Elsevier

Fungal Ecology

Volume 17, October 2015, Pages 84-95
Fungal Ecology

Diversity and host preference of fungi co-inhabiting Cenococcum mycorrhizae

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.05.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We investigated fungal communities associated with Cenococcum mycorrhizae.

  • Fungal species and diversity were determined by culture independent methods.

  • We detected 50 different endophytes, ecto- and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi.

  • Species composition and diversity differed significantly among the three hosts.

  • Differences in root associated fungal communities may impact host ecology.

Abstract

Diverse fungal assemblages colonize the fine feeder roots of woody plants, including mycorrhizal fungi, fungal root endophytes and soil saprotrophs. The fungi co-inhabiting Cenococcum geophilum ectomycorrhizae (ECM) of Abies balsamea, Betula papyrifera and Picea glauca were studied at two boreal forest sites in Eastern Canada by direct PCR of ITS rDNA. 50 non-Cenococcum fungal sequence types were detected, including several potentially mycorrhizal species as well as fungal root endophytes. Non-melanized ascomycetes dominated, in contrast to the dark septate endophytes (DSE) reported in most culture dependent studies. The results demonstrate significant differences in root associated fungal assemblages among the host species studied. Fungal diversity was also host dependent, with P. glauca roots supporting a more diverse community than A. balsamea. Differences in root associated fungal communities may well influence ecological interactions among host plant species.

Introduction

Ectomycorrhizae (ECM) consist of both fine root and fungal tissues, resulting in a unique and metabolically active habitat within the soil ecosystem. A healthy ECM can support a wide variety of soil organisms, including a diverse array of fungi other than the dominant ectomycorrhizal symbiont (Bergero et al., 2000, Kernaghan et al., 2003, Menkis et al., 2005, Bergemann and Garbelotto, 2006, Morris et al., 2008, Urban et al., 2008, Wright et al., 2009). These secondary fungi may be other mycorrhizal species within the root (Cázares and Trappe, 1993, Olsson et al., 2000, Morris et al., 2008, Toju et al., 2014), or saprobes on the surface and associated mycorrhizosphere (Foster and Marks, 1967, Fogel, 1988). Ectomycorrhizae also harbor a wide range of asymptomatic fungal endophytes, which colonize the root tissue internally and appear to be as common as mycorrhizal fungi (Mandyam and Jumpponen, 2005, Weishampel and Bedford, 2006, Toju et al., 2013a).

Fungal endophytes can be found colonizing all types of plant tissue (Rodriguez et al., 2009), but the species assemblages associated with roots appear distinct from those colonizing shoots and leaves (Addy et al., 2005, Summerbell, 2005). Although the ecological role of these fungi is unclear (Mandyam and Jumpponen, 2005, Mayerhofer et al., 2013), some may be latent pathogens (Schulz et al., 1999) or saprotrophs (Kernaghan, 2013). Others may provide protection from soil pathogens (Narisawa et al., 2004), or improve plant growth through phytohormone production (Khan et al., 2012), drought tolerance (Barrow, 2003), or improved access to soil phosphorus (Barrow and Osuna, 2002) or nitrogen (Upson et al., 2009).

Unlike mycorrhizal fungi, fungal root endophytes lack highly evolved absorptive structures involved in carbon and nutrient exchange (Brundrett, 2006), instead forming structures such as microsclerotia and hyphal coils within the host root (O'Dell et al., 1993, Vohník et al., 2003). Also, ECM fungal hyphae explore the soil environment and generally colonize fine roots only, while fungal root endophytes are more likely to be restricted to the roots, although they may grow throughout the root system (Menkis et al., 2004, Rodriguez et al., 2009, Toju et al., 2013a).

Much of the research into fungal root endophytes has focused on the dark septate endophytes, or DSE (Ahlich and Sieber, 1996, Grünig et al., 2002, Alberton et al., 2010, Newsham, 2011); a morphological classification encompassing fungal root endophytes with highly melanized hyphae. Although DSE are common, woody roots and ECM are colonized by a much more diverse array of fungi, including many non-melanized species, as demonstrated by several culture dependent (Schild et al., 1988, Fisher et al., 1991, Girlanda and Luppi-Mosca, 1995, Girlanda et al., 2002, Summerbell, 2005, Hoff et al., 2004, Kernaghan and Patriquin, 2011), and culture independent studies (Kernaghan et al., 2003, Kwaśna et al., 2008, Urban et al., 2008, Izumi and Finlay, 2011, Tedersoo et al., 2009, Toju et al., 2013a).

Recent evidence also indicates that some fungal root endophytes exhibit preference for particular host plants (Grünig et al., 2008, Quilliam and Jones, 2012, Kernaghan and Patriquin, 2011, Tedersoo et al., 2009, Tejesvi et al., 2013), although examples of specificity at levels seen in some ECM fungi are lacking (Molina et al., 1992, Toju et al., 2013a). There is also increasing evidence that some fungal root endophytes prefer ECM formed by particular species of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Tedersoo et al., 2009, Urban et al., 2008, Izumi and Finlay, 2011, Yamamoto et al., 2014), potentially representing a second level of root endophyte selection.

The occurrence of host preference, in combination with the range of possible effects that root associated fungi may have on their host plants, has motivated our research into differences in root associated fungal communities among host trees. In a previous study (Kernaghan and Patriquin, 2011), we investigated species composition, diversity and host preference in fungal root endophyte communities of ECM of boreal trees using culture-based techniques. To focus on differences among host plant species, and to avoid the potential influence of preference for ectomycorrhizal symbionts, ECM formed by Cenococcum geophilum (Cg) were focused on. Cg forms distinctive ECM that often dominate forest soils. It is widely dispersed, with a very broad host range and a relatively even distribution across soil horizons and successional stages (LoBuglio, 1999, Dickie et al., 2002). Although genetic variability in Cenococcum appears to be quite high (Douhan and Rizzo, 2005), the Cg ECM of a given host plant species should still represent a relatively homogeneous set of habitats for the study of root associated fungi.

Here, we revisit questions regarding the species composition, diversity and host preference of fungi associated with the Cg ECM of boreal trees, using direct PCR and cloning to eliminate the biases inherent in culture-dependant studies. We expected that the diversity of fungi associated with Cg ECM was underestimated in our previous work (Kernaghan and Patriquin, 2011) due to fast growing fungi such as Phialocephala fortinii outcompeting slower growing species. We also expected that a culture-independent approach would reveal obligate root associates that are not readily amenable to culture.

Section snippets

Sampling

ECM samples were collected from two boreal forest sites; Mount Mackenzie, Cape Breton Highlands National Park, Nova Scotia and the Lac Duparquet Teaching and Research Forest, Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Québec. The sites are 1 400 km apart and support similar mixtures of mature Abies balsamea, Betula papyrifera and Picea glauca with sparse understory vegetation dominated by herbaceous species including Cornus canadensis and Clintonia borealis, as well as ferns such as Osmundastrum cinnamomeum.

Fungi detected

Our PCR-cloning strategy detected 50 distinct non-Cg ITS sequence types that varied by at least 3 % (including 18 singletons) (Table 1, Table S1). Of these, ascomycetes accounted for 56 % of the sequence types (species) and 75 % of the amplicons and basidiomycetes represented 42 % of the sequence types and 24 % of the amplicons. The Mucoromycotina made up only 1 % of amplicons and 2 % of sequence types. At the family level, the Helotiaceae and Dermateaceae were most common, followed by the

Discussion

We detected 50 species of fungi associated with Cg ECM, and found that fungal diversity and species composition varied significantly among the three host tree species sampled. The majority of fungi detected were ascomycetes, with the Helotiaceae as the largest group overall. It is becoming clear that members of the Helotiaceae, such as Meliniomyces spp., are not only important components of fungal root endophyte communities, but are also potential ericoid or ectomycorrhizal symbionts (Vrålstad

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (341671-2007). We thank Cape Breton Highlands National Park and the Lac Duparquet Teaching and Research Forest for field Logistics. We also thank Michael Mayerhofer for assistance with statistics and graphics.

References (84)

  • P.A. Olsson et al.

    Molecular and anatomical evidence for a three-way association between Pinus sylvestris and the ectomycorrhizal fungi Suillus bovinus and Gomphidius roseus

    Mycological Research

    (2000)
  • P.A. Schmidt et al.

    Illumina metabarcoding of a soil fungal community

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2013)
  • B. Schulz et al.

    The endophyte-host interaction: a balanced antagonism?

    Mycological Research

    (1999)
  • R.C. Summerbell

    Root endophyte and mycorrhizosphere fungi of black spruce, Picea mariana, in a boreal forest habitat: influence of site factors on fungal distributions

    Studies in Mycology

    (2005)
  • M. Vohník et al.

    The cultivable endophytic community of Norway spruce ectomycorrhizas from microhabitats lacking ericaceous hosts is dominated by ericoid mycorrhizal Meliniomyces variabilis

    Fungal Ecology

    (2013)
  • T.J. White et al.

    Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics

  • H.D. Addy et al.

    Microfungal endophytes in roots

    Canadian Journal of Botany

    (2005)
  • K. Ahlich et al.

    The profusion of dark septate endophytic fungi in non-ectomycorrhizal fine roots of forest trees and shrubs

    New Phytologist

    (1996)
  • O. Alberton et al.

    Dark septate root endophytic fungi increase growth of Scots pine seedlings under elevated CO2 through enhanced nitrogen use efficiency

    Plant and Soil

    (2010)
  • J.R. Barrow

    Atypical morphology of dark septate fungal root endophytes of Bouteloua in arid southwestern USA rangelands

    Mycorrhiza

    (2003)
  • S.E. Bergemann et al.

    High diversity of fungi recovered from the roots of mature tanoak (Lithocarpus densiorus) in northern California

    Canadian Journal of Botany

    (2006)
  • R. Bergero et al.

    Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi are common root associates of a Mediterranean ectomycorrhizal plant (Quercus ilex)

    Molecular Ecology

    (2000)
  • D.S. Bougoure et al.

    Diversity of fungi in hair roots of Ericaceae varies along a vegetation gradient

    Molecular Ecology

    (2007)
  • J. Breitenbach et al.

    Fungi of Switzerland

    (1984)
  • M.C. Brundrett

    Understanding the roles of multifunctional mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi

  • E. Cázares et al.

    Vesicular endophytes in roots of the Pinaceae

    Mycorrhiza

    (1993)
  • S.M. Chambers et al.

    Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi are common root inhabitants of non-Ericaceae plants in a south-eastern Australian sclerophyll forest

    FEMS Microbiology Ecology

    (2008)
  • I.A. Dickie et al.

    Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP analysis

    New Phytologist

    (2002)
  • K.H. Domsch et al.
    (1993)
  • G.W. Douhan et al.

    Phylogenetic divergence in a local population of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Cenococcum geophilum

    New Phytologist

    (2005)
  • P.J. Fisher et al.

    Endophytic ascomycetes and deuteromycetes in roots of Pinus sylvestris

    Nova Hedwigia

    (1991)
  • R.C. Foster et al.

    Observations on the mycorrhizas of forest trees. II. The rhizosphere of Pinus radiata D. Don

    Australian Journal of Biological Science

    (1967)
  • M. Gardes et al.

    ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts

    Molecular Ecology

    (1993)
  • M. Girlanda et al.

    Diversity of sterile root-associated fungi of two Mediterranean plants

    New Phytologist

    (2002)
  • M. Girlanda et al.

    Microfungi associated with ectomycorrhizae of Pinus halepensis Mill

    Allionia

    (1995)
  • G.A. Grelet et al.

    New insights into the mycorrhizal Rhizoscyphus ericae aggregate: spatial structure and co-colonization of ectomycorrhizal and ericoid roots

    New Phytologist

    (2010)
  • C.R. Grünig et al.

    Structure of diversity in dark septate endophytes: from species to genes

  • C.R. Grünig et al.

    Dark septate endophytes (DSE) of the Phialocephala fortinii sl-Acephala applanata species complex in tree roots: classification, population biology, and ecology

    Botany

    (2008)
  • J.A. Hoff et al.

    Fungal endophytes in woody roots of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa)

    Forest Pathology

    (2004)
  • T. Hosoya

    Application of underutilized microbial resources in drug discovery: a review focused on discomycetes

    Annual Report of the Sankyo Research Laboratory

    (1998)
  • H. Izumi et al.

    Ectomycorrhizal roots select distinctive bacterial and ascomycete communities in Swedish subarctic forests

    Environmental Microbiology

    (2011)
  • A. Jumpponen et al.

    Massively parallel 454 sequencing of fungal communities in Quercus spp. ectomycorrhizas indicates seasonal dynamics in urban and rural sites

    Molecular Ecology

    (2010)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Ectomycorrhizal root tips harbor distinctive fungal associates along a soil nitrogen gradient

      2021, Fungal Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Endophytic fungi, predominately ascomycetes, colonize EcM root tips (Grelet et al., 2010; Toju et al., 2013b; Nakamura et al., 2018). Estimates suggest that ∼35–45% of healthy EcM root tips are colonized by endophytic fungi (Kernaghan and Patriquin 2011, 2015; Vohník et al., 2013); however, these estimates rely upon culturing approaches that often obscure endophytic diversity. Endophytes associated with EcM fungi appear omnipresent across boreal and temperate ecosystem, and, in certain cases, they may be more abundant and diverse than co-occurring EcM fungi (Toju et al., 2013b).

    • Spruce girdling decreases abundance of fungivorous soil nematodes in a boreal forest

      2021, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, most plants belonging to Ericales form a distinctive type of mycorrhiza, termed ericoid mycorrhiza, which can interact with ectomycorrhiza (Perotto et al., 2002). For instance, ericoid mycorrhizal fungi may co-colonize ectomycorrhizal root tips (Tedersoo et al., 2009; Kernaghan and Patriquin, 2015). The presence of ericaceous host plants has been found to inhibit the ectomycorrhizal colonization of coniferous seedlings (Walker et al., 1999) and reduce the number of species or change community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Collier and Bidartondo, 2009; Kohout et al., 2011).

    • Detection of a root-associated group of Hyaloscyphaceae (Helotiales) species that commonly colonizes Fagaceae roots and description of three new species in genus Glutinomyces

      2018, Mycoscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Oidiodendron spp., Trichoderma spp., Umbelopsis spp. and members of Sordariales, were commonly isolated from several study sites. The identification of these groups corresponds well with the prevalent root-associated fungi reported in previous studies (Kernaghan & Patriquin, 2011, 2015; Kwaśna, Szewczyk, & Behnke-Borowczyk, 2016; Summerbell, 2005), although species-level correlations have not been confirmed. Cladophialophora spp. were also commonly isolated.

    • Scattered far and wide: A broadly distributed temperate dune grass finds familiar fungal root associates in its invasive range

      2017, Soil Biology and Biochemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is difficult to predict whether an identical or alternative community will develop in a new arrival to a plant community. Plant host species identity has been shown to impact fungal community composition in some studies (Barrett et al., 2009; Becklin et al., 2012; Kernaghan and Patriquin, 2015; Tedersoo et al., 2010; Tejesvi et al., 2013; Vályi et al., 2014), but in other cases, host plant identity has had limited or no influence on root endophytes (David et al., 2016; Glynou et al., 2016; Knapp et al., 2012) and communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Davison et al., 2015; Li et al., 2015; Saks et al., 2013). The degree of relatedness between resident and introduced plant host species may impact the degree to which they share available fungal lineages (Bufford et al., 2016; Wehner et al., 2014).

    • A native and an invasive dune grass share similar, patchily distributed, root-associated fungal communities

      2016, Fungal Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The role of host identity in structuring root fungal communities is unclear (Dickie et al., 2015). Field investigations suggest the effect of host species is context-specific for fungal communities, with this found to be an important control in some cases (Becklin et al., 2012; Hazard et al., 2013; Tejesvi et al., 2013; Vályi et al., 2014; Kernaghan and Patriquin, 2015), but not in others (Saks et al., 2013; Porras-Alfaro et al., 2014; Glynou et al., 2016; Li et al., 2015). The phylogenetic relationships of the hosts being compared may be important, with root fungal community similarity increasing with host relatedness in grasslands (Wehner et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text