Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 249, 1 April 2020, 107762
Field Crops Research

Interseeding cover crops into maize: Characterization of species performance under Mediterranean conditions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107762Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The crop diversification technique of cover crop interseeding was tested in a Mediterranean region.

  • Nine species were interseeded into irrigated maize and compared to autumn cover crops.

  • Ryegrass, common vetch, yellow sweetclover and barrel medic were the most suitable species.

  • Maize grain yield and quality were not affected by interseeded crops.

  • Interseeded crops lengthened cover crop benefits compared to autumn cover crops.

Abstract

Cover crop (CC) benefits and adoption in crop rotations may be limited by the short planting window after the cash crop. Interseeding or relay intercropping of CC is a technique that could overcome short planting windows constraints and allow CC establishment and growth. However, in Mediterranean regions this technique has been poorly implemented.

Field experiments were established in Central Spain during two consecutive growing seasons to assess the performance of different species as interseeded crops into irrigated maize (Zea mays L.). The treatments included annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) and eight legumes: burr medic (Medicago polymorpha L.), barrel medic (Medicago truncatula L.), yellow sweetclover (Melilotus officinalis L.), berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.), balansa clover (Trifolium michelanium L.), red clover (Trifolium pratense L.), Persian clover (Trifolium resupinatum L.), and common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). A bare soil was included as control treatment. After the maize harvest, the four species with the best performance were planted as autumn cover crops in adjacent plots. The ground cover was studied throughout the experimental period, and biomass and N content for each species were determined in the autumn and in the following spring prior to the cover crop termination. The soil inorganic N content was determined in spring.

Barrel medic, yellow sweetclover, common vetch and annual ryegrass were the species with the best performance in terms of soil coverage during the summer. Red clover and Persian clover had good establishment in one out of two years. None of the interseeded species impaired maize grain yield or quality. Interseeded species achieved better soil coverage and increased the biomass accrued at autumn compared to cover crops sown in October. Therefore, interseeded species ensured longer ground coverage, increasing the potential for soil quality improvement or weed suppression. Moreover, the higher biomass achieved by interseeded species ensured the survival of yellow sweetclover, which was winter killed when planted in the autumn. Interseeded cover crops enhanced the potential of N leaching reduction compared to autumn cover crops.

This experiment confirms the suitability of different species interseeded in summer into irrigated maize in Mediterranean regions, and highlights the extra benefits of this practice in annual rotations.

Introduction

The use of cover crops (CCs) is a recognized practice that increases diversity and offers environmental benefits such as soil and water quality improvement, nutrient recycling and weed suppression in the agroecosystem (Schipanski et al., 2014; Gabriel et al., 2012). In annual rotations, CCs are mostly planted in autumn, replacing bare fallows, and terminated in spring (García-González et al., 2018), but the limited time window for planting was pointed out as one major reason for low CC adoption (CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center), 2017; Roesch-McNally et al., 2018). In general, early planting (August–September) has been recommended to achieve greater biomass, N uptake and soil coverage during the growing period (Baraibar et al., 2018; Lawson et al., 2015; Teasdale et al., 2004). Due to the greater vegetative development, the planting date may be responsible for CC survival itself, since late planting can increase the winter kill risk, especially in legumes (Brandsæter et al., 2008; Teasdale et al., 2004) and therefore jeopardize the diversity in CC mixtures (Murrell et al., 2017). In addition, early planting dates may enhance weed suppression (Lawson et al., 2015) or ensure the CC termination efficacy in spring (Mirsky et al., 2009). Nevertheless, an early planting date choice is not always possible for the farmer. On the one hand, it depends on the previous cash crop, such as grain maize, that in some cases is harvested late. On the other hand, inclement weather may be responsible for the planting delay. Under semi-arid conditions, it is common to match the planting date with an autumnal rain, but this rain event may be delayed (Gabriel and Quemada, 2011).To overcome this problem, CCs could be established earlier in the rotation with relay intercropping (Bybee-Finley and Ryan, 2018; Hively and Cox, 2001), i.e., CC planting within the rows of the cash crop in an early vegetative stage. The relay intercropping or interseeding (IS) has been evaluated mainly in temperate climate regions. In most of these studies, IS species performance (Caswell et al., 2019; Curran et al., 2018) and the impact on the cash crop yield (Abdin et al., 1998; Noland et al., 2018) were assessed. A longer growing period can extend CC ecosystem services, and in years with high biomass production open the opportunity to harvest the CC or to terminate the CC in autumn for pasture (Gardner and Faulkner, 1991).

In Mediterranean systems, we could not find any study focus on IS of CC even if a short planting window was identified as a limitation for CC growth in years with unfavorable conditions for establishment (Gabriel and Quemada, 2011; García-Gonzalez et al., 2018; Salmerón et al., 2011). The strategies studied to increase temporal diversity in annual rotations have mainly focused on simultaneous cereal/legume intercrops (Hauggaard-Nielsen et al., 2009; Mariotti et al., 2015; Tosti et al., 2016), and the studies of IS crops have focused on winter cereals as main crops (Amossé et al., 2014; Vrignon-Brenas et al., 2016).

This study hypothesized that interseeded cover crops in irrigated maize vs. cover crops planted in autumn extend the cover crop window, lengthening their benefits in time, and offering new possibilities for annual rotation design. Our primary objective was to identify species with good performance as interseeded cover crops in irrigated maize under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Moreover, interseeded crop performance was compared with autumn cover crops planted in October, in terms of ground coverage, biomass accumulation and soil inorganic N content.

Section snippets

Experimental design

The study was conducted during two experimental years (2017/2018; 2018/2019) in the central Tajo River basin (La Chimenea Field Station. Aranjuez, Spain. 40°04′N and 3°32′W, 550 m.a.s.l.). The soil at the study site has been classified as Typic Calcixerept (Soil Survey Staff, 2014), with a loam topsoil (pH ∼8.2; organic matter: 1.06 %, Gabriel et al., 2010). The climate in the area is cold semi-arid (BSk), according to the Köppen classification. The mean annual temperature and precipitation are

Interseeded crops and autumn cover crops: establishment, ground cover and aboveground biomass

In June 2017, 10 days after the planting, only annual ryegrassIS, barrel medicIS and vetchIS species had emerged and seedlings were visible on all plots; and 1 month after planting, vetchIS reached ∼20 % GC (Fig. 3A). Annual ryegrassIS, barrel medicIS and yellow sweetcloverIS progressively increased the GC to reach ∼20 % at the time of maize harvest; and only vetchIS exceeded 30 %. The rest of the species did not exceed 10 % GC (Fig. 3A).

In June 2018, 10 days after the planting, all the species

Discussion

Cover crop interseeding is a technique of cropping system diversification that may boost sustainable intensification, while enhancing cover crops benefits and facilitating its management. However, it has barely been explored in semi-arid Mediterranean conditions.

Annual ryegrass and different legume species were successfully interseeded into irrigated maize at the V5 growth stage without resulting in a maize grain yield penalty under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Among the species tested,

Conclusions

This experiment characterized the performance of nine species for their use as interseeded cover crops into irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions. Barrel medic, yellow sweetclover, common vetch and annual ryegrass were identified as the most suitable, due to their performance during the summer, and they did not compromise the maize grain yield or quality. Compared to autumn CCs, interseeded crops enhanced the potential of CCs given that they enlarged the growing period and in autumn

CRediT authorship contribution statement

María Alonso-Ayuso: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Visualization. José Luis Gabriel: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing, Funding acquisition. José Luis Pancorbo: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Miguel Quemada: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (AGL2017-83283-C2-1/2-R), the Comunidad de Madrid, Spain (AGRISOST-CM S2018/BAA-4330 project) and Structural Funds 2014-2020 (ERDF and ESF) for financial support. We thank the staff from La Chimenea field station (IMIDRA) for their technical support, and we thank R. González-Lara, M.D. Raya and I. García-González for their help in labors and data collection.

References (51)

  • H. Uchino et al.

    Yield losses of soybean and maize by competition with interseeded cover crops and weeds in organic-based cropping systems

    Field Crops Res.

    (2009)
  • S. Vrignon-Brenas et al.

    Effect of spring fertilization on ecosystem services of organic wheat and clover relay intercrops

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2016)
  • O. Abdin et al.

    Yield and yield components of corn interseeded with cover crops

    Agron. J.

    (1998)
  • R.G. Allen et al.

    Crop Evapotranspiration—guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Vol. 300

    (1998)
  • M. Alonso-Ayuso et al.

    The kill date as a management tool for cover cropping success

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • C. Amossé et al.

    Contribution of relay intercropping with legume cover crops on nitrogen dynamics in organic grain systems

    Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys.

    (2014)
  • B. Baraibar et al.

    Weed suppression in cover crop monocultures and mixtures

    Weed Sci.

    (2018)
  • K.D. Belfry et al.

    Establishment and impact of cover crops intersown into corn

    Crop Sci.

    (2016)
  • D.T. Booth et al.

    Point sampling digital imagery with ‘SamplePoint’

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2006)
  • K. Bybee-Finley et al.

    Advancing intercropping research and practices in industrialized agricultural landscapes

    Agriculture

    (2018)
  • K. Caswell et al.

    Cover crop species and cultivars for drill-interseeding in Mid-Atlantic corn and soybean

    Agron. J.

    (2019)
  • R. Core Team

    R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing

    (2018)
  • CTIC (Conservation Technology Information Center)

    Report of the 2016-2017 Cover Crop Survey

    (2017)
  • W.S. Curran et al.

    Evaluation of cover crops drill interseeded into corn across the Mid-Atlantic region

    Agron. J.

    (2018)
  • S.M. Dabney et al.

    Using cover crops and cropping systems for Nitrogen management

    Advances in Nitrogen management for water quality

    (2010)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Drought impact on cropland use monitored with AVIRIS imagery in Central Valley, California

      2023, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conservation tillage also minimizes soil erosion and water runoff, and therefore reduce the amount of agrochemical and nutrients that reach adjacent water bodies (Delgado, 2010). Due to the benefits of the conservation tillage practices and the negative effect of the soil in the environment and water use efficiency, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) promotes maintaining plant residues on the soil surface (Mitchel et al., 2016; Alonso-Ayuso et al., 2020; FAO, 2022a). Therefore, it is important to identify the crop fields covered by plant residue or soil when mapping crop land use (Hively et al., 2018).

    • Influence of cover crops at the four spheres: A review of ecosystem services, potential barriers, and future directions for North America

      2023, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Eutrophication has renewed interest in quantifying the contribution of N and P from agricultural fields and watersheds. Cover crops are known as ‘catch crops’ as they capture residual nutrients after crop harvest that would otherwise be available for leaching and runoff (e.g., Alonso-Ayuso et al., 2020; Mohammed et al., 2020; Peterson et al., 2019; Abdalla et al., 2019; Tonitto et al., 2006). For example, using cereal rye and the mix of cereal rye and radish reduced N leaching loss by 80 % (Gaimaro et al., 2022).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Dep. Agricultural Production. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Avda. Complutense S/N, Madrid 28040, Spain.

    View full text