Elsevier

Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Volume 181, 5 November 2016, Pages 364-374
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Widespread kelp-derived carbon in pelagic and benthic nearshore fishes suggested by stable isotope analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.08.039Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We collected two species of nearshore fish at eight northeast Pacific Ocean sites.

  • Fish carbon and nitrogen isotope values were measured to estimate energy sources.

  • Kelp-derived carbon contributions were prominent for nearshore fish at all sites.

  • Isotopes of nearshore fishes suggest strong benthic-pelagic coupling.

Abstract

Kelp forests provide habitat for diverse and abundant fish assemblages, but the extent to which kelp provides a source of energy to fish and other predators is unclear. To examine the use of kelp-derived energy by fishes we estimated the contribution of kelp- and phytoplankton-derived carbon using carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotopes measured in muscle tissue. Benthic-foraging kelp greenling (Hexagrammos decagrammus) and pelagic-foraging black rockfish (Sebastes melanops) were collected at eight sites spanning ∼35 to 60°N from the California Current (upwelling) to Alaska Coastal Current (downwelling) in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Muscle δ13C values were expected to be higher for fish tissue primarily derived from kelp, a benthic macroalgae, and lower for tissue primarily derived from phytoplankton, pelagic microalgae. Muscle δ13C values were higher in benthic-feeding kelp greenling than in pelagic-feeding black rockfish at seven of eight sites, indicating more kelp-derived carbon in greenling as expected. Estimates of kelp carbon contributions ranged from 36 to 89% in kelp greenling and 32 to 65% in black rockfish using carbon isotope mixing models. Isotopic evidence suggests that these two nearshore fishes routinely derive energy from kelp and phytoplankton, across coastal upwelling and downwelling systems. Thus, the foraging mode of nearshore predators has a small influence on their ultimate energy source as energy produced by benthic macroalgae and pelagic microalgae were incorporated in fish tissue regardless of feeding mode and suggest strong and widespread benthic-pelagic coupling. Widespread kelp contributions to benthic- and pelagic-feeding fishes suggests that kelp energy provides a benefit to nearshore fishes and highlights the potential for kelp and fish production to be linked.

Graphical abstract

Map of black rockfish (left) and kelp greenling (right) sampling locations in the northeast Pacific Ocean with pie charts representing the relative carbon contributions from kelp (brown) and phytoplankton (green) primary producers estimated using carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotope values of muscle tissue. Black rockfish feed pelagically in the nearshore water column and kelp greenling feed benthically in nearshore waters. Mixing models were used to estimate carbon contributions based on site-specific phytoplankton and kelp (Table 2) and trophic discrimination factors (mean ± SD) of 1.0 ± 1.0‰ for δ13C per trophic level. Image credits: kelp and phytoplankton Jane Thomas and Tracey Saxby, IAN Image Library (http://ian.umces.edu/imagelibrary) and fish pictures, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Image 1
  1. Download : Download high-res image (169KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Kelp forests are ubiquitous along temperate and sub-arctic coastlines (Dayton, 1985, Estes and Steinberg, 1988) where they provide habitat and prey for diverse and abundant fish assemblages (Bodkin, 1988, Efird and Konar, 2014, Leaman, 1980, Siddon et al., 2008). Kelp-derived energy may also provide a trophic benefit to fishes (Foster and Schiel, 1985, Koenigs et al., 2015), as is the case for several benthic invertebrates (Duggins et al., 1989, Eckman and Duggins, 1991, Fredriksen, 2003, Salomon et al., 2008, Tallis, 2009). Nearshore marine food webs are complex with energy derived from phytoplankton, macroalgae (e.g., kelp), and terrestrial primary production (Duggins et al., 1989, Dunton et al., 2012, Fredriksen, 2003, Tallis, 2009, von Biela et al., 2013) and changes in the availability of these energy sources appears to influence the growth and production of fishes (Robards et al., 2002, von Biela et al., 2011). Canopy-forming kelps are a conspicuous source of energy with a concentrated biomass of primary production available to food webs by grazers, detritivores, and filter feeders (Kaehler et al., 2006, Steneck et al., 2002). Understanding the extent to which kelp provides energy throughout the nearshore food web is a priority as warming temperatures, rising sea levels, and increased human development have the potential to disrupt the function of ecologically and economically important nearshore ecosystems (Agardy et al., 2005, Harley et al., 2006, Scavia et al., 2002). Critical knowledge gaps include understanding the extent to which kelp energy reaches higher trophic level predators, such as fishes, and whether kelp is a routine source of energy for pelagic-, as well as benthic-, feeding species.

Kelp forest fish assemblages include species that are associated with the seafloor and forage benthically and species that occur primarily in the water column and forage pelagically within and along the edge of kelp forests. We define kelp forest ecosystems in this study as subtidal rocky reefs characterized by canopy- and understory-forming kelp (brown algae of the order Laminariales) in the neritic zone and use the term pelagic to refer to water column feeding in nearshore habitats unless otherwise specified. Evidence of kelp-derived energy in nearshore food webs has most often focused on benthic invertebrates (Duggins et al., 1989, Fredriksen, 2003, Salomon et al., 2008, Tallis, 2009) and occasionally benthic fishes or other predators that consume benthic invertebrates (Duggins et al., 1989, McMeans et al., 2013). In these studies, kelp-derived energy enters food webs either through the direct grazing of live kelp by kelp herbivores (e.g., urchins) or more commonly as kelp detritus by filter and suspension feeders (e.g., clams and mussels) (Duggins et al., 1989, Fredriksen, 2003, Salomon et al., 2008, Tallis, 2009). Recently, the tissues of pelagic-feeding fishes in nearshore systems were shown to contain substantial amounts of benthically produced carbon (Kopp et al., 2015) and kelp carbon (Koenigs et al., 2015, Markel and Shurin, 2015).

If kelp-derived energy is an important reason why so many fishes are associated with kelp forests, kelp should be a routine and substantial source of primary production that supplies energy for species that have either benthic or pelagic feeding modes. Energy can be traced through food webs by analyzing carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope values. Kelp generally have higher δ13C values than sympatric phytoplankton and these differences propagate up the food chain even when predators are separated from primary producers by several trophic levels (Duggins et al., 1989, Fredriksen, 2003, Michener and Kaufman, 2007, Page et al., 2008, Tallis, 2009). When the isotope values of both primary producers (e.g., kelp and phytoplankton) and focal consumers (e.g., fish) are measured, a stable isotope mixing model can estimate the relative carbon contribution of each primary producer (e.g., Parnell et al., 2010). Mixing models also require estimates of consumer trophic level that can be estimated from δ15N analysis and trophic discrimination factors, defined as the isotopic difference between consumer tissues and that of their prey (Δ13Ctissue-diet or Δ15Ntissue-diet). Ideally, isotope values of potential energy sources used in mixing models are well constrained, however, δ13C and δ15N values of phytoplankton and kelp can vary both spatially and seasonally (Bond and Diamond, 2011, Fox, 2013, Miller and Page, 2012, Page et al., 2008, Simenstad et al., 1993) and may require some considerations.

Black rockfish (Sebastes melanops) and kelp greenling (Hexagrammos decagrammus) are ideal focal predators for examining the use of both kelp and phytoplankton energy pathways in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Both fishes are widely distributed in nearshore habitats with small individual home ranges (∼1 km2; Love, 2011, Parker et al., 2007), assuring that capture locations reflect foraging grounds. Each species represents one of the two principal feeding modes in aquatic marine ecosystems, pelagic and benthic. Black rockfish are water-column (e.g., pelagic) generalists that consume forage fish, euphausiids, and zooplankton, and often aggregate near steep rocky reefs in relatively shallow water <55 m deep (Brodeur et al., 1987, Love, 2011, Love et al., 2002, Pirtle et al., 2012, Rosenthal, 1983). Kelp greenling are benthic generalists that consume sea cucumbers, brittle stars, crabs, amphipods, shrimp, worms, and snails on or near the seafloor (Love, 2011, Moulton, 1977, Rosenthal, 1983). Based on these feeding modes, we anticipated that each species would acquire carbon contributions from both kelp and phytoplankton pathways, but that kelp greenling would derive substantially larger carbon contributions from kelp than black rockfish. Ontogenetic dietary shifts may occur in either species, thus we considered individual fish size. To determine whether pelagic- and benthic-feeding predators consistently use both kelp and phytoplankton pathways, black rockfish and kelp greenling were collected from eight nearshore sites in the northeast Pacific Ocean from California to Alaska, spanning 25 degrees of latitude (∼35 to 60°N) and two large marine ecosystems, the California Current and Gulf of Alaska. The former is a seasonal coastal upwelling system, whereas the latter is predominantly a year-round downwelling system.

Section snippets

Sample collection and stable isotope analysis

A total of 308 black rockfish and 336 kelp greenling were captured at eight subtidal rocky reef sites in the northeast Pacific Ocean: Katmai National Park and Preserve, AK (KATM); western Prince William Sound, AK (WPWS); Elfin Cove, AK (ELFI); Whale Bay, AK (WHAL); Clayoquot Sound, BC (CLAY); Neah Bay, WA (WASH); Monterey Bay, CA (MONT); and Big Sur, CA (BIGS) (Fig. 1; Table 1). Sea otters were present at all sites; predation by otters increases kelp production and species diversity via

Results

The average length of black rockfish (one-way ANOVA, F = 35.7, P < 0.001) and kelp greenling (one-way ANOVA, F = 13.8, P < 0.001) differed among sites (Table 1). Rockfish from BIGS and MONT were the smallest (P < 0.05 for pairwise comparisons with all other sites) and those from ELFI and WPWS were largest (P < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons except fish from ELFI were not significantly larger than those from KATM or CLAY), while rockfish from other sites were intermediate in mean length.

Discussion

This collection of nearshore fish isotope values provides the first evidence of routine kelp-derived carbon contributions to benthic- and pelagic-feeding nearshore fishes across a wide latitudinal gradient. Kelp forests have been known to benefit fish by providing habitat (Bodkin, 1986, Efird and Konar, 2014, Holbrook et al., 1990, Reisewitz et al., 2006, Siddon et al., 2008), and our data suggests that kelp also provides an important source of primary production for the food webs used by

Conclusions

Overall, the high muscle δ13C values and isotope mixing model results of both kelp greenling and black rockfish strongly suggest that a 13C-enriched carbon source, likely dominated by canopy kelp, contributes substantially to the benthic and pelagic food webs that these species utilize across both coastal upwelling and downwelling systems in the northeast Pacific Ocean. If kelp contributes substantial energy to fishes, it follows that shifts in kelp production could influence fish production in

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the Pacific Nearshore Project supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, Ecosystems Mission Area and the Department of the Interior on the Landscape Initiative to investigate biotic response to environmental variation in nearshore habitats of the northeast Pacific Ocean. We thank the USGS Pacific Nearshore Team for project support, H. Coletti and the National Park Service, M. Murray and the Monterey Bay Aquarium, S. Larson at the Seattle Aquarium, S. Hoobler and the

References (91)

  • M.J. Behrenfeld et al.

    Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity

    Nature

    (2006)
  • J.L. Bodkin

    Fish assemblages in Macrocystis and Nereocystis kelp forests off central California

    Fish. Bull.

    (1986)
  • A.L. Bond et al.

    Recent Bayesian stable-isotope mixing models are highly sensitive to variation in discrimination factors

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2011)
  • R.D. Brodeur et al.

    Food Habits and Dietary Variability of Pelagic Nekton off Oregon and Washington, 1979-1984

    (1987)
  • T. Dalsgaard

    Benthic primary production and nutrient cycling in sediments with benthic microalgae and transient accumulation of macroalgae

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (2003)
  • P.K. Dayton

    Ecology of kelp communities

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

    (1985)
  • T.A. Dean et al.

    The distribution of nearshore fishes in kelp and eelgrass communities in Prince William Sound, Alaska: associations with vegetation and physical habitat characteristics

    Environ. Biol. Fishes

    (2000)
  • M. Dethier et al.

    Addressing assumptions: variation in stable isotopes and fatty acids of marine macrophytes can confound conclusions of food web studies

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2013)
  • D.O. Duggins

    Kelp beds and sea otters: an experimental approach

    Ecology

    (1980)
  • D.O. Duggins et al.

    Magnification of secondary production by kelp detritus in coastal marine ecosystems

    Science

    (1989)
  • K.H. Dunton

    δ15N and δ13C measurements of Antarctic Peninsula fauna: trophic relationships and assimilation of benthic seaweeds

    Am. Zool.

    (2001)
  • K.H. Dunton et al.

    Dependence of consumers on macroalgal (Laminaria solidungula) carbon in an arctic kelp community: δ13C evidence

    Mar. Biol.

    (1987)
  • K.H. Dunton et al.

    Food web structure of the Alaskan nearshore shelf and Estuarine Lagoons of the Beaufort sea

    Estuar. Coasts

    (2012)
  • J.E. Eckman et al.

    Life and death beneath macrophyte canopies: effects of understory kelps on the growth rates and survival of marine, benthic suspension feeders

    Oecologia

    (1991)
  • T.P. Efird et al.

    Habitat characteristics can influence fish assemblages in high latitude kelp forests

    Environ. Biol. Fishes

    (2014)
  • T. Elsdon et al.

    Experimental evaluation of stable isotope fractionation in fish muscle and otoliths

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2010)
  • J.A. Estes et al.

    Sea otters and kelp forests in Alaska: Generality and variation in a community ecological paradigm

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1995)
  • J.A. Estes et al.

    Predation, herbivory, and kelp evolution

    Paleobiology

    (1988)
  • M. Foley et al.

    Correlation between allochthonous subsidy input and isotopic variability in the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera in central California, USA

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2010)
  • M.M. Foley

    Investigating the Influence of Allochthonous Subsidies on Nearshore Giant Kelp Forests in Big Sur, California

    (2009)
  • M.S. Foster et al.

    The Ecology of Giant Kelp Forests in California: a Community Profile

    (1985)
  • M.D. Fox

    Resource translocation drives δ13C fractionation during recovery from disturbance in giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera

    J. Phycol.

    (2013)
  • S. Fredriksen

    Food web studies in a Norwegian kelp forest based on stable isotope (δ13C and δ15N) analysis

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2003)
  • B.S. Graham et al.

    Using isoscapes to trace the movements and foraging behavior of top predators in oceanic ecosystems

  • N.M. Haddad et al.

    Plant diversity and the stability of foodwebs

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2011)
  • L.E. Hallacher et al.

    Differential utilization of space and food by the inshore rockfishes (Scorpaenidae: Sebastes) of Carmel Bay, California

    Environ. Biol. Fishes

    (1985)
  • C.D. Harley et al.

    The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2006)
  • C.D.G. Harley et al.

    Effects of climate change on global seaweed communities

    J. Phycol.

    (2012)
  • R. Hesslein et al.

    Replacement of sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen in tissue of growing broad whitefish (Coregonus nasus) in response to a change in diet traced by δ34S, δ13C, and δ15N

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.M. Hill et al.

    Temporal and spatial variability in stable isotope ratios of SPM link to local hydrography and longer term SPM averages suggest heavy dependence of mussels on nearshore production

    Mar. Biol.

    (2008)
  • S.J. Holbrook et al.

    Effect of giant kelp on local abundance of reef fishes: the importance of ontogenetic resource requirements

    Bull. Mar. Sci.

    (1990)
  • S. Johnson et al.

    Atlas of Nearshore Fishes of Alaska: a Synthesis of Marine Surveys from 1998 to 2011

    (2012)
  • S. Kaehler et al.

    Trophic importance of kelp-derived suspended particulate matter in a through-flow sub-Antarctic system

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (2006)
  • S.S. Kilham et al.

    Challenges for interpreting stable isotope fractionation of carbon and nitrogen in tropical aquatic ecosystems

    Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie

    (2009)
  • T.C. Kline

    Temporal and spatial variability of 13C/12C and 15N/14N in pelagic biota of Prince William Sound, Alaska

    Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text