Selective improvement of global datasets for the computation of locally relevant environmental indicators: A method based on global sensitivity analysis
Section snippets
Software and data availability
The modelling done in this paper is performed in the R project for statistical computing. R is an open source statistics software and can be downloaded from https://www.r-project.org. Data from a global dataset were obtained from the Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM) version 2, which was developed by the Animal Production and Health Division (AGA) of Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO). The description of GLEAM can be found at //www.fao.org/gleam/en/
Description of the proposed method
The different steps of the proposed method are summarized in Fig. 1.
Uncertainties of N use indicators
The results of the uncertainty analysis for N use indicators in the Netherlands are shown in Fig. 2. The mean value of life-cycle-NUEN for FADNNL was similar to GLEAMNL (46%). For other indicators, however, there was a larger difference in mean values. The mean value of life-cycle-NNBN was lower for FADNNL (105 kg N ha−1) as compared to GLEAMNL (132 kg N ha−1). Regarding the NHIN, the mean value was higher for FADNNL (158%) as compared GLEAMNL (147%).
The distribution of NHIN was similarly
Conclusions
This study proposed a method to improve the local relevance of the environmental performance indicators computed from a global dataset, by identifying important input parameters through a GSA that shall be prioritized and established with high-quality data. We demonstrated that N use indicators computed from GLEAM dataset were relatively close to those estimated from farm survey data in the Netherlands than in Rwanda. However, by substituting the important input parameters for activity data
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Teagasc Walsh Fellowship Scheme (Ref: 2012230), the Livestock Environmental Assessment Performance (LEAP) Partnership (GCP/GLO/369/MUL) and the Livestock Information, Sector Analysis and Policy Branch (AGAL) of Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO). We would like to thank Angel Bas for his statistical advice and GLEAM development team for their support in data handling.
References (56)
- et al.
An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models
Environ. Model. Softw.
(2007) - et al.
Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater applications: a comprehensive comparison of different methods
Environ. Model. Softw.
(2013) - et al.
Benchmarking the economic, environmental and societal performance of Dutch dairy farms aiming at internal recycling of nutrients
Eco-Effic. Agric. Food Syst. Sel. Pap. Life Cycle Assess. LCA Food Conf. 2012 St. Malo Fr.
(2014) - et al.
SyNE: an improved indicator to assess nitrogen efficiency of farming systems
Agric. Syst
(2014) - et al.
Soil phosphorus, potassium and sulphur excesses, regularities and heterogeneity in grazing-based dairy farms
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2015) - et al.
Ignoring correlation in uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: what is the risk?
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
(2017) - et al.
Methods for uncertainty propagation in life cycle assessment
Environ. Model. Softw.
(2014) Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments
J. Clean. Prod.
(1996)- et al.
Identification of influential parameters through sensitivity analysis of the TOUGH + Hydrate model using LH-OAT sampling
Mar. Pet. Geol.
(2015) - et al.
A sensitivity analysis of nitrogen losses from dairy farms
J. Environ. Manage
(1997)
The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling
Themat. Issue Expert Opin. Environ. Model. Manag.
Benchmarking nutrient use efficiency of dairy farms: the effect of epistemic uncertainty
Agric. Syst.
Stochastic uncertainty and sensitivities of nitrogen flows on dairy farms in The Netherlands
Agric. Syst.
Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient management and environmental policies
Elem. Balanc. Sustain. Tools
Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: a systematic review with practical workflow
Environ. Model. Softw.
How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis
Environ. Model. Softw.
Global sensitivity analysis of environmental models: convergence and validation
Environ. Model. Softw.
Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty
Water Res.
Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates
Math. Comput. Simul.
Phosphorus use-efficiency of agriculture and food system in the US
Phosphorus Cycle
Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms
Ecol. Econ.
An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support
Environ. Model. Softw.
A comprehensive framework to assess the sustainability of nutrient use in global livestock supply chains
J. Clean. Prod.
Evaluation of a feeding strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farming: the level of analysis matters
Agric. Syst.
Mitigation and heterogeneity in management practices on New Zealand dairy farms
Motu Econ. Public Policy Res. Motu Work. Pap.
Uncertainty of global warming potential for milk production on a New Zealand farm and implications for decision making
Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
Greenhouse gas emissions from ground level area sources in dairy and cattle feedyard operations
Atmosphere
Boot: Bootstrap R (S-plus) Functions
Cited by (10)
Nutrient use efficiency of intensive dairy farms in China – Current situation and analyses of options for improvement
2022, Agricultural SystemsCitation Excerpt :We sampled and analysed 141 farms out of thousands of farms (1108 intensive dairy farms in Hebei in 2018 and an unknown but likely similar number in Shandong) and visited them once. We conducted a global sensitivity analysis (Hoops et al., 2016; Uwizeye et al., 2017) to estimate the uncertainty of nutrient flows and nutrient use efficiencies of the whole intensive dairy production sector, instead of only for the sampled farms, to compensate for possible sampling biases. We performed Monte Carlo simulations using @RISK software (Palisade Corporation) by varying parameters and inputs in the model used to estimate NUE and PUE.
Nitrogen flows in global pork supply chains and potential improvement from feeding swill to pigs
2019, Resources, Conservation and RecyclingCitation Excerpt :The uncertainties of the data have a large influence on the results. For instance, a previous study using this framework identified synthetic fertilizer, manure application and deposition, crop yields and emission factors as the most important data to explain the variance of life-cycle-NUEN, life-cycle-NNBN, and NHIN (Uwizeye et al., 2017). The data used in this study, however, do not capture the variability of N use practices within a system in the country, which can be observed if spatial differentiated data are available.
Nitrogen Footprints
2019, Encyclopedia of Ecology: Volume 1-4, Second EditionGlobal agricultural ammonia emissions simulated with the ORCHIDEE land surface model
2023, Geoscientific Model Development