Electrodeposition of microstructures using a patterned anode

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2011.08.037Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we report the transfer of micro-scale patterns by electrodeposition on to substrates without requiring them to be coated with a photoresist mask. This approach makes uses of a patterned tool which is placed in close proximity to the substrate in an electrochemical reactor. With an appropriate choice of electrochemical parameters, electrodeposition can be confined to regions corresponding to the exposed regions of the tool. Experiments indicate that the electrodeposition of copper features on to conductive substrates is possible using this approach. Copper lines of 100 μm width have been successfully replicated, but with some increase in dimension due to current spreading. This effect can be minimised by reducing the inter-electrode gap and employing an electrolyte with a low conductivity. It is also demonstrated that the tool can be used to pattern multiple substrates.

Research highlights

► Electrodeposition of micro-scale metallic patterns on to substrates using patterned anode ► Substrate is not masked with a photoresist material. ► Fine copper lines have been successfully deposited on to cathode substrates. ► Anode tool can be used to pattern multiple substrate.

Introduction

Electrochemical microfabrication techniques are routinely used in the manufacture of microsystem devices [1]. Broadly, these techniques can be classified as “additive” methods were electrodeposition is used to deposit material on to a substrate or “subtractive” where electrochemical etching is used to remove material. Additive processes are usually based on the technique of “through-mask” plating [2] while subtractive ones typically employ masked electrochemical etching [3]. In both of these approaches the substrate is patterned with a photoresist material which acts as a mask to define the areas to be etched or plated. More recently, techniques based on patterned electrodeposition using conformal masks have been developed [4], [5].

A wide range of other electrochemical techniques (including mask-less and direct-write processes) has also been developed to deposit micro- and nano-structures on metal and semiconductors substrates [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Often these involve rastering a sharp electrode tool over the substrate, or using light or other forms of radiation to induce localised deposition [6], [7], [8]. Meniscus-confined electrodeposition of 3D microstructures has also been demonstrated [9]. These techniques are capable of high spatial resolution and accuracy, but many [6], [7], [8], [9] are essentially serial fabrication methods and are generally not suitable for volume production of micro-devices.

Roy [12], [13], [14], [15] has recently proposed an alternative electrochemical microfabrication technique known as “EnFACE” which can be used to etch micro-patterns on copper substrates. They used a tool patterned with a photoresist mask while the substrate remained fully exposed. The tool and substrate were mounted in opposite walls of a flow channel. By employing a very small gap (< 500 μm) and a suitable electrolyte, selective metal dissolution on the regions facing the exposed portions of the tool was achieved. In this manner, micro-scale patterns which were considerably smaller (i.e. 50–200 μm) than the electrode gap were transferred to the substrates.

This technique has the advantage that a single patterned cathode can be used to etch many substrates. This is contrast to conventional etching techniques where each anode substrate has to be individually patterned with a photoresist mask [3]. By minimising the demands for lithography, this technique has the potential of drastically reducing the cost of electrochemically micro-fabricated parts. It is also a parallel microfabrication method with corresponding advantages in cost and throughput. While EnFACE was originally developed for etching, patterned electrodeposition is also feasible.

The objective of this paper is to report the results of pattern transfer achieved by electrodeposition. In this study we report for the first time the electrodeposition of copper on to substrates using the EnFACE process and the electrochemical parameters required for good pattern transfer.

Section snippets

Experimental

The apparatus used in the present study is similar to that used in the etching experiments and is described in detail in earlier publications [12], [13]. It is shown schematically in Fig. 1, which indicates the relative disposition of the anode tool and cathode substrate and other key components. The anodes were fabricated from 1 cm diameter polished copper discs (99.99%). These were patterned with a 7 μm thick layer of SPR 220 resist (Rohm and Haas) using standard photolithographic techniques.

Limiting current measurements

Initially experiments were performed on un-patterned copper substrates to determine the limiting current for copper deposition in a 0.1 M CuSO4 with different electrode spacings. This is an important parameter to establish because, if exceeded, the deposit morphology and current efficiency can be adversely affected. As expected, the limiting current decreased as the recess depth increased [16]. At a flow rate of 40 ml s 1 the limiting currents at spacings of 300, 500, 750 and 1000 μm were 78, 68,

Conclusions

The electrodeposition of micrometer-scale copper features on to fully exposed substrate using a masked tool has been demonstrated. Linewidths of 120–200 μm have been successfully reproduced on the substrate with a total deposit thickness of up to 2.5 μm. Some broadening of the lines occurs due to current spreading effects, but these can be minimised by using a small inter-electrode gap and an electrolyte with a low conductivity. The tool was re-used to pattern multiple copper substrates without

Acknowledgments

The work is supported by NSTAR Proof of Concept Fund.

References (18)

  • M. Datta et al.

    Electrochimica Acta

    (2000)
  • P. Möller et al.

    Microelectronic Engineering

    (2006)
  • J. Hu et al.

    Science

    (2010)
  • H. Sato et al.

    Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

    (2005)
  • I. Schönenberger et al.

    Electrochimica Acta

    (2005)
  • L.T. Romankiw et al.
  • M. Datta

    IBM Journal of Research and Development

    (1998)
  • E.J.J. Kruglick et al.
  • J.D. Madden et al.

    Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems

    (1996)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Electrodeposited copper using direct and pulse currents from electrolytes containing low concentration of additives

    2018, Surface and Coatings Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, particular amounts of commercially available additives are also recommended by suppliers [4]. A recent advance in electrochemical mask-less patterning [5] process showed that micro-scale copper features, such as those required in PCBs, can be formed by dissolution [6] or deposition [7] using an acid-free, low copper ion concentration (0.1 M CuSO4) electrolyte [8]. Their research also showed that lower concentrations of commercial plating additives could be added to improve deposit morphology and properties, so that they are suitable for industrial applications [9].

  • Design of an ultrasonic tank reactor for copper deposition at electrodes separated by a narrow gap

    2018, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    An acid free electrolyte containing 0.1 M CuSO4 was used in these experiments. Earlier studies [12,13,16] have shown that pattern replication is enabled if the conductivity of the solution is low. In each experiment, a Thurlby Thandar power supply was used to apply a direct current (DC) and the cell potential was measured with a multimeter during plating.

  • Sono-electrodeposition transfer of micro-scale copper patterns on to A7 substrates using a mask-less method

    2016, Electrochimica Acta
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, it has been shown that an acceptable deposition rate requires high and uniform mass transport in the inter-electrode gap. Similarly, good feature definition which exhibit minimum current spreading requires the use of a narrow and repeatable gap and a low conductivity (i.e. acid-free) electrolyte [17–20]. Therefore, in order to fully exploit the potential of the technique, a method to provide adequate mass transfer between the two closely spaced electrodes is essential.

  • Additive Manufacturing of Coreless Flyback Transformers Using Aerosol Jet Printing and Electrochemical Deposition

    2023, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text