Elsevier

Fisheries Research

Volume 213, May 2019, Pages 196-203
Fisheries Research

Sizing up the role of predators on Mullus barbatus populations in Mediterranean trawl and no-trawl areas

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.01.023Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We show that the white grouper and the black-bellied anglerfish are the most important predators of the red mullet in Mediterranean areas.

  • We show how predators of an important demersal target species (Mullus barbatus) can increase after a decadal trawling ban.

  • Our results show a potential re-establishment of the trophic role for white grouper inside the untrawled areas.

  • Our study focus on the possible benefits obtained from the use of large offshore marine protected areas as a tool for ecosystem conservation.

Abstract

Fishing leads to drastic changes in ecosystems with a net loss of predatory biomass. This issue has been evidenced from historical ecological studies and from the evaluation of the effects of effective and large marine protected areas. In two fishery reserves off the northern Sicily coast the red mullet Mullus barbatus underwent an impressive biomass increment and a few piscivores fish species recovered after a trawl ban. The red mullet, more than 20% of all demersal fish in the untrawled areas, represented a huge food resource to its potential predators. By contrasting two trawled and two untrawled gulfs we figured out predator - prey relationships through the use of a combined approach based on trophic niche, stable isotopes data and biomass. We show that the white grouper Epinephelus aeneus and the black-bellied anglerfish Lophius budegassa are the most important predators of the red mullet with higher biomass in the untrawled areas. We also found a potential re-establishment of the trophic role for white grouper inside the untrawled areas. Our study highlights some of the benefits obtained from the use of large offshore marine protected areas as a tool for ecosystem restoration.

Introduction

Fishing affects the structure and composition of fish populations and assemblages in different ways, leading to drastic changes in their size structure, abundance, composition and diversity (Bianchi et al., 2000; Gristina et al., 2006; McCauley et al., 2015). In intensely fished areas the loss of predatory biomass determine ultimately a reshuffle of trophic cascade processes (Estes et al., 2011; Pauly, 1998; Sala, 2004). In such cases a decline of the average trophic level of the fish community has often been observed, which is sometimes compensated by a biomass increase of the species at the base of the food web (Prugh et al., 2009) with a consequent alteration of the ecosystem functioning and of the integrity of benthic habitats (Bascompte et al., 2005; De Juan et al., 2007; Graham et al., 2017; Guillemot et al., 2014; Stevens et al., 2000; Thrush et al., 2011).

Historical studies have been carried out in different parts of the world that clearly suggest higher abundance and larger size of predators in ancient times (Lotze et al., 2011; McClanahan and Omukoto, 2011; Shaffer et al., 1998). In recent times, the assessment of the effects of marine protected areas (MPAs) provide an idea of the status of predatory fish assemblages before intense human exploitation. In particular, no-take MPAs have proven effective at replenishing fish stocks especially of predator species targeted by fishermen, restoring ecosystems and rebuilding food webs (Claudet et al., 2011; Edgar et al., 2014; Garcia Charton et al., 2000; Lester et al., 2009; Sala and Giakoumi, 2018). While such evidence comes mainly from coastal rocky habitats (Di Franco et al., 2018), data from soft-bottom offshore areas show that also partial protection, namely from industrial fishing may effectively lead to a recovery of fishery resources (Bailey, 1997; Fisher and Frank, 2004; Florin et al., 2013; Jaworski et al., 2006; Murawski et al., 2000).

In areas such as the Mediterranean Sea, where fisheries resources have been exploited for centuries (D’Arienzo and Di Salvia, 2010; Piroddi et al., 2015) it is hard to figure out the trophic relationships and the width and complexity of the trophic web in a pristine ecosystem where top predators must have been larger and more abundant (Jackson et al., 2001; Piroddi et al., 2015; Valdivia et al., 2017). Most Mediterranean MPAs have been established to protect inshore rocky areas and include zones at different degree of protection where the absence or strong reduction of fishing has often led to an increase of mesopredators like serranids, scorpaenids, seabreams and labrids, which are the main targets of artisanal and recreational fishermen (Di Franco et al., 2018, 2016; Sala et al., 2012). The effects of protection in Mediterranean MPAs however cannot be directly extrapolated to the ecosystem at a regional scale due to the small size of their no-take zones (<2 km2 in 60% of MPAs) (Di Franco et al., 2018). Fishery reserves and other spatial management tools created to limit or forbid non-selective fishing activities like trawling occur in larger, soft-bottom offshore areas that host the vast majority of Mediterranean commercial fisheries (Pipitone et al., 2014). To date, few studies have been performed on the ecosystem functioning and trophic structure of such large managed areas.

A case of Mediterranean fishery reserve is provided by two trawl exclusion areas implemented in 1990 off the northern Sicily coast in the Gulf of Castellammare (GCAST) and the Gulf of Patti (GPATT) (Pipitone et al., 2000; Whitmarsh et al., 2003). In GCAST the trawlable resources of the continental shelf, including piscivores like the hake Merluccius merluccius and the black bellied anglerfish Lophius budegassa recovered dramatically after the trawl ban (Badalamenti et al., 2008; Pipitone et al., 2000) and a similar, although less notable biomass increase was observed in GPATT (Potoschi et al., 2006). Despite the increase of teleosts, the elasmobranch assemblage did not seem to recover on the continental shelf of both gulfs (Arena and Bombace, 1970; Badalamenti et al., 2003) although a few species of sharks and rays are occasionally caught by professional fishermen (pers. observ.). Among soft-bottom benthic mesopredators the red mullet Mullus barbatus, an important target of Mediterranean fishing fleets (Tserpes et al., 2002) underwent an impressive biomass increment in GCAST and GPATT since the trawl ban (Pipitone et al., 2000; Potoschi et al., 2006, 1995), becoming one of the most abundant species in the trawlable assemblage (33.7%, 24% and 19.5% of total demersal biomass after 15 years of trawl ban in GCAST in the 10–50 m, 51–100 m and 101–200 m depth ranges respectively) (Badalamenti et al., 2003). The recovery of the red mullet was attributed to a concurrence of management effects and biological traits, namely the effects of reduced fishing mortality on its spawning stock biomass and on its recruitment pattern, an increased abundance of larger and more fecund females and an early age at first maturity (Fiorentino et al., 2008). Moreover in the Gulf of Castellammare, the trophic level of red mullet came out unexpectedly high (about 4.2 for adults with >13.5 cm total length) (Badalamenti et al., 2008) and close to that of top marine predators (Cortes, 1999; Jennings and Van Der Molen, 2015; Stergiou and Karpouzi, 2002), which was explained with an adult diet based on carnivorous polychaetes (Badalamenti et al., 2002).

Although a number of studies have investigated the trophodynamics of the red mullet including feeding habits (Caragitsou and Tsimenidis, 1982; Lipari et al., 1998; Vassilopoulou and Papaconstantinou, 1993), interspecific trophic interactions (Badalamenti et al., 1993), resource partitioning with other species (Bautista-Vega et al., 2008; Golani, 1994; Labropoulou and Papadopoulou-Smith, 1999) and trophic level (Badalamenti et al., 2008, 2002), the relationships with its predators remain poorly investigated. It is especially interesting to investigate such relationships in an ecosystem that is recovering from intense trawling, where theoretically it could be assumed that non-selective piscivores have a diet composed of more than 20% (i.e., mean biomass of all strata) of red mullet. Dell et al. (2015) have shown that longer and more complex food webs have developed in a tropical no-take MPA with changes in the diet of a mid-level consumer such as grouper, possibly as a consequence of increased prey availability. A similar situation could have developed in the two untrawled Sicilian gulfs, where the increased red mullet biomass represents a huge food resource to its potential predators. A few ecological questions arise: have predators increased as a consequence of protection? Have they benefited from an increased potential prey in the untrawled gulfs? Does the red mullet have the same importance as a prey in the different gulfs? In order to answer the above questions, we contrasted two untrawled and two trawled areas, to assess (i) what are the main predators of the red mullet, and (ii) if their biomass is higher in the untrawled areas.

Section snippets

Study area

The study area comprised four localities off the northern Sicily coast (Fig. 1): the Gulfs of Castellammare (GCAST, 38°03′N 12°54′E), Termini Imerese (GTERM, 38°00′N 13°44′E), Sant’Agata (GSANT, 38°03′N 14°23′E) and Patti (GPATT, 38°10′N 15°06′E). GCAST and GPATT are no-trawl areas subject to a year-round ban on commercial trawling since 1990 (Regional Act no. 25/1990), while artisanal and recreational fishing are permitted (Pipitone et al., 2000; Potoschi et al., 1995). GTERM and GSANT host

Identification of predators

The initial list of potential red mullet predators responding to basic ecological criteria, included ten elasmobranchs and nine teleosts (Table 1).

The red mullet exhibited the highest mean δ15N values in the two untrawled gulfs (GCAST: 10.62 ± 0.81‰, GPATT: 9.61 ± 0.62‰), while δ13C values were similar among all gulfs. The ellipse overlap analysis (Fig. 2, Table 3) suggests that, among the nineteen species initially identified, the following four species can be considered predators of the red

Discussion

Our study suggests that E. aeneus and L. budegassa are the main potential predators of the red mullet in the study area. Curiously, the feeding habits of these two fish genera are poorly studied overall, and this is particularly so for our two species. However, along the Ivorian coast (western Africa) E. aeneus is known to feed primarily on fish and secondarily on crustaceans (Kouassi et al., 2010) while in the Cyclades Islands (eastern Mediterranean) its main preys are fish followed by

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Mr Giuseppe Di Stefano and Mrs Marilena Coppola for the precious help provided during field sampling and laboratory analysis. This work has been realized with the contribution of the Italian Ministry of Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali, project n. 6A84.

References (100)

  • C. Pipitone et al.

    Spatial management of fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea: problematic issues and a few Success stories

  • I. Preciado et al.

    The role of pelagic fish as forage for the demersal fish community in the southern Bay of Biscay

    J. Mar. Syst.

    (2008)
  • C.J. Sweeting et al.

    Effects of body size and environment on diet-tissue δ15N fractionation in fishes

    J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.

    (2007)
  • C.J. Sweeting et al.

    Effects of body size and environment on diet-tissue δ13C fractionation in fishes

    J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.

    (2007)
  • V. Vassilopoulou et al.

    Feeding habits of red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in a gulf in western Greece

    Fish. Res.

    (1993)
  • D. Whitmarsh et al.

    The economic sustainability of artisanal fisheries: the case of the trawl ban in the Gulf of Castellammare, NW Sicily

    Mar. Policy

    (2003)
  • M. Albo-Puigserver et al.

    Feeding ecology and trophic position of three sympatric demersal chondrichthyans in the northwestern Mediterranean

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2015)
  • F. Andaloro et al.

    Food and feeding habits of the amberjack, Seriola dumerii in the Central Mediterranean Sea during the spawning season

    Cah. Biol. Mar.

    (1997)
  • F. Andaloro et al.

    Contribution to the knowledge of the age, growth and feeding of hake Merluccius Merluccius (L.1758) in the Sicilian Channel

    FAO Fishery Reports

    (1985)
  • P. Arena et al.

    Bionomie benthique et faune ichthyologique des fonds del’etage circalittoral et bathyal des golfes de Castellammare (Sicile N±O) et de Patti (Sicile NE)

    Journees Ichthyol. CIESM Rome

    (1970)
  • M.P. Armstrong et al.

    Food and ontogenetic shifts in feeding of the goosefish, Lophius americanus

    J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci

    (1996)
  • R. Babcock et al.

    Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2010)
  • F. Badalamenti et al.

    Relazioni trofiche tra quattro specie ittiche catturate su differenti substrati nel Golfo di Castellammare (Sicilia N/O)

    Biol. Mar. Mediterr.

    (1993)
  • F. Badalamenti et al.

    Size-related trophodynamic changes in three target fish species recovering from intensive trawling

    Mar. Biol.

    (2002)
  • F. Badalamenti et al.

    Case study 1: the Gulf of Castellammare, sicily, Italy

  • F. Badalamenti et al.

    Ricostituzione delle risorse di pesca in un’area precedentemente soggetta ad intenso sfruttamento: dinamiche a larga scala del popolamento ittico e della struttura trofica della comunità marina

    (2007)
  • F. Badalamenti et al.

    Limited trophodynamics effects of trawling on three Mediterranean fishes

    Mar. Biol.

    (2008)
  • J. Bascompte et al.

    Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2005)
  • A.A. Bautista-Vega et al.

    Difference in diet and size-related trophic level in two sympatric fish species, the red mullets Mullus barbatus and Mullus surmuletus, in the Gulf of Lions (north-west Mediterranean Sea)

    J. Fish Biol.

    (2008)
  • G. Bianchi et al.

    Impact of fishing on size composition and diversity of demersal fish communities

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2000)
  • E. Caragitsou et al.

    Seasonal changes and comparative analysis of the food of the red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in the Gulfs of Saronikos and Thermaikos

    Thalassographica

    (1982)
  • S. Caut et al.

    Variation in discrimination factors (Δ15N and Δ13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • A. Celona et al.

    Bluntnose sixgill shark, Hexanchus griseus (Bonnaterre, 1788), in the eastern north Sicilian waters

    Bollettino Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale Di Venezia

    (2005)
  • J. Claudet et al.

    Combined effects of levels of protection and environmental variables at different spatial resolutions on fish assemblages in a marine protected area

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2011)
  • E. Cortes

    Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (1999)
  • W.W. Crozier

    Observations on the food and feeding of the angler‐fish, Lophim piscatorius L., in the northern Irish Sea

    J. Fish Biol.

    (1985)
  • V. D’Arienzo et al.

    Pesci, barche, pescatori nell’area mediterranea dal medioevo all’età contemporanea

    (2010)
  • D. Damalas et al.

    “Once upon a time in the Mediterranean” long term trends of Mediterranean fisheries resources based on fishers’ traditional ecological knowledge

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • S. De Juan et al.

    Functional changes as indicators of trawling disturbance on a benthic community located in a fishing ground (NW Mediterranean Sea)

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2007)
  • C. Dell et al.

    Effect of marine protected areas (MPAs) on consumer diet: MPA fish feed higher in the food chain

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2015)
  • J. Desse et al.

    Pêche et surpêche en Méditerranée: le témoignage des os

    Exploitation des Animaux Sauvages a Travers le Temps

    (1993)
  • A. Di Franco et al.

    Five key attributes can increase marine protected areas performance for small-scale fisheries management

    Sci. Rep.

    (2016)
  • G.J. Edgar et al.

    Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features

    Nature

    (2014)
  • J.A. Estes et al.

    Trophic downgrading of planet Earth

    Science

    (2011)
  • E. Fanelli et al.

    Feeding habits of blackmouth catshark Galeus melastomus Rafinesque, 1810 and velvet belly lantern shark Etmopterus spinax (Linnaeus, 1758) in the western Mediterranean

    J. Appl. Ichthyol.

    (2009)
  • F. Fiorentino et al.

    Changes in spawning-stock structure and recruitment pattern of red mullet, Mullus barbatus, after a trawl ban in the Gulf of Castellammare (central Mediterranean Sea)

    ICES J. Mar. Sci.

    (2008)
  • J.A.D. Fisher et al.

    Abundance-distribution relationships and conservation of exploited marine fishes

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2004)
  • A.B. Florin et al.

    Effects of a large northern European no-take zone on flatfish populationsa

    J. Fish Biol.

    (2013)
  • I. Garcia Charton et al.

    Evaluating the ecological effects of Mediterranean marine protected areas: habitat, scale and the natural variability of ecosystems

    Environ. Conserv.

    (2000)
  • D. Golani

    Niche separation between colonizing and indigenous goatfish (Mullidae) along the Mediterranean coast of Israel

    J. Fish Biol.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Effects of a trawling ban on the growth of young-of-the-year European hake, Merluccius merluccius in a Mediterranean fishing exclusion zone

      2022, Regional Studies in Marine Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Their effectiveness as fisheries management tools aimed at recovering the biomass and size structure of fish stocks, including protection and enhancement of smaller fish (Sweeting et al., 2009) has been widely discussed (see e.g., Sumaila et al., 2000; Jaworski et al., 2006; Alemany et al., 2013). Fishing exclusion zones also provide a chance to investigate the dynamics of recovery from fishing from a wider ecological standpoint (Murawski et al., 2000; Badalamenti et al., 2002; Sinopoli et al., 2012; Agnetta et al., 2019). Data on the age and growth of fishes are essential for understanding their biological traits and for studying their population structure and dynamics (Panfili et al., 2002).

    • Incorporating ecosystem services conservation into a scenario-based MSP framework: An Adriatic case study

      2020, Ocean and Coastal Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since fishing capacity increased enormously during the last decades (Fortibuoni, 2010), making the Adriatic Sea the portion of Mediterranean Sea with the highest concentration of trawlers (Russo et al., 2019), many exploited fish stocks (Colloca et al., 2013) and vulnerable species (i.e., elasmobranchs and large-sized species; Ferretti et al., 2008; Fortibuoni et al., 2017) considerably declined because of the unsustainable exploitation rates and the low selectivity of trawling fisheries (Colloca et al., 2013). Conservation measures have to strongly address such excessive pressure (Dureuil et al., 2018) with an effective enforcement of fishing control (Tassetti et al., 2019), favoring a positive long-term effect on fish stocks due to the protection of recruits (Agnetta et al., 2019; Scarcella et al., 2014), and drastically reducing the potential bycatch of pelagic species in the area. The measures from the EU Common Fishery Policy, CFP (EC, 2014) include the closure of areas where juveniles congregate at the end of their planktonic dispersal phase.

    • The use of Mean Life Span index as indicator of ecological status in trawled areas: Preliminary observations

      2022, 2022 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for the Sea; Learning to Measure Sea Health Parameters, MetroSea 2022 - Proceedings
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text