Interseeding cover crops into maize: Characterization of species performance under Mediterranean conditions
Introduction
The use of cover crops (CCs) is a recognized practice that increases diversity and offers environmental benefits such as soil and water quality improvement, nutrient recycling and weed suppression in the agroecosystem (Schipanski et al., 2014; Gabriel et al., 2012). In annual rotations, CCs are mostly planted in autumn, replacing bare fallows, and terminated in spring (García-González et al., 2018), but the limited time window for planting was pointed out as one major reason for low CC adoption (CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center), 2017; Roesch-McNally et al., 2018). In general, early planting (August–September) has been recommended to achieve greater biomass, N uptake and soil coverage during the growing period (Baraibar et al., 2018; Lawson et al., 2015; Teasdale et al., 2004). Due to the greater vegetative development, the planting date may be responsible for CC survival itself, since late planting can increase the winter kill risk, especially in legumes (Brandsæter et al., 2008; Teasdale et al., 2004) and therefore jeopardize the diversity in CC mixtures (Murrell et al., 2017). In addition, early planting dates may enhance weed suppression (Lawson et al., 2015) or ensure the CC termination efficacy in spring (Mirsky et al., 2009). Nevertheless, an early planting date choice is not always possible for the farmer. On the one hand, it depends on the previous cash crop, such as grain maize, that in some cases is harvested late. On the other hand, inclement weather may be responsible for the planting delay. Under semi-arid conditions, it is common to match the planting date with an autumnal rain, but this rain event may be delayed (Gabriel and Quemada, 2011).To overcome this problem, CCs could be established earlier in the rotation with relay intercropping (Bybee-Finley and Ryan, 2018; Hively and Cox, 2001), i.e., CC planting within the rows of the cash crop in an early vegetative stage. The relay intercropping or interseeding (IS) has been evaluated mainly in temperate climate regions. In most of these studies, IS species performance (Caswell et al., 2019; Curran et al., 2018) and the impact on the cash crop yield (Abdin et al., 1998; Noland et al., 2018) were assessed. A longer growing period can extend CC ecosystem services, and in years with high biomass production open the opportunity to harvest the CC or to terminate the CC in autumn for pasture (Gardner and Faulkner, 1991).
In Mediterranean systems, we could not find any study focus on IS of CC even if a short planting window was identified as a limitation for CC growth in years with unfavorable conditions for establishment (Gabriel and Quemada, 2011; García-Gonzalez et al., 2018; Salmerón et al., 2011). The strategies studied to increase temporal diversity in annual rotations have mainly focused on simultaneous cereal/legume intercrops (Hauggaard-Nielsen et al., 2009; Mariotti et al., 2015; Tosti et al., 2016), and the studies of IS crops have focused on winter cereals as main crops (Amossé et al., 2014; Vrignon-Brenas et al., 2016).
This study hypothesized that interseeded cover crops in irrigated maize vs. cover crops planted in autumn extend the cover crop window, lengthening their benefits in time, and offering new possibilities for annual rotation design. Our primary objective was to identify species with good performance as interseeded cover crops in irrigated maize under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Moreover, interseeded crop performance was compared with autumn cover crops planted in October, in terms of ground coverage, biomass accumulation and soil inorganic N content.
Section snippets
Experimental design
The study was conducted during two experimental years (2017/2018; 2018/2019) in the central Tajo River basin (La Chimenea Field Station. Aranjuez, Spain. 40°04′N and 3°32′W, 550 m.a.s.l.). The soil at the study site has been classified as Typic Calcixerept (Soil Survey Staff, 2014), with a loam topsoil (pH ∼8.2; organic matter: 1.06 %, Gabriel et al., 2010). The climate in the area is cold semi-arid (BSk), according to the Köppen classification. The mean annual temperature and precipitation are
Interseeded crops and autumn cover crops: establishment, ground cover and aboveground biomass
In June 2017, 10 days after the planting, only annual ryegrassIS, barrel medicIS and vetchIS species had emerged and seedlings were visible on all plots; and 1 month after planting, vetchIS reached ∼20 % GC (Fig. 3A). Annual ryegrassIS, barrel medicIS and yellow sweetcloverIS progressively increased the GC to reach ∼20 % at the time of maize harvest; and only vetchIS exceeded 30 %. The rest of the species did not exceed 10 % GC (Fig. 3A).
In June 2018, 10 days after the planting, all the species
Discussion
Cover crop interseeding is a technique of cropping system diversification that may boost sustainable intensification, while enhancing cover crops benefits and facilitating its management. However, it has barely been explored in semi-arid Mediterranean conditions.
Annual ryegrass and different legume species were successfully interseeded into irrigated maize at the V5 growth stage without resulting in a maize grain yield penalty under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Among the species tested,
Conclusions
This experiment characterized the performance of nine species for their use as interseeded cover crops into irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions. Barrel medic, yellow sweetclover, common vetch and annual ryegrass were identified as the most suitable, due to their performance during the summer, and they did not compromise the maize grain yield or quality. Compared to autumn CCs, interseeded crops enhanced the potential of CCs given that they enlarged the growing period and in autumn
CRediT authorship contribution statement
María Alonso-Ayuso: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Visualization. José Luis Gabriel: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition. José Luis Pancorbo: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Miguel Quemada: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (AGL2017-83283-C2-1/2-R), the Comunidad de Madrid, Spain (AGRISOST-CM S2018/BAA-4330 project) and Structural Funds 2014-2020 (ERDF and ESF) for financial support. We thank the staff from La Chimenea field station (IMIDRA) for their technical support, and we thank R. González-Lara, M.D. Raya and I. García-González for their help in labors and data collection.
References (51)
- et al.
Weed density and diversity in a long-term cover crop experiment background
Crop Prot.
(2018) - et al.
Winter survival, biomass accumulation and N mineralization of winter annual and biennial legumes sown at various times of year in Northern Temperate Regions
Eur. J. Agron.
(2008) - et al.
Replacing bare fallow with cover crops in a maize cropping system: Yield, N uptake and fertiliser fate
Eur. J. Agron.
(2011) - et al.
The role of cover crops in irrigated systems: soil salinity and salt leaching
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2012) - et al.
Cover crops to mitigate soil degradation and enhance soil functionality in irrigated land
Geoderma
(2018) - et al.
Integrated crop–livestock systems: strategies to achieve synergy between agricultural production and environmental quality
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2014) - et al.
Multicriteria decision analysis applied to cover crop species and cultivars selection
Field Crops Res.
(2015) - et al.
Effect of winter cover crop species and planting methods on maize yield and N availability under irrigated Mediterranean conditions
Field Crops Res.
(2011) - et al.
A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems
Agr. Syst.
(2014) - et al.
Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: a meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2006)
Yield losses of soybean and maize by competition with interseeded cover crops and weeds in organic-based cropping systems
Field Crops Res.
Effect of spring fertilization on ecosystem services of organic wheat and clover relay intercrops
Eur. J. Agron.
Yield and yield components of corn interseeded with cover crops
Agron. J.
Crop Evapotranspiration—guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Vol. 300
The kill date as a management tool for cover cropping success
PLoS One
Contribution of relay intercropping with legume cover crops on nitrogen dynamics in organic grain systems
Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys.
Weed suppression in cover crop monocultures and mixtures
Weed Sci.
Establishment and impact of cover crops intersown into corn
Crop Sci.
Point sampling digital imagery with ‘SamplePoint’
Environ. Monit. Assess.
Advancing intercropping research and practices in industrialized agricultural landscapes
Agriculture
Cover crop species and cultivars for drill-interseeding in Mid-Atlantic corn and soybean
Agron. J.
R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Report of the 2016-2017 Cover Crop Survey
Evaluation of cover crops drill interseeded into corn across the Mid-Atlantic region
Agron. J.
Using cover crops and cropping systems for Nitrogen management
Advances in Nitrogen management for water quality
Cited by (15)
Drought impact on cropland use monitored with AVIRIS imagery in Central Valley, California
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Conservation tillage also minimizes soil erosion and water runoff, and therefore reduce the amount of agrochemical and nutrients that reach adjacent water bodies (Delgado, 2010). Due to the benefits of the conservation tillage practices and the negative effect of the soil in the environment and water use efficiency, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) promotes maintaining plant residues on the soil surface (Mitchel et al., 2016; Alonso-Ayuso et al., 2020; FAO, 2022a). Therefore, it is important to identify the crop fields covered by plant residue or soil when mapping crop land use (Hively et al., 2018).
Influence of cover crops at the four spheres: A review of ecosystem services, potential barriers, and future directions for North America
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Eutrophication has renewed interest in quantifying the contribution of N and P from agricultural fields and watersheds. Cover crops are known as ‘catch crops’ as they capture residual nutrients after crop harvest that would otherwise be available for leaching and runoff (e.g., Alonso-Ayuso et al., 2020; Mohammed et al., 2020; Peterson et al., 2019; Abdalla et al., 2019; Tonitto et al., 2006). For example, using cereal rye and the mix of cereal rye and radish reduced N leaching loss by 80 % (Gaimaro et al., 2022).
Management of Cover Crop Intercropping for Live Mulch on Plant Productivity and Growth Resources: A Review
2023, Air, Soil and Water Research
- 1
Present address: Dep. Agricultural Production. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Avda. Complutense S/N, Madrid 28040, Spain.