Elsevier

Engineering Structures

Volume 132, 1 February 2017, Pages 671-683
Engineering Structures

Experiments on prefabricated segmental bridge piers with continuous longitudinal reinforcing bars

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.070Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Experiments on precast bridge piers with bonded prestressing tendons and continuous mild reinforcement are conducted.

  • Continuous longitudinal reinforcing bars significantly improves seismic performance of the precast pier.

  • The prestressed precast columns show stable behavior up to drift level of 8%.

  • Magnitude of effective prestressing force is an essential design consideration to prevent fracture of tendons.

Abstract

Prestressed precast concrete bridge piers have recently been considered as an excellent design alternatives because of their recentering capability under seismic actions. Axial prestressing is designed to control cracking at precast joints by service loads. In this paper, a combination of continuous mild reinforcing bars and prestressing tendons is suggested for enhancing the seismic performance as well as economy of post-tensioned precast bridge piers. Cyclic tests were conducted to measure and observe the behavior of the proposed bridge pier system. By preventing buckling and fracture of the reinforcing bars in the plastic hinge region, the test specimens showed improved structural behavior up to a drift level of 8% without reduction in their flexural strength. Energy absorption capacity was also investigated. An appropriate magnitude of initial prestressing force was found to be an essential design consideration for preventing fracture of tendons by lateral displacement of columns.

Introduction

In seismic regions, a prestressed precast segmental bridge pier has many design challenges in terms of structural performance, durability and cost. For the structural performance of the pier, connections between segments are main concerns to ensure serviceability, safety and seismic performance. Even though quality control of precast segments is better than cast-in-place concrete members, the joints between segments must be properly protected against corrosion. Assembly of the segments requires accurate geometry control, and 3D engineering emerged in precast concrete industry for digital manufacturing and geometry control [1], [2], [3], [4].

Axial prestressing is introduced to control joint opening and cracking at service loadings. For short columns, full prestressing can be used for design philosophy while partial prestressing is more appropriate for high-rise bridge piers. Billington and Yoon [5] have done cyclic tests on unbonded post-tensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete. This combination consisting of post-tensioning with the ductile fiber-reinforced cement-based composite in precast segments at potential hinging regions, resulted in increased energy dissipation and improved integrity under cyclic loadings. Ou et al. [6] investigated seismic performance of precast unbonded posttensioned bridge columns with bonded longitudinal mild steel reinforcements continuous across the segment joints. Optimum ratio of energy dissipation bars to enhance hysteretic behavior was proposed as 0.5%. Kwan and Billington [7] proposed a segmental precast bridge pier system using both bonded reinforcement and unbonded post-tensioning. Bonded mild reinforcement crossing the precast joints provides hysteretic energy dissipation as well as controlling crack widths. However, there are issues of durability, serviceability and efficiency of prestressing steels for given design conditions. Sideris et al. [8] performed shake table tests on hybrid sliding-rocking bridge with internal unbonded posttensioning. The tests showed that joint sliding at the columns provided energy dissipation, while joint rocking provided self-centering to the structure.

The axial steel design using prestressing bars and steel tubes can provide enough strength and ductility even though the axial reinforcing bars are not continuous across the joints that was investigated by Shim et al [9]. Experimental study on prefabricated composite columns was also conducted by Shim et al [10]. Precast composite columns with prestressing showed a significant increase in the maximum strength of columns as the applied prestress increased. While the ultimate strength of composite columns with prestressing can be increased by higher prestress, the displacement ductility of the prestressed composite column decreased as the prestress increased. Level of prestressing to enhance seismic performance needs more investigation. Bonded and unbonded prestressing for precast hollow bridge piers were studied by experimental programs [11], [12]. The bridge pier with bonded prestressing strands showed better energy dissipation capacity and higher strength. The partial precast segmental column showed excellent energy dissipation capacity and damping ratio [12]. For accelerated bridge construction, grouted splice sleeve connectors were used, and experimental evaluation showed satisfactory hysteretic performance which exceeds the drift demand in large earthquakes [13].

A self-centering precast concrete pier with external energy dissipators was proposed and a theoretical model for the pier was also validated [14]. Parametric studies using a linear form of constitutive models for precast prestressed concrete segmental columns were suggested to predict the deformation of the columns [15]. In order to provide numerical models of post-tensioned precast concrete columns, a two-plastic-hinge model using the moment curvature analysis was proposed by Chou et al. [16].

The prefabricated bridge pier investigated in this research is a segmentally precast concrete system with bonded post-tensioning. Combination of continuous reinforcing bars and prestressing steels was proposed to enhance current practices in terms of erection efficiency, durability of the segment joints and seismic performance. Design is based on partial prestressing concept by continuous reinforcing bars crossing the joints as shown in Fig. 1. Location of longitudinal bar in a column section is determined to maximize effectiveness of each material strength and ductility of each component. Anchorages of the post-tensioned strands are located at the sides of a foundation to enhance efficiency of site work. Cyclic tests were conducted to investigate seismic performance of the proposed precast segmental columns.

Section snippets

Test specimens

A laboratory testing program was planned to investigate the static and seismic behavior of the proposed bridge pier system under cyclic loading. A total number of five precast pier specimens were fabricated and tested, as shown in Fig. 2. A circular solid section with a diameter of 800 mm was designed. The distance between the point of fixity and the loading point was 2750 mm. The aspect ratio of the pier specimens was 3.44. The pier consists of three segments which are a footing and two column

Ultimate strength and measured response

All test specimens exhibited ductile flexural response up to the maximum drift level of 8% without abrupt strength reduction as in the hysteretic force-displacement curves shown in Fig. 6. Load-displacement curves showed recentering behavior up to 2% drift level. Initial transverse cracking was observed at 1% drift level for specimens except for T75PT1B. Crushing of the concrete near the first joint was delayed by the chamfered edge of the precast segment. Cover concrete spalling was observed

Conclusion

The investigation of the structural performance of precast prestressed concrete columns for bridges in seismic regions is described in this paper. In order to enhance seismic performance and economy of prefabricated bridge columns, combination of prestressing steels and bonded mild reinforcing bars are provided. The work presented in this paper revealed the following conclusions.

  • (1)

    3D design and fabrication procedures including the chamfered edge of the precast segment and machined milled

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Excellent Student Scholarship in 2011 and a grant (13SCIPA01) from Smart Civil Infrastructure Research Program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) of Korea government and Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA).

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (50)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text