Investigation on the sensitivity of flexible foundation models of an offshore wind turbine under earthquake loadings
Introduction
Wind energy is currently playing a leading role in the global production of cleaner energy as an alternative to fossil and non-cleaner fuels. The 2018 Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) annual wind report states that 52 GW of newly installed wind capacity was added globally in 2017, and with 50% of the figure shared by China and the USA [1]. The southeast coastal areas of China and the west coast of the USA, located close to the Pacific seismic belts, are prone to earthquake. Wind turbines installed in these areas are susceptible to damage from the resulting earthquake loading coupled with the local wind loading. Similar circumstances exist for the wind farms located along the southern areas of Europe and New Zealand where there are rich offshore wind resources. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate the impacts of earthquake loading on wind turbines due to potential consequences on operation and supply of wind energy in these locations.
Environmental loads acting on wind turbines along with earthquake loadings have a significant influence on the accuracy of the seismic analysis of wind turbines. Dynamic behaviours of wind turbines under earthquake excitations have been studied over the past decades but with simplifications on the model geometries [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. In these studies, the rotor and nacelle were either completely ignored or simplified as a lumped mass. The unsteady wind loads are often treated as a rotor thrust, leading to inaccuracies in the prediction of aerodynamic loads acting on the blades. Generally, the aerodynamic loads increase exponentially with the rotor diameter for large-scale wind turbines. The resulting aerodynamic effects have been determined to be unneglectable from a comparative study on operational and parked states [10]. Therefore, over-simplification of aerodynamic loads is never precise, thereby undermining the accuracy of results in the seismic analysis of large-scale wind turbines. Therefore, in the seismic analysis of large-scale wind turbines, it is necessary to correctly take into account the coupled effect of wind and earthquake loadings.
One of the efficient approaches of improving the accuracy of coupled earthquake and wind loadings for wind turbines is by integrating an additional seismic module into an aeroelastic analysis tool. An early study on the coupled behaviour of earthquake and wind loadings was conducted by Witcher for a 2 MW wind turbine [11]. With the use of GH Bladed, Santangelo et al. [12] investigated the difference between the results from fully coupled and uncoupled time-domain simulations for a 5 MW wind turbine under the combined excitations of wind and earthquakes. Using FAST as a design basis, Asareh and Prowell [13], [14] developed a seismic module in order to examine the coupled effect of wind and earthquake. In the seismic module, the calculation of the earthquake loading is based on a specific ground motion, and the stiffness and damping properties of a damped actuator are located at the tower-base. Asareh et al. [15] used the improved FAST (also called NREL Seismic) to investigate the relationships between earthquake intensity and structural responses. Jin et al. [16] also used the NREL Seismic tool to predict the dynamic responses of a wind turbine under multiple hazards associated with earthquake and turbulent wind. Similarly, Yang et al. [8] proposed a numerical analysis framework coupled with FAST in order to obtain seismic responses of wind turbines. It is noted that the method of earthquake analysis proposed by Asareh and Prowell [13], [14] is different from the one applied to seismic analysis of buildings. The accuracy of predictions is significantly influenced by the stiffness and damping properties. The selection of the values of stiffness and damping depends on the experience of the involved analytical engineers.
However, it is noted that most of the aforementioned literatures focused heavily on earthquake effects for land-based wind turbines, which are significantly different from the offshore types. Since a large number of newly installed offshore wind turbines are located in earthquake-prone areas, it is necessary to investigate the seismic behaviour of offshore wind turbines in order to mitigate potential consequences of damage caused by earthquakes.
Offshore wind turbines have slender support structures resulting in large vibration amplitudes at the tower-top. In addition, the nature of the soils in the offshore environment often leads to more severe structural responses. The offshore soil is composed of detrital materials and sediments, implying that the wind turbine foundation is installed in a layer of less dense and less stiff soil [17], [18]. The soft soil condition is often associated with liquefaction in earthquake-prone offshore environments. This may affect the integrity or the serviceability of the foundation during its operational lifespan. As discussed by Wang et al. [19], the liquefaction is more easily caused by earthquakes leading to severe damage to the wind turbine under soft soil conditions. Some common foundation problems resulting from soil liquefaction include operational difficulty and loss of stability of the wind turbine. In addition, the cost of the foundation is approximately 30% of the total cost of a bottom-fixed offshore wind turbine and could reach up to 35% for the wind turbines installed in water depth of 30–40 m [20]. Hence, the deign of offshore wind turbine foundation subjected to earthquakes needs to be carefully handled due to its impact on the overall cost of wind turbines and the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE).
The soil structure interaction (SSI) model plays a key role in the design of a foundation as can be seen in Fig. 1. The accuracy of the results from foundation design analyses, including eigen-analysis and ultimate state analysis, is significantly influenced by the selection of the SSI model. This means that the selection of a SSI model determines the reliability of the foundation which costs over 30% of the whole wind turbine. Hence, the sensitivity analysis of SSI models is beneficial to the wind turbine industry for practical cost-reduction reasons when selecting the appropriate foundation concept during the design stage.
SSI can be modelled using three methods: apparent fixity (AF), coupled springs (CS) and distributed springs (DS) [21]. The CS model is the most widely used method in the dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbines and it is applicable to any type of offshore foundations due to its ease in obtaining results using typical theories [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. For the CS model, the foundation is modelled using a set of translational and rotational springs placed at the bottom of the structure to represent the SSI effect. Bhattacharya et al. [28], [29] investigated the SSI of a monopile wind turbine under different soil conditions by using scaled experiments and numerical analysis. It was found that the numerical models had first natural frequencies similar to those of the test models in most soil conditions including clay. In some foundation cases with saturated sands, however, over 20% discrepancies were observed between the numerical and experimental results. In another study conducted by Bhattacharya et al. [30], it was found that the stiffness of lateral springs could be reduced under cyclic loadings, which is a major contributor to fatigue. The study found that 30% change in the first natural frequency of the wind turbine system occurred after 10,000 cycles. This suggests that there is a limitation on the use of the CS model for SSI modelling of the dense soil condition.
The DS model is another widely used foundation modelling method for SSI [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. In this method, the SSI is represented by a set of lateral and vertical springs distributed along the embedded pile (usually, only the lateral springs are considered). The stiffness of the springs is obtained in accordance with p-y curves at different depths. Compared to the CS model, the DS model has an advantage that the responses of the embedded portion of the foundation can be investigated more specifically. The DS model is well suited for modelling pile in a multi-layered soil condition while the CS model could only model an overall effect of SSI at the seabed level.
The AF method is another modelling option which is an alternative to the CS and DS models. In this method, a fictive length is assumed to connect the bottom of the support structure and the foundation soils. The support structure is fixed and has the same mudline lateral deformation and rotation as the CS and DS models under external excitations. This approach is much easier to implement in any multi-body analysis tool for accounting the SSI effect. Damgaard et al. [37] investigated the dynamic responses of a monopile offshore wind turbine by considering the effect of SSI modelled using AF and CS models. The AF model results in similar fatigue damage compared to the CS model for two distinct types of soil. From the preceding literatures, it has been noted that the SSI effect for offshore wind turbines has been examined under multiple loadings with the exception of earthquakes.
Santangelo et al. [38] compared the structural responses of coupled and uncoupled time-domain simulations for an offshore wind turbine under earthquake loadings. Kim et al. [39] investigated the seismic fragility of a monopile offshore wind turbine by considering the SSI effect. They modelled the flexible foundation using a set of lateral springs distributed along the length of the support structure underneath the seabed. The stiffness of each spring at a corresponding depth was represented by a p-y curve. Mo et al. [40] also performed a seismic fragility analysis of an offshore wind turbine under different operating states by considering the effect of SSI. Wind loads were calculated using FAST and then applied to the FEM model for coupling with earthquake loadings in OpenSees. The probability of reaching damage states was discussed for different wind conditions and earthquake loadings. Alati et al. [41] studied the seismic responses of two bottom-fixed offshore wind turbines using GH Bladed in which the SSI model was represented by two transitional springs.
However, there are still some notable limitations in the above-mentioned literatures. First, the dynamic characteristic in the frequency domain of offshore wind turbines under multi-loadings, which is important in the control and mitigation of vibration induced by an earthquake [42], [43], has not been addressed. Secondly, although it has been widely accepted that the DS model offers the best approach for representing realistic foundation conditions, the difference between the three SSI modelling approaches (i.e. the AF, CS and DS) for seismic analysis of offshore wind turbines has not been thoroughly investigated. For offshore wind turbines located in earthquake-prone areas, the support structure suffers from high frequency and strong underlying excitations. This means that an investigation of the sensitivity of flexible foundation models becomes imperative in order to perform accurate seismic analysis for a reliable foundation design.
The purpose of this study, therefore, is to investigate the sensitivity of foundation models of offshore wind turbines under multi-hazards by including earthquake, wind and wave loadings. The structural responses of the wind turbine with distinct foundation models will be examined in both time domain and frequency domain. For this purpose, a seismic analysis framework (SAF) is developed to take into account the influences of earthquake loading and foundation flexibility by extending the capability of the FAST source code. One of the benefits of using SAF is that it is generic and can be applied to different types of wind turbine models compared with the NREL Seismic tool presented in [14], [15]. In addition, SAF offers capabilities for different SSI models to be examined as opposed to other tools that exclusively focus on the rigid foundation concept.
Section snippets
Seismic analysis framework modelling
In order to adequately examine the combined effects of earthquake, wind and wave in the design of offshore wind turbines, SAF for offshore wind turbines is developed and implemented in an open source numerical tool, FAST. The improved capability of the FAST-SAF means that comprehensive coupled analysis of wind turbine dynamics can be accurately performed by incorporating an appropriate foundation model. In this study, two subroutines (UserTwrLd and UserPtfmLd) in FAST have been extended to take
Full-field turbulent wind
TurbSim [54] developed by NREL is used to generate the full-field turbulent wind for simulations. The wind field centred on hub is discretized in finite grids in both the horizontal and vertical directions. The size of the wind field adopted to cover the operating domain of the wind turbine in this study is 175 m × 200 m (Fig. 7). The velocity component in x direction is perpendicular to the rotor plane while the directions of the other two components are also depicted in Fig. 7.
Time-varying
Validation for the developed SAF
In order to validate the computational accuracy of SAF, dynamic responses of the NREL 5 MW monopile wind turbine predicted using SAF and GH Bladed are compared. In addition, a comparison between SAF and the NREL Seismic tool is also presented. The choice of these tools (GH Bladed and NREL Seismic) was driven by the fact that they were thoroughly validated using experimental results, hence their wide acceptance in the industry. The ground accelerations of Northridge earthquake event which
Conclusions
In this study, the sensitivity of foundation models to the dynamic behaviour of an offshore wind turbine under earthquake loadings has been investigated. In order to consider the influence of flexible foundation and earthquake loading, SAF is developed and implemented in an open source tool named FAST. The validation of SAF is carried out through comparisons with some experimentally validated numerical tools, GH Bladed and NREL Seismic. Three distinct flexible foundation models are established
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial supports from the Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 51676131 and 51811530315) and Royal Society (grant number: IEC\NSFC\170054). This project is partially supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, RISE, under grant agreement no. 730888 (RESET) and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Interreg Atlantic Area (grant number: EAPA_344/2016). The first author (Yang Yang) and the last
References (63)
- et al.
Static, seismic and stability analyses of a prototype wind turbine steel tower
Eng Struct
(2002) - et al.
Analysis and design of the prototype of a steel 1-MW wind turbine tower
Eng Struct
(2003) - et al.
Structural performance of a parked wind turbine tower subjected to strong ground motions
Eng Struct
(2016) - et al.
Time-domain uncoupled analyses for seismic assessment of land-based wind turbines
Eng Struct
(2016) - et al.
Effects of seismic and aerodynamic load interaction on structural dynamic response of multi-megawatt utility scale horizontal axis wind turbines
Renew Energy
(2016) - et al.
Multi-hazard response analysis of a 5 MW offshore wind turbine
Procedia Eng
(2017) - et al.
Seismic centrifuge modelling of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine
Renew Energy
(2017) - et al.
Dynamic analysis of wind turbines including soil-structure interaction
Eng Struct
(2012) - et al.
Foundation damping and the dynamics of offshore wind turbine monopiles
Renew Energy
(2015) - et al.
Dynamic response sensitivity of an offshore wind turbine for varying subsoil conditions
Ocean Eng
(2015)
Closed form solution of Eigen frequency of monopile supported offshore wind turbines in deeper waters incorporating stiffness of substructure and SSI
Soil Dyn Earthq Eng
Experimental validation of soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines
Soil Dyn Earthq Eng
Dynamic soil–structure interaction of monopile supported wind turbines in cohesive soil
Soil Dyn Earthq Eng
Assessment of the dynamic behaviour of saturated soil subjected to cyclic loading from offshore monopile wind turbine foundations
Comput Geotech
Dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine in clay considering soil–monopile–tower interaction
Soil Dyn Earthq Eng
An investigation into the effect of scour on the natural frequency of an offshore wind turbine
Ocean Eng
Design of monopile supported offshore wind turbine in clay considering dynamic soil–structure-interaction
Soil Dyn Earthq Eng
Effects of soil–structure interaction on real time dynamic response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles
Eng Struct
Seismic fragility analysis of 5 MW offshore wind turbine
Renew Energy
Semi-active control of monopile offshore wind turbines under multi-hazards
Mech Syst Sig Process
Bi-directional vibration control of offshore wind turbines using a 3D pendulum tuned mass damper
Mech Syst Sig Process
Parameters of Jonswap spectral model for surface gravity waves—II. Predictability from real data
Ocean Eng
Stochastic seismic response analysis of offshore wind turbine including fluid-structure-soil interaction
Struct Des Tall Special Build
Seismic response of a prestressed concrete wind turbine tower
Int J Civil Eng
Multihazard assessment of wind turbine towers under simultaneous application of wind, operation, and seismic loads
J Perform Constr Facil
Seismic response analysis of wind turbine towers including soil-structure interaction
Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part K: J Multi-body Dyn
Nonlinear response of wind turbines under wind and seismic excitations with soil–structure interaction
J Comput Nonlinear Dyn
Dynamic behavior of wind turbines influenced by aerodynamic damping and earthquake intensity
Wind Energy
Seismic analysis of wind turbines in the time domain
Wind Energy
A computational platform for considering the effects of aerodynamic and seismic load combination for utility scale horizontal axis wind turbines
Earthq Eng Eng Vib
Cited by (39)
Vibration control of a monopile offshore wind turbines under recorded seismic waves
2024, Renewable EnergyGeneric fully coupled framework for reliability assessment of offshore wind turbines under typical limit states
2024, Engineering StructuresSeismic response of monopile foundation of offshore wind turbines under near-field and far-field ground motions
2023, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringRelationships between vibrations of main device and mechanical network in a classical vibration control system
2023, Journal of Sound and Vibration