Analytical MethodsHighly sensitive and simultaneous detection of melamine and aflatoxin M1 in milk products by multiplexed planar waveguide fluorescence immunosensor (MPWFI)
Introduction
Aflatoxins are highly toxic and carcinogenic metabolites produced by Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus, which may contaminate various agricultural commodities and animal foodstuffs. Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) can be found as hydroxylated metabolite of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in urine, blood, milk, and internal organs of animals that have ingested AFB1 contaminated feed. Currently, available research results demonstrate that aflatoxin M1 can also be present in a wide range of milk-derived or products containing milk, such as cheese, yogurt, cream, and chocolate (Pei, Zhang, Eremin, & Lee, 2009), because of the stability of aflatoxins during processes involved in preparation of these commodities. However, unlike aflatoxin M1, melamine (1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine) is a nitrogen-based industrial chemical used in the manufacture of durable plastics, melamine–formaldehyde resins, and flame-retardants, which has been illegally added in feed stuffs and milk products in some developing countries in the recent years to artificially boost crude protein value, which has caused or may cause illnesses and even death (Brown et al., 2007). Given the hepatotoxic and carcinogenic effects of aflatoxin M1 and the oral acute toxicity of melamine when unintentionally and excessively ingested, many countries have regulated the levels of aflatoxin M1 and melamine in milk. In particular, the World Health Organization has set maximum permissible levels of 0.5 ppb (0.25 ppb for baby food) for aflatoxin M1 and 2.5 ppm (1.0 ppm for infant formula) for melamine. These guidelines were also followed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA and the Chinese government after several accidents related to milk.
Currently, routine analysis of melamine contaminated milk powder samples are mostly performed by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (Miao et al., 2010), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Zhong, Zhang, Zhang, Liu, & Wang, 2011) or in tandem with mass spectrometry (LC–MS) (Goscinny et al., 2011, MacMahon et al., 2012), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Lei et al., 2011, Pei et al., 2009, Zhou et al., 2012), capillary electrophoresis (CE) (Huang et al., 2012, Wen et al., 2010), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Mauer, Chernyshova, Hiatt, Deering, & Davis, 2009), and Raman spectrometry (Almeida et al., 2011, Cheng et al., 2010); while thin-layer chromatography (TLC), self-assembled metal-supported bilayer lipid membranes (s-BLMs) (Siontorou, Nikolelis, Miernik, & Krull, 1998), and ultrasensitive chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Magliulo et al., 2005) are reported for routine analysis of aflatoxin M1 for the same milk powder samples. These analytical methods have high sensitivity and good accuracy, but are time-consuming and involve complicated techniques, require highly trained personnel in specialized laboratories, extensive preparation steps, and bulky and expensive instruments. Therefore, alternative methods have been reported to simplify and expedite the detection of melamine and aflatoxin M1, such as colorimetric (Guan et al., 2013, Li et al., 2010) and fluorescence (Le, Yan, Xu, & Hao, 2013). Colorimetric and fluorescence methods based on Au NPs or Ag NPs suffer from low selectivity and non-applicability in real time detection of melamine. Therefore, rapid, sensitive, portable, on-site, and low-cost methods to analyze melamine and aflatoxin M1 are in great demand.
To date, the immunoassay-based biosensor systems have proven to be the most widely reported for biosensor applications, combining with various techniques to detect the presence of a target analyte (Paniel et al., 2010, Ricci et al., 2007). Among the immunoassay-based biosensor systems, the fluorescent immunosensor has been widely used in food analysis and monitoring of pollutant (Guo et al., 2014, Hao et al., 2014). Surface plasmon resonance has been reported for detection of melamine (Fodey et al., 2011, Wu et al., 2013) and aflatoxin M1 (Wang, Dostálek, & Knoll, 2009). To date, most of the immunosensor target only a single compound. The imaging surface plasmon resonance (iSPR) platform (Raz, Bremer, Haasnoot, & Norde, 2009) and the wavelength-interrogated optical system (WIOS) (Adrian et al., 2009) have been reported for multiplex detection of antibiotic residues, which is known as the optical waveguide light-mode spectroscopy (OWLS) (Adányi et al., 2007) suspension array (Ying et al., 2013). In addition, immune chip (Ying et al., 2012) has also been developed for simultaneous detection of mycotoxins. These methods however are limited in detecting multiplex compounds in a single class, while some need more than four hours for the analysis, which are not suitable for an on-site, low cost, and real time detection, as opposed to our present study.
In this study, the multiplexed planar waveguide fluorescence immunosensor (MPWFI) was used to determine the possibility of simultaneous assays for two compounds of different families. The objective of achieving spatially-resolved excitation and collection of fluorescence from fluorescently-labeled antibodies locally-bound at a planar interface can be met by the evanescent field excitation of a fluorophore. Excitation light was guided by total internal reflection within transducer structure resulting in an evanescent wave, which allowed the excitation of fluorophore bound to the transducer surface. The total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) principle allowed selective detection of surface bound fluorophore, and therefore, on-line monitoring of binding events was superior to that with direct illumination of the active area of transducers. A planar transducer was also preferred to a fiber-based system, being manufactured as an integrated part of fluidics systems (Tschmelak et al., 2005).
Meanwhile, a fast, sensitive, reliable, and simultaneous indirect competitive immunoassay was adopted to detect two low molecular weight analytes (melamine and aflatoxin M1) from different families; one is an industrial chemical while the other is a mycotoxin. The sensitivity of the method in measuring melamine and aflatoxin simultaneously both in buffer and milk products based on PWFI were demonstrated. The stability and reusability of sensing surface and its cross-reactivity were also evaluated. This method was successfully applied to determine the melamine and aflatoxin M1 in the cow milk formulas for infants. The schematic of the detection procedures is illustrated in Scheme 1.
Section snippets
Reagents and materials
The 3-mercaptopropyl-trimethoxysilane (MTS), N-(4-maleimidobutyryloxy) succinimide (GMBS), bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1-ethyl-3-(-3dimethylamino-propyl), aflatoxin M1, aflatoxin B1, and aflatoxin B2 were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). All the other reagents, unless specified otherwise, were purchased from Beijing Chemical Agents. Approximately 1 mg/mL melamine and 1 μg/mL stock solutions were prepared in mixture (1:9, v/v) of methanol and deionized water (18 MΩ) and stored at 4
MPWFI-based immunoassays for simultaneous detection
Simultaneous detection of melamine and aflatoxin M1 were achieved by integrating double immunoassays on a single sensor chip. The immunoassays were implemented in an indirect competitive format. Each analyte had to compete with the antigen coating for the corresponding antibody-bioreceptor binding sites. Each measurement cycle lasted for 20 min (including the regeneration steps). After four minutes of incubation, the mixture was allowed to flow onto the chip surface. During the five-minute
Conclusion
The present work had established an effective monitoring approach based on multiplex planar waveguide fluorescence immunosensors (MPWFI), which provided a new method for simultaneously determining different compounds such as melamine and aflatoxin M1 in milk products within 20 min. The entire detection system required less sample volume because of the indirect competitive immunoassay, and provided both qualitative and quantitative data with high sensitivity. However, this technique required
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Major Scientific Equipment Development Project of China (2012YQ030111). We would also like to thank the special funding support of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (12L01ESPC).
References (40)
- et al.
Development of immunosensor based on OWLS technique for determining aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
(2007) - et al.
Wavelength-interrogated optical biosensor for multi-analyte screening of sulfonamide, fluoroquinolone, β-lactam and tetracycline antibiotics in milk
TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
(2009) - et al.
Fourier-transform Raman analysis of milk powder: A potential method for rapid quality screening
Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
(2011) - et al.
Development and application of solvent-free extraction for the detection of aflatoxin M1 in dairy products by enzyme immunoassay
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(2008) - et al.
Survey of the occurrence of Aflatoxin M1 in ovine milk by HPLC and its confirmation by MS
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
(2006) - et al.
Outbreaks of renal failure associated with melamine and cyanuric acid in dogs and cats in 2004 and 2007
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
(2007) - et al.
Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric confirmatory method for determining aflatoxin M1 in cow milk: Comparison between electrospray and atmospheric pressure photoionization sources
Journal of Chromatography A
(2006) - et al.
Screening melamine adulterant in milk powder with laser Raman spectrometry
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
(2010) - et al.
Development of surface plasmon resonance-based immunoassay for aflatoxin B1
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(2000) - et al.
Surface plasmon resonance immunosensor for human cardiac troponin T based on self-assembled monolayer
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
(2007)
Development of an optical biosensor based immunoassay to screen infant formula milk samples for adulteration with melamine
Analytical Chemistry
Rapid analysis of melamine residue in milk, milk products, bakery goods and flour by ultra-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry: From food crisis to accreditation
Food Control
Label-free colorimetric sensing of melamine based on chitosan-stabilized gold nanoparticles probes
Food Control
Highly sensitive and rapid detection of melamine in milk products by planar waveguide fluorescence immunosensor (PWFI)
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
Melamine detection in dairy products by using a reusable evanescent wave biosensor
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
Capillary electrochromatography–mass spectrometry determination of melamine and related triazine by-products using poly(divinyl benzene-alkene-vinylbenzyl trimethylammonium chloride) monolithic stationary phases
Analytica Chimica Acta
Determination of melamine in milk-based products and other food and beverage products by ion-pair liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
Analytica Chimica Acta
A novel colloidal gold-based lateral flow immunoassay for rapid simultaneous detection of cyromazine and melamine in foods of animal origin
Food Chemistry
Development of a specifically enhanced enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of melamine in milk
Molecules
Visual detection of melamine in raw milk using gold nanoparticles as colorimetric probe
Food Chemistry
Cited by (38)
Developmental trend of immunoassays for monitoring hazards in food samples: A review
2021, Trends in Food Science and TechnologyNanobiosensors for food analysis
2020, Handbook of Food Nanotechnology: Applications and ApproachesAn octuplex lateral flow immunoassay for rapid detection of antibiotic residues, aflatoxin M<inf>1</inf> and melamine in milk
2019, Sensors and Actuators, B: ChemicalCitation Excerpt :As shown in Table 2 and Table S3, the LOD values were calculated to be 0.38–3.4 ng/mL for quinolones, 0.64–1.4 ng/mL for tetracyclines, 0.13–4.8 ng/mL for β-lactams, 0.27–3.2 for sulfonamides, 0.04 ng/mL for chloramphenicol, 1.1 ng/mL for streptomycin, 0.016 ng/mL for aflatoxin M1 and 2.5 ng/mL for melamine, respectively. These LOD values were far below the MRLs set by the United States and the European Union [14,16,18]. As compared with literature reports, the assay sensitivity of our octuplex LFA is comparable to or superior to other immunoassays (Table 1).
Aquamarine blue emitting silver nanoparticles as fluorescent sensor for melamine detection
2019, Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular SpectroscopyRapid and sensitive label-free determination of aflatoxin M1 levels in milk through a White Light Reflectance Spectroscopy immunosensor
2019, Sensors and Actuators, B: ChemicalCitation Excerpt :Thus, there is a demand for analytical methods that could provide quantitative results at the point-of-need [26,27]. To satisfy this demand, several biosensors based on electrochemical [28–32] or optical transducers [33–37] have been reported for the determination of AFM1 in milk samples. Optical biosensors and specifically those offering label-free detection, have considerable advantages over other sensing principles since they combine increased miniaturization with less interference from the sample matrix [38].
Cadmium chalcogenide derived fluorescent quanta-sensor for melamine detection
2018, Sensors and Actuators, B: ChemicalCitation Excerpt :In China and US, the maximum residue limit (MRL) for infant formula has been set at 1.0 mg/kg and at 2.5 mg/kg for milk and other milk products, while in Europe, the Food Safety Authority has set the limit to 2.5 mg/kg [5]. At present, lots of confirmation and screening methods are available for the determination of melamine and its analogues which include liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) [6], gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) [7], capillary zone electrophoresis (CE) [8], enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) [9], waveguide fluorescence immunosensor [10–12] and surface enhanced raman spectroscopy (SERS) [13]. Despite the high sensitivity of these conventional methods for melamine analysis, these strategies are generally not favored due to the necessity of complicated, expensive and labor-intensive instrumentation.