Elsevier

Electoral Studies

Volume 25, Issue 1, March 2006, Pages 103-128
Electoral Studies

The non-declared vote in the surveys: The Spanish case in the 1980s

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.03.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Do individuals conceal their voting intentions? If so, why? In this article the author attempts to answer both these questions through a case study of declared voting intentions for the two main Spanish political parties in the 1980s. His analysis shows that the distribution of the hidden vote has not remained constant over time. Whereas in the early 1980s conservative voters were more likely not to disclose their vote, later in the decade a number of decisions taken by the Socialist government led some leftwing voters to hide their partisan preferences from pollsters.

Introduction

The use of pre-electoral surveys poses numerous problems. This articles focuses on two of these: first, the lack of correspondence between declared voting intentions and actual election results; and second, “the limited statistical analysis of non-responses or missing data” (Varela et al., 1998: 274–275). The first problem, namely opinion polls' failure to provide accurate predictions of the distribution of the vote has fuelled criticism and distrust of survey results. However, the disparity which often exists between predictions and reality cannot simply be attributed to statistical error. On the one hand, problems may also arise from the misrepresentation of poll results by the media.1 On the other, with respect to the incidence of non-responses to some questions, researchers are only just beginning to develop convincing statistical solutions to the problem (Berinsky, 1999, Berinsky, 2002a, Berinsky, 2002b, Breen, 2000, Varela et al., 1998).

In this article I will address both these problems. I will try to discover pre-electoral surveys sometimes fail to reflect the real distribution of partisan preferences. More specifically, I will base my argument on an analysis of non-responses to questions about direct intended vote in various studies produced by the Spanish Centre for Sociological Research (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, henceforth CIS). In these surveys, many respondents take refuge in the “Don't know/No answer” response to this question. Why is this so? In some cases, these respondents are deliberately concealing their partisan preferences. In others, their response will reflect genuine indecision. Significantly, however, both the hidden vote and indecision are not always uniformly distributed among voters for the various parties. That is, respondents sympathizing for a given political party may be more likely to remain silent than those supporting one or various of its competitors. This may be because the voters for the party in question are less sure of how to vote, or because they are more likely to hide their vote, than other voters. In this type of situation the sample will be biased if we treat these individuals as missing cases. This is the key issue I am going to examine in this article.

Spain constitutes an exceptionally interesting case through which to study this issue. As will become apparent below, the nature and scale of the non-declared vote in Spain has changed significantly since the return to democracy, as a relatively consistent reticence to reveal partisan preferences for rightwing parties has given way to a pattern in which the undeclared vote is more closely linked to particular situations and circumstances. Nonetheless, these developments have not been analyzed in the literature. Moreover, some Spanish authors have gone as far as to deny the existence of a hidden vote in Spain altogether (Arango and Díez, 1993). For both these reasons, the Spanish case would appear to be particularly relevant for the study of the hidden vote.

The article is divided into three parts. First, I will analyze participation in surveys and the declaration of voting intention, basing my argument on Spanish pre-electoral polls carried out by the CIS between 1982 and 2004. Having established the patterns of responses to the survey question about direct voting intentions, I will present the statistical model and data used here to analyze the “No answer” problem. Finally, I will test the main hypothesis put forward to account for the non-declared vote through reference to the main Spanish political parties in the 1980s.

Section snippets

Participation in surveys and hidden preferences: an analysis of CIS questionnaires between 1982 and 2004

If we accept that democracies should seek to encourage citizens' participation in the decision-making process, Sidney Verba must surely be right to argue that opinion polls can play a crucial role in achieving this goal (Verba, 1996). In contrast to other forms of political participation that require material resources, educational resources, etc. (Verba et al., 1995), according to Verba no such resources are needed by those responding to surveys. Moreover, questionnaires make it possible to

The non-declared vote for the PSOE and AP/CP/PP between 1982 and 2004

The mass media frequently invoke the phenomenon of the hidden vote. Indeed, it is often given as the main cause of the prediction errors found in survey results released by public opinion research institutes in the run-up to elections.2

The statistical model

As noted in the introduction, one of the problems facing the analysis of public opinion surveys are the “No answer” responses to certain questions. The statistical issues raised by these non-answers have rarely been considered in studies of voting behaviour and results. Only Breen, 2000, Berinsky, 1999, Varela et al., 1998 have attempted to clarify these responses. Breen, 2000, Varela et al., 1998 do not consider the problem of the possible existence of a selection bias in the samples. However,

The non-declared vote for AP/CP/PP between 1982 and 1993

We have already seen that February 1993 marked a turning point in terms of declared voting intentions for AP/CP/PP. Until then, the party's share of the obtained vote had been 1.57 times greater than its share of declared voting intentions. Moreover, declared voting intentions for the party remained relatively stable, especially in comparison to the variations in voting intentions for the Socialists in the same surveys.

The statistical model that I use here is very simple. In the selection

The non-declared vote for the PSOE between 1982 and 1993

We have seen that in the period 1982–1993 the Socialists were relatively unaffected by the hidden vote. Nonetheless, the PSOE did not escape this phenomenon at certain critical moments. When were these? In this article, I consider two such critical junctures: the 1986 NATO referendum and the 1988 general strike. In both cases, reasons existed which might have led Socialist voters to hide their partisan preference. In the wake of the NATO referendum and again after the 1988 general strike, the

Conclusion

Not all individuals are willing to admit their partisan preferences to pollsters. This would not be a problem if this type of behavior was distributed randomly among respondents to a survey. However, in some circumstances certain groups of people are more likely to hide their vote than others. In these cases, we are confronted by a problem of selection bias, and consequently, the poll results will also be biased.

Spanish democracy has not escaped this phenomenon. We have seen that during the

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Belén Barreiro, Justin Byrne, Carles Boix, José Fernández Albertos, José María Maravall, Ferrán Martínez i Coma, José Ramón Montero, Ignacio Sanchez-Cuenca, Julián Santamaría and Roger Senserrich for their comments on earlier drafts of this article. I would also like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestion. As ever, I have benefited enormously from the support of the Juan March Institute and particularly its splendid library.

References (20)

  • J. Arango et al.

    6-J: El sentido de una elección

    Claves de Razón Práctica

    (1993)
  • A.J. Berinsky

    The two faces of public opinion

    American Journal of Political Science

    (1999)
  • A.J. Berinsky

    Silent voices: social welfare policy opinions and political equality in America

    American Journal of Political Science

    (2002)
  • A.J. Berinsky

    Political context and the survey response: the dynamics of racial policy opinion

    The Journal of Politics

    (2002)
  • R. Breen

    Why is support for extreme parties underestimated by surveys? A latent class analysis

    British Journal of Political Science

    (2000)
  • P. Delicado et al.

    ¿Cómo y cuánto fallan los sondeos electorales?

    Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas

    (2001)
  • J.A. Dubin et al.

    Selection bias in linear regression, logit and probit models

    Sociological Methods and Research

    (1989/1990)
  • J.A. Dubin et al.

    Selection bias in linear regression, logit and probit models

  • M.J. Funes

    Social responses to political violence in the basque country: peace movements and their audience

    The Journal of Conflict Resolution

    (1998)
  • J.J. Heckman

    Sample selection bias as a specification error

    Econometrica

    (1979)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (12)

  • The role of the political context in voting indecision

    2014, Electoral Studies
    Citation Excerpt :

    The literature already provides us with some anecdotal findings consistent with this hypothesis. Studying the Spanish case, Urquizu Sancho (2006) shows that the ‘Don't know/No answer’ option was used by many right-wing voters during the first years of democracy so as to hide their true preferences. The rationale behind this is that conservative voters preferred to hide partisan preference to the main party on the right (the PP) because many party leaders were linked with the Francoist dictatorship.

  • Rationalizing systematic discrepancies between election outcomes and opinion polls

    2022, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text