Elsevier

Food Microbiology

Volume 33, Issue 2, April 2013, Pages 282-291
Food Microbiology

Selection of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from fermented olives by in vitro tests

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.10.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from naturally fermented olives and select candidates to be used as probiotic starters for the improvement of the traditional fermentation process and the production of newly added value functional foods. Seventy one (71) lactic acid bacterial strains (17 Leuconostoc mesenteroides, 1 Ln. pseudomesenteroides, 13 Lactobacillus plantarum, 37 Lb. pentosus, 1 Lb. paraplantarum, and 2 Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei) isolated from table olives were screened for their probiotic potential. Lb. rhamnosus GG and Lb. casei Shirota were used as reference strains. The in vitro tests included survival in simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions, antimicrobial activity (against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli O157:H7), Caco-2 surface adhesion, resistance to 9 antibiotics and haemolytic activity. Three (3) Lb. pentosus, 4 Lb. plantarum and 2 Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei strains demonstrated the highest final population (>8 log cfu/ml) after 3 h of exposure at low pH. The majority of the tested strains were resistant to bile salts even after 4 h of exposure, while 5 Lb. plantarum and 7 Lb. pentosus strains exhibited partial bile salt hydrolase activity. None of the strains inhibited the growth of the pathogens tested. Variable efficiency to adhere to Caco-2 cells was observed. This was the same regarding strains' susceptibility towards different antibiotics. None of the strains exhibited β-haemolytic activity. As a whole, 4 strains of Lb. pentosus, 3 strains of Lb. plantarum and 2 strains of Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei were found to possess desirable in vitro probiotic properties similar to or even better than the reference probiotic strains Lb. casei Shirota and Lb. rhamnosus GG. These strains are good candidates for further investigation both with in vivo studies to elucidate their potential health benefits and in olive fermentation processes to assess their technological performance as novel probiotic starters.

Highlights

► The in vitro probiotic potential of 71 lactic acid bacteria from olives was studied. ► The strains Lactobacillus casei Shirota and Lb. rhamnosus GG were used as reference. ► 4 Lb. pentosus, 3 Lb. plantarum and 2 Lb. paracasei strains showed probiotic potential. ► These strains can be used as novel probiotic starters in table olive fermentation. ► Further in vivo studies are necessary to elucidate their potential health benefits.

Introduction

The term probiotic, literally meaning “for life”, was first addressed by Lilly and Stillwell (1965) and was used to describe substances produced by protozoa to stimulate the growth of other organisms. Nowadays, the term refers to viable, nonpathogenic microorganisms (bacteria or yeasts) that, when ingested, are able to reach the intestines in sufficient numbers to confer health benefits to the host (De Vrese and Schrezenmeir, 2008). Commonly used bacterial probiotics include various species of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus, as well as Lactococcus lactis and some Enterococcus species. Currently, the only probiotic yeast used is the nonpathogenic Saccharomyces boulardii (Morrow et al., 2012).

It is well established that probiotics confer a number of beneficial health effects to humans and animals. Intake of probiotics stimulates the growth of beneficial microorganisms and reduces the amount of pathogens improving thus the intestinal microbial balance of the host and lowering the risk of gastro-intestinal diseases (Fuller, 1989; Cross, 2002; Chiang and Pan, 2012). Their benefits include also the alleviation of certain intolerances (such as lactose intolerance), the enhancement of nutrients bioavailability, and prevention or reduction of the prevalence of allergies in susceptible individuals (Isolauri, 2001; Chiang and Pan, 2012). Probiotics are reported to have also antimutagenic, anticarcinogenic, hypocholesterolemic, antihypertensive, anti-osteoporosis, and immunomodulatory effects (Chiang and Pan, 2012). They relieve the symptoms of inflammatory bowel diseases, irritable bowel syndrome, colitis, alcoholic liver disease, constipation and reduce the risk for colon, liver and breast cancers (Prado et al., 2008).

Probiotic foods receive market interest as health-promoting, functional foods. Probiotic food products according to FAO/WHO (2002) are in general fermented foods containing an amount of viable and active microorganisms large enough to reach the intestine and exert an equilibrating action on the intestinal microflora. To deliver the health benefits, probiotic foods need to contain an adequate amount of live bacteria (at least 106–107 cfu/g) (Oliveira et al., 2001; Boylston et al., 2004), although there are recent convincing data on beneficial immunological effects derived from dead cells (Vinderola and Reinheimer, 2003; Mottet and Michetti, 2005).

Most probiotic bacteria are lactic acid bacteria and, among them, lactobacilli represent one of the fundamental microbial groups. They have been introduced in a wide range of food products. Many studies have reported that the best matrices to deliver probiotics are dairy fermented products, such as fermented milks and yogurt. On the other hand, nowadays there is a need for novel and non-dairy probiotics and it has been found that traditional fermented foods may constitute a good working base for the development of probiotic-type functional foods (De Vuyst et al., 2008; Ruiz-Moyano et al., 2008, 2011). A window of opportunity for the development of non-dairy probiotic products has arisen from the increasing number of lactose intolerance cases occurring in the world population, coupled with the unfavourable effect of cholesterol contained in fermented dairy products (Granato et al., 2010).

Among the traditional fermented foods, table olives could be a promising probiotic food through the use of functional probiotic starter cultures. Functional starter cultures contribute to microbial safety and offer organoleptic, technological, nutritional or health advantages. In contrast to well-adapted industrial starters, wild-type strains that naturally dominate traditional fermentations tend to have higher metabolic capacities, which can beneficially affect product quality, for instance with regard to aroma formation and/or food safety. Natural selection is likely to have forced such strains to be more competitive by endowing them with ecological advantages (Ayad et al., 2002). The information provided from traditional fermented foods and scientific research could help develop new probiotic products for the food industry (Rivera-Espinoza and Gallardo-Navarro, 2010).

Most of the studies published today about physiological properties of strains intended to be used as probiotics are performed on strains from human or animal internal cavities, considering that strains of these origins would be better adapted and colonize the human/animal gastrointestinal tract (Johansson et al., 1993; Prasad et al., 1998; Xanthopoulos et al., 2000; Ouwehand et al., 2002; Ruiz-Moyano et al., 2009; Zacarías et al., 2011). On the other hand, research has started to increase on probiotic functions of lactic acid bacteria isolated from foods like dairy products (Maragkoudakis et al., 2006; Bao et al., 2010; Monteagudo-Mera et al., 2012; Espeche et al., 2012), dry sausages (Papamanoli et al., 2003; Pennacchia et al., 2004; De Vuyst et al., 2008), foods of plant origin (Husmaini et al., 2011), fruits, cereals, meat or fish (Rivera-Espinoza and Gallardo-Navarro, 2010). Traditional fermented foods are a plentiful source of microorganisms and some of them show probiotic characteristics, although the research of these matrices as raw material for probiotic microorganisms is still scarce compared with their dairy counterpart (Rivera-Espinoza and Gallardo-Navarro, 2010).

The aim of this work was to perform established in vitro tests to evaluate the probiotic potential and safety of 71 LAB strains originating from olive microbiota and especially from naturally fermented olives. The candidate probiotic strains that fulfil the established criteria could therefore be potentially used as novel probiotic strains by the table olive industry and food industry in general.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A total of 71 strains, isolated from naturally fermented olives of cv. Conservolea and Halkidiki, as well as 2 reference strains, namely Lb. casei Shirota (ACA-DC 6002) and Lb. rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) were screened for their probiotic potential, following a series of in vitro tests according to relevant proposed guidelines (FAO/WHO, 2002). The studied strains included 17 Ln. mesenteroides, 1 Ln. pseudomesenteroides, 13 Lb. plantarum, 1 Lb. paraplantarum, 37 Lb. pentosus and 2 Lb. paracasei

Survival under conditions simulating the human GI tract

In order to act as a probiotic in the gastrointestinal tract and to exert their beneficial effect on the host, the bacteria must be able to survive the acidic conditions in the stomach and resist bile acids at the beginning of the small intestine (Holzapfel et al., 1998; Klaenhammer and Kullen, 1999). Approximately 2.5 l of gastric juice (Cotter and Hill, 2003) and 1 l of bile (Begley et al., 2005) are secreted into the human digestive tract every day. Thus, it is essential for the bacteria to

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of this study showed that 4 strains of Lb. pentosus (E281, E97, E104, E108), 3 strains of Lb. plantarum (B282, E10, E69), and two strains of Lb. paracasei subsp. paracasei (E93, E94) were found to possess desirable in vitro probiotic properties similar or superior to the reference probiotic strains Lb. casei Shirota and Lb. rhamnosus GG. The summarized results obtained from all in vitro tests for these strains are given in Table 3. These strains are good candidates

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the EU (FP7/2007–2013), under grant agreement no 243471-PROBIOLIVES. The information in this document reflects only the authors' views and the Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. The authors would like to thank Dr. A.I. Doulgeraki for strain identification and Mrs. A. Damaskinou for technical assistance.

References (100)

  • P.L. Conway et al.

    Survival of lactic acid bacteria in the human stomach and adhesion to intestinal cells

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1987)
  • Cross

    Microbes versus microbes: immune signals generated by probiotic lactobacilli and their role in protection against microbial pathogens

    FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • M.R. D'Aimmo et al.

    Antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacterium spp. isolated from dairy and pharmaceutical products

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2007)
  • M. Danielsen et al.

    Susceptibility of Lactobacillus ssp. to antimicrobial agents

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • B.Z. De Rodas et al.

    Hypocholesterolemic action of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 and calcium in swine with hypocholesterolemia induced by diet

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1996)
  • A. Doulgeraki et al.

    Molecular characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from industrially fermented Greek table olives

    LWT-Food Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • M. Du Toit et al.

    Characterisation and selection of probiotic lactobacilli for a preliminary minipig feeding trial and their effect on serum cholestrerol levels, faeces pH and faeces moisture content

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (1998)
  • M.C. Espeche et al.

    Lactic acid bacteria from raw milk as potentially beneficial strains to prevent bovine mastitis

    Anaerobe

    (2012)
  • C.M. Franz et al.

    Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2011)
  • M. Gänzle et al.

    Effect of ecological factors on the inhibitory spectrum and activity of bacteriocins

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • M.G. Gänzle et al.

    Effect of bacteriocin-producing lactobacilli on the survival of Escherichia coli and Listeria in a dynamic model of the stomach and the small intestine

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • W.H. Holzapfel et al.

    Overview of gut flora and robiotics

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (1998)
  • H. Jensen et al.

    In vitro testing of commercial and potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • S. Kastner et al.

    Antibiotic susceptibility patterns and resistance genes of starter cultures and probiotic bacteria used in food

    Syst. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • A.K. Katla et al.

    Antimicrobial susceptibility of starter culture bacteria used in Norwegian dairy products

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2001)
  • T.R. Klaenhammer et al.

    Selection and design of probiotics

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • M.T. Liong et al.

    Acid and bile tolerance and cholesterol removal ability of L actobacilli strains

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (2005)
  • C. Liu et al.

    Antibiotic resistance of probiotic strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from marketed foods and drugs

    Biomed. Environ. Sci.

    (2009)
  • P.A. Maragkoudakis et al.

    Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products

    Int. Dairy J.

    (2006)
  • M.L. Marco et al.

    Towards understanding molecular modes of probiotic action

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2006)
  • P. Marteau et al.

    Survival of lactic acid bacteria in a dynamic model of the stomach and small intestine: validation and the effects of bile

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1997)
  • C. Mottet et al.

    Probiotics: wanted dead or alive

    Dig. Liver Dis.

    (2005)
  • M.N. Oliveira et al.

    Effect of milk supplementation on acidification, textural properties and microbiological stability of fermented milks containing probiotic bacteria

    Int. Dairy J.

    (2001)
  • A.C. Ouwehand et al.

    The health effects of cultured milk products with viable and non viable bacteria

    Int. Dairy J.

    (1998)
  • E. Papamanoli et al.

    Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a Greek dry-fermented sausage in respect to their technological and probiotic properties

    Meat Sci.

    (2003)
  • J.H. Park et al.

    Encapsulated Bifidobacterium bifidum potentiates intestinal IgA production

    Cell. Immunol.

    (2002)
  • C. Pennacchia et al.

    Selection of Lactobacillus strains from fermented sausages for their potential use as probiotics

    Meat Sci.

    (2004)
  • F.C. Prado et al.

    Trends in non-dairy probiotic beverages

    Food Res. Int.

    (2008)
  • J. Prasad et al.

    Selection and characterisation of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains for use as probiotics

    Int. Dairy J.

    (1998)
  • B. Ripamonti et al.

    Screening of species-specific lactic acid bacteria for veal calves multi-strain probiotic adjuncts

    Anaerobe

    (2011)
  • Y. Rivera-Espinoza et al.

    Non-dairy probiotic products

    Food Microbiol.

    (2010)
  • S. Ruiz-Moyano et al.

    Screening of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria for potential probiotic use in Iberian dry-fermented sausages

    Meat Sci.

    (2008)
  • S. Ruiz-Moyano et al.

    Application of Lactobacillus fermentum HL57 and Pediococcus acidilactici SP979 as potential probiotics in the manufacture of traditional Iberian dry-fermented sausages

    Food Microbiol.

    (2011)
  • M.E. Sanders et al.

    Performance of commercial cultures in Fluid milk applications

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1996)
  • N.P. Shah

    Functional cultures and health benefits

    Int. Dairy J.

    (2007)
  • N. Sridevi et al.

    Hypocholesteremic effect of bile salt hydrolase from Lactobacillus buchneri ATCC 4005

    Food Res. Int.

    (2009)
  • T. Takahashi et al.

    Absence of cholic acid 7α-dehydroxylase activity in the strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1994)
  • R. Temmerman et al.

    Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from probiotic products

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2003)
  • L.A. Thomas et al.

    Mechanism for the transit-induced increase in colonic deoxycholic acid formation in cholesterol cholelithiasis

    Gastroenterology

    (2000)
  • M.J. Veysey et al.

    Colonic transit influences deoxycholic acid kinetics

    Gastroenterology

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text