Two new “flagship” ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Venezuela: Sleighophrys pustulata and Luporinophrys micelae
Introduction
Endemicity is difficult to prove in microscopic organisms because (i) they are not easily recognizable; (ii) many species are dormant (encysted) most of their life; (iii) distinctive morphological features are rare, as compared to higher plants and animals; (iv) the field is distinctly undersearched, and (v) differences may remain unrecognized or misclassified as “site variations” due to the use of holarctic identification literature for species from other biogeographical regions (Foissner 2004). In this situation, eyecatching “flagships” with conspicuous size and/or morphology are the best distribution indicators. Many such species have been described (for a review, see Foissner 2004), but others remain to be discovered, showing our ignorance about even conspicuous taxa (Foissner et al. 2003). The two species described here are just other examples for this situation and support my hypothesis that we know mainly the more abundant and/or widely distributed protist species (Foissner 2004).
Sleighophrys pustulata and Luporinophrys micelae belong to an assemblage of free-living ciliates with a mucilaginous cortex cover; taxonomically, they are haptorid trachelophyllids, which are part of the time-honoured Gymnostomatea, now often called Litostomatea (Corliss 1979; Lynn 2003). Several such species were already described by Stokes (1884) and Kahl (1930), but it was only in 1984 that Nicholls and Lynn investigated a “slimy” species with the electron microscope. This showed the mucilaginous layer to be composed of minute, organic scales, which are now termed lepidosomes (Foissner et al. 2005). More recently, Foissner et al. (2002) described several new trachelophyllids, showing a considerable diversity of the lepidosomes. However, the individual lepidosomes of these species are difficult to recognize because they are ⩽3 μm in size. In contrast, the lepidosomes of S. pustulata and L. micelae have a size of ⩾5 μm and many fine details useable as biogeographic markers. Accordingly, they will be documented in great detail, allowing a meticulous comparison if they ever should be found in another biogeographic region.
Section snippets
Material and methods, terminology
Sleighophrys pustulata and L. micelae were discovered west of the Venezuelan capital Caracas, that is, in the Maracay National Park, about 13 km inshore from the north coast, where some Flamingo lakes surround the village of Chichiriviche, W67°13′N11°33′. This area, which is used as a cattle pasture and occasionally burnt, contains countless flat depressions which become small puddles after heavy rains. The sample, which was taken in May 1997, consisted of dry cyanobacterial and algal crusts,
Genus Sleighophrys nov. gen
Diagnosis: Trachelophyllidae Kent, 1881 with types I and V lepidosomes. Type I lepidosomes as diagnosed by Foissner et al. (2002). Type V lepidosomes upon a layer of type I lepidosomes, conspicuously hat-shaped, composed of a finely perforated, dish-shaped baseplate from which the coarsely and polygonally faceted, hemispherical dome emerges.
Type species: S. pustulata nov. spec.
Dedication: I dedicate this genus to Prof. Dr. Michael Sleigh (Southampton University), acknowledging his unforgettable
Classification of the Trachelophyllina Grain, 1994
Foissner et al. (2002) diagnosed a new suborder, Trachelophyllina, as “Spathidiida with epicortical scales”. However, Grain (1994) established the same suborder earlier, albeit with a different and rather vague diagnosis not including the lepidosomes which are, in my opinion, the main diagnostic feature. Nonetheless, Grain (1994) has nomenclatural priority.
Grain (1994) and Foissner et al. (2002) classify the trachelophyllids into the haptorids, and Foissner et al. (2002) relate them to the
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (projects P 12367-BIO and P 15017-BIO). The technical assistance of Dr. Eva Herzog, Dr. Brigitte Moser and Andreas Zankl is greatly acknowledged.
References (20)
Basic light and scanning electron microscopic methods for taxonomic studies of ciliated protozoa
Europ. J. Protistol.
(1991)An updated compilation of world soil ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora), with ecological notes, new records, and descriptions of new species
Europ. J. Protistol.
(1998)- et al.
Apofrontonia lametschwandtneri nov. gen., nov. spec., a new peniculine ciliate (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Venezuela
Europ. J. Protistol.
(2002) - et al.
Endemic ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from tank bromeliads (Bromeliaceae)a combined morphological, molecular, and ecological study
Europ. J. Protistol.
(2003) Morphology or moleculeshow do we identify the major lineages of ciliates (Phylum Ciliophora)?
Europ. J. Protistol.
(2003)- et al.
The importance of physical isolation to microbial diversification
FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.
(2004) The Ciliated Protozoa. Characterization, Classification and Guide to the Literature
(1979)Taxonomische Studien über die Ciliaten des Großglocknergebietes (Hohe Tauern, Österreich) I. Familien Holophryidae, Prorodontidae, Plagiocampidae, Colepidae, Enchelyida e und Lacrymariidae nov. fam
Annln naturh. Mus. Wien
(1983)Spetazoon australiense nov. gen., nov. spec., ein neues Wimpertier (Protozoa, Ciliophora) von Australien
Kataloge des OÖ. Landesmuseums (N. F.)
(1994)Faunistics, taxonomy and ecology of moss and soil ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from Antarctica, with description of new species, including Pleuroplitoides smithi gen. n., sp. n.
Acta Protozool.
(1996)
Cited by (26)
A new “flagship” ciliate, Pseudostylonychia obliquocaudata n. gen., n. sp. (Ciliophora, Hypotricha), from South Korea
2022, European Journal of ProtistologyCitation Excerpt :In the present study, we discovered a new stylonychine ciliate with unusual shape of the caudal area and with undulating membranes similar to those of Laurentiella. The comparatively large body and the unique structure of the posterior body end make this species unlikely to be overlooked and can therefore be considered a “flagship species” (Foissner 1999, 2004a, 2004b, 2005, 2006; Foissner and Stoeck 2008; Foissner et al. 2008). To appropriately characterize the new species, we investigate its morphology, ontogenesis, and molecular phylogeny.
Checklist, diversity and biogeography of ciliates (Ciliophora) from Chile
2022, European Journal of ProtistologyWilhelm Foissner and the European Journal of Protistology
2020, European Journal of ProtistologySoil ciliates of the Indian Delhi Region: Their community characteristics with emphasis on their ecological implications as sensitive bio-indicators for soil quality
2019, Saudi Journal of Biological SciencesMorphologic and molecular characterization of seven species of the remarkably diverse and widely distributed metopid genus Urostomides Jankowski, 1964 (Armophorea, Ciliophora)
2017, European Journal of ProtistologyCitation Excerpt :Although Kahl initially mistook U. darwini for a caenomorphid and even wondered whether it might be a transitional form between Metopus and Caenomorpha, he concluded this was doubtful (Kahl 1927). The unique shape of U. darwini makes confusion with other species highly unlikely and in this sense U. darwini qualifies as a “flagship” species (Foissner 2005, 2006). However, distinction from other “tailed” members of Metopida is appropriate.
How Far do Ciliate Flagships Sail? A Proposed Gondawanaland Endemic Species at Anchor in Idaho Soils
2017, ProtistCitation Excerpt :However both S. pustulata and L. micelae also have lepidosomes the morphology of which is unique to each genus (type V and type VI respectively). Neither S. pustulata or L. micelae had been encountered in Foissner’s studies of approximately 1000 soil samples from elsewhere around the globe and, apparently, neither has, until now, been reported since (Foissner 2005). Regarding the biogeography of L. micelae and 51 other flagship ciliates, Foissner et al. considered it “… unlikely that one of these species crosses the ancient Gondwanan-Laurasian border…” (Foissner et al. 2008).