Elsevier

Fisheries Research

Volume 144, July 2013, Pages 91-102
Fisheries Research

Characterizing daily movements, nomadic movements, and reproductive migrations of Panulirus argus around the Western Sambo Ecological Reserve (Florida, USA) using acoustic telemetry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.12.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The movements of the Caribbean spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) were studied in three subregions: (1) patch reefs, (2) forereef, and (3) outlier reef, in and around the Western Sambo Ecological Reserve (WSER) (Florida, USA) using acoustic tags and receivers. The studies took place from the June 2003 through July 2007 and involved various receiver deployments such as tracking grids and emigration rings designed to track relatively short daily movements and long-distance (>1 km) movements. Daily movements were found to be highly repetitive in some individual lobsters in both the patch reef and the forereef. Some forereef lobsters shifted foraging preference between the forereef itself (63%), a shallow back reef area (10%), reef base (9%), and a deeper reef base area (4%), with undetermined making up the remainder. Approximately one-third of the patch reef resident lobsters exhibited significantly enhanced nocturnal movements during periods of low or no lunar illumination. Twenty-two nomadic movements were detected and occurred throughout the year and included individuals that moved between Western Sambo Ecological Reserve and the outlier reef south of the reserve. Lateral movements detected along the forereef were exhibited by only a few male lobsters. Reproductive migrations by reproductively active female lobsters were observed in all subregions. These movements are characterized by a sudden rapid southward move initiated near midnight. For patch reef and forereef females, the destination is deep water to the south of the forereef. Outlier reef females moved to deeper water to their south. Up to three reproductive migrations were conducted at a median interval of 25 days (16 multiple trips detected). With respect to one of WSER's stated management goals, i.e., to protect life histories, lobster movements have shown that the outlier reef subregion, located 1 km south of the southern WSER border, is integral to the spiny lobster life history and should be considered for inclusion into WSER.

Highlights

► We studied spiny lobster movement with acoustic telemetry. ► Most female lobsters in all areas made up to 3 reproductive migrations to deep water. ► The median interval between reproductive migrations was 25 days. ► Some lobsters increased nighttime activity during new moon. ► Many lobster movements occurred between the outlier reef and inside WSER.

Introduction

Ecological reserves are a relatively recent addition to the ecological management landscape of the Florida Keys. In July 1997, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) established the Western Sambo Ecological Reserve (WSER) within the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS). The objectives of the reserve are to “protect marine life natural histories within large contiguous diverse habitats, protect and enhance natural spawning, and provide replenishment of marine life to the surrounding areas” (DOC, 1996). The performance of these objectives was put to the test through a series of monitoring projects (Keller and Donahue, 2006), of which the monitoring of abundance and size of the Caribbean spiny lobster, Panulirus argus (Latreille, 1804), was a part. Understanding movement patterns of lobsters can also provide a means of evaluating a reserve's potential of meeting those performance standards by providing information about habitat use, home range, migrations, retention times and spillover, and location of spawning grounds (Bertelsen and Hornbeck, 2009, Goñi et al., 2008, Hovel and Lowe, 2007).

Movement patterns of lobsters have been described in studies using a variety of techniques such as trap monitoring (Crawford and de Smidt, 1922, Davis, 1974, Lyons et al., 1981), tag-recapture with traps (Creaser and Travis, 1950, Gardner et al., 2003, Gregory et al., 1982, Hunt et al., 1991, Linnane et al., 2005, Warner et al., 1977), tag-recapture with diver surveys (Cox et al., 1997, Davis, 1974, Hunt et al., 1991, Kelly and MacDiarmid, 2003), and acoustic technology (Bertelsen and Hornbeck, 2009, Herrnkind and McLean, 1971, Herrnkind et al., 1975, Jernakoff et al., 1987, Kelly, 2001, MacArthur et al., 2008, Olsen et al., 1971, Scopel et al., 2009). While each of these techniques has its own strengths and weaknesses (see Herrnkind, 1980), only acoustic technologies offer the ability to track (e.g., Simpfendorfer et al., 2002, Giacalone et al., 2005) or reveal the location of individual lobsters regardless of water clarity, time of day, depth of water, or weather conditions. When omnidirectional recording receivers became readily available in the 1990s, larger-scale movements on the order of kilometers or tens of kilometers could be quantified and timed using gates and other configurations of receivers (Heupel et al., 2006).

Ninety years ago, P. argus was described as a sluggish animal and incapable of locating the same den from day to day but perhaps capable of long distance movements (Crawford and de Smidt, 1922). By the 1970s this view was changing rapidly. Traditional tag-recapture studies (Warner et al., 1977, Gregory et al., 1982) established that P. argus was capable of movements of tens of kilometers. Acoustic technologies were first used to study spiny lobster movement in the early 1970s. In St. Thomas, USVI, during the Tektite II project Olsen et al. (1971), used acoustic tags and directional hydrophones to describe in detail nightly movement patterns, which varied from lobsters remaining near a given den to traveling as far as 200 m to forage and returning a few hours before dawn. Some lobsters were observed to navigate both along and across surge channels and to move across open sand plains. A strong homing ability was also observed, even when lobsters had been experimentally displaced (Herrnkind and McLean, 1971). Later, Boles and Lohmann (2003) experimentally demonstrated that P. argus used the earth's magnetic field for orientation.

Since the 1990s, omnidirectional recording receivers have been predominately used to study spiny lobster movement. In addition, tags have been greatly miniaturized permitting tagging a wide range of size of animals (Heupel et al., 2005). Subsequent studies of spiny lobsters using either electromagnetic or acoustic tracking have for example, included determining foraging distances of Panulirus cygnus (Jernakoff et al., 1987) and Panulirus interruptus (Hovel and Lowe, 2007), general large scale movements and site fidelity of Jasus edwardsii (Gardner et al., 2003, Kelly, 2001); and migration and emigration of P. cygnus (MacArthur et al., 2008).

The movement patterns of lobsters, including P. argus, have been reviewed by Herrnkind (1980) and Childress and Jury (2006). Herrnkind (1980) defined three categories in basically spatial terms: (1) homing (the ability for a lobster to locate a previously occupied shelter after foraging), (2) nomadic (undirected long movements that may require more than one night that move a lobster away from its normal forage/shelter area), and (3) migratory (such as movements that take a reproductively active female from its forage/shelter area to a different area to release eggs). Childress and Jury's (2006) categories focused on temporal aspects of movement: (1) daily, (2) ontogenetic, and (3) seasonal. Daily movements in this study refer to the diurnal shelter by day and forage by night movements. Ontogenetic movements pertaining to changes in lobster shelter preferences and habitats such as when juvenile lobster mature (Bertelsen et al., 2009). Seasonal movement patterns refer to yearly cycles such as movements that characterize the reproductive season. Portions of both spatial and temporal classification systems are used herein.

This study builds upon previous work conducted in WSER (Bertelsen and Hornbeck, 2009). All these acoustic studies were designed to evaluate the performance of the Western Sambo Ecological Reserve with respect to spiny lobster movement and potential interaction with the Reserve's boundaries (see Keller and Donahue, 2006) and as such we were exploring the movements of lobsters without a preconceived hypothesis to prove or disprove. Indeed, the discovery of the reproductive migrations by females in the patch reef area in the first study directly influenced our subsequent broader area based exploration of movement over the course of a year. And finally, the inability to track lobsters within the rocky forereef area, influenced a concluding study that intensely focused on a small subset of the forereef. The overall objectives of these studies were (1) to detect and characterize daily movement patterns, emigrations, and migrations of P. argus throughout WSER and surrounding habitats and (2) to discuss, based on this knowledge of lobster movements, the strengths and weaknesses of the current design of WSER.

Section snippets

Study site

The studies were conducted in an area that included the southern half of WSER and outlier reef located approximately 1 km south (Fig. 1). WSER protects 30 km2, from the shoreline of Boca Chica Key to the base of the Western Sambo forereef (approximately 9 km), with an average width of approximately 3.5 km.

Although spiny lobsters are present in virtually all areas of this region at night, by day they seek shelter in hard crevices to avoid daytime predators. This behavior tends to concentrate their

Overall summary

Over the course of the four studies (Table 1), nearly 1 million tag transmissions were recorded by the acoustic receivers. Of the 143 tags placed on lobsters in WSER, only four tags were never detected by any receiver; one tag was detected only once. Very few tags were continually detected during the tracking grid and tracking line deployments. More commonly, several gaps of a few days would occur in a tag's record, presumably when the lobster had moved into an area, where either through

Daily movements

The Tektite II team (Olsen et al., 1971, Herrnkind and McLean, 1971, Herrnkind et al., 1975) was the first to acoustically tag and track spiny lobster and to augment those data with visual surveys by divers. Their detailed descriptions of movement was fortunate for us, because visual confirmation of our tracking and nomadic data was virtually impossible due to poor visibility or, in the case of the deeper waters south of the forereef, because SCUBA limitations at those depths. Nevertheless, all

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) for permitting support and FKNMS and US Navy for boat dockage space. We also thank the following Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission staff for support in the field; P. Barbera, C. Cox, A. Dahood, D. Eaken, M. Feeley, J. Giganti, C. Lewis, T. Matthews, K. Maxwell, K. Miller, B. Sharp, J. Simonds, and M. Tellier. Also assisting in the field were FKNMS staffer S. Braynard and über-volunteer D.

References (48)

  • W.F. Herrnkind

    Spiny lobsters: patterns of movement

  • P. Jernakoff et al.

    A quantitative study of nocturnal foraging distances of the western rock lobster Panulirus cygnus (George)

    J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (1987)
  • Bertelsen, R.D., Cox, C., 2001. Sanctuary roles in population and reproductive dynamics of Carribbean spiny lobster....
  • R.D. Bertelsen et al.

    Regional characterisation of hard-bottom nursery habitat for juvenile Caribbean spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) using rapid assessment techniques

    N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2009)
  • R.D. Bertelsen et al.

    Using acoustic tagging to determine adult spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) movement patterns in the Western Sambo Ecological Reserve (Florida, United States)

    N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2009)
  • R.D. Bertelsen et al.

    Fecundity dynamics of female spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) in a south Florida fishery and Dry Tortugas National Park lobster sanctuary

    Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2001)
  • L.C. Boles et al.

    True navigation and magnetic maps in spiny lobsters

    Nature

    (2003)
  • M.J. Childress et al.

    Behaviour

  • C. Cox et al.

    Change in size and abundance of Caribbean spiny lobsters, Panulirus argus, in a marine reserve in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, USA

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2005)
  • C. Cox et al.

    Nocturnal foraging of the Caribbean spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) on offshore reefs of Florida, USA

    Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (1997)
  • D.R. Crawford et al.

    The spiny lobster, Panulirus argus, of southern Florida: its natural history and utilization

    Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish.

    (1922)
  • E.P. Creaser et al.

    Evidence of a homing instinct in the Bermuda spiny lobster

    Science

    (1950)
  • Davis, G.E., 1974. Notes on the status of spiny lobsters Panulirus argus at Dry Tortugas, Florida. U.S. National Park...
  • Department of Commerce
    (1996)
  • C. Gardner et al.

    Movements of the southern rock lobster Jasus edwardsii in Tasmania, Australia

    Bull. Mar. Sci.

    (2003)
  • V.M. Giacalone et al.

    Estimation of positioning error from an array of automated omnidirectional receivers in an artificial reef area

  • A. Gifi

    Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis

    (1990)
  • R. Goñi et al.

    Spillover from six western Mediterranean marine protected areas: evidence from artisanal fisheries

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2008)
  • D.R. Gregory et al.

    Reproductive dynamics of the spiny lobster Panulirus argus in South Florida

    Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.

    (1982)
  • W.F. Herrnkind et al.

    Field studies of orientation, homing, and mass emigration in the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1971)
  • W.F. Herrnkind et al.

    Preliminary study of establishment of den residency by the spiny lobster, Panulirus argus, at Grand Bahama Island

    Hydro-Lab J.

    (1975)
  • Herrnkind, W.F., Van Derwalker, J., Barr, L., 1975. Population dynamics, ecology, and behavior of spiny lobster,...
  • M. Heupel et al.

    Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays

    Mar. Freshw. Res.

    (2006)
  • Heupel, M., Simpfendorfer, C., Lowe, C., 2005. Passive acoustic telemetry technology: current applications and future...
  • Cited by (35)

    • Movement patterns analysis as a tool in Fully Protected Areas design: Influence of relocations on travelled distances of Palinurus elephas (Fabr. 1787) in Sardinian FPAs (central-western Mediterranean)

      2022, Marine Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      They are target of MPAs conservation in several regions of the globe (Follesa et al., 2009; Withy-Allen, 2010). While some oceanic species, like Panulirus argus, P. cygnus, Palinurus delagoae and P. gilchristi are known to undertake long migrations between shallow coastal to deeper offshore waters (e.g. Bertelsen, 2013; Boles and Lohmann, 2003; De Lestang, 2014; Frisch 2007; Groeneveld, 2002; Kelly and MacDiarmid, 2003; Santos et al., 2014), usually linked to reproduction, others, like Jasus edwardsii, show a higher site fidelity and are generally considered as sedentary (MacDiarmid et al., 1991; Linnane et al., 2015). In the Mediterranean basin, 4 species of Palinurids are present: Palinurus elephas, P. mauritanicus, Panulirus regius and the lessepsian migrant P. ornatus.

    • Residency and dispersal of three sportfish species from a coastal marine reserve: Insights from a regional-scale acoustic telemetry network

      2020, Global Ecology and Conservation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, these details help evaluate whether a given reserve is large enough to encompass the home range of managed species, how the level of protection varies across fish species with different life history strategies, and whether spawning occurs within reserve boundaries or at distant locations. Passive acoustic telemetry provides a powerful fishery-independent means to answer such questions and has been increasingly used to reveal the behavior and site fidelity for various faunal groups within existing reserves including tropical and temperate reef fishes (Meyer et al., 2010), seagrass associates (March et al., 2011), sharks (Knip et al., 2012), and even invertebrates such as lobster and conch (Bertelsen, 2013). Passive telemetry uses an array of autonomous submerged receivers to record the presence of animals tagged with acoustic transmitters, revealing the long-term movement patterns generally unobtainable with traditional mark-recapture studies or active acoustic tracking (where individuals are followed with a mobile receiver).

    • Influence of light, food and predator presence on the activity pattern of the European spiny lobster Palinurus elephas: An investigation using tri-axial accelerometers

      2020, Ecological Indicators
      Citation Excerpt :

      They were less active in the presence of the predator and the pattern of activity was influenced by the presence of food. Nocturnal activity was previously documented for spiny and clawed lobster species (Goldstein et al., 2015; Bertelsen, 2013; Scopel et al., 2009; MacArthur et al., 2008) and for P. elephas (Giacalone et al., 2015). The latter authors, during an acoustic telemetry study conducted in summer on wild P. elephas inside a NW Sicily marine protected area, identified a periodicity of 24 h in their activity pattern with active movements between 20:00 and 06:00, which correspond to the most active phases found in the present study (sunset, night and sunrise).

    • Simulated mark-recovery for spatial assessment of a spiny lobster (Panulirus argus) fishery

      2015, Fisheries Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Accordingly, modeling constraints should be addressed when considering how spatial simulations can most appropriately inform fisheries management policies. First, actual movement dynamics are certainly more complex than we represented in the simulations and can affect perceived performance of assessments (Bertelsen, 2013). Our simulations did not consider the effects of size-dependent and sex-dependent movement nor density-dependent movement rates (Follesa et al., 2009; Goñi et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text