De Villiers

    Choice in congruent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect

  • P.A. De Villiers et al.

    Toward a law of response strength

    Psychological Bull.

    (1976)
  • Dorris, M.C., Glimcher, P.W., 2003. Monkeys as an animal model of human decision making during strategic interactions....
  • Dorris, M.C., Glimcher, P.W., 2004. Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative subjective...
  • D. Ellsberg

    Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms

    Quart. J. Econ.

    (1961)
  • S.D. Fretwell

    Populations in a Seasonal Environment

    (1972)
  • P.W. Glimcher

    Decisions, Uncertainty and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics

    (2003)
  • P.W. Glimcher

    Neural correlates of primate decision-making

    Annual Rev. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • D.P. Hanes et al.

    Neural control of voluntary movement initiation

    Science

    (1996)
  • R.J. Herrnstein

    Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement

    J. Exper. Anal. Behav.

    (1961)
  • R.J. Herrnstein
  • D. Kahneman et al.

    Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk

    Econometrica

    (1979)
  • D. Kahneman et al.

    Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

    (1982)
  • D.M. Kreps

    A Course in Microeconomic Theory

    (1990)
  • Cited by (204)

    • The hierarchical construction of value

      2021, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text