Elsevier

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Volume 174, 1 February 2016, Pages 122-142
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Effects of calcium and phosphate on uranium(IV) oxidation: Comparison between nanoparticulate uraninite and amorphous UIV–phosphate

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.11.010Get rights and content

Abstract

The mobility of uranium in subsurface environments depends strongly on its redox state, with UIV phases being significantly less soluble than UVI minerals. This study compares the oxidation kinetics and mechanisms of two potential products of UVI reduction in natural systems, a nanoparticulate UO2 phase and an amorphous UIV–Ca–PO4 analog to ningyoite (CaUIV(PO4)2·1–2H2O). The valence of U was tracked by X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES), showing similar oxidation rate constants for UIVO2 and UIV–phosphate in solutions equilibrated with atmospheric O2 and CO2 at pH 7.0 (kobs,UO2 = 0.17 ± 0.075 h−1 vs. kobs,UIVPO4 = 0.30 ± 0.25 h−1). Addition of up to 400 μM Ca and PO4 decreased the oxidation rate constant by an order of magnitude for both UO2 and UIV–phosphate. The intermediates and products of oxidation were tracked by electron microscopy, powder X-ray diffraction (pXRD), and extended X-ray absorption fine-structure spectroscopy (EXAFS). In the absence of Ca or PO4, the product of UO2 oxidation is Na–uranyl oxyhydroxide (under environmentally relevant concentrations of sodium, 15 mM NaClO4 and low carbonate concentration), resulting in low concentrations of dissolved UVI (<2.5 × 10−7 M). Oxidation of UIV–phosphate produced a Na-autunite phase (Na2(UO2)PO4·xH2O), resulting in similarly low dissolved U concentrations (<7.3 × 10−8 M). When Ca and PO4 are present in the solution, the EXAFS data and the solubility of the UVI phase resulting from oxidation of UO2 and UIV–phosphate are consistent with the precipitation of Na-autunite. Bicarbonate extractions and Ca K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy of oxidized solids indicate the formation of a Ca–UVI–PO4 layer on the UO2 surface and suggest a passivation layer mechanism for the decreased rate of UO2 oxidation in the presence of Ca and PO4. Interestingly, the extractions were unable to remove all of the oxidized U from partially oxidized UO2 solids, suggesting that oxidized U is distributed between the interior of the UO2 nanoparticles and the labile surface layer. Accounting for the entire pool of oxidized U by XANES is the likely reason for the higher UO2 oxidation rate constants determined here relative to prior studies. Our results suggest that the natural presence or addition of Ca and PO4 in groundwater could slow the rates of UIV oxidation, but that the rates are still fast enough to cause complete oxidation of UIV within days under fully oxygenated conditions.

Introduction

Uranium is a toxic and radioactive element that has been used for energy generation and military purposes for several decades, resulting in stockpiles of spent fuel, mine tailings, and enrichment process waste stored at many locations around the world. Designing appropriate storage practices and predicting the effects of accidental release requires an in-depth understanding of the coupled chemical, physical, biological, and hydrological processes that control the mobility of U in oxic and anoxic environments. Developing this understanding is currently hindered by the limited availability of mechanistic information on the transformations and speciation of U under environmentally relevant conditions (Burns et al., 2012, Bargar et al., 2013, Williams et al., 2013, Newsome et al., 2014).

The solubility, and therefore the mobility, of uranium is strongly affected by its valence state. In oxidizing environments uranium is stable as UVI. When equilibrium with schoepite (UO3·2H2O) controls UVI solubility, the resulting aqueous concentrations are on the order of 10−4 M at pH 7 (Jang et al., 2006). In reducing environments uranium is stable as UIV. When equilibrium with uraninite (UO2+x) controls UIV solubility, the resulting aqueous concentrations are on the order of 10−8 M at pH 7 (Ulrich et al., 2008). The dramatic decrease in solubility in this simplified scenario is expected to significantly influence U mobility in the subsurface and has been the impetus for extensive research on (bio-) reduction of UVI for the purpose of contaminated site remediation. However, uranium transformations in the subsurface occur in the presence of various surfaces and dissolved ions, which can affect the solubility, speciation, and outcome of reactions with U. For instance, carbonate forms strong, highly soluble complexes with UVI and together with Ca2+ decreases the ability of UVI to be reduced to UIV (Brooks et al., 2003). Phosphate and phosphatase activity influences UVI solubility through the formation of precipitates (Beazley et al., 2007), which can affect the rate of UVI bioreduction (Rui et al., 2013). UVI can interact with various mineral and biological surfaces to form stable adsorption complexes (Bargar et al., 1999, Kelly et al., 2002). The complexity in UVI speciation described above is accounted for in most transport models. However, only an amorphous uraninite phase is typically used to model the behavior of reduced UIV, under the assumption that the lowest solubility mineral controls UIV dynamics (Yabusaki et al., 2007a, Li et al., 2009, Li et al., 2010). Research in the past few years has drawn this assumption into question, at least for processes occurring over the months-to-years timescale. Low levels of phosphate were shown to inhibit the formation of uraninite during UVI reduction, resulting in non-uraninite, phosphate-complexed UIV solid phases (Boyanov et al., 2011, Stylo et al., 2013, Alessi et al., 2014b). Investigations of U speciation in reduced sediments and soils also indicates the prevalence of non-uraninite UIV species over uraninite, although the exact identity of UIV species remains unclear (Bargar et al., 2013, Wang et al., 2014, Alessi et al., 2014a, Li et al., 2015). Recently, high-affinity mineral surface sites were shown to stabilize mononuclear UIV adsorption complexes and thus inhibit uraninite formation (Latta et al., 2014). Subsequent work developed a surface complexation model and determined stability constants for such sites (Wang et al., 2015a). These developments indicate a significant gap in the description of short-term UIV dynamics in transport models and suggest the need for the study of non-uraninite UIV reactions in model systems so appropriate reactions can be included in the more complex field-scale models (Long et al., 2015).

Of particular importance to U stability under the changing redox conditions in natural environments is the oxidation of UIV phases, as UVI species have а much higher potential for remobilization. Oxidation can occur due to the influx of dissolved oxidants, as well as due to water radiolysis under anoxic conditions (Ekeroth and Jonsson, 2003, Ulrich et al., 2008). A number of studies have addressed uraninite oxidation in batch and electrochemical experiments from the perspective of nuclear fuel corrosion, providing a detailed and mechanistic understanding of the process (Shoesmith, 2000, Roth and Jonsson, 2008 and references therein). Electrochemical studies coupled with surface sensitive X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy have shown that UO2 oxidation proceeds via surface oxidation to UO2.33, followed by accumulation of surface UO22+ layers as oxidation further progresses (Shoesmith et al., 1989, Shoesmith, 2000). Accumulation of surface UV/UVI hinders the interpretation of batch and flow UO2 oxidation experiments. Surface layers of UO2.33 do not form under high-bicarbonate conditions because UVI dissolves directly to solution (Shoesmith, 2000, Ulrich et al., 2009). Hence, most electrochemical studies have used high bicarbonate concentrations to provide meaningful results for UO2 oxidation and dissolution. On the other hand, electrochemical studies only measure electron transfer reactions, and thus require supporting evidence such as spectroscopic or diffraction data to provide comprehensive information about non-redox phase transformations.

More recent studies have looked at the oxidation of uraninite from the perspective of U release following reductive remediation. Consistent with electrochemical studies on UO2 spent fuel corrosion, several studies of UO2 dissolution after reductive immobilization have found that carbonate increases the rate of oxidative UO2 dissolution through promotion of UV/UVI surface layer detachment (Pierce et al., 2005, Ulrich et al., 2009). Interestingly, Ulrich and coworkers found that biogenic nanoparticulate uraninite dissolved at a similar surface-area-normalized rate as larger particles of synthetic UO2, but nanoparticulate UO2 supported a higher concentration of U in solution during oxidation, presumably due to higher surface strain in the smaller particles. Several studies to date have shown that mass transport has important effects on the mobility of U in subsurface systems, and have found that the release of UVI from UO2 is slowed in diffusion limited and advective systems relative to mixed batch reactors (Campbell et al., 2011, Giammar et al., 2012).

In contrast to the extensive studies of UO2 oxidation, very limited information is available on the stability and oxidation of non-uraninite UIV phases. UIV in biogenic, non-uraninite solids was found more labile to dissolution than uraninite in 1 M anoxic bicarbonate extractions (Alessi et al., 2012). Interpretation of UIV release in bicarbonate extractions, however, may be complicated by reversal of the electron transfer between UIV and the oxidized reductant of UVI (e.g., organic matter, electron shuttles, or Fe3+) (Ginder-Vogel et al., 2006, Stoliker et al., 2013), leading to UIV oxidation and release of UVI. Cerrato et al. (2013) studied the oxidation of a biogenic, non-uraninite phase at lower bicarbonate concentrations (100 mM) and concluded comparable oxidation rates for biogenic uraninite and non-uraninite UIV species. A slight preference for oxidation of non-uraninite UIV species relative to uraninite was suggested in experiments with mixtures of these two phases. Sharp et al. (2011) investigated the oxidative release of U from non-uraninite UIV species in sediments that have been previously subjected to reducing conditions and UVI-containing influents. The authors concluded that these UIV species were less stable than biogenic uraninite under both anoxic and oxic conditions. Despite these initial results, the knowledge about the stability of non-uraninite UIV phases appears to be far from a state where specific reactions can be included in reactive transport models.

Here, we investigate the rates and products of the oxidation of a non-uraninite, amorphous UIV–phosphate phase by dissolved oxygen (DO), under environmentally relevant conditions. The results are compared to the oxidation of nanoparticulate uraninite under the same conditions. The goal was to obtain insight on the oxidation mechanisms and to estimate the relative stability of the two UIV phases in controlled experiments. We examined the effect of Ca2+ and HPO42− on UIV oxidation; both are ions that are ubiquitous and are typically in excess of U in natural environments, thus potentially affecting uranium geochemistry. Elevated Ca2+ and PO4 concentrations also create conditions that inhibit UVI dissolution, allowing for control of the surface dissolution step in the overall oxidation process and providing information on the mechanism of oxidation. Unlike previous studies, which determined the rate of UIV oxidation from the rate of oxidant consumption or from the rate of UVI dissolution, here we determined the change in UIV/UVI content over time from X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements. This approach provides a direct measurement of UIV oxidation in the hydrated solids under the conditions of interest, as well as information on the reaction products and intermediates. In such a way, the UIV oxidation reaction was studied without potential interfering factors such as rate-limiting dissolution of the oxidized products or solution conditions that may favor oxidized U dissolution but alter U speciation and reaction dynamics. In addition, potential artifacts from drying of the samples or from unaccounted oxidant consumption in parallel reactions not related to UIV oxidation are eliminated.

Section snippets

Synthesis of UIV solids

UraniumIV solids were synthesized by chemical reduction of uranyl-carbonate solutions using 9,10-anthrahydroquinone-2,6-disulfonic acid (AH2QDS). A 25 mM stock solution of AH2QDS was prepared by reduction of 25 mM 9,10-anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonic acid (AQDS) by H2 in the presence of a Pd catalyst (0.5 wt% on Al2O3 supports). AH2QDS stock solutions were filtered prior to use. Uranyl chloride was used as the starting UVI stock, and was synthesized by dissolving UO3 in HCl to prepare a stock with an

Oxidation of UIV in nanoparticulate uraninite and in UIV–phosphate

Here we present the results from the oxidation of nanoparticulate uraninite and amorphous UIV–phosphate in closed systems with dissolved oxygen (O2) and carbonate concentrations resulting from equilibrium of the initial solution with air (approximately 250 μM O2 and 100 μM HCO3; air in the headspace). Suspensions with 100 μM UIV were oxidized at pH 7.0 buffered by 5 mM MOPS in 15 mM NaClO4 background electrolyte. U in the solution phase of all systems was less than 0.3% of total U at all stages of

Implications for uranium dynamics and transport modeling

The results of this work suggest that two of the UIV species expected to form under reducing conditions in uranium contaminated sediments—nanoparticulate UO2 and (Ca-)UIV–phosphate—are likely to be oxidized by dissolved oxygen (O2) at rates that are within an order of magnitude of each other. The relative oxidation rates determined here in systems at neutral pH and low bicarbonate content are consistent with the relative rates of oxidation of these two materials observed in recent work (Cerrato

Acknowledgements

We thank Edward O’Loughlin for insightful discussions and Carolyn Steele for editing the final version of the manuscript. This research is part of the Subsurface Science Scientific Focus Area at Argonne National Laboratory, which is supported by the DOE Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Office of Science. Use of the Electron Microscopy Center at Argonne and the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy,

References (75)

  • S.D. Kelly et al.

    X-ray absorption fine structure determination of pH-dependent U-bacterial cell wall interactions

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • L. Li et al.

    Effects of physical and geochemical heterogeneities on mineral transformation and biomass accumulation during biostimulation experiments at Rifle, Colorado

    J. Contam. Hydrol.

    (2010)
  • P.E. Long et al.

    Bicarbonate impact on U(VI) bioreduction in a shallow alluvial aquifer

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2015)
  • V.S. Mehta et al.

    Effect of co-solutes on the products and solubility of uranium(VI) precipitated with phosphate

    Chem. Geol.

    (2014)
  • T. Murakami et al.

    Field evidence for uranium nanocrystallization and its implications for uranium transport

    Chem. Geol.

    (2005)
  • L. Newsome et al.

    The biogeochemistry and bioremediation of uranium and other priority radionuclides

    Chem. Geol.

    (2014)
  • E.M. Pierce et al.

    Experimental determination of UO2(cr) dissolution kinetics: effects of solution saturation state and pH

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2005)
  • A. Rey et al.

    Secondary phase formation on UO2 in phosphate media

    Appl. Geochem.

    (2008)
  • B.G. Santos et al.

    The influence of calcium ions on the development of acidity in corrosion product deposits on SIMFUEL, UO2

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2006)
  • B.G. Santos et al.

    The influence of silicate on the development of acidity in corrosion product deposits on SIMFUEL (UO2)

    Corros. Sci.

    (2006)
  • J.O. Sharp et al.

    Uranium speciation and stability after reductive immobilization in aquifer sediments

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2011)
  • D. Shoesmith

    Fuel corrosion processes under waste disposal conditions

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2000)
  • D.W. Shoesmith et al.

    The corrosion of nuclear fuel (UO2) in oxygenated solutions

    Corros. Sci.

    (1989)
  • A. Singh et al.

    Impact of phosphate on U(VI) immobilization in the presence of goethite

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2010)
  • S. Sunder et al.

    The effect of pH on the corrosion of nuclear fuel (UO2) in oxygenated solutions

    Corros. Sci.

    (1991)
  • K.-U. Ulrich et al.

    Comparative dissolution kinetics of biogenic and chemogenic uraninite under oxidizing conditions in the presence of carbonate

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2009)
  • E.D. Vecchia et al.

    U(VI) reduction by spores of Clostridium acetobutylicum

    Res. Microbiol.

    (2010)
  • H. Veeramani et al.

    Products of abiotic U(VI) reduction by biogenic magnetite and vivianite

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2011)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Low temperature equilibrium isotope fractionation and isotope exchange kinetics between U(IV) and U(VI)

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2015)
  • K.H. Williams et al.

    Bioremediation of uranium-contaminated groundwater: a systems approach to subsurface biogeochemistry

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2013)
  • S.B. Yabusaki et al.

    Uranium removal from groundwater via in situ biostimulation: field-scale modeling of transport and biological processes

    J. Contam. Hydrol.

    (2007)
  • S.B. Yabusaki et al.

    Uranium removal from groundwater via in situ biostimulation: field-scale modeling of transport and biological processes

    J. Contam. Hydrol.

    (2007)
  • J.M. Zachara et al.

    Persistence of uranium groundwater plumes: contrasting mechanisms at two DOE sites in the groundwater–river interaction zone

    J. Contam. Hydrol.

    (2013)
  • D.S. Alessi et al.

    Quantitative separation of monomeric U(IV) from UO2 in products of U(VI) reduction

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2012)
  • D.S. Alessi et al.

    Speciation and reactivity of uranium products formed during in situ bioremediation in a shallow alluvial aquifer

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2014)
  • J.W. Anthony et al.

    Handbook of Mineralogy

    (2003)
  • J.S. Arey et al.

    Immobilization of uranium in contaminated sediments by hydroxyapatite addition

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Oxidative dissolution of uraninite nanoparticles in the presence of manganite

      2022, Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring and Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Iowa, 4105 Seamans Center, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

    View full text