Carbon motivated regional trade arrangements: Analytics and simulations
Highlights
► We present analytics and numerical simulation results of proposals for carbon RTAs. ► We develop a multi-region GE structure with endogenously determined energy supply. ► Carbon RTAs may reduce global carbon emissions, while the effects are small. ► Most carbon RTAs are welfare improving. ► Trade policy is likely to be a minor consideration in climate change containment.
Introduction
This paper presents both analytics and numerical simulation results relevant to recent debate on carbon motivated regional trade agreements (see Chatham House, 2007, Dong and Whalley, 2010). Proposals which circulate include explicitly lowering or eliminating tariffs among parties to a regional agreement on low carbon intensive goods and products used in low carbon technologies, border adjustments on trade with parties outside the area based on differential emission content of goods, and the use of trade sanctions against countries outside the area to enforce compliance with emission reduction targets set for them. Such proposals reflect an effective merging of trade and climate change regimes, and are rising in profile as part of the post 2012 Copenhagen UNFCC negotiations (see Walsh and Whalley, 2008 and Lockwood and Whalley, 2010). Here we discuss carbon motivated regional agreements in terms similar to customs union and regional trade agreements based literature (see Viner, 1950).
We note that agreements with lower within-region barriers on low carbon intensive products need not reduce emissions globally if emission intensities of production differ sharply within and inside the region. This reflects the differential impact of trade creation and trade diversion on emissions. We also note that unlike conventional customs union literature the welfare effects of a regional agreement now also include welfare impacts on climate change from emission changes.
We use a multi-region general equilibrium structure in which countries produce commodities of varying emission intensities using substitutable fossil fuel based energy and non-energy inputs. Commodities are differentiated by country of origin following Armington (1969). Preferences are defined over both consumption of goods and climate change, with lower utility from higher global temperature change.
Unlike in conventional trade models in which there is a fixed endowment of factor inputs for each country, here we model energy supply globally as integrated with a single global market and price, and there being a supply function for each country reflecting increasing extraction costs. We do not separately differentiate between fossil and non fossil fuels, but in a further model extension we could do so. We model the extraction cost function in constant elasticity form to yield a specification consistent with alternative values of the supply elasticity of energy. We then treat emissions in each country as fixed coefficient in energy use, and in this way incorporate endogeneity of emission levels. Global emission levels can thus rise or fall under any given regional trade agreement. This differs from other equilibrium structures (see OECD, 1993; Bhattacharyya, 1996; and Wing, 2004) in which the energy endowment is fixed (perfectly inelastic supply).
We next turn to numerical simulation, and using a number of data sources construct a benchmark global equilibrium data set based on data for 2006. This covers production, consumption and trade for each of a number of regions (US, EU, China, ROW) which we then project forward using 2004–2006 average growth rates for the period 2006–2036. In our static equilibrium model we thus treat the 30-year period 2006–2036 as a single period. The data set also contains estimates of energy use by sector and emissions for 2006 which are growth rate projected forward for period 2006–2036. We calibrate our model to this data set using literature based estimates of key elasticities.
Results from our analysis support the conjecture made verbally in our previous policy paper (see Dong and Whalley, 2010) that carbon motivated trade policies such as carbon free trade areas can only have a relatively small role in reducing carbon emissions. Carbon motivated regional agreements may increase world welfare, but the effects on participating countries may be negative or positive, when with penalties, the effect of carbon motivated trade policies on carbon emissions is still small. Though the carbon motivated regional agreements will have larger effects with emissions of high and low emission intensities countries involved, the effects are still small.
Section snippets
Literature review
Discussion of both the form and impact of carbon free trade agreements is related to the long studied customs union issue originally analyzed by Viner (1950). Viner, the initiator of subsequent customs union literature, pointed out that regional trade agreements do not necessarily result in gains to members, even though bilateral tariffs are eliminated by the agreement. He developed what later became known as the trade creation — trade diversion approach to regional trade agreements to help
Data and parameterization
We build a model compatible benchmark general equilibrium data set which we use in calibration. Our base case assumes a single 30-year period, forward projecting a business as usual scenario for trade, production, and consumption data (as well as energy use) for a 2 good (energy/non energy intensive), 2 factor (energy inputs, other inputs) structure for 4 regions (China, US, EU, ROW). We forward project 2006 data using 2004–2006 average growth rates, for the period 2006–2036.
In Table 1-1 GDP
Model experiments and results for carbon motivated regional trade agreements
We have used our calibrated model to simulate the impacts of carbon motivated regional trade agreements on emissions and welfare. Following Dong and Whalley (2010), we analyze the first type of carbon motivated regional agreement (lower tariffs on low carbon intensive goods) and the third types of carbon motivated regional agreements (added penalties on third parties). Results are presented in Table 3-1, Table 3-2, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6-1, Table 6-2, Table 7, Table 8.
These experiments
Concluding remarks
We build on an earlier policy piece by Dong and Whalley (2010) and develop a multi-region general equilibrium model calibrated to a single period data set reflecting a business as usual scenario between 2006 and 2036. We use this to evaluate the impacts of both carbon motivated free trade agreements and customs unions on trade, emissions and welfare. Our results confirm the widely held view that as a mechanism for reducing carbon emissions trade policy would seem to only offer quantitatively
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Center for International Governance Innovation (CIGI), and the Academic Development Fund of the University of Western Ontario, and the Ontario Research Fund for financial support. Yan Dong acknowledge the financial support from Minister of Human Resources and Social Security of China for the Scientific Research Starting Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars.
References (23)
Applied general equilibrium models for energy studies: a survey
Energy Economics
(1996)Estimated substitution elasticities of a nested CES production function approach for Germany
Energy Economics
(1998)- et al.
An elementary proposition concerning the formation of customs unions
Journal of International Economics
(1976) A 3 × 3 model of customs unions
Journal of International Economics
(1979)A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production
- et al.
International trade and the negotiability of global climate change agreements
Changing Climates: Interdependencies on Energy and Climate Security for China and Europe
- et al.
Carbon, trade policy, and carbon free trade areas
The World Economy
(2010) - et al.
GTAP 7 Data Base Documentation — Chapter 14: Behavioral Parameters
- et al.
SALTER: a general equilibrium model of the world economy
The general theory of second best
The Review of Economic Studies
Cited by (25)
Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism on China's manufacturing sector: A dynamic recursive CGE model based on an evolutionary game
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementComparative analysis of carbon border tax adjustment and domestic carbon tax under general equilibrium model: Focusing on the Indonesian economy
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Some researchers found that BTA regulation is inefficient in handling the carbon leakage issue. Dong and Whalley (2011)built a multi-regional general equilibrium model and concluded that BTA distorts economics despite reducing carbon leakage effects in not significant value. Niu et al. (2013) show that BTA implementation resulted in adverse economic impact and has only accrued weak environmental benefits.
The impacts of carbon tariffs on international trade flows and carbon emissions: An analysis integrating trade elasticities with an application to US-China trade
2022, Energy EconomicsCitation Excerpt :A higher export carbon intensity usually entails a higher carbon tariff, which increases the trade cost. Dong and Whalley (2011) find that while carbon tariffs imposed by developed countries would bring massive shocks to China's economy, there would be only a minimal contribution to global decarbonization. Ghosh et al. (2012) employ a multi-regional multi-sectoral computable general equilibrium model and find out that carbon tariffs would result in lower efficiency and unfavorable distribution results in China.
Measuring preferences for energy efficiency in ACI and EU nations and uncovering their impacts on energy conservation
2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsA simulation study of China's imposing carbon tax against American carbon tariffs
2020, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Through meta-analysis, Branger and Quirion (2014) found that the average carbon leakage range was 14% without any policies being implemented, and the carbon leakage rate was reduced by 6% with other parameters unchanged through the carbon border regulation tax, indicating that the carbon tariff was conducive to reducing carbon leakage. Dong and Whalley (2011) established a four-region general equilibrium model, based on which trade measures of three kinds of carbon tariff agreements were analyzed. The results showed that carbon tariff agreements helped reduce global carbon dioxide emissions, but the value was very small.
Capital-labour-energy substitution in a nested CES framework: A replication and update of Kemfert (1998)
2019, Energy EconomicsCitation Excerpt :Kemfert (1998) is an often-cited article that presents the results of estimations of CES production functions with capital, labour and energy as inputs, using data for West Germany.2 Several policy simulation studies refer to this article for one or more of the values of the elasticity of substitution used in the simulation model (e.g., Wissema and Dellink, 2007; Dong and Whalley, 2011; Turner and Hanley, 2011; Meng, 2014). Kemfert (1998) reports estimated elasticities for the German industry for 1960–1993 and for seven industrial sub-sectors for 1970–1988.