Neurodevelopmental outcomes of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months of corrected age associated with prenatal risk factors
Introduction
In the last decade, improvements in perinatal care have resulted in increased survival rates of very preterm and/or very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. However, new social and health problems related to their high risk of brain damage and neurological sequelae have arisen [1]. Long-term follow-up studies have also emphasized the occurrence of significant neuropsychological and behavioral deficits at school age of those who survive without major neurological deficits [2]. Moreover, some studies point out that the problems such as academic under achievement, behavioral problems, and deficits in higher-order neurocognitive functions of the majority of nondisabled survivors persist throughout childhood and young adulthood [3], [4], [5]. Preventing preterm delivery, therefore, has been one of the impending problems in obstetrics practice.
Intrauterine infection, defined as chorioamnionitis (CAM) and funisitis, has been recently identified as a major cause of preterm delivery and the inflammatory response syndrome of the infants has been proven to be mediated by cytokines [6], [7]. A recent report has also revealed that CAM is a risk factor for both cerebral palsy (CP) and cystic periventricular leukomalacia of the infants [8]. However, CAM and funisitis are most often clinically silent and the histological examination of the placenta after delivery is the gold standard for their diagnosis [9]. It is also recognized that the relation between infection and preterm delivery is not consistent throughout gestation. That is, infection is present in most cases with early preterm deliveries before 30 weeks of gestation as shown by histologic examinations, and is rare in late preterm deliveries after 34 weeks [10]. It is therefore mandatory to establish treatment strategies for intrauterine infection in early gestational age.
On the other hand, it is revealed that antenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with an increased risk of CP [11], and absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocity (AREDFV) in the umbilical artery (UA) is an independent predictor of either neonatal decease or CP in preterm FGR infants [12]. FGR is a multifaceted condition which results in the birth of a small for gestational age (SGA) infant. It is also pointed out that being born SGA is associated with lower intelligence, poor academic performance, low social competence and behavioral problems [13], [14], [15], and some studies have indicated that children born SGA have long-term global cognitive impairment [16], [17], [18]. Although underlying mechanisms for FGR are heterogeneous, the most common cause is utero-placental dysfunction [19]. Fetal health during FGR may be determined from changes in regional fetal growth, behavior, cardiotocography and from studies of umbilical and regional fetal flow velocities using Doppler ultrasound. Because these changes may be related to the severity of the perinatal morbidity, the policy of delivery may be essential for short and long-term outcomes. In other words, if infants are delivered after fetal conditions have deteriorated with poor heart rate variability, they may be complicated by general issues relating to fetal hypoxia superimposed on prematurity that may worsen both of short and long-term outcomes. In contrast, early preterm delivery before fetal health deteriorates may increase the risk of complications due to prematurity [20]. In such a dilemma and under quite limited knowledge of long-term prognosis estimation, we obstetricians have been deciding when to deliver FGR infants with no established idea of what is the best prenatal management plan for short and long-term consequences of those premature infants.
Therefore, the purpose of the present study should be targeted to clarify the relationship between prenatal risk factors and neurodevelopmental outcomes of VLBW and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.
Section snippets
Participants
This retrospective study investigated cases of Japanese women cared for through their pregnancy and delivery in our hospital during the period between October 2000 and December 2007. One hundred seventy women with a singleton pregnancy and their infants whose birth weight being less than 1500 g were included in this study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagano Children's Hospital. We classified those infants into two groups, that is, 118 appropriate for gestational age (AGA)
Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population. Gestational age at delivery of the AGA group was significantly earlier than that of the SGA group (P < 0.001). Mortality (7.6% vs 15.4%, P = 0.12) and rate of infants who could not be evaluated by KSPD because of severe impairment (2.5% vs 1.9%, P = 0.806) were not significantly different between the two groups.
Table 2 shows the characteristics of the study population born between 25 and 31 gestational weeks. The gestational age at delivery
Discussion
According to the website of the Vital Statistics in Japan (http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/kakutei04/) and the World Health Statistics of WHO (http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2009/en/index.html), mortality rates of neonates and infants in Japan in 2004 were 1.5 and 2.8 per 1000 live births, respectively and those are among the lowest figures in the world. And those of Nagano Prefecture where our hospital is located were 1.2 and 2.1, respectively. Moreover, according to the
Conflict of interest
The authors do not have any conflict of interest to disclose.
References (32)
- et al.
An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood
Lancet
(2008) - et al.
The relationship among inflammatory lesions of the umbilical cord (funisitis), umbilical cord plasma interleukin 6 concentration, amniotic fluid infection, and neonatal sepsis
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2000) - et al.
Neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm histological chorioamnionitis
Early Hum Dev
(2009) - et al.
Long-term behavioral sequelae of prematurity
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
Memory functions of children born with asymmetric intrauterine growth restriction
Brain Res
(2006) - et al.
Delivery before 32 weeks of gestation for maternal pre-eclampsia: neonatal outcome and 2-year developmental outcome
Early Hum Dev
(2004) - et al.
Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age of a national cohort of extremely low birth weight infants who were born in 1996–1997
Pediatrics
(2005) - et al.
Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth
N Engl J Med
(2005) - et al.
Functional outcomes and participation in young adulthood for very preterm and very low birth weight infants: the Dutch Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants at 19 years of age
Pediatrics
(2007) - et al.
Behavioral outcomes and evidence of psychopathology among very low birth weight infants at age 20 years
Pediatrics
(2004)
Sequelae of chorioamnionitis
Curr Opin Infect Dis
Chorioamnionitis as a risk factor for cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis
JAMA
Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery
N Engl J Med
Maternal antecedents for cerebral palsy in extremely preterm babies: a case–control study
Dev Med Child Neurol
Prognostic value of umbilical artery Doppler studies in unselected preterm deliveries
Obstet Gynecol
The behavioral and emotional well-being of school-age children with different birth weights
Pediatrics
Cited by (33)
The effects of a postural supporting “New Nesting Device” on early neurobehavioral development of premature infants
2021, Journal of Neonatal NursingCitation Excerpt :They often demonstrate extended arms or lay flat in bed with a straight body posture and abducted hip joints. These fragile infants cannot change posture without nursing intervention, especially for those born before 34 weeks of gestational age (The Canadian Neonatal Network™, 2014; Tamaru et al., 2011). Several clinical studies suggest that extended posture can negatively affect the neuromuscular development and hinder self-regulation ability of the infant (Groot, 2000).
Catch-up growth and neurobehavioral development of small-for-gestational-age infants
2021, Factors Affecting Neurodevelopment: Genetics, Neurology, Behavior, and DietOvarian cancer in pregnancy
2017, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and GynaecologyLongitudinal change in white matter in preterm infants without magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities: Assessment of serial diffusion tensor imaging and their relationship to neurodevelopmental outcomes
2017, Brain and DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :For each neural tract, we evaluated the average FA values of the left and right hemispheres. At 3 years of corrected age, enrolled preterm infants were assessed using the latest version of the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development (KSPD) [12,15,16]. KSPD is a Japanese standard development test and is used to assess disabled children at public health centers.
Comparison of the Kyoto Scale of Psychological Development 2001 with the parent-rated Kinder Infant Development Scale (KIDS)
2016, Brain and DevelopmentCitation Excerpt :In Japan, the KSPD test is the most widely-used standardized testing battery that measures broad aspects of children’s development and allows a trained examiner to directly work with children and observe their behaviors to assess their developmental level. The KSPD has also been somewhat widely used among pediatric researchers who study developmental outcomes/trajectories of particular groups of children [2,3] and those who examine the outcomes of intervention [4,5]. Additionally, due to its popularity among Japanese clinicians and lack of alternatives, recently, the KSPD was chosen as a tool to measure the developmental outcome of children who are participating in a large-scale birth cohort survey, the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) [6], which is being conducted by the Ministry of the Environment of Japan.
Extremely preterm infants small for gestational age are at risk for motor impairment at 3years corrected age
2016, Brain and Development