Elsevier

Environmental Pollution

Volume 267, December 2020, 115622
Environmental Pollution

Silent effect of the fungicide pyraclostrobin on the larval exposure of the non-target organism Africanized Apis mellifera and its interaction with the pathogen Nosema ceranae in adulthood

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115622Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Larval exposure to fungicide caused cytotoxic effects in the midgut of adult bees.

  • N. ceranae potentiated cytotoxic effects to bee midgut exposed to pyraclostrobin.

  • Fungicide commercial formulation + pathogen intensified the damages to bee’s midgut.

  • The work provides important output to be considered in higher tier risk assessments.

Abstract

The frequent exposure of bees to a wide variety of fungicides, on crops where they forage, can be considered a stressor factor for these pollinators. The organisms are exposed both to the fungicide active ingredients and to the adjuvants of commercial formulations. All these ingredients are brought to the hive by bee foragers through contaminated pollen and nectar, thus exposing also immature individuals during larval phase. This work aimed to compare the effects of larval exposure to the fungicide pyraclostrobin (active ingredient and commercial formulation) and its influence on the cytotoxicity to midguts in adults, which were inoculated with the Nosema ceranae spores in the post-emergence stage. Under laboratory conditions, Apis mellifera larvae received an artificial diet containing fungicide solution from the third to the sixth day of the feeding phase. One-day-old adult workers ingested 100,000 infectious N. ceranae spores mixed in sucrose solution. Effects on midgut were evaluated through cellular biomarkers of stress and cell death. The exposure to the fungicide (active ingredient and commercial formulation) did not affect the larval post-embryonic development and survival of adult bees. However, this exposure induced cytotoxicity in the cells of the midgut, showed by the increase in DNA fragmentation and alteration in the HSP70 immunolabeling pattern. Without the pathogen, the midgut cytotoxic effects and HSP70 immunolabeling of the organisms exposed to the commercial formulation were lower when compared to the exposure to its active ingredient. However, in the presence of the pathogen, the cytotoxic effects of the commercial formulation to the adult bees’ midgut were potentialized. The pathogen N. ceranae increased the damage to the intestinal epithelium of adult bees. Thus, realistic doses of pyraclostrobin present in beebread consumed by larvae can affect the health and induce physiological implications to the midgut functions of the adult bees.

Introduction

Non-target organisms as bees may be potentially threatened by exposure to pesticides (Pisa et al., 2014; Yoder et al., 2013). Among pesticides, fungicides are widely used to control pest and diseases in agricultural production (Cullen et al., 2019). Systemic fungicides are frequently detected in beekeeping matrices and floral resources (Long and Krupke, 2016; Raimets et al., 2020) as their active ingredient and to adjuvants of commercial preparations remain in plants (Chen and Mullin, 2013). For honeybees, these fungicide inert compounds may be more toxic than the active ingredient increasing up to 26,000 times the organisms sensitivity to pesticides (Mullin et al., 2016, 2015).

Concentrations of fungicides found in samples of pollen, nectar and beebread might vary from residual to higher concentrations than those causing lethality to 50% of honeybees, when ingested (Böhme et al., 2018). Concentrations of the fungicide strobilurin pyraclostrobin found in pollen were 8 ng/g (Vázquez et al., 2015), 145.8 ng/g (Mullin et al., 2010) and 27,000 ng/g (Pettis et al., 2013). For the beebread, the pyraclostrobin concentrations reached up to 2,170 ng/g (Yoder et al., 2013).

Fungicides have been linked to several effects in honeybees, such as: behavioral changes (Artz and Pitts-Singer, 2015; Tadei et al., 2019), reduction in longevity of adult (Fisher et al., 2017), cell alterations and microbiota changes of intestine (Anderson et al., 2011; Batista et al., 2020; Carneiro et al., 2020; DeGrandi-Hoffman et al., 2017) and changes in the immune system (Cizelj et al., 2016), facilitating their infection by pathogens (Degrandi-Hoffman et al., 2015) as the Nosema ceranae (Glavinic et al., 2019; Pettis et al., 2013). However, studies combining the exposure of bees to pathogens and fungicide are still scarce.

N. ceranae are a highly specialized fungi that exclusively parasitize the epithelial cells of the midgut of Apis mellifera (Fries et al., 2006, 1996). The intracellular parasite N. ceranae can also negatively affect in the health of bees, leading to individual energy stress (Kurze et al., 2016; Mayack and Naug, 2009) and cell lysis at the end of the pathogen cycle (Fries et al., 1996; Panek et al., 2018). When the organisms are exposed to stress conditions, they may activate mechanisms of cellular defense such as the expression of heat shock proteins, as for example the HSP70 that are ATP-dependent for their chaperone activity (Beere, 2004; King and MacRae, 2015). The expression of these proteins may inhibit cell death (Garrido et al., 2001), preventing protein aggregation and restoring the native conformation of proteins and, consequently, their functions (Bukau and Horwich, 1998; Priya et al., 2013). The HSP70 is considered a cell biomarker of exposure to xenobiotics in bees (Silva-Zacarin et al., 2006), being its level used to measure cellular stress (Kim et al., 2019; King and MacRae, 2015).

In Brazil, when assessing the Environmental Risks to bees of using pesticides in agricultural fields, only short-term experiments are normally done. These results may lead to a misunderstanding of the consequences of bee’s exposure to pesticides depending on the mode of action of the pesticide of interest. Thus, this study aimed to compare the sub-lethal effects of larval exposure to the active ingredient and the commercial formulation of the fungicide pyraclostrobin and to evaluate the influence of this exposure on the cytotoxicity to midgut of the adults’ honeybees, which were infected with the N. ceranae spores in the adult phase. Midgut effects were evaluated through cellular biomarkers of cytotoxicity and response to cell stress (HSP 70).

Section snippets

Exposure to fungicides

Three bioassays were conducted in order to assess the effects of the fungicide pyraclostrobin (active ingredient and commercial formulation) on the development of the honeybees’ larvae (oral exposure) and the emerging adults. For each bioassay, which followed the OECD no. 239 guideline (OECD, 2016), 576 larvae of the bee Apis mellifera were used, being 144 per experimental group.

First instar larvae from three healthy colonies of Africanized Apis mellifera were individually transferred to

Exposure to pesticides

There was no difference in larval mortality between controls and the fungicide-exposed groups (Table S2, p = 0.08). Pupation and emergence rates did not differ among the different experimental groups (Table S2, p = 0.41 and 0.20, respectively). The larvae exposed to dimethoate showed a mean mortality of 91.67%, validating the bioassays, according to OECD protocol no. 239. The fungicide, isolated or in combination with the pathogen N. ceranae, did not affect the survival of adult honeybees (

Discussion

Larval exposure to pyraclostrobin fungicide, both as active ingredient and commercial formulation, did not affect the development or survival of adult honeybees. The absence of effects on survival was also observed in larval exposure to the dose of the pyraclostrobin fungicide (Tadei et al., 2019) and other fungicides such as iprodione (Carneiro et al., 2020), propiconazole and pyraclostrobin + boscalide (Wade et al., 2019).

In the adult phase, sublethal effects from the larval exposure to

Conclusion

Exposure to the fungicide pyraclostrobin in the larval phase of Apis mellifera affected the morphology of the midgut of emerging bees. The combination of stressors (exposure to the fungicide and pathogen Nosema ceranae) increased the damages to the bees’ midgut epithelium. However, these effects did not affect bee survival at any stage of development and post-emergence, although it may potentially compromise their fitness. The cytotoxic effects of the commercial formulation, in the absence of

Author contributions

Rafaela Tadei, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing. Vanessa B. Menezes-Oliveira, Investigation, Methodology, Writing. Elaine C.M. Silva-Zacarin, Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the support from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP no.2017/21097–3) and CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) by master’s degree scholarship for first author and post-doctoral scholarship for the second author. We thank also Monique S. Souza and Caio E. C. Domingues for their technical help during bioassays, to the beekeeper Edson Sampaio (COAPIS) for providing bee colonies for experiments, and Profa. Dra. Letícia Silva Souto from

References (74)

  • C. Mayack et al.

    Energetic stress in the honeybee Apis mellifera from Nosema ceranae infection

    J. Invertebr. Pathol.

    (2009)
  • C.A. Mullin

    Effects of “inactive” ingredients on bees

    Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.

    (2015)
  • C.A. Mullin et al.

    The formulation makes the honey bee poison

    Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.

    (2015)
  • C.R. Oliveira et al.

    Nanopesticide based on botanical insecticide pyrethrum and its potential effects on honeybees

    Chemosphere

    (2019)
  • J. Panek et al.

    Impact of the microsporidian Nosema ceranae on the gut epithelium renewal of the honeybee, Apis mellifera

    J. Invertebr. Pathol.

    (2018)
  • S. Priya et al.

    Molecular chaperones as enzymes that catalytically unfold misfolded polypeptides

    FEBS Lett.

    (2013)
  • É.W. Teixeira et al.

    Spores of paenibacillus larvae, ascosphaera apis, Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis in bee products supervised by the Brazilian federal inspection service

    Rev. Bras. Entomol.

    (2018)
  • T. Tesovnik et al.

    Exposure of honey bee larvae to thiamethoxam and its interaction with Nosema ceranae infection in adult honey bees

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • H.V.V. Tomé et al.

    Frequently encountered pesticides can cause multiple disorders in developing worker honey bees

    Environ. Pollut.

    (2020)
  • P.P. Vázquez et al.

    A sensitive and efficient method for routine pesticide multiresidue analysis in bee pollen samples using gas and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2015)
  • K.E. Anderson et al.

    An emerging paradigm of colony health: microbial balance of the honey bee and hive (Apis mellifera)

    Insectes Soc.

    (2011)
  • Y. Ansoar-Rodríguez et al.

    Liver alterations in Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces) induced by insecticide imidacloprid: histopathology and heat shock protein in situ localization

    J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B Pestic. Food Contam. Agric. Wastes

    (2016)
  • D.R. Artz et al.

    Effects of fungicide and adjuvant sprays on nesting behavior in two managed solitary bees, osmia lignaria and Megachile rotundata

    PloS One

    (2015)
  • P. Aupinel et al.

    Improvement of artificial feeding in a standard in vitro method for rearing Apis mellifera larvae

    Bull. Insectol.

    (2005)
  • A.C. Batista et al.

    Is a strobilurin fungicide capable of inducing histopathological effects on the midgut and Malpighian tubules of honey bees?

    J. Apicult. Res.

    (2020)
  • H.M. Beere

    “The stress of dying”: the role of heat shock proteins in the regulation of apoptosis

    J. Cell Sci.

    (2004)
  • D. Bernet et al.

    Histopathology in fish: proposal for a protocol to assess aquatic pollution

    J. Fish Deseases

    (1999)
  • F. Böhme et al.

    Pesticide residue survey of pollen loads collected by honeybees (Apis mellifera) in daily intervals at three agricultural sites in South Germany

    PloS One

    (2018)
  • B. Bukau et al.

    The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines

    Cell

    (1998)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Quantitative determination of trisiloxane surfactants in beehive environments based on liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • R.S. Cornman et al.

    Pathogen webs in collapsing honey bee colonies

    PloS One

    (2012)
  • M.G. Cullen et al.

    Fungicides, herbicides and bees: a systematic review of existing research and methods

    PloS One

    (2019)
  • G. Degrandi-Hoffman et al.

    Effects of oral exposure to fungicides on honey bee nutrition and virus levels

    J. Econ. Entomol.

    (2015)
  • G. DeGrandi-Hoffman et al.

    Honey bee gut microbial communities are robust to the fungicide Pristine® consumed in pollen

    Apidologie

    (2017)
  • D.M. Eiri et al.

    Nosema ceranae can infect honey bee larvae and reduces subsequent adult longevity

    PloS One

    (2015)
  • S. Elmore

    Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death

    Toxicol. Pathol.

    (2007)
  • A. Fisher et al.

    The synergistic effects of almond protection fungicides on honey bee (hymenoptera: apidae) forager survival

    J. Econ. Entomol.

    (2017)
  • Cited by (29)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This paper has been recommended for acceptance by Sarah Harmon.

    View full text