Elsevier

Ecological Indicators

Volume 117, October 2020, 106607
Ecological Indicators

Benthic foraminifera to assess ecological quality statuses: The case of salmon fish farming

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106607Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Benthic foraminifera allowed to show degraded Ecological Quality Statuses due to salmon fish farming.

  • Ecological Quality Statuses derived from foraminifera showed similar trend as those derived from benthic macrofauna.

  • Rank-frequency distributions may be used to assess the Good Environmental Status.

  • Benthic foraminifera is a reliable Biological Quality Element to include in routine environmental survey.

Abstract

The “Rade de Cherbourg” (RdC, Cotentin) hosts the only marine salmon fish farm along the French coasts. High hydrodynamic regime would limit, there, organic matter (OM) accumulation directly under the cages, and enhance the transport of OM in the surrounding of the cages. This study was aiming at (1) monitoring the impact of a salmon fish farm on ecological quality statuses (EcoQs) of the RdC based on a benthic foraminiferal biotic index, (2) comparing EcoQs assessment results between foraminifera and macrofauna, and (3) in fine assessing the potential for benthic foraminifera to become an alternate biological quality element. In 2014 and 2015, bottom sediments of the RdC were sampled at 13 stations under and outside the farm for sedimentary (grain size and OM), and living foraminiferal and macrofaunal analyses. For benthic foraminifera, Exp(H’bc) was used to determine EcoQs, while H’, AMBI and BO2A indices were used for benthic macrofauna. Rank-frequency distributions (RFDs) were calculated for both groups. Ecological quality statuses based on foraminifera and macrofauna indicated a moderate degradation of the environmental conditions, shifting from excellent outside the farm to poor under the cages for foraminifera and from excellent to moderate for macrofauna. This study showed that benthic foraminifera are as reliable as macrofauna to assess EcoQs in the RdC. It offers interesting perspectives to monitor the health of marine systems based on benthic foraminifera. Furthermore, results obtained with RFDs suggested that this approach should be considered in the assessment of the good environmental status within the European marine strategic framework directive. Finally, diversity proved to be efficient in monitoring the health of the RdC, suggesting that it should not be set aside for the benefit of sensitivity-based indices.

Introduction

During the last 30 years, aquaculture in marine waters has greatly increased partly driven by the need for greater self-sufficiency in marine food production (Holmer, 2010). However, it is now widely acknowledged that activities related to aquaculture cause environmental disturbances (Bouchet and Sauriau, 2008, Carvalho et al., 2006, Chamberlain et al., 2001). Numerous studies have demonstrated that aquaculture degrades both sedimentary characteristics and benthic communities (Bouchet and Sauriau, 2008, Karakassis et al., 2002, La Rosa et al., 2004, Mazzola et al., 2000, Dauvin et al., 2020), which ultimately leads to decreased ecological quality statuses (Bouchet and Sauriau, 2008, Muxika et al., 2005). Previous studies show that the impacts of fish farms are essentially localised and depend mainly on aquaculture and environmental factors such as fish density, start date of activities, water depth, initial sea bottom site characteristics and hydrodynamic regime (Black, 2001, Karakassis et al., 2002, Yokoyama et al., 2006, Dauvin et al., 2020).

The Rade de Cherbourg (RdC), the second largest artificial roadstead in the world, is located on the north coast of the Cotentin Peninsula (Normandy, France) and hosts the only open marine water French salmon farm since the begining of 1990 s. Sediments directly below the cages are characterized by a moderated and localized increase in mud, organic carbon and nitrogen content (Kempf et al., 2002, Baux et al., 2017, Dauvin et al., 2020). Both the high hydrodynamic regime in the RdC and the acceleration of currents under the cages (Poizot et al., 2016) may often enhance the dispersion of excess organic waste from the salmon fish farm and limit long term accumulation of organic matter (OM). Hence, there are most likely a shift between periods of accumulation and then dispersion of the sediment under the cages. Accumulated OM under salmon farms may leads to anoxia in the sediment (Nickell et al., 2003), hence generate further constraints on the related benthic communities. So far, only two studies described the soft bottom macrobenthic communities and the associated habitats in the RdC (Andres et al., 2020, Baux et al., 2017) and no information is available on meiobenthic communities. In addition, the salmon cages in the RdC have been shown to induce high to moderate Ecological Quality status (EcoQs), but only on the basis of a macrobenthic community assessment (Dauvin et al., 2020). There is consequently a need to monitor other components of the benthic ecosystem, an absolute prerequisite to assess the health status of the RdC in general, and in relation to salmon farming in particular.

There is now a plethora of biological quality elements (BQE) used to assess the health of benthic ecosystem — sensu stricto EcoQs — for instance, benthic macrofauna (Borja et al., 2000), fish (Coates et al., 2007), seagrass (Krause-Jensen et al., 2005), macro-algae (Ar Gall et al., 2016), and more recently, benthic foraminifera (Bouchet et al., 2012). Note that over the last 20 years, benthic macrofauna has been by far the most widely used BQE to assess EcoQs (Birk et al., 2012, Borja et al., 2000, Bouchet and Sauriau, 2008, Dauvin, 2018, Dauvin et al., 2007, Pinto et al., 2009, Rombouts et al., 2013). Recent developments in benthic foraminiferal biotic indices (Bouchet et al., 2012, Alve et al., 2016, Dimiza et al., 2016) provide, however, further opportunities for the development and implementation of this meiobenthic group as an acknowledged biological quality element within marine legislations for EcoQs assessment.

Benthic foraminifera have increasingly been acknowledged as indicators of human-induced stresses (e.g. Alve, 1995, Francescangeli et al., 2016, Polovodova Asteman et al., 2015), such as oil spills (Morvan et al., 2004), heavy metals (Armynot du Châtelet et al., 2004), urban sewage (Melis et al., 2016), and aquaculture (Bouchet et al., 2007, Debenay et al., 2015, Vidovic et al., 2014). Specifically, fish farms induce clear shifts in the community structure of benthic foraminifera (Pochon et al., 2015), promote tolerant species (Angel et al., 2000) and lead to moderate to poor EcoQs (Bouchet et al., 2018a). In Norwegian fjords, benthic foraminiferal communities significantly correlate with benthic macrofauna communities, indicating that foraminifera can also be considered as good indicators of environmental conditions (Bouchet et al., 2018b). Foraminiferal indices based either on diversity (Alve et al., 2009, Bouchet et al., 2013, Bouchet et al., 2012) and on the sensitivity of species to organic pollution (Alve et al., 2016, Barras et al., 2014, Dimiza et al., 2016, Jorissen et al., 2018), have been designed and successfully applied to assess EcoQs of benthic habitats (Alve et al., 2019, Bouchet et al., 2018a, Bouchet et al., 2012, Damak et al., 2020, Dijkstra et al., 2017, Dolven et al., 2013, El Kateb et al., 2020, Francescangeli et al., 2016, Melis et al., 2016). Alve et al. (2019) further demonstrated that foraminifera and macrofauna have similar indicator efficiency by applying multimetric index based on foraminifera (NQIf) as an alternative, which is an adaptation of the Norwegian Quality Index (NQI), an internationally intercalibrated macrofauna index. Based on their results, Alve et al. (2019) recommended the inclusion of foraminifera as Biological Quality Element within the European Water Framework Directive’s guidelines (WFD). In a study of Italian transitional waters, benthic foraminifera have further been shown to be more accurate than benthic macrofauna to assess EcoQs (Bouchet et al., 2018a). Considering the difficulties to assess EcoQs in naturally stressed ecosystems (Dauvin, 2007, Dauvin and Ruellet, 2009, Elliott and Quintino, 2007), foraminifera may be a relevant alternative to macrofauna (Hess et al., in press). Because of their potential to reconstruct palaeo-environments (Alve, 1991, Alve et al., 2009, Hayward et al., 2004), an unique feature compared to benthic macrofauna (except for molluscs; Poirier et al., 2009), foraminifera are also good candidates to establish objective and reliable reference conditions (Dolven et al., 2013, Francescangeli et al., 2016). In short, benthic foraminifera may be a relevant complement to benthic macrofauna to assess EcoQs. These two groups exhibit similar features. Both are benthic and sedentary organisms, their distribution patterns depending directly on the environmental conditions. Furthermore, foraminiferal and macrofaunal community compositions in SE Norwegian fjords were significantly correlated suggesting that benthic foraminiferal distribution patterns mirror those of benthic macrofauna (Bouchet et al., 2018b). Intercalibration of benthic foraminiferal and macrofaunal biotic indices further confirm the complementarity of these two groups (Alve et al., 2019). Hence, this study was designed to discuss the relative strength of the classical macrofauna tool and the “newcomers” benthic foraminifera one to assess ecological quality statuses in the RdC in the context of salmon fish farming.

In this context, the present study aims at (1) monitoring the impact of a salmon fish farm on ecological quality statuses (EcoQs) of the Rade of Cherbourg based on a benthic foraminiferal biotic index, (2) comparing EcoQs assessment results between benthic foraminifera and benthic macrofauna, and (3) assessing the potential for benthic foraminifera to become an alternate biological quality element.

Section snippets

Sedimentological, foraminiferal and macrofaunal sampling

For the present study, thirteen stations (Fig. 1) were sampled in June 2015 in the RdC by scuba-diving using a push corer (diameter: 9.8 cm, layer: 0–1 cm, n = 3). Stations from S17 to S24 were away the salmon fish farm in the RdC, while stations from S25 to S28 and S30 were directly under the salmon cages (Fig. 1). The geographical positions of the stations were determined using a RTK Global Position System (GPS ASHTECH Promark 120, accuracy better than 10 cm). The study stations were visited

Environmental parameters

Results for the fine fraction (<63 µm) and total organic carbon (TOC) percentages were summarized in the Table 2. The average percentage of the fine fraction represented 33 ± 7% outside the farm and 21 ± 5% under the salmon cages. There was no difference between the two areas (t-test, p > 0.05). Total organic carbon average contents in the sediment remained low in the RdC, 0.72 ± 0.16% and 0.45 ± 0.05%, respectively outside the farm and under the cages. There was no difference between the two

Effects of salmon fish farm on the benthic ecosystem health in the RdC

Our results did not reveal any specific accumulation of silt sediments nor organic matter due to the presence of the salmon farm in the RdC. This fact confirmed previous studies that showed only a moderate impact on the sediment characteristics in the RdC (Dauvin et al., 2020, Kempf et al., 2002). Specifically, the semi-diurnal megatidal regime of the Rade de Cherbourg (5–8 m tidal range from neap to spring tide) likely limits any long term accumulation of OM under the cages, with tidal current

Conclusion

This work confirmed that benthic foraminifera are reliable to evaluate EcoQs in the context of salmon fish farm as the indices used for the macrofauna. Hence, this study represents a further step towards the official inclusion of benthic foraminifera in the list of biological quality elements. Comparison with macrofauna confirmed that these two groups, that share similar features, have the same response to pollution. However, differences in the reported EcoQs might suggest that

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Vincent M.P. Bouchet: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Noémie Deldicq: Investigation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Noémie Baux: Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Jean-Claude Dauvin: Writing - review & editing. Jean-Philippe Pezy: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Laurent Seuront: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Yann Méar: Resources, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank A. Baffreau and Q. Bachelet for their help in field and laboratory macrofauna works. We are grateful to crews of the “GMG Saumon de France” and N.O. Côtes de la Manche (CNRS-INSU) vessels. We are thankful to Helena Adão, guest editor of the special Issue of Ecological Indicators entitled: “SeventIMCO, the 17th International Meiofauna Conference: Meiofauna in a changing world” and to two anonymous reviewers; their comments greatly help improving this paper.

References (91)

  • V.M.P. Bouchet et al.

    Benthic foraminifera provide a promising tool for ecological quality assessment of marine waters

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2012)
  • V.M.P. Bouchet et al.

    Effects of short-term environmental disturbances on living benthic foraminifera during the Pacific oyster summer mortality in the Marennes-Oléron Bay (France)

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2007)
  • V.M.P. Bouchet et al.

    Benthic foraminifera to assess the Ecological Quality Status of Italian transitional waters

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2018)
  • V.M.P. Bouchet et al.

    Can benthic foraminifera serve as proxies for changes in benthic macrofaunal community structure? Implications for the definition of reference conditions

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2018)
  • S. Carvalho et al.

    Distribution patterns of macrobenthic species in relation to organic enrichment within aquaculture earthern ponds

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2006)
  • S. Coates et al.

    Efficacy of a multi-metric fish index as an analysis tool for the transitional fish component of the Water Framework Directive

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • J.-C. Dauvin

    Paradox of estuarine quality: benthic indicators and indices, consensus or debate for the future

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • J.-C. Dauvin et al.

    Benthic indicators: From subjectivity to objectivity – Where is the line?

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2010)
  • J.-C. Dauvin et al.

    Effects of salmon fish farm on benthic habitats in a high-energy hydrodynamic system: The case of the Rade of Cherbourg (English Channel)

    Aquaculture

    (2020)
  • J.-C. Dauvin et al.

    The estuarine quality paradox: is it possible to define an ecological quality status for specific modofied and naturally stressed estuarine ecosystems?

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2009)
  • J.-C. Dauvin et al.

    The ecological quality status of the Bay of Seine and the Seine estuary: use of biotic indices

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • J.-P. Debenay et al.

    Factors determining the distribution of foraminiferal assemblages in Port Joinville harbor (Ile d’Yeu, France): The influence of pollution

    Mar. Micropaleontol.

    (2001)
  • J.-P. Debenay et al.

    Foraminiferal assemblages as bioindicators to assess potential pollution in mangroves used as a natural biofilter for shrimp farm effluents (New Caledonia)

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2015)
  • M. Denoyelle et al.

    Comparison of benthic foraminifera and macrofaunal indicators of the impact of oil-based drill mud disposal

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2010)
  • N. Dijkstra et al.

    Benthic foraminifera as bio-indicators of chemical and physical stressors in Hammerfest harbor (Northern Norway)

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2017)
  • M.D. Dimiza et al.

    The Foram Stress Index: A new tool for environmental assessment of soft-bottom environments using benthic foraminifera. A case study from the Saronikos Gulf, Greece

    Eastern Mediterranean. Ecol. Indic.

    (2016)
  • J.K. Dolven et al.

    Defining past ecological status and in situ reference conditions using benthic foraminifera: A case study from the Oslofjord

    Norway. Ecol. Indic.

    (2013)
  • A. El Kateb et al.

    Foraminiferal-based biotic indices to assess the ecological quality status of the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia): Present limitations and future perspectives

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2020)
  • M. Elliott et al.

    The Estuarine Quality Paradox, environmental homeostasis and the difficulty of detecting anthropogenic stress in naturally stressed areas

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • F. Francescangeli et al.

    Palaeo-ecological quality status based on foraminifera of Boulogne- sur-Mer harbour (Pas-de-Calais, Northeastern France) over the last 200 years

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2016)
  • A. Gomez-Léon et al.

    Abundance and distribution of benthic foraminifera as indicators of the quality of the sedimentary environment in a subtropical lagoon, Gulf of California

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2018)
  • B.W. Hayward et al.

    Foraminiferal record of human impact on intertidal estuarine environments in New Zealand’s largest city

    Mar. Micropaleontol.

    (2004)
  • F.J. Jorissen et al.

    Developing Foram-AMBI for biomonitoring in the Mediterranean: Species assignments to ecological categories

    Mar. Micropaleontol.

    (2018)
  • T. La Rosa et al.

    Benthic microbial indicators of fish farm impact in a coastal area of the Tyrrhenian Sea

    Aquaculture

    (2004)
  • M. Mojtahid et al.

    Comparison of benthic foraminiferal and macrofaunal responses to organic pollution in the Firth of Clyde (Scotland)

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2008)
  • M. Musco et al.

    Benthic foraminifera as bio-indicators of anthropogenic impacts in coastal environments: Acqua Dei Corsari area case study (Palermo, Italy)

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2017)
  • I. Muxika et al.

    The suitability of the marine biotic index (AMBI) to new impact sources along European coasts

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2005)
  • L.A. Nickell et al.

    Bioturbation, sediment fluxes and benthic community structure around a salmon cage farm in Loch Creran

    Scotland. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.

    (2003)
  • R. Pinto et al.

    Review and evaluation of estuarine biotic indices to assess benthic condition

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2009)
  • X. Pochon et al.

    Accurate assessment of the impact of salmon farming on benthic sediment enrichment using foraminiferal metabarcoding

    Mar. Polution Bull.

    (2015)
  • C. Poirier et al.

    Can molluscan assemblages give insights into Holocene environmental changes other than sea level rise? A case study from a macrotidal bay (Marennes-Oléron, France)

    Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.

    (2009)
  • I. Polovodova Asteman et al.

    An almost completed pollution-recovery cycle reflected by sediment geochemistry and benthic foraminiferal assemblages in a Swedish-Norwegian Skagerrak fjord

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2015)
  • S. Porrello et al.

    The influence of marine cages on the sediment chemistry in the Western Mediterranean Sea

    Aquaculture

    (2005)
  • I. Rombouts et al.

    Evaluating marine ecosystem health: Case studies of indicators using direct observations and modelling methods

    Ecol. Indic.

    (2013)
  • J. Schönfeld et al.

    The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal BIo-MOnitoring) initiative—Towards a standardised protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring studies

    Mar. Micropaleontol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text