Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 114, Issue 3, 12 December 2009, Pages 361-373
Field Crops Research

Grain yield increase in cereal variety mixtures: A meta-analysis of field trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Plant ecology theory predicts that growing seed mixtures of varieties (variety mixtures) may increase grain yields compared to the average of component varieties in pure stands. Published results from field trials of cereal variety mixtures demonstrate, however, both positive and negative effects on grain yield. To investigate the prevalence and preconditions for positive mixing effects, reported grain yields of variety mixtures and pure variety stands were obtained from previously published variety trials, converted into relative mixing effects and combined using meta-analysis. Furthermore, available information on varieties, mixtures and growing conditions was used as independent variables in a series of meta-regressions. Twenty-six published studies, examining a total of 246 instances of variety mixtures of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis; on the other hand, nearly 200 studies were discarded. The accepted studies reported results on both winter and spring types of each crop species. Relative mixing effects ranged from −30% to 100% with an overall meta-estimate of at least 2.7% (p < 0.001), reconfirming the potential of overall grain yield increase when growing varieties in mixtures. The mixing effect varied between crop types, with largest and significant effects for winter wheat and spring barley. The meta-regression demonstrated that mixing effect increased significantly with (1) diversity in reported grain yields, (2) diversity in disease resistance, and (3) diversity in weed suppressiveness, all among component varieties. Relative mixing effect was also found to increase significantly with the effective number of component varieties. The effects of the latter two differed significantly between crop types. All analyzed models had large unexplained variation between mixing effects, indicating that the variables retrievable from the published studies explained only a minority of the differences among mixtures and trials.

Introduction

The mixed cultivation of different varieties of a crop species in varietal seed mixtures represents a low-tech method to increase and stabilize grain yields and to reduce the dependence on pesticides (Smithson and Lenné, 1996). Cultivation of variety mixtures of various crops is a characteristic trait of subsistence agriculture (Harlan, 1975), and it has gained increasing importance in industrialized countries also (e.g. Østergård and Jensen, 2005, Finckh and Wolfe, 1997, Wolfe et al., 2008). In variety mixtures, two or more component varieties are grown concurrently within the same field, introducing diversity to the crop stand. The hypothesis is that genetic, physiological, structural and phenological diversity among component varieties may drive beneficial interactions between varieties and between varieties and environments. For example, the commercial cultivation of cereal variety mixtures has been driven primarily by the aim of controlling foliar diseases through the introduction of diversity in disease resistance genes (Finckh and Wolfe, 1997). The possible benefits include better overall utilization of resources and buffering against variation in environmental factors, potentially resulting in higher and more stable crop yields (Simmonds, 1962, Wolfe et al., 2008). The former is the focus of the present study; for a review of the latter, see Piepho (1998).

There is an ongoing effort to design favourable cereal variety mixtures for various growing conditions and to learn about the influence of various environmental and varietal characteristics (e.g. Cowger and Weisz, 2008, Kaut et al., 2008, Newton and Guy, 2009). Convincing increases in grain yield have generally been reported for cereal variety mixtures (e.g. see the papers in Further reading), and positive overall differences, or mixing effects, were found for reported grain yields in the review of Smithson and Lenné (1996). However, in specific cases, many negative mixing effects have also been reported, and most often both positive and negative mixing effects are observed in the same trial (e.g. Finckh and Mundt, 1992, Jedel et al., 1998). The mixing effect of a specific variety mixture may be difficult to predict, partly due to the complex processes underlying crop interactions and the uncontrollable factors characteristic of many field trials. Consequently, results of individual trials may be limited in their relevance to other mixtures and other growing conditions, and information about underlying mechanisms may not be revealed. One possible answer to this problem is to combine the mixing effects found in different field trials, and to relate these to the circumstantial differences between trials.

Meta-analysis, as a well-established statistical method, is becoming the standard approach for evaluating experimental results across studies, analysing the influence of various experimental factors, and assessing publication bias, that is, the tendency of published results within a given research area to be more significant than given by the meta-population of effects being considered. Furthermore, variation between studies can be modelled explicitly in the analysis. In this respect, a meta-analysis differs fundamentally from other review types such as narrative reviews and vote counting, being a quantitative synthesis of reported results. Having been developed initially in educational psychology (Glass, 1976) and medicine (Mann, 1990) it has been increasing applied in ecology, starting with the work of Gurevitch et al. (1992). Within agronomical sciences, meta-analysis is a relatively novel method (e.g. Rosenberg et al., 2004, Tonitto et al., 2006, Rotundo and Westgate, 2009).

In this study, we used established meta-analysis techniques to investigate overall effects on grain yield when cereal varieties are grown in mixtures, as compared to the average yield when varieties are grown in pure stand. Furthermore, we analyzed to which extent this relates to a number of mixture characteristics and growing conditions. Previous reviews of cereal variety mixtures have been narrative (e.g. Finckh et al., 2000, Mundt, 2002a) or semi-quantitative (Smithson and Lenné, 1996). To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative review of cereal variety mixtures. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) were first chosen as focal species. These are important cereal crops around the world, and results from field trials of variety mixtures of each of these have been published. An important issue in meta-analysis of field trials is how to transform the reported measures of experimental variation to mixing effect variances. Only a small number of studies have previously used meta-analysis to combine data from field trials (e.g. Miguez and Bollero, 2005, Leimu and Koricheva, 2006, Paul et al., 2007). Very few of these have addressed directly the issue of variation, which we will therefore also do in this study.

Section snippets

Database retrieval

The main criterion for inclusion of studies in the meta-analysis was publication in a peer-reviewed journal included in The Science Citation Index Expanded database (Web of Science, 2008), spanning the period from 1900 to 19 January 2008. A wide Boolean search was made on all possible combinations of typically used wordings for variety mixtures and the common names for the crop species of interest (Table 1). For consistency, we chose not to include any unpublished results.

Filtering

As a first coarse

Results

Database retrieval followed by examination of titles and abstracts resulted in 213 potentially relevant reference studies on field trials that involved variety mixtures of wheat, barley or oat (list available from the authors). A total of 28 references fulfilled the criteria for being included in the meta-analysis. Among these were only two studies on oat variety mixtures, which were considered an insufficient number for oat to be included. The resulting 26 studies of wheat and barley (see

Discussion

The results obtained through meta-analysis confirm the potential of cereal variety mixtures as a means of obtaining higher grain yields, on average, compared to growing the crop in pure stand. Further, being based on a range of genotypes and growing conditions, our analyses show that this covers significant differences between crop types and relationships with a number of covariates. These will be discussed in the following.

Conclusion

By means of meta-analysis, we were able to consolidate the potentials of seed mixtures of wheat and barley to provide increased grain yields. Additionally, our results support that this is crop type specific. We were also able to demonstrate significant relationships with the effective number of component varieties in mixtures, as well as several types of diversity between components, thus supporting the hypothesis that positive mixing effects may derive from beneficial interactions between the

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank colleagues in SUSVAR (COST action 860) for fruitful early discussions on the potential for meta-analysis of variety mixtures, and the anonymous reviewers for suggestions that improved the manuscript. The work was partially funded by a grant from the Research School for Organic Agriculture and Food Systems.

References (53)

  • M. Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    Br. Med. J.

    (1997)
  • M.R. Finckh et al.

    Cereal variety and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance

    Agronomie

    (2000)
  • M.R. Finckh et al.

    Plant competition and disease in genetically diverse wheat populations

    Oecologia

    (1992)
  • M.R. Finckh et al.

    The use of biodiversity to restrict plant diseases and some consequences for farmers and society

  • G. Fischbeck

    Variability in winter wheat and spring barley yields in Bavaria

  • C. Gini

    Variabilità e mutabilità

  • G.V. Glass

    Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research

    Educ. Res.

    (1976)
  • J. Gurevitch et al.

    Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses

    Ecology

    (1999)
  • J. Gurevitch et al.

    A meta-analysis of competition in field experiments

    Am. Nat.

    (1992)
  • J.R. Harlan

    Crops and Man

    (1975)
  • L.V. Hedges et al.

    Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis

    (1985)
  • J.P.T. Higgins et al.

    Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis

    Stat. Med.

    (2002)
  • J.P.T. Higgins et al.

    Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

    Br. Med. J.

    (2003)
  • M. Huhn

    Theoretical studies on the necessary number of components in mixtures. 1. Number of components and yield stability

    Theor. Appl. Genet.

    (1985)
  • P.E. Jedel et al.

    Yield, quality and stress tolerance of barley mixtures in central Alberta

    Can. J. Plant Sci.

    (1998)
  • M.D. Jennions et al.

    Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the ‘trim and fill’ method

    Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (146)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text