Geophysical evaluation of the enigmatic Bedout basement high, offshore northwestern Australia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.014Get rights and content

Abstract

The Bedout High in the Roebuck Basin (formerly offshore Canning Basin) on the northwest shelf of Australia is an unusual structure, which has been controversially interpreted as an end-Permian impact structure similar in size to the K–T boundary Chicxulub Crater. We present a geophysical perspective of the associated debate, based on deep seismic reflection, refraction and well data. The basement and crust in the Roebuck Basin display a number of features that distinguish them from other basins along the northwest Australian margin, including major crustal thinning and the presence of a thick layer of interpreted magmatic underplating. The Bedout High consists of two separate highs separated by a Paleozoic fault, and is associated with a Moho uplift of 7–8 km, and is about 40–50 km wide. The normal fault separating the two highs trends NNW–SSE, roughly paralleling a Paleozoic fault system associated with rifting in the Canning Basin and terminating below the interpreted top-Permian reflection. There are no circular, symmetric fault zones bounding the proposed annular trough, and the distinct difference in seismic character normally associated with impact breccias versus layered sediments above are not expressed in deep multichannel seismic data. The end-Permian horizon exhibits little topography, with well-layered units both below and above. The area around the Bedout High stands out as an area of low velocity basement: 5400–5600 m/s compared to 5800–6000 m/s for other nearby basement areas located in a similar depth range, but known complex impact sites are not characterized by a unique seismic basement velocity signature. Both seismic velocity analysis, revealing a thick underplated layer in the lower crust, and thermal modelling based on data from well La Grange-1 and basalts drilled on top of the Bedout High, are consistent with rifting above anomalously hot mantle. The available geophysical and geological data are compatible with an interpretation of the Bedout structure as a basement high formed by two consecutive Paleozoic and Mesozoic episodes of rifting roughly orthogonal to each other, associated with basin formation east and west of the Bedout High, but fail nearly all unequivocal criteria for impact crater recognition.

Introduction

The Bedout High, a basement high in the Roebuck Basin on the Northwest Australian Margin (Fig. 1), has been interpreted as an end-Permian impact structure [1], [2]. This has resulted in a vigorous debate, expressed in three comments [3], [4], [5] and replies [6], [7], [8] in Science focused on whether or not the Bedout High was caused by an extraterrestrial impact, mainly based on petrological arguments. In the impact scenario, the Bedout structure is interpreted by Becker et al. [2] to be similar in size to the Chicxulub crater, about 200 km in diameter, and the Bedout High is thought to represent the central uplift of the impact crater [6]. In this paper we present an analysis of available seismic reflection, refraction and well data associated with the Bedout structure, and discuss the likelihood of it being an impact structure.

The Bedout High is located in the Roebuck (formerly part of the offshore Canning) Basin, one of the largest sedimentary basins in Western Australia, bounded to the west by the Argo Abyssal Plain (Fig. 1). The Bedout High is flanked by two sub-basins of the Roebuck Basin, the Bedout Sub-Basin to the southeast, and the Rowley Sub-Basin to the northwest (Fig. 2). A Paleozoic west-northwest trending extensional structural grain defines major tectonic units in the Canning Basin [9]. These structures are well visible in marine gravity anomalies, especially on and around the Broome Platform and within and west of the Rowley Sub-Basin (Fig. 2). A set of northeast trending structures was imposed on the older structural grain during Mesozoic rifting and continental breakup, as expressed by the orientation of the Rowley Sub-Basin itself (Fig. 2). A major tectonic event has been interpreted as extensive uplift, faulting and volcanism in Late Permian/Early Triassic time in the Roebuck Basin, known as the “Bedout Movement” [10]. Gorter [1] interpreted the “Bedout Movement” producing the Bedout High through a bolide impact. However, Colwell and Stagg [10] pointed out, that the Bedout Movement is mainly defined in the onshore part of the Canning Basin (Fig. 1), where it represents a widespread tectonic event and thus is not confined to the vicinity of the Bedout High.

Continental breakup occurred at the seaward edge of the Roebuck Basin at about 155 Ma; the oldest identifiable magnetic anomaly along the margin is anomaly M25A, aged 154.5 Ma [11], in accordance with ODP drilling results [12], based on the Gradstein et al. [13] timescale (Fig. 1). The geometry of the rifted margin is unusual in that it does not follow the main NE–SW structural grain. Instead the Argo Abyssal Plain margin is indented between the Exmouth Plateau to the south and the Scott Plateau to the north, with the apex of the indentation corresponding to the narrowest portion of the margin, pointing towards the Roebuck Basin (Fig. 1).

The margin is characterized by an up to 18 km deep Paleozoic/Mesozoic trough, as expressed on the deep seismic reflection lines 120-1 (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, for profile location) and 120-4 (Fig. 4) [14]. The Paleozoic (Ordovician(?)–Permian) section is ∼0.8 s (two way travel time—TWT) thick, but considerably thinned to about ∼0.2 s TWT over the Bedout High. The Triassic–Jurassic sequence is highly variable in thickness. On the seaward portion of line 120-1, the Triassic–Jurassic section forms a seaward-thickening wedge reaching a maximum thickness of ∼3.75 s TWT adjacent to the lower continental slope. At the seaward flank of the section, Middle Triassic folds and Late Triassic faults affect the ∼1.9 s TWT thick Triassic section. The post-Jurassic sedimentary section includes < 1 km of Cretaceous section overlain by Tertiary section that reaches a maximum thickness of ∼1.5 km beneath the upper continental slope. The boundary between continental and oceanic crust (COB) is well defined, situated on the seaward side of a deep-seated tilted block of continental crust at the edge of the Argo Abyssal Plain (Fig. 2). The lower continental slope is effectively the basin edge, and is steep (15–20°) and controlled by faults [14]. Erosion of the Jurassic section landward of the fault indicates significant uplift of the basin flank at breakup. In the following we will review evidence for and against the impact hypothesis based on two deep seismic reflection lines crossing the Bedout High, basement topography maps based on a grid of seismic lines [15], a seismic refraction profile coincident with line 120-1 and industry well data in the area.

Section snippets

Seismic reflection data and interpretation

The Bedout High is crossed by two deep seismic reflection profiles (120-1 and 120-4, see Fig. 2 for location) collected by the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO—now Geoscience Australia) on the R/V Rig Seismic in 1993. The multichannel seismic (MCS) data were collected with a 4800 m seismic streamer with 192 channels and towed at a depth of 12 m. The acoustic source was a sleeve gun array (capacity 50 l, 3000 cu in.) and the shot interval was 50 m.

The data clearly show the Bedout

Refraction seismic velocity modelling and interpretation

Seismic refraction data were collected along the seismic reflection profile 120-1 (Fig. 2) using seventeen ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs). The deep water instruments provide good seismic data from deep crustal structures and the Moho. A 2D velocity model for the Roebuck/Canning OBS transect was derived by forward modelling using the SIGMA ray-tracing software, which is based on the algorithm of Sclater and Christie [21]. The starting 2D model was based on the analysis of recorded refracted

Gravity modelling

The gravity data used to constrain the velocity model were taken from the R/V Rig Seismic 101 profile, which was coincident with profile 120-1 (Fig. S4). The contribution of the sediments was calculated using the drilling results at ODP Site 765 [16] to determine the velocity–density relationship for the top 1 km of the sediments. The velocity–density relationship was then extrapolated downward to cover the entire sediment column. The contribution from the crust was calculated from the velocity

Seismic basement velocities

The basement and crust in the Roebuck Basin have a number of features that make it distinct from other basins at the northwest Australian margin. Major crustal thinning from 34 to 12 km thick crust over a distance of 100 km, and a sharp boundary between continental and oceanic crust to the northwest of the Bedout High are prominent features. Similar extreme lateral variations of crustal thinning across the continental margin are not encountered anywhere else along the northwest Australian

Distribution of crustal thinning from seismic refraction and well data

The tectonic subsidence history of a continental margin through space and time can provide vital clues as to the causes of subsidence, including assessment of differential subsidence due to a bolide impact [18]. Stretching factors for the lower and upper crust were estimated from the change in the thickness of the crust along the seismic refraction/reflection profile 120-1, assuming an initial crustal thickness of 40 km and an initial mid-crust boundary depth of 14.5 km [19] (Fig. S5).

Composition of the lower crust

To better understand the origin of lateral variations in crustal thickness we investigate the seismic velocities that may correspond to rocks of gabbro-type bulk geochemistry under modern pressure and temperature conditions in the region, to identify underplated material. Underplating can be recognised from the presence of seismic velocities higher than 7.0 km/s in the lower crust that result from the injection of mafic material at the bottom of the crust from partial upper mantle melting. To

Thermal history of the Bedout High from well data

The thermal history of the Bedout High was analysed by Smith [15], who undertook one-dimensional thermal modelling of several wells, including La Grange-1, using BasinMod™. We show an example from this analysis, based on well stratigraphy, used as input for tectonic subsidence and thermal history analysis modelled from vitrinite reflectance (Ro) data (Fig. S7). Modelling of heat flow through time was constrained by the present heat flow in the area, which ranges from 31 to 38 mWm 2 [15],

Discussion

In the following, we will evaluate the likelihood of the Bedout structure being an impact structure, based on evaluating a “checklist” expanded from that compiled by Stewart [18], which is based on criteria to assess undrilled, buried impact structures (Table 2). The seismically best-mapped marine impact crater structures are the Eocene Chesapeake Bay crater [27], [28], the K–T boundary Chicxulub crater in Mexico [29], [30], [31], [32], the Volgian–Berriasian Mjølnir impact structure in the

Summary

A “checklist” with the most relevant criteria for differentiating between a structural/rifting origin from an impact origin for a basement high such as Bedout is presented in Table 2. If the structure has been cored and imaged by deep seismic reflection data, as is the case for the Bedout High, then the primary discriminating evidence lies in the unique petrological signature of the impact breccia and the imaging of structural features typically produced by impacts. As the petrological evidence

Acknowledgments

DM carried out this work while on a sabbatical at the Norwegian Geological Survey in Trondheim, Norway. The work benefited from discussions with John Kennard, Trond Torsvik, Stephanie Werner, Per Terje Osmundsen, Susanne Buiter, and Craig Nicholson, as well as from reviews of an early version of the manuscript by Clive Collins and Jim Colwell. Both Luann Becker and Andrew Glickson emphasized the importance of a summary checklist for impact recognition, which we included in the paper. We thank

References (52)

  • L. Becker et al.

    Is Bedout an impact crater? Take 2—response

    Science

    (2004)
  • N.F. Exon et al.

    Geological history of the outer North West Shelf of Australia: a synthesis

    AGSO J. Aust. Geol. Geophys.

    (1994)
  • J.B. Colwell et al.

    Structure of the Offshore Canning Basin: First Impressions from a New Regional Deep-Seismic Data Set

  • C. Heine et al.

    Late Jurassic rifting along the Australian Northwest Shelf: margin geometry and spreading ridge configuration

    Aus. Jour. Earth Sci.

    (2005)
  • W.W. Sager et al.

    Argo Abyssal Plain Magnetic Lineations Revisited: Implications for the Onset of Seafloor Spreading and Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Indian Ocean

  • F.M. Gradstein et al.

    A Mesozoic time scale

    J. Geophys. Res., [Solid Earth]

    (1994)
  • Deep reflections on the North west Shelf: changing perceptions of basin formation

  • S.A. Smith, The Phanerozoic basin-fill history of the Roebuck Basin, PhD, The University of Adelaide,...
  • N.F. Exon et al.

    The Mesozoic and Cainozoic Sequences of the Northwest Australian Margin, as Revealed by ODP Core Drilling and Related Studies

  • W.J. Ludwig et al.

    Sediment distribution in the Bering sea; Bowers ridge, Shirshov ridge, and enclosed basins

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1971)
  • S.A. Stewart

    How will we recognize buried impact craters in terrestrial sedimentary basins?

    Geology

    (2003)
  • B.J. Drummond et al.

    Half-Graben Model for the Structural Evolution of the Fitzroy Trough, Canning Basin, and Implications for Resource Exploration

  • N. White

    Recovery of strain rate variation from inversion of subsidence data

    Nature (London)

    (1993)
  • J.G. Sclater et al.

    Continental streching—an explanation of the post mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the Central Graben of the North Sea

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1980)
  • S.V. Sobolev et al.

    Modelling of mineralogical composition, density and elastic wave velocities in anhydrous magmatic rocks

    Surv. Geophys.

    (1994)
  • J.P. Cull

    Geothermal gradients in Australia

    Spec. Publ.—Geol. Soc. Aust.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text