Tumor detection by using Zernike moments on segmented magnetic resonance brain images
Introduction
This paper presents a general framework for analyzing structural and radiometric asymmetry in brain images and determining the existence of tumors. In a healthy brain, the left and right hemispheres are largely symmetric across the mid-sagittal plane. Brain tumors may belong to one or both of the following categories: mass-effect, in which the diseased tissue displaces healthy tissue; and infiltrating, in which healthy tissue has become diseased. Mass-effect brain tumors cause structural asymmetry by displacing healthy tissue, and may cause radiometric asymmetry in adjacent normal structures due to edema (Lefebvre, Berger, & Laugier, 1998).
For this reason, it is no surprising that the asymmetry can be utilized as one of the major indicators for the presence of brain tumors. In this study, asymmetry is determined by a novel neural network based segmentation procedure using transforms.
The constitution of the right data space is a common problem in connection with segmentation. The features that are sufficiently representative of the physical process must be searched. In the literature, it is observed that different transforms are used to extract desired information from biomedical images. Image intensities at the neighboring pixels (Dokur & Ölmez, 2000) are utilized to represent the tissues in magnetic resonance and computed tomography images. Wavelet transform (Dokur et al., 2006, Iscan et al., 2006), co-occurrence matrix (Haering & Lobo, 1999), Fourier transform (Feleppa et al., 1996), spatial gray-level dependence matrices (Llobet, Perez-Cortes, Toselli, & Juan, 2007) and Laws’ micro-texture energies (Hsiang & Sun, 2006) are used to extract tissues in ultrasound images. Wavelet transform is used for the detection of the micro-calcifications in digital mammograms (Zhang, Yoshida, Nishikawa, & Doi, 1998). The second-order statistical methods include the gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM, Lefebvre et al., 1998). In GLCM method, there is an inherent problem to choose the optimal inter-pixel distance in a given situation. Sixteen features based on sizes and shapes of lesions were computed for the malignant and benign lesions of the mammography images (Retico, Delogu, Fantacci, & Kasae, 2006). The massive lesions were identified within a rectangular region of interest interactively chosen by a radiologist.
In pathological cases, the methods based on supervised or unsupervised classification integrating anatomical templates (Kaus et al., 2001, Warfield et al., 2000) have shown their robustness. Level set methods are also used for brain tumor segmentation (Ho, Bullitt, & Gerig, 2002) with some success. Mancas and Gosselin (2003) used the iterative watersheds to segment the brain tumor with a given initialization. Gibbs, Buckley, Blackband, and Horsman (1996) combined morphological process and region growing method for tumor volume determination. Cabral, White, Kim, and Effmann (1993) proposed an interactive segmentation of brain tumor based on a three-dimensional (3D) region growing. Clark et al. (1998), and Udupa and Samarasekera (1996) have introduced knowledge based techniques to make classification and segmentation more intelligent. Based on the concept of fuzzy logic, Udupa, Saha, and Lotufo (2002), and Saha and Udupa (2001) used the fuzzy clustering or the fuzzy connectedness for addressing the problem of abnormal tissue segmentation and classification. In spite of the power of those kinds of approaches, some of them need manual tracing (Udupa et al., 1997) for the initialization or a semi-supervised system (Saha & Udupa, 2001) with some manual learning.
The healthy human brain is largely symmetric across the mid-sagittal plane, recognizing that structural asymmetry may indicate disease. In previous studies, shape and volume differences between the left and right hippocampi in patients with schizophrenia (Csernansky et al., 1998, Styner and Gerig, 2001) and Alzheimer’s disease (Csernansky et al., 2000) were examined. These results have provided only a rough qualitative difference between the tumor and normal controls and that robust statistical inference should not be drawn from them. Most other work involving structural asymmetry has focused on small-scale geometric inter-hemispheric differences (Smith and Jenkinson, 1999, Thompson et al., 2001). Up to now, little attention has been paid to gross differences between the left and right brain hemispheres in patients with brain tumors.
Reviews of mid-sagittal plane (MSP) extraction methods can be found in Prima, Ourselin, and Ayache (2002). Some of the methods are based on inter-hemispheric fissure identification and symmetry criteria (Mancas & Gosselin, 2003). They exploit the extraction of symmetry lines in axial or coronal 2D slices and fitting a 3D plane to the dataset. There are methods based on cross-correlation and symmetry measures (Llobet et al., 2007, Udupa et al., 2002), but they are sensitive to asymmetry (Junck et al., 1990, Prima et al., 2002). A large deformation image warping method (Joshi, Lorenzen, Gerig, & Bullitt, 2003) is used for finding the plane of symmetry, not necessarily being the MSP. Problem of symmetry detection arises in different areas, e.g. computer vision, object recognition, shape representation, etc. Different approaches for this problem can be found in Sun and Sherrah (1997).
In the literature mentioned above, it is observed that brain tumors are detected by two different methodologies; mid-sagittal plane extraction methods, and segmentation or classification processes. In this study, these methodologies are unified to inquire the presence of asymmetry and hence, the brain tumors. First, MR head image is coarsely segmented with ISNN (incremental supervised neural network) by using feature vectors formed by continuous wavelet transform. Then, after determining the symmetry axis on this coarsely segmented image, presence of asymmetry is investigated on the segmented image by comparing the Zernike moments of the brain tissues lying on the left and right hand sides of the symmetry axis. Finally, tumorous tissues are determined and tumor is visualized apart from the healthy tissues.
Section snippets
Methods
In this study, tumor detection is finalized by going through the following steps: Segmentation of MR head image into seven classes (six different head tissues and the background), determination of the symmetry axis of the head, vectoral representation of the tissues lying on the left and right hand sides of the symmetry axis, indication of asymmetry in the brain, and finally, localization of the tumor. The techniques employed to perform these processing steps are explained below.
In this study,
Artificial neural networks
The formulation of a proper data representation is a common problem in segmentation/classification systems design. In order to construct realistic classifiers, the vectors that are sufficiently representative of the physical process must be found. If the right representation is not realized, classification performance will decrease. In this case, the solution of the problem is searched in the classifier structures, and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are used as classifiers.
The reasons that
Computer simulations and conclusions
In the study, phantom image, 20 original MR images with tumor, and 50 normal MR images, which are obtained from different patients, were used for testing the proposed method. Fig. 4a and b shows one of the normal and tumorous MR brain images, respectively. The simulations were performed on 2 GHz PC by using MATLAB 7.0.
The proposed method is tested on the phantom image, which is rotated by 10°, for the inquiry of both the advantages and disadvantages of the method. It is assumed that the phantom
References (31)
- et al.
Features and classification methods to locate deciduous trees in images
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
(1999) - et al.
Structural and radiometric in brain images
Medical Image Analysis
(2003) - et al.
Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer
International Journal of Medical Informatics
(2007) - et al.
An automatic system to discriminate malignant from benign massive lesions on mammograms
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, A
(2006) - et al.
Fuzzy connected object delineation: Axiomatic path strength definition and the case of multiple seeds
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
(2001) - et al.
Fuzzy connectedness and object definition: theory, algorithms, and applications in image segmentation
Graphical Models and Image Processing
(1996) - et al.
Adaptive, template moderated, spatially varying statistical classification
Medical Image Analysis
(2000) - et al.
Interactive segmentation of brain tumors in MR images using 3D region growing
Medical Imaging: Image Processing
(1993) - et al.
Automatic tumor segmentation using knowledge-based techniques
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
(1998) - et al.
Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(1998)