Original Research Paper
China’s role in the next phase of the energy transition: Contributions to global niche formation in the Concentrated Solar Power sector

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • China has recently launched a support policy for Concentrated Solar Power.

  • Sector formation was strongly rooted in domestic knowledge and other resources.

  • China may no longer be a follower country in the next phase of the energy transition.

  • China’s industrial path formation environment differs from that seen in the OECD.

  • China may support industrial paths trajectories unlikely to develop elsewhere.

Abstract

The role that emerging economies, and China in particular, play in the global energy transition appears to be transforming. Transition literature to date characterizes the formation of cleantech sectors in emerging economies as being heavily dependent on foreign inputs of knowledge and other key resources. This article argues that in the, currently unfolding, next phase of the global energy transition, Chinese actors may play a more central role in global niche development for high-tech industries, including in constructing innovative and effective socio-technical configurations. This argument is illustrated with a case study of the Chinese Concentrated Solar Power industry, which is found to have developed largely independently of foreign resources. The case is used to highlight a number of specificities of the Chinese environment that set it apart from niche formation environments in OECD countries, and may allow China to open up technological trajectories unlikely to develop in those OECD countries.

Introduction

Preventing dangerous levels of climate change requires deep decarbonization of global systems for the production and consumption of energy. An ongoing transition to cleaner sources is particularly visible in electricity production, where onshore wind and solar PV in particular are starting to attain substantial market shares in a number of countries. Transition scholars have argued that transition dynamics in the energy sector are now entering a new phase in which, amongst others, the diffusion of renewables is accelerating, support policies are re-aligned from R&D and price support towards system integration and complementary technologies, and renewables are starting to push out rather than add to conventional sources of power generation (Markard, 2018; Smil, 2016). The foundational concepts of the field would accordingly have to be adapted or reformulated to explain these new dynamics. This paper embraces this argument, but highlights an area that has thus far mostly been overlooked in the debate about the next phase of transition concepts: the increasingly central, and potentially transformative, role that actors in emerging economies could have.

In the first phase of the global energy transition, early stage R&D, as well as market and industry formation around renewable energy technologies was largely concentrated in advanced economies. Only in later stages did renewable energy industries like wind and solar PV spread to emerging and developing economy countries (Lema and Lema, 2012; Quitzow, 2015). China is a case in point, having grown from a marginal role in renewable energy industries around the year 2000, to the worlds’ largest market and equipment manufacturer for wind and PV in recent years.

Much scholarly attention has been focused on the conditions that enabled this shift of manufacturing industries towards China and other emerging economies such as India, South Korea, Brazil, etc. (Binz and Anadon, 2018; de la Tour et al., 2011; Fu and Zhang, 2011; Gosens and Lu, 2013; Lema and Lema, 2012; Lewis, 2007; Quitzow, 2015). These studies have in large part re-iterated conclusions from literatures on National Innovation Systems or on catching-up. They have pointed out that China and other emerging economy countries started to gain market shares in the wind and solar PV industry, when these industries had entered a relatively mature stage in their global life-cycle, i.e., when dominant designs had emerged, and substantial experience and industry leadership had been built up elsewhere (Malerba and Nelson, 2011; Mathews, 2006; Shin, 1996). These studies have further stressed the importance of domestic capability formation through the absorption of foreign technology and experience (Abramovitz, 1986; Ernst and Kim, 2002; Gereffi et al., 2005; Lundvall, 1992; Perez and Soete, 1988).

The next phase of the global energy transition is expected to see accelerated deployment of wind and PV, which are relatively mature technologies by now (Markard, 2018). A new generation of renewable energy technologies, including Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), tidal & wave power, enhanced geothermal, and thin film, perovskite and organic PV, are still in earlier stages of development, but may see strong future growth, and come to support or compete with current mainstream renewables (Hussain et al., 2017). Should history repeat itself, development and deployment of these technologies would remain limited to advanced economy countries for the foreseeable future, and shift towards emerging economies only after a lengthy process of technological maturation.

There are, however, indications that this is not what is happening in a number of next-generation renewables, and with CSP in particular. This sector is currently in its formative stage, with only small niche markets in a limited number of countries, and research programs in place to tackle fundamental engineering challenges even in advanced economy countries. Nevertheless, a demonstration program is underway in China, with support for 20 CSP projects with a total capacity of 1349 MW, making China one of the largest current CSP markets (NEA, 2016; SolarPACES/NREL, 2018).

This article will highlight the divergence from traditional catch-up development in the Chinese CSP sector by analysing the relative importance of domestic and foreign elements in its early stage CSP industry formation. Similar to recent analyses on transnational innovation dynamics in emergent cleantech sectors (Andersson et al., 2018; Binz and Anadon, 2018), we will trace the origin of four industrial path formation resources (knowledge, market demand, investment, and legitimacy). This is done through a review of Chinese government policy and industry reports, the creation of a database of actors involved in pilot and demonstration projects, and a series of interviews with Chinese CSP experts in academia, industry, and government.

Our findings show that Chinese CSP sector development has occurred largely independent from foreign innovation system resources. Technological development, as well as pilot and demonstration activities are strongly rooted in domestic knowledge bases and technological capabilities of local firms. The bulk of the project developers, design institutes, EPC contractors, equipment manufacturers and financiers are domestic. Domestic markets are being actively created and dominated by Chinese developers and equipment manufacturers, and these have started to make inroads into foreign markets. Rather than depending on foreign standards or inclusion in global supplier networks, Chinese actors are helping set global standards and take lead firm roles in developing supplier networks.

These findings suggest that global development patterns of innovative activity for the next generation of renewable energy technologies may see a decidedly different role for emerging economies. China in particular appears to have an environment suitable for early stage industrial path development, benefitting from a specific combination of policy-induced experimentation, bottom-up entrepreneurship, and risk acceptance levels by key investors that exceed Western standards (cf. Gosens et al., 2018; Tyfield, 2018; Tyfield et al., 2015). Discussions on the concept of the next phase of the global energy transition should arguably include attention to shifting geographical patterns in the development of next generation renewables technologies and their industries.

Section snippets

Theory and method

Emerging or developing economies are typically latecomers in newly emerging technological fields; an issue intimately connected with their lagging economic development status (Abramovitz, 1986; Lundvall, 1992). Although this means that domestic innovation system formation lags behind the global forefront, it also provides a ‘latecomer advantage’ to rapid industry formation, through the absorption of up-to-date technology from abroad (Gerschenkron, 1962; Mathews, 2002).

Analysts studying the

Sector overview

Although there is a rich literature on CSP technologies relating to engineering and economic aspects (Chaanaoui et al., 2016; Lilliestam et al., 2017; Villarini et al., 2011), it has so far received very little attention in the literature on innovation or sustainability transitions, with a small number of exceptions (Hu and Wu, 2013; Lilliestam et al., 2018; Vieira de Souza and Gilmanova Cavalcante, 2017; Wang et al., 2017). Here, we first help fill some of this gap by providing a description

Origin of system building resources for China’s CSP sector

This section describes the geographic origin of the knowledge, market demand, finance, and legitimacy used in the formation of China’s CSP sector, as well as outgoing flows of these resources. A summary overview is provided at the end of this section, in Table 5.

Changing relation with global pools of resources for industry formation

The development of a competent Chinese CSP industry has depended only to a very limited extent on foreign resources for industry formation (Table 5). The development of components and design of complete plants, as well as systems integration capabilities, are largely rooted in domestic research institutes and corporate R&D. The domestic market has been nearly entirely captured by domestic firms, already in its earliest formative phases, with only limited involvement of foreign knowledge or

Conclusion

The formation of a competent CSP sector in China, although a recent and ongoing phenomenon, has largely depended on domestic resources for industry formation. Development of components and design of complete plants, as well as systems integration capabilities, are largely rooted in domestic research institutes and corporate R&D. The developers, component suppliers, and financiers for projects in the domestic market are largely domestic actors. Rather than taking cues from established global

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jorrit Gosens: Conceptualization, Investigation, Data curation, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Christian Binz: Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Rasmus Lema: Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Aalborg University (AAU Grant 771107) and a travel grant from the Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research (SDC). These financiers had no involvement in research design or reporting.

References (91)

  • U.E. Hansen et al.

    Transnational linkages and sustainable transitions in emerging countries: exploring the role of donor interventions in niche development

    Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.

    (2013)
  • A. Hussain et al.

    Emerging renewable and sustainable energy technologies: state of the art

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • J. Laird

    Still on track?

    Renew. Energy Focus

    (2012)
  • J.I. Lewis

    The evolving role of carbon finance in promoting renewable energy development in China

    Energy Policy

    (2010)
  • J. Lilliestam et al.

    Policies to keep and expand the option of concentrating solar power for dispatchable renewable electricity

    Energy Policy

    (2018)
  • J. Nahm et al.

    Scale-up nation: china’s specialization in innovative manufacturing

    World Dev.

    (2014)
  • R. Quitzow

    Dynamics of a policy-driven market: the co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany

    Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.

    (2015)
  • T.S. Schmidt et al.

    Anticipating industry localization effects of clean technology deployment policies in developing countries

    Glob. Environ. Chang.

    (2016)
  • F. Sengers et al.

    Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: the case of Bus Rapid Transit

    Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.

    (2015)
  • V. Smil

    Examining energy transitions: a dozen insights based on performance

    Energy Res. Soc. Sci.

    (2016)
  • D. Tyfield

    Innovating innovation—disruptive innovation in China and the low-carbon transition of capitalism

    Energy Res. Soc. Sci.

    (2018)
  • L.E. Vieira de Souza et al.

    Concentrated Solar Power deployment in emerging economies: the cases of China and Brazil

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Status and future strategies for concentrating solar power in China

    Energy Sci. Eng.

    (2017)
  • A.J. Wieczorek et al.

    Broadening the national focus in technological innovation system analysis: the case of offshore wind

    Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.

    (2015)
  • A.J. Wieczorek et al.

    Transnational linkages in sustainability experiments: a typology and the case of solar photovoltaic energy in India

    Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.

    (2015)
  • X.-S. Yap et al.

    Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: a systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity

    Res. Policy

    (2019)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Overcoming the liability of newness: entrepreneurial action and the emergence of China’s private solar photovoltaic firms

    Res. Policy

    (2016)
  • M. Abramovitz

    Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind

    J. Econ. Hist.

    (1986)
  • ADB

    China, People’s Republic of: Qinghai Delingha Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Project. Sovereign (Public) Project 46058-002

    (2017)
  • ADB

    People’s Republic of China: Concentrating Solar Thermal Power Development. Project Number: 43356 / TA 7402

    (2012)
  • T. Altenburg et al.

    Guest editorial: comparing low-carbon innovation paths in Asia and Europe

    Sci. Public Policy

    (2016)
  • P.E. Auerswald et al.

    Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States

    J. Technol. Transf.

    (2003)
  • Author’s database

    Project Database Collecting Information from Industry News Sites Such As CSP Focus, CSP Plaza, CNSTE, and Company Websites

    (2018)
  • S.H. Barr et al.

    Bridging the valley of death: lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education

    Eng. Manag. Rev. IEEE

    (2014)
  • C. Binz et al.

    Unrelated diversification in latecomer contexts—the emergence of the Chinese solar photovoltaics industry

    Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans.

    (2018)
  • C. Binz et al.

    Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing

    Econ. Geogr.

    (2016)
  • BLM

    Solar Plant California

    (2004)
  • CNSTE

    A 50MW Beam-down Molten Salt Tower Plant Started BOP Construction [WWW Document]

    (2017)
  • CNSTE

    Blue Book for Industry Development of Chinese Concentrated Solar Power and Solar Heating in 2016

    (2017)
  • CNSTE

    Research Report on China’s Solar Thermal Power Generation Industry Policy [In Chinese]

    (2013)
  • CSP Focus

    6 CSP Solar Projects with 350MW Capacity Will Be Newly Built in China This Year [WWW Document]

    (2019)
  • CSP Focus

    SupCon Delingha 10MW Tower CSP Project [WWW Document]

    (2018)
  • CSP Plaza

    CSP Plaza Introduction [WWW Document]

    (2018)
  • CSP Plaza

    Progress Between Different CSP Projects has Started to Diverge in Past Two Months (In Chinese) [WWW Document]

    (2018)
  • CSP Plaza

    The World’s First Tower-Type CSP Design Standard Officially Released [WWW Document]

    (2018)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Progress in research and technological advancements of commercial concentrated solar thermal power plants

      2023, Solar Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many of these projects have promoted the use of thermal energy storage, which allows solar energy to be used during times of greatest demand (Price et al., 2021). The latest wave in CSP projects came in September 2016, when China adopted FIT approach to support the construction of 20 CSP plants (1.35 GW) by the end of 2018 as a step toward CSP target of 5 GW as part of 13th Five-Year national Plan (Gosens et al., 2020). These examples illustrate that policy instability makes CSP deployment difficult due to the length of time required for CSP project development, financing, and construction (Price et al., 2021).

    • ‘License to green’: Regional patent licensing networks and green technology diffusion in China

      2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, China's role in global innovation systems is not limited to manufacturing and green technology development. Rather, China is increasingly in a position to shape global socio-technical regimes (Gosens et al., 2020). China has been able to achieve this position in particular through a shift to an innovation-based economy, which is reflected in the focus on green technologies and sustainable development in China's 5-year plans (e.g. 12th, 13th and 14th plan).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text