Elsevier

Environmental Pollution

Volume 306, 1 August 2022, 119442
Environmental Pollution

Effects of exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on vaccine antibodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on epidemiological studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119442Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Associations between five PFAS and tetanus and diphtheria antibodies were assessed.

  • PFOA and PFOS exposure were negatively correlated to children tetanus antibody.

  • PFHxS was negatively correlated to children tetanus antibody with heterogeneity.

  • Effects of PFAS on the other four vaccines are uncertain due to limited studies.

Abstract

Vaccines are essential for children to defend against infection. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are emerging contaminants with the characteristics of persistence and bioaccumulation. PFAS exposure can affect the function of the nervous, endocrine, and immune system of animals and humans. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological studies investigating potential relationships between PFAS exposure and vaccine antibody levels, and assessed whether PFAS would affect vaccine response in healthy children. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to February 2022. We chose studies that measured serum vaccines antibodies and PFAS concentrations of the participants. Essential information, including mean difference of percentage change, regression coefficient, odds ratio, Spearman correlation coefficient, and 95% confidence intervals, were extracted from the selected studies to conduct descriptive analysis and meta-analysis where appropriate. The qualities of these studies were evaluated as well. Finally, nine epidemiological studies about children met our inclusion criteria. A high degree of heterogeneity is observed in terms of breastfeeding time, confounder control, and detection method. Exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid is negatively associated with tetanus antibody level in children without heterogeneity by Cochran's Q test (p = 0.26; p = 0.55), and exposure to perfluorohexane sulfonate is negatively associated with tetanus antibody level but with heterogeneity (p = 0.04). This comprehensive review suggests that PFAS can have adverse health effects on children by hindering the production of vaccine antibodies. There are some consistent and negative associations between children exposure to certain PFAS and tetanus antibody level. The association of the other four vaccines (measles, rubella, mumps, and influenza) with PFAS remains uncertain, because very few studies are available. Further studies are needed to validate the possible associations.

Introduction

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a class of persistent organic pollutants, have been extensively used in water/stain repellents, firefighting foams, and food-contact paper coatings since the 1940s (Sun et al., 2016). In 2000, the 3 M company, the first fluorochemical producer, voluntarily took action for phase-out of C8-based products, followed by the actual phase-out in 2003 (Renner, 2006). Following the goal of the voluntary 2010/15 perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) Stewardship Program, more companies participated in the stewardship program from the United States Environmental Protectin Agency on reduced emission of PFOA, PFOA precursors (Janousek et al., 2019). The legacy PFAS started to shift from more developed countries to less developed countries in Asia (Wang et al., 2014). However, due to their high stability derived from the covalent C–F bond, PFAS are ubiquitously present in the environment and could be detected in the Arctic and wildlife in remote regions (O'Rourke et al., 2022), which is becoming a serious global environmental problem. Meanwhile, PFAS can accumulate in the human body through multiple exposure routes, such as skin adsorption and digestive and respiratory systems, and for fetus and babies, placental transfer and breastfeeding can be two important exposure routes (Pasecnaja et al., 2022). So far, more and more information on adverse health effects of PFAS on humans and animals has been known, e.g., reproductive and developmental toxicology and thyroid dysfunction (Sunderland et al., 2019).

Apart from the toxicities mentioned above, assessment of the association between PFAS exposure and immunomodulation has become an interesting topic in the past decade. A systematic review of animal and epidemiological studies demonstrated that PFAS are potentially hazardous to the immune system (DeWitt et al., 2012). Toxicological studies have found that PFAS are suspected of immunotoxicity or immune suppression. For example, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) exposure could modulate the immune system in mice by changing the structure and function of the liver (Dong et al., 2009). This study revealed that the developing immune system is sensitive to the effects of PFOS exposure, which will lead to functional deficits in innate and humoral immunity. Animal studies also indicated that PFOS and PFOA could have immunosuppression in mice indirectly through preventing the increases of Immunoglobulin M (IgM) and Immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in serum by humoral immunity (Keil et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2002).

Several studies have explored the associations between antibody concentrations of influenza and hepatitis vaccines in adults with PFAS, but no significant correlation was yielded (Looker et al., 2014; Shih et al., 2021; Zeng et al., 2020), or only PFAS at relatively high concentrations were inversely associated with influenza vaccine antibodies (Stein et al., 2016a). In general, xenobiotic exposures are more likely to affect the immune system in children, as they are in a critical and sensitive period of development (Feng et al., 2014). An epidemiological study of children demonstrated that PFOA and PFOS exposure was associated with reduced humoral immune response to routine childhood immunizations (Grandjean et al., 2012). As one of the essential measures to protect the immune system, vaccines can stimulate the human body to produce antibodies, thus protecting them from infection, especially for children. All people, especially young children, are advised to vaccinate in order to improve their immunity to various diseases (Wen et al., 2020). According to the health guidance of different countries, children at a certain age often receive the same dose of antigen by taking officially recommended vaccines. Childhood vaccination responses, usually reflected by antibody titer, can be applied as feasible and clinically relevant outcomes for vaccination effect evaluation (Mogensen et al., 2015).

Given the potential immunotoxicity of PFAS, increased attention has been paid to investigating the relationship between PFAS exposure and vaccine antibodies production. Although some of the existing studies have proven that exposure to PFAS would affect the generation of vaccine antibodies in children, their conclusions are not consistent. Two of them reported a positive association between perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) exposure and diphtheria antibody concentration for children (Grandjean et al., 2017b; Shih et al., 2021), while some other studies reported a negative association between PFNA and diphtheria antibody concentration (Grandjean et al., 2012; Mogensen et al., 2015; Timmermann et al., 2021).

Considering the inconsistency in literature and lack of sufficient evidence with regards to the impact of PFAS exposure on vaccination antibody response, this work is aimed to (1) examine peer-reviewed literature focused on the relationship between PFAS exposure and vaccine antibody levels based on epidemiology; (2) identify the difficulties and challenges in relevant research of PFAS exposure and vaccine antibody so as to suggest potential perspectives for future research.

Section snippets

Methods

The protocol adopted for this work was developed following the principles suggested in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement constructed by Moher et al. (2010).

Results

Researchers initially found 599 articles in relation to PFAS and vaccine antibodies from several databases and 22,475 articles through searching the reference list of screened papers. Four thousands and fifty articles were excluded, because they are irrelevant to the subject, or for some other reasons as presented in Fig. 1. After title and abstract screening and methodological quality assessment, nine papers were finally included. The subsequent sections in this work mainly focused on these

Discussion

All the retrieved literature aimed to analyze the effect of PFAS on human immune system functionalities. However, since the immune response in the human body involves multiple aspects, and measuring the concentrations of various vaccine antibodies is a simple and easy approach to understand the immune status of individual, we selectively identified nine papers reporting the influences of PFAS exposure on the generation of vaccine antibodies in the human body. The literature that explore such

Conclusion

In this review, literature search in Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases was performed to identify epidemiologic studies related to the effects of PFAS exposure on immune system functions, specifically the production of antibodies induced by vaccination. Nine papers covering six types of vaccines were included for further analysis in this work, and cross-study heterogeneity was observed in the following aspects: the type of study design, study object, inclusion and exclusion criteria,

Credit author statement

Xin Zhang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data extraction, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Liang Xue: Data extraction and curation, Writing – review & editing. Zhuoma Deji: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Xin Wang: Data curation, Validation, Writing–review & editing. Peng Liu: Data curation, Validation. Jing Lu: Writing – review & editing. Ruke Zhou: Data extraction and curation. Zhenzhen Huang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Funding

Funding sources

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 81903368).

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (80)

  • G.H. Guyatt et al.

    GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias)

    J. Clin. Epidemiol.

    (2011)
  • J. Hu et al.

    Prevalence of suicide attempts among Chinese adolescents: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

    Compr. Psychiatr.

    (2015)
  • H. Huang et al.

    Association between prenatal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and respiratory tract infections in preschool children

    Environ. Res.

    (2020)
  • A.R. Jadad et al.

    Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control

    Clin. Trials

    (1996)
  • N. Kanda et al.

    Estrogen enhances immunoglobulin production by human PBMCs

    J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

    (1999)
  • J. Li et al.

    Legacy per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and alternatives (short-chain analogues, F-53B, GenX and FC-98) in residential soils of China: present implications of replacing legacy PFASs

    Environ. Int.

    (2020)
  • K. Miyamura et al.

    Micro cell culture method for determination of diphtheria toxin and antitoxin titres using VERO cells. I. Studies on factors affecting the toxin and antitoxin titration

    J. Biol. Stand.

    (1974)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

    Int. J. Surg.

    (2010)
  • R.L. Morgan et al.

    GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health

    Environ. Int.

    (2016)
  • R.L. Morgan et al.

    Identifying the PECO: a framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes

    Environ. Int.

    (2018)
  • E. Pasecnaja et al.

    Occurrence of selected per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) in food available on the European market - a review on levels and human exposure assessment

    Chemosphere

    (2022)
  • H.L. Shane et al.

    Immunotoxicity and allergenic potential induced by topical application of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in a murine model

    Food Chem. Toxicol.

    (2020)
  • C.R. Stein et al.

    Perfluoroalkyl substance serum concentrations and immune response to FluMist vaccination among healthy adults

    Environ. Res.

    (2016)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Global emission inventories for C4-C14 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (PFCA) homologues from 1951 to 2030, Part I: production and emissions from quantifiable sources

    Environ. Int.

    (2014)
  • H.J. Wen et al.

    Prenatal and childhood exposure to phthalic acid esters and vaccination antibodies in children: a 15-year follow-up birth cohort study

    Environ. Int.

    (2020)
  • Q. Yang et al.

    Further evidence for the involvement of inhibition of cell proliferation and development in thymic and splenic atrophy induced by the peroxisome proliferator perfluoroctanoic acid in mice

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (2001)
  • Q. Yang et al.

    Potent suppression of the adaptive immune response in mice upon dietary exposure to the potent peroxisome proliferator, perfluorooctanoic acid

    Int. Immunopharm.

    (2002)
  • M.J. Zare Sakhvidi et al.

    Air pollution exposure and bladder, kidney and urinary tract cancer risk: a systematic review

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • K. Abraham et al.

    Internal exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and biological markers in 101 healthy 1-year-old children: associations between levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and vaccine response

    Arch. Toxicol.

    (2020)
  • S. Bastuji-Garin et al.

    Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • A.M. Calafat et al.

    Legacy and alternative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the US general population: paired serum-urine data from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

    Environ. Int.

    (2019)
  • S.T. Callahan et al.

    Impact of body mass index on immunogenicity of pandemic H1N1 vaccine in children and adults

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2014)
  • M.D. Coory

    Comment on: heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (2010)
  • J.C. DeWitt et al.

    Immunotoxicity of perfluorinated compounds: recent developments

    Toxicol. Pathol.

    (2012)
  • J.C. DeWitt et al.

    Exposure to per-fluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances leads to immunotoxicity: epidemiological and toxicological evidence

    J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.

    (2019)
  • G.H. Dong et al.

    Chronic effects of perfluorooctanesulfonate exposure on immunotoxicity in adult male C57BL/6 mice

    Arch. Toxicol.

    (2009)
  • M. Fisher et al.

    Concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in maternal and cord blood from the maternal-infant research on environmental chemicals (MIREC) cohort study

    Environ. Health

    (2016)
  • R.P. Frawley et al.

    Immunotoxic and hepatotoxic effects of perfluoro-n-decanoic acid (PFDA) on female Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats and B6C3F1/N mice when administered by oral gavage for 28 days

    J. Immunot.

    (2018)
  • P. Grandjean et al.

    Serum vaccine antibody concentrations in children exposed to perfluorinated compounds

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (2012)
  • P. Grandjean et al.

    Serum vaccine antibody concentrations in adolescents exposed to perfluorinated compounds

    Environ. Health Perspect.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    This paper has been recommended for acceptance by Payam Dadvand.

    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors

    View full text