Lurasidone and fluoxetine reduce novelty-induced hypophagia and NMDA receptor subunit and PSD-95 expression in mouse brain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Lurasidone, a novel second-generation antipsychotic agent, exerts antidepressant actions in patients suffering from bipolar type I disorder. Lurasidone acts as a high affinity antagonist at multiple monoamine receptors, particularly 5-HT2A, 5-HT7, D2 and α2 receptors, and as a partial agonist at 5-HT1A receptors. Accumulating evidence indicates therapeutic actions by monoaminergic antidepressants are mediated via alterations of glutamate receptor-mediated neurotransmission. Here, we used mice and investigated the effects of chronic oral administration of vehicle, lurasidone (3 or 10 mg/kg) or fluoxetine (20 mg/kg) in the novelty induced hypophagia test, a behavioral test sensitive to chronic antidepressant treatment. We subsequently performed biochemical analyses on NMDA receptor subunits and associated proteins. Both lurasidone and fluoxetine reduced the latency to feed in the novelty-induced hypophagia test. Western blotting experiments showed that both lurasidone and fluoxetine decreased the total levels of NR1, NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDA receptors and PSD-95 (PostSynaptic Density-95) in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. Taken together, these data indicate that antidepressant/anxiolytic-like effects of lurasidone, as well as fluoxetine, could involve reduced NMDA receptor-mediated signal transduction, particularly in pathways regulated by PSD-95, in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex.

Introduction

Lurasidone is a novel atypical antipsychotic which alleviates both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (Citrome et al., 2012, Meltzer et al., 2011). In addition, lurasidone has recently also been approved by the food and drug administration (FDA) for treatment of bipolar depression. Lurasidone acts as an antagonist at dopamine D2, serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT7 and adrenergic α2 receptors (Cates et al., 2013, Ishiyama et al., 2007) and as a partial agonist at 5-HT1A receptors (Ishibashi et al., 2010). It possesses antidepressant properties, either when used as a monotherapy (Loebel et al., 2014a) or an adjuvant therapy (Loebel et al., 2014b), for type I bipolar depression. Accordingly, chronic lurasidone administration induces antidepressant-like effects in rodent models (Cates et al., 2013, Luoni et al., 2013, Luoni et al., 2014).

An increasing amount of evidence indicates that serotonergic modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission is a plausible approach in treating depression and cognitive dysfunction (Pehrson and Sanchez, 2014, Sanacora et al., 2008). It has, for example, been indicated that chronic treatment with different classes of monoaminergic antidepressants decreases N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) function (Skolnick et al., 1996). Clinical trials have shown that a single, subanesthetic dose of the non-selective NMDAR antagonist, ketamine, has a rapid and sustained antidepressive effect (Sanacora et al., 2008, Zarate et al., 2006). Moreover, preclinical studies in rodents indicate that treatment with an acute, subanesthetic dose of ketamine or Ro25-6981 (a NR2B subunit-specific NMDAR antagonist) have rapid and sustained antidepressive effects at the behavioral level (Autry et al., 2011, Kiselycznyk et al., 2011, Li et al., 2010, Maeng et al., 2008) which are accompanied by altered presynaptic (Muller et al., 2013, Stan et al., 2014) and postsynaptic NMDAR-mediated signaling (Autry et al., 2011, Li et al., 2010, Maeng et al., 2008). Given this background, the current study aimed at exploring the effects of chronic treatment with lurasidone or fluoxetine on antidepressive/anxiolytic-like properties in the novelty-induced hypophagia test, which is sensitive to chronic antidepressant treatment, and in regulating the levels of NMDA receptor subunits and associated proteins, in hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of mice.

Section snippets

Animals

Adult male C57Bl/6J mice were obtained from Charles River (Erkrath, Germany) and housed under controlled temperature and humidity at the local Karolinska Institutet animal facility, in a 12 h light/dark cycle and ad libitum food and water. All experiments were carried out in agreement with the European Council Directive (86/609/EEC) and were approved by the local Animal Ethics Committee (N40/13; Stockholms Norra Djurförsöksetiska Nämnd). All efforts were made to reduce the number of animals used

Chronic treatment with lurasidone and fluoxetine decrease novelty-induced hypophagia

Animals were given oral administration of either vehicle, 3 or 10 mg/kg lurasidone or 20 mg/kg fluoxetine, daily for 21 days and were then tested in the NIH test (Dulawa et al., 2004). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA of latencies indicated an effect of cage environment (F1,24=66.0; p<0.001) and cage environment×treatment interaction (F3,24=5,77; p<0.001) (Figure 1). Post-hoc analysis indicated that the latency to drink milk in the home cage trial was not significantly different between the

Chronic lurasidone and fluoxetine decrease novelty-induced hypophagia

The present study shows that chronic treatment with lurasidone, both at 3 and 10 mg/kg, decreases novelty-induced hypophagia (NIH). In accordance to previous findings (Dulawa et al., 2004), we also report that chronic treatment with fluoxetine has a strong antidepressive/anxiolytic-like effect in this test. The effects of lurasidone and fluoxetine in the NIH test were robust, but it should be noted that they may be partly affected by the reduced body weight seen after fluoxetine and the reduced

Role of funding source

This work was supported by Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma (PS; TLS), the European Union Seventh Framework Program, Belgium, under Grant agreement FP7-People-ITN-2008-238055 (“BrainTrain” project) (TLS), and the Wenner-Gren Foundation, Sweden (Grant no. 2012) (VCS). None of the organizations influenced the writing of the manuscript.

Author contribution

TLS, VCS, MO and PS contributed to idea/hypothesis and design;

TLS performed all animal handling; weighing; drug preparation and administration;

TLS implemented all behaviour testing (nest building behaviour, novelty-induced hypophagia and open field);

VCS and XZ assisted TLS with animal experiments and analysis;

TLS planned and implemented immunoblotting measurements and data analysis;

TLS, VCS and PS wrote the manuscript;

Conflict of interest

This work was supported by Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma. MO is an employee of Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Marcela Pereira, Alexandra Alvarsson and Niclas Branzell for their help during the course of this work.

References (39)

  • P. Paoletti et al.

    NMDA receptor subunits: function and pharmacology

    Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.

    (2007)
  • A. Pittaluga et al.

    Antidepressant treatments and function of glutamate ionotropic receptors mediating amine release in hippocampus

    Neuropharmacology

    (2007)
  • G. Sanacora et al.

    Towards a glutamate hypothesis of depression: an emerging frontier of neuropsychopharmacology for mood disorders

    Neuropharmacology

    (2012)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Supertertiary structure of the MAGUK core from PSD-95

    Structure

    (2013)
  • C. Aoki et al.

    Electron microscopic immunocytochemical detection of PSD-95, PSD-93, SAP-102, and SAP-97 at postsynaptic, presynaptic, and nonsynaptic sites of adult and neonatal rat visual cortex

    Synapse

    (2001)
  • A.E. Autry et al.

    NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses

    Nature

    (2011)
  • M.G. Carta et al.

    Potential use of lurasidone for the treatment of bipolar psychosis

    Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs

    (2015)
  • L. Citrome et al.

    Long-term safety and tolerability of lurasidone in schizophrenia: a 12-month, double-blind, active-controlled study

    Int Clin Psychopharmacol

    (2012)
  • S.C. Dulawa et al.

    Effects of chronic fluoxetine in animal models of anxiety and depression

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    This work was supported by Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma (PS; TLS), the European Union Seventh Framework Program, under Grant agreement FP7-People-ITN- 2008–238055 (“BrainTrain” project) (TLS), and The Wenner-Gren Foundation (VCS).

    View full text