Elsevier

Gait & Posture

Volume 36, Issue 3, July 2012, Pages 541-545
Gait & Posture

Differences in axial segment reorientation during standing turns predict multiple falls in older adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The assessment of standing turning performance is proposed to predict fall risk in older adults. This study investigated differences in segmental coordination during a 360° standing turn task between older community-dwelling fallers and non-fallers.

Methods

Thirty-five older adults age mean (SD) of 71 (5.4) years performed 360° standing turns. Head, trunk and pelvis position relative to the laboratory and each other were recorded using a Vicon motion analysis system. Fall incidence was monitored by monthly questionnaire over the following 12 months and used to identify non-faller, single faller and multiple faller groups.

Results

Multiple fallers were found to have significantly different values, when compared to non-fallers, for pelvis onset (p = 0.002); mean angular separation in the transverse plane between the head and trunk (p = 0.018); peak angular separation in the transverse plane between the trunk and pelvis (p = 0.013); and mean angular separation between the trunk and pelvis (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Older adults who subsequently experience multiple falls show a simplified turning pattern to assist in balance control. This may be a predictor for those at increased risk of falling.

Highlights

► Standing turning performance may predict fall risk in older adults. ► We assessed segmental coordination during a 360° pivot turn in 35 older adults. ► Fall incidence was monitored over the following 12 months. ► Multiple fallers demonstrated a simplified turning pattern compared to non fallers.

Introduction

Falls and fall-related injuries are amongst the most serious and common medical problems experienced by the older population with approximately one-quarter of community-dwelling people aged 65 and over reporting at least one fall in a year [1]. Turning is one of the fundamental components of mobility, and is associated with 35–45% of steps in common everyday tasks [2]. Staggering when turning is a prominent characteristic of recurrent fallers [3], and those who are unsteady during turning are more likely to fall whilst turning [4]. If an individual does experience a fall during turning, they are eight times more likely to fracture their hip than if the fall occurred when walking in a straight line [5]. These findings suggest that turning could be a greater challenge to older people at risk of falling than walking straight ahead, and result in more serious consequences.

Assessment of standing turn performance is considered of value in predicting potential fall risk in older adults [6], and as a result has been included in many clinical tests. The 360° turn forms part of regularly used clinical assessment tools for assessing dynamic balance in older persons [7], [8], [9], with a longer turn time and a greater number of steps associated with an increased risk of falling [10] and loss of independence in activities of daily living [11]. Performance on the 360° turn is also strongly associated with walking speed and chair rise ability [12]. Therefore, the 360° turn is a useful measure of function in older adults.

During a turn, there is a clear temporal sequence in the initiation of axial segment reorientation. The movement is initiated in the yaw direction by the head, followed by the trunk and finally the feet in a cranio–caudal sequence [13]. Older adults have demonstrated less head on trunk rotation than young adults during a 130° turning task [14], which was suggested to be due to age-related decreases in cervical spine rotation. This reduced head on trunk rotation was partly compensated by increased trunk on pelvis rotation. However this is in contrast to a study of a 90° standing turn, which found that older adults started turning their head, trunk and pelvis simultaneously [15]. This en-bloc method of segmental reorientation may be adopted to simplify the control of the movement and to minimalise the risk of imbalance. This en-bloc strategy has also been demonstrated in patients groups such as turning in place in Parkinson's Disease [16] and online steering in stroke [17]. This en-bloc strategy may therefore be demonstrated in older adults who are at risk of experiencing a fall, and the 360° turn that is already utilised in clinical balance assessments may be suitable for identifying differences that may be present prior to falling.

Anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) occur prior to a voluntary movement and have been observed in scenarios such as lateral stepping [18] and gait initiation [19]. In lateral stepping, the centre of pressure (COP) showed a small shift towards the swing side prior to the weight transfer to the support side [18]. This COP adjustment preceded a centre of mass (COM) adjustment. Longer APA time has been reported during obstructed gait initiation in older adults at high risk of falling compared to those at low risk, suggesting that those adults need a longer preparatory control time [19]. Therefore, it is likely that APAs will be detectable in standing turning.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate prospectively any differences in segmental coordination and APAs during a 360° standing turn task between older community-dwelling fallers and non-fallers. It was hypothesised that the fallers would display less segment-to-segment rotation during the turn, and demonstrate a longer APA time than the non-fallers.

Section snippets

Participants

Thirty-five older (23 women) adults (age mean (SD) of 71 (5.4) years; height mean (SD) 167.3 (9.9) cm; mass mean (SD) 71.2 (13.1) kg) were recruited through letters sent through community groups. All participants were able to walk at least 100 m without the use of a gait aid. None of the participants had experienced a fall, been injured or had surgery in the previous six months, and were free of known neurological or vestibular problems. All participants had normal or corrected to normal vision.

Fall occurrence

Thirteen (9 women, age mean (SD) 70 (5.0) years, height mean (SD) 164.4 (9.1) cm, mass mean (SD) 69.4 (10.3) kg) participants did not fall during the follow-up 12 months and were classed as non-fallers. Ten (7 women, age mean (SD) 74 (4.7) years, height mean (SD) 168.0 (8.7) cm, mass mean (SD) 65.0 (8.0) kg) participants experienced one fall during the follow-up and were classified as single fallers. Twelve (7 women, age mean (SD) 70 (6.1) years, height mean (SD) 169.7 (11.5) cm, mass mean (SD)

Discussion

This is the first prospective study to explore biomechanical differences between older community-dwelling fallers and non-fallers during a standing turning task, with differences detected between groups for measures of segmental orientation. The biomechanical assessment of turning is of particular importance as falls when turning have a higher likelihood of resulting in a sideways fall than a forward or backward fall [5]. A fall to the side is more likely to result in a hip fracture than a fall

Conclusions

Axial segmental reorientation was significantly more en-bloc during a 360° standing turn in community-dwelling older adults who fell two or more times during a prospective 12-month period. Other measures such as turn time and number of steps used to turn did not differ between the groups. These findings suggest that en-bloc axial segment reorientation during turning may be an indicator of compensating for decreased stability and therefore may be useful in identifying older adults at risk of

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References (30)

  • R. Grasso et al.

    Development of anticipatory orienting strategies during locomotor tasks in children

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

    (1998)
  • Department of Health

    Chronic diseases: the health of older people. 2. 2007

    (2005)
  • A.K. Topper et al.

    Are activity-based assessments of balance and gait in the elderly predictive of risk of falling and/or type of fall?

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (1993)
  • R.G. Cumming et al.

    Fall frequency and characteristics and the risk of hip fractures

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (1994)
  • M.E. Tinetti

    Performance-orientated assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (1986)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Concern about falling is associated with segmental control when turning in older adults

      2021, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      The mechanics of turning typically follow a progressive top-down ‘unfolding’ pattern; beginning with the head, with subsequent rotational adaptations to the trunk then feet [3,4]. When turning 360° on the spot, OAs who subsequently fall display smaller angular differences from head to trunk and trunk to pelvis [2]. It remains unclear if this en-bloc strategy is associated with physiological constraints limiting decoupling between body segments (i.e., functional balance ability) or perceived balance ability (i.e., concern about falling).

    • Turning assessment for discrimination of frailty syndrome among community-dwelling older adults

      2021, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      Research related to turning has been widely conducted in older populations [7–9], and in patients with neurological disorders such as stroke [10] and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [11]. Previous studies showed that older people who fell often spent more time, took a greater number of steps, and displayed rigid inter-segmental movements with instability when completing a 360° turn on the spot [9]. However, research based on turning in frailty syndrome is limited.

    • The relation between limb segment coordination during walking and fall history in community-dwelling older adults

      2019, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      To investigate fall incidence, the participants were asked “Do you have any history of falling within the past year?” ( Uemura et al., 2015; Wright et al., 2012). A fall was defined as an unexpected event during which the subjects came to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level (Lamb et al., 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text