Review
Thermophysical properties and applications of nano-enhanced PCMs: An update review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112876Get rights and content

Highlights

  • PCM is a solution to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

  • Evaluating the techniques used for the addition of nanoparticles to PCMs.

  • Discussing on effects of nanoparticles on the thermophysical properties of PCMs.

  • Examining the applications of nano-PCMs.

  • Phase change rate increases with the addition of nanoparticles.

Abstract

Energy conservation management using latent heat storage (LHS) technique is nowadays employed as a solution to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Phase change materials (PCMs) are the main candidate for LHS method. The main focus of this study is to evaluate the techniques used for the addition of nanoparticles to PCMs. The present paper is divided into three parts. The first part summarizes PCMs and nanoparticles. In the second part, the effects of nanoparticles on the most important thermophysical properties of PCMs are discussed. In the third part, the applications of nano-PCMs (NPCMs) in the fields such as thermal energy storage (TES), thermal control unit (TCU), photovoltaic thermal (PVT), solar still (SS) and building are examined. In general, all studies show that the phase change rate increases with the addition of nanoparticles. This means that the amount of energy stored/released during the phase change process is improved.

Introduction

Energy consumption management has always been one of the concerns of various researchers [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] because fossil fuel energy is non-renewable and the use of fossil fuels also causes environmental problems. The use of renewable energies can be substituted as a way to reduce fossil fuel consumption. Thus, scientists are looking for ways to make more energy from renewable sources. Another way to manage energy consumption is to use thermal energy storage systems [6], [7]. Using energy storage can prevent the transfer of energy to the environment, etc. [8], [9]. In other words, energy can be stored for future applications. Thermal energy storage is classified into three groups: sensible energy storage, latent energy storage and chemical energy storage [10] (Fig. 1). Each of the three methods mentioned above has some advantages and limitations for use in energy storage. This study investigates the latent energy storage.

Among the methods that fall into the latent energy storage group, the technique of using PCMs has unique capabilities [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. PCMs are capable of storing or releasing large amounts of energy while their temperature is kept constant or slightly changed [16] (Fig. 2). Fig. 2 compares the amount of energy stored in the PCM of RT-27 with water (one of the most commonly used materials for energy storage). As we know, the behavior of the material is such that its temperature increases by receiving the heat. But if heat is given to PCMs at a phase change temperature, they can store a great deal of energy without change in their temperature. Therefore, the most important property of PCMs is the ability to store thermal energy.

PCMs have the ability to store a lot of energy. The high storage potential of PCMs is activated when their phase is changed. In other words, if these materials do not undergo phase change, they do not have a particular ability to store energy in comparison with the rest of the materials. Unfortunately, the thermal conductivity of PCMs is very low and comparable to the best insulators in this respect. Low thermal conductivity reduces the energy storage rate, i.e., energy is stored or released with fewer rates. For example, consider two PCMs A and B that have the same properties except their thermal conductivity. Now, if the two PCMs are used to store energy, the PCM with higher thermal conductivity has lower charging time. The same is true for energy release. The PCM with higher thermal conductivity has lower discharging time. It is important to note that the energy stored or released from the PCM may change (not necessarily) by changing the thermal conductivity. However, an increase of thermal conductivity has been desirable in many cases. Nanoparticles have a very high surface-to-volume ratio, which makes they have specific properties. For example, the thermal conductivity of MWCNT and graphene nanoparticles is about 3000 W/m.K and 5300 W/m.K, respectively [17], [18], while the thermal conductivity of PCMs is very low, for example that of paraffin is about 0.2 W/m.K [19]. Therefore, it is expected that by adding nanoparticles with high thermal conductivity into PCMs, their thermal conductivity increases. Studies have demonstrated that NPCM has better phase-change and storage parameters than PCM and can therefore be replaced in energy storage applications.

In this paper, the effects of nanoparticles on the thermophysical properties of PCM as well as the phase change process are thoroughly investigated. The study is divided into three sections. The first section briefly refers to the PCMs. In the second section, the effects of nanoparticles on the most important thermophysical properties of PCM are discussed. At the end of this section, the role of nanoparticles in improving the phase change process is examined. In the third section, the applications of NPCMs in the fields such as TES, TCU, PVT, solar still and building are discussed. Each section attempts to use new and up-to-date articles, and is additionally categorized in tables for ease of review.

Section snippets

Overview of PCMs

PCM is a material with phase change. The main advantage of PCMs is their high energy storage potential. The high capacity of PCM in energy storage can be seen in Fig. 3. As can be seen, when the phase of PCM changes (blue line), the amount of energy stored in the PCM is much greater than that in which the PCM only undergoes a sensible heat transfer process (purple line).

The sensible and latent heat stored in the PCM can be obtained from Eqs. (1), (2) [20].Qs=mcpΔTQl=mhfgwhere m indicates the

Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles are particles that are less than 100 nm in size. With the advancement of science, various nanoparticles such as metals such as gold, silver, platinum, titanium and aluminum and copper, metal oxides such as titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, silica, alumina, manganese oxide and iron oxide, carbon nanotubes include single layer and multilayer, graphene, graphene oxide, graphite, etc. have been produced. Fig. 11 shows the classification of the nanoparticles.

Nanoparticles have a very high

The influence of nanoparticles on thermophysical properties of PCMs

The NPCM is a combination of PCM and nanoparticles. Certainly, due to the presence of nanoparticles, the thermophysical properties of NPCM and PCM are different. This section discusses the effect of adding nanoparticles and how their properties change. The nanoparticles employed by various researchers are summarized in Table 4. In addition to the type of nanoparticles, their applications, phase change process type (melting/solidification) and study type (experimental/numerical) are classified.

Different applications of NPCMs

NPCMs are used in various applications such as thermal storages [43], [124], [125], building [126], thermal management of electronic equipment [103], [114], [127], [128], [129], heat pipe [130], [131], solar water heaters [132], and solar stills [68], [113], [122], [133], [134], [135].

Challenges and future works

One of the most important parameters of using NPCMs is their cost. Processes such as nanoparticle preparation, synthesis, and sustainability are costly and time-consuming. The higher cost of producing NPCMs than PCMs is a concern that should be reduced as much as possible by optimized methods. While studies have shown that the thermal conductivity of NPCMs is higher than that of PCMs, in some cases it has been observed that the phase enthalpy decreases with the addition of nanoparticles. Thus,

Conclusions

The advantage of PCMs is their high phase change enthalpy and their disadvantage is their low thermal conductivity. In this study, the use of nanoparticles was evaluated to improve the thermal performance of PCMs. Phase change temperature, phase change enthalpy and thermal conductivity are three important parameters for the selection of an appropriate PCM. The presence of nanoparticles affects all three factors.

  • The effect of the presence of nanoparticles on thermal conductivity has excellent

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The work of this paper is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51876040) and the Zhishan Youth Scholar Program of SEU. The supports are gratefully acknowledged

References (188)

  • A. Hassan et al.

    Thermal management and uniform temperature regulation of photovoltaic modules using hybrid phase change materials-nanofluids system

    Renew Energy

    (2020)
  • M. Sajawal et al.

    Experimental thermal performance analysis of finned tube-phase change material based double pass solar air heater

    Case Stud Therm Eng

    (2019)
  • A. Asadi

    Effect of sonication characteristics on stability, thermophysical properties, and heat transfer of nanofluids: a comprehensive review

    Ultrason Sonochem

    (2019)
  • Z. Khan et al.

    A review of performance enhancement of PCM based latent heat storage system within the context of materials, thermal stability and compatibility

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2016)
  • B. Shang et al.

    Modularized thermal storage unit of metal foam/paraffin composite

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2018)
  • R. Raud et al.

    A critical review of eutectic salt property prediction for latent heat energy storage systems

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2017)
  • E. Oró et al.

    Review on phase change materials (PCMs) for cold thermal energy storage applications

    Appl Energy

    (2012)
  • B. Eanest Jebasingh et al.

    A comprehensive review on latent heat and thermal conductivity of nanoparticle dispersed phase change material for low-temperature applications

    Energy Storage Mater

    (2020)
  • L. Fan et al.

    Thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials for thermal energy storage: a review

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2011)
  • J.M. Khodadadi et al.

    Thermal conductivity enhancement of nanostructure-based colloidal suspensions utilized as phase change materials for thermal energy storage: a review

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2013)
  • N. Kumar et al.

    Review of stability and thermal conductivity enhancements for salt hydrates

    J Storage Mater

    (2019)
  • Y. Lin et al.

    Review on thermal conductivity enhancement, thermal properties and applications of phase change materials in thermal energy storage

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2018)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials for thermal energy storage: a review

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2016)
  • N.H. Mohamed et al.

    Thermal conductivity enhancement of treated petroleum waxes, as phase change material, by α nano alumina: energy storage

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2017)
  • Z.A. Qureshi et al.

    Recent advances on thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials for energy storage system: a review

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2018)
  • A.M. Abdulateef et al.

    Geometric and design parameters of fins employed for enhancing thermal energy storage systems: a review

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2018)
  • J.M. Munyalo et al.

    Particle size effect on thermophysical properties of nanofluid and nanofluid based phase change materials: a review

    J Mol Liq

    (2018)
  • L. Yang et al.

    Enhancing the thermal conductivity of SAE 50 engine oil by adding zinc oxide nano-powder: An experimental study

    Powder Technol

    (2019)
  • L. Yang et al.

    Recent developments on viscosity and thermal conductivity of nanofluids

    Powder Technol

    (2017)
  • L. Yang et al.

    Thermal conductivity enhancement of water by adding graphene Nano-sheets: Consideration of particle loading and temperature effects

    Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer

    (2019)
  • L. Yang et al.

    An updated review on the influential parameters on thermal conductivity of nano-fluids

    J Mol Liq

    (2019)
  • L. Yang et al.

    Numerical assessment of Ag-water nano-fluid flow in two new microchannel heatsinks: Thermal performance and thermodynamic considerations

    Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer

    (2020)
  • M. Alomair et al.

    Analyses of bio-based nano-PCM filled concentric cylindrical energy storage system in vertical orientation

    J Storage Mater

    (2018)
  • S. Ebadi et al.

    Geometry and nanoparticle loading effects on the bio-based nano-PCM filled cylindrical thermal energy storage system

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2018)
  • S. Ebadi et al.

    Melting of nano-PCM inside a cylindrical thermal energy storage system: numerical study with experimental verification

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2018)
  • M. Sheikholeslami

    Numerical simulation for solidification in a LHTESS by means of Nano-enhanced PCM

    J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng

    (2018)
  • S.K. Mandal

    Performance investigation of CuO-paraffin wax nanocomposite in solar water heater during night

    Thermochim Acta

    (2019)
  • S. Sharma et al.

    Nano-enhanced phase change material for thermal management of BICPV

    Appl Energy

    (2017)
  • M. Sheikholeslami et al.

    Enhancement of PCM solidification using inorganic nanoparticles and an external magnetic field with application in energy storage systems

    J Cleaner Prod

    (2019)
  • M. Al-Jethelah et al.

    Charging nanoparticle enhanced bio-based PCM in open cell metallic foams: an experimental investigation

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2019)
  • R. Hossain et al.

    Energy storage system based on nanoparticle-enhanced phase change material inside porous medium

    Int J Therm Sci

    (2015)
  • M.T. Kohyani et al.

    Melting of cyclohexane–Cu nano-phase change material (nano-PCM) in porous medium under magnetic field

    J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng

    (2017)
  • M. Sheikholeslami et al.

    Lorentz forces effect on NEPCM heat transfer during solidification in a porous energy storage system

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2018)
  • S.H. Tasnim et al.

    Convection effect on the melting process of nano-PCM inside porous enclosure

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2015)
  • B. Praveen et al.

    Experimental study on heat transfer performance of neopentyl glycol/CuO composite solid-solid PCM in TES based heat sink

    Eng Sci Technol Int J

    (2018)
  • M. Gorzin et al.

    Nano-enhancement of phase change material in a shell and multi-PCM-tube heat exchanger

    J Storage Mater

    (2019)
  • M. Sheikholeslami et al.

    Heat transfer simulation of heat storage unit with nanoparticles and fins through a heat exchanger

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2019)
  • R. Elbahjaoui et al.

    Thermal analysis of nanoparticle-enhanced phase change material solidification in a rectangular latent heat storage unit including natural convection

    Energy Build

    (2017)
  • Y. Pahamli et al.

    Effect of nanoparticle dispersion and inclination angle on melting of PCM in a shell and tube heat exchanger

    J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng

    (2017)
  • K. Venkitaraj et al.

    Experimental heat transfer analysis of macro packed neopentylglycol with CuO nano additives for building cooling applications

    J Storage Mater

    (2018)
  • Cited by (213)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text