Elsevier

Electrochimica Acta

Volume 108, 1 October 2013, Pages 820-826
Electrochimica Acta

Polypyrrole-coated α-LiFeO2 nanocomposite with enhanced electrochemical properties for lithium-ion batteries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.130Get rights and content

Abstract

A conducting α-LiFeO2-polypyrrole (α-LiFeO2-PPy) nanocomposite material was prepared by the chemical polymerization method as a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. The porous α-LiFeO2 was prepared via the microwave hydrothermal method and a post-annealing. The X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and field emission scanning electron microscopy measurements showed that the α-LiFeO2 nanoparticles were coated with PPy. The polypyrrole coating improves the reversible capacity and cycling stability (104 mAh g−1 at 0.1C after 100 cycles) for lithium-ion batteries. Even at the high rate of 10C, the electrode showed more than 40% of the capacity at low rate (0.1C).

Introduction

Lithium ferrite (LiFeO2), a layered cathode material, has attracted much attention because it is non-toxic, environmentally friendly, and low-cost [1], [2]. As is well known, α-NaFeO2-type LiCoO2 cathode materials are in widespread use in commercial lithium-ion batteries. Layered LiCoO2 has a rock-salt structure, where alternate layers of Li and Co occupy the octahedral sites of a cubic close packed oxygen array [3]. LiCoO2 is more toxic and more expensive than oxides of other transition metals (Mn, Ni, Fe, etc.) [4], [5], [6]. LiFeO2 has different forms, including the α-, β-, γ-forms, etc. α-LiFeO2 has a disordered-cation cubic rock-salt structure with space group Fm3m. β-LiFeO2 with space group C2/c is formed as an intermediate phase during the ordering process. γ-LiFeO2 with space group I41/amd is obtained by reducing the symmetry from cubic to tetragonal by ordering the Li+ and Fe3+ ions at octahedral sites [1], [2], [3], [6].

α-LiFeO2 has many advantages as a cathode material for the lithium-ion battery as a substitute for LiCoO2 in terms of lower price and environmental friendliness. The charging reaction can be written as:LiFeIIIO2  xLi+ + xe + Li1−xFe1−xIIIFexIVO2with x = 1, this reaction provides a theoretical capacity of 282 mAh g−1. Kanno et al. [3], however, reported a maximum value of x = 0.1 for the α-NaFeO2-type structure. The charged electrodes should contain iron in a mixed oxidation state (III and IV). The first charge voltage plateau is above 4 V, corresponding to the Fe3+/Fe4+ couple reaction, however, large voltage hysteresis is observed during the discharge step. Sakurai et al. reported that unusual Fe4+ ions generated during charging may play an important role in the occurrence of voltage hysteresis [7]. Kanno et al. also pointed out that the conversion proceeds from the corrugated layered structure LiFeO2 to an amorphous phase during the first charge, and the charge-discharge process after the second cycle proceeds in the amorphous phase [3]. According to the structural change in α-LiFeO2 in the charge/discharge process, as determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray diffraction near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy, Morales et al. confirmed that Fe2+ may exist after the first discharge, and the strong exothermic peak close to 398 K in the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curve may result from the reaction of Fe4+ with electrolyte [8].

The electrical conductivity is extremely low, however, because the iron ions on lithium sites block the lithium diffusion pathways. There are mainly two ways to increase the electrical conductivity: one way is to fabricate nanosized α-LiFeO2. Nanosized materials have short pathway lengths for lithium ion transport and a large contact area between the electrode and electrolyte for improving the reaction rate at the interface [9]. The other way is to coat a conductive material onto the surface of the α-LiFeO2 [8]. Using the hydrothermal method, nanosized FeOOH can be prepared in different crystal phases and morphologies [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Later, FeOOH can be converted into α-LiFeO2 via a solid-state reaction. Polypyrrole (PPy) is a popular conducting polymer due to its ability to act as a binder and store electric charge (Cppy = 72 mAh g−1) [15], [16], [17]. Our group has successfully used PPy to improve the performance of cathode and anode materials in lithium-ion batteries, in such composites as S-PPy, SnO2-PPy, and LiV3O8-PPy [18], [19], [20]. The theoretical capacity of polypyrrole-coated M (M = S, SnO2, and LiV3O8) can be calculated as following according to the theoretical capacity of M and the theoretical capacity of PPy: CM × wt.% of α-LiFeO2 + CPPy × wt.% of PPy. However, the synthesis of polypyrrole-coated α-LiFeO2 composite for use in lithium-ion batteries has not been explored yet.

In this study, α-LiFeO2-PPy nanocomposite was synthesized using a chemical polymerization method. The structural characterization and electrochemical performance of the α-LiFeO2-PPy composite are discussed and compared with the performance of bare α-LiFeO2 cathode material.

Section snippets

Preparation of β-FeOOH

The β-FeOOH was prepared by using a microwave autoclave method. 3.244 g of FeCl3 (Sigma–Aldrich) was dissolved in 200 ml distilled water to obtain a final concentration of 0.1 M in a beaker. Then, the solution was sonicated to dissolve the FeCl3 particles to achieve a homogeneous system. The solution was transferred into sealed Teflon vessels and reacted for 5 min at 120 °C using a Milestone Microsynth Microwave Labstation (Germany) [21]. After cooling down naturally and washing 3 times with

Results and discussion

The β-FeOOH precursor was prepared by using a microwave autoclave method. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of β-FeOOH is presented in Fig. 1(a). The β-FeOOH sample diffraction peaks are consistent with reported values (JCPDS 34-1266). Fig. 1(b) shows a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) image of β-FeOOH. The obtained β-FeOOH has rod-like nanoparticle morphology, with a nanorod diameter of about 50 nm and length of 100 nm.

Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of α-LiFeO2 and α-LiFeO2

Conclusions

Nanosized α-LiFeO2 has been synthesized at low temperature using a solid-state reaction method with β-FeOOH as the precursor. A novel α-LiFeO2-PPy composite was then prepared by chemical polymerization. The α-LiFeO2-PPy composite shows better capacity retention and higher rate capability than the bare α-LiFeO2. The Rf and Rct for the α-LiFeO2-PPy nanocomposite electrode are much lower than for the bare α-LiFeO2 electrode, indicating enhanced electron transfer due to the good conductivity of the

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project (DP100103909). Zhijia Zhang is grateful to the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for scholarship support. Many thanks are owed to Zidong Zhang and Sha Li for their help on measurements, and many thanks also go to Dr. Tania Silver for critical reading of the manuscript.

References (33)

  • H. Liu et al.

    Doping effects of zinc on LiFePO4 cathode material for lithium ion batteries

    Electrochemistry Communications

    (2006)
  • J. Li et al.

    Recent advances in the LiFeO2-based materials for Li-ion batteries

    International Journal of Electrochemical Science

    (2011)
  • R. Kanno et al.

    Synthesis and electrochemical properties of lithium iron oxides with layer-related structures

    Journal of Power Sources

    (1997)
  • M.M. Rahman et al.

    Nanocrystalline porous α-LiFeO2-C composite—an environmentally friendly cathode for the lithium-ion battery

    Energy and Environmental Science

    (2011)
  • C. Delmas et al.

    Effect of iron on the electrochemical behaviour of lithium nickelate: from LiNiO2 to 2D-LiFeO2

    Solid State Ionics

    (2007)
  • J. Morales et al.

    Highly electroactive nanosized α-LiFeO2

    Electrochemistry Communications

    (2007)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Preparation and electrochemical properties of benzothiadiazole-benzotriazole donor-acceptor conductive polymer lithium-ion anode materials

      2022, Synthetic Metals
      Citation Excerpt :

      The other reason was that the EDOT unit made POTTBT more rigid and coplanar than PTTBT, and the conjugation effect of POTTBT was stronger, so that when lithium ions were inserted, the charge can be quickly dispersed throughout the polymer backbone and quickly stabilized, which contributed to the further embedding of subsequent lithium ions [53]. In contrast to the conventional conductive polymer composite electrode materials [7,9,10], the two electrode materials prepared in this paper had good specific capacity and rate performance, which were well suited as anode materials for lithium batteries. In this paper, two D-A conducting polymer monomers OTTBT and TTBT were synthesized using ethylhexyl-benzothiadiazole triazole as the acceptor unit and EDOT or thiophene as the donor unit, followed by the preparation of POTTBT@AC and PTTBT@AC lithium battery anode materials by in situ polymerization.

    • Synthesis of α-LiFeO<inf>2</inf>/Graphene nanocomposite via layer by layer self-assembly strategy for lithium-ion batteries with excellent electrochemical performance

      2020, Journal of Materials Science and Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The XRD patterns of the as-prepared α-LiFeO2 and α-LiFeO2/rGO composites were presented in Fig. 1. All the diffraction peaks of the both samples could be well matched with the cubic phase α-LiFeO2 (Space group of Fm3m, JCPDS No. 74-2284, a =4.156 Å) [27]. The lattice parameters were a = 4.157 and 4.158 for α-LiFeO2 and α-LiFeO2/rGO, respectively.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text