Elsevier

DNA Repair

Volume 49, January 2017, Pages 60-69
DNA Repair

Defect of Fe-S cluster binding by DNA polymerase δ in yeast suppresses UV-induced mutagenesis, but enhances DNA polymerase ζ – dependent spontaneous mutagenesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2016.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are duplicated by a complex machinery, utilizing high fidelity replicative B-family DNA polymerases (pols) α, δ and ε. Specialized error-prone pol ζ, the fourth B-family member, is recruited when DNA synthesis by the accurate trio is impeded by replication stress or DNA damage. The damage tolerance mechanism dependent on pol ζ prevents DNA/genome instability and cell death at the expense of increased mutation rates. The pol switches occurring during this specialized replication are not fully understood. The loss of pol ζ results in the absence of induced mutagenesis and suppression of spontaneous mutagenesis. Disruption of the Fe-S cluster motif that abolish the interaction of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the catalytic subunit of pol ζ with its accessory subunits, which are shared with pol δ, leads to a similar defect in induced mutagenesis. Intriguingly, the pol3-13 mutation that affects the Fe-S cluster in the CTD of the catalytic subunit of pol δ also leads to defective induced mutagenesis, suggesting the possibility that Fe-S clusters are essential for the pol switches during replication of damaged DNA. We confirmed that yeast strains with the pol3-13 mutation are UV-sensitive and defective in UV-induced mutagenesis. However, they have increased spontaneous mutation rates. We found that this increase is dependent on functional pol ζ. In the pol3-13 mutant strain with defective pol δ, there is a sharp increase in transversions and complex mutations, which require functional pol ζ, and an increase in the occurrence of large deletions, whose size is controlled by pol ζ. Therefore, the pol3-13 mutation abrogates pol ζ-dependent induced mutagenesis, but allows for pol ζ recruitment for the generation of spontaneous mutations and prevention of larger deletions. These results reveal differential control of the two major types of pol ζ-dependent mutagenesis by the Fe-S cluster present in replicative pol δ.

Introduction

Mutagen-induced lesions in DNA that escape repair [1], [2] can block cell division. This occurs when replicative DNA polymerases cannot incorporate nucleotides across from the damaged sites, leading to replication fork collapse. This collapse can be prevented by DNA damage tolerance mechanisms that allow for the completion of genomic replication [3], [4]. The DNA damage tolerance pathways include mutation-avoiding recombinational and fork reversal mechanisms, and mutation-prone translesion synthesis (TLS) [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8].

Mutagenic TLS processes are responsible for most environmentally induced cancers [9], [10], [11]. During TLS there is a switch from accurate, replicative DNA pols to specialized DNA pols. These specialized pols incorporate nucleotides across from the damaged/altered base(s) and then extend from the resulting aberrant termini [12], [13], [14]. Each TLS event can be broken down into three major steps. First, there is the insertion of nucleotides across from the altered base(s) by specialized polymerases [13]. This is typically accomplished by the low fidelity Y-family pols η, κ, ι, and Rev1 [15], [16], and sometimes by X-, A-, or B-family DNA pols, or a member of archaeal-eukaryotic primase family, PrimPol [6], [17], [18]. In the second step, the inserter pol itself or another pol extends the aberrant primer terminus. The efficient bypass and extension of such termini are incompatible with proofreading [19], [20], and as such the participating pols do not have this activity. If an error (inserting a base that does not match the original sequence) was made during bypass, this extension allows the altered sequence to remain in the new DNA strand sequence, leading to a mutation. Most commonly, the extension step in eukaryotes is accomplished by the error-prone B-family pol ζ [5], [9], [17], [21]. In the third step, the resumption of “normal” synthesis downstream of the lesion on the undamaged template occurs. This synthesis can be done by either pol ζ itself up to a new replication restart site, or by switching back to replicative polymerases [6], [22], [23], [24]. The replication fork can restart downstream to allow for continuation of replication as this multistep TLS process of lesion bypass occurs [22]. Filling the gap between the site of bypass and replication restart is another mutagenic threat, because of the longer lifetime of chemically unstable ssDNA templates [25] and the use of less accurate DNA pols [23].

Pol ζ is responsible for most induced point mutations and roughly half of all spontaneous mutations [14], [26]. Pol ζ has relatively low fidelity, and produces a characteristic mutational signature [27]. However, this signature was determined with preparations of yeast pol ζ with incorrect stoichiometry, (mostly Rev3/Rev7 subunits [28]) and with non-physiological equimolar concentrations of nucleotides, which can strongly alter a spectrum of pol mutations [29]. Nevertheless, remnants of this signature can be found in mutation spectra in vivo [2,23,30,31]. One of the features of the signature, complex mutations, are defined as sequence changes of a short stretch of nucleotides and are attributed to template switches [32]. Loss of the catalytic subunit of pol ζ results in decreased spontaneous mutation rates, but elevated rates of large deletions [31], [32] and gross chromosomal abnormalities [33].

Mutation-prone TLS during replication is not necessarily connected to DNA damage. Similar processes, called DRIM (Defective Replisome Induced Mutagenesis), occur in yeast strains with mutant replicative polymerases that have attenuated activity [30], [31], [34], [35], in strains with defects of pol subunits or accessory factors [36], [37], at unusual DNA structures [32], [38], or when nucleotide pools are perturbed [31], [39]. It is generally believed [30] that the cellular machinery for damage-induced and DRIM-like events are the same, due to their common genetic control and dependence on a complex of proteins comprised of replicative pols, TLS pol ζ, Rev1, and monoubiquitylated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) [5], [14], [40], [41].

The mechanisms of switches between DNA polymerases responsible for mutations are not well understood. The recent intriguing finding that the subunits POLD2 and POLD3 (Pol31 and Pol32 in yeast) are shared by major replicative pol δ and pol ζ (reviewed in [28]) may be a clue for the mechanism [42]. The Fe-S cluster in the C-terminal part of the catalytic subunits of these pols [43] plays a role in the interaction with POLD2 (Pol31 in yeast) [42], [44]. We proposed that the Fe-S cluster in the catalytic subunit of pol δ plays an additional role in the DNA pol switch [24], because yeast strains bearing allele pol3-13, encoding for a variant of Pol3 with one of the cysteines (Cys 1074) coordinating the Fe-S cluster changed to serine, were reported to have a defect in induced mutagenesis [45]. This allele has amazing pleiotropic effects and a wide spectrum of genetic interactions [45], [46]. Yeast pol3-13 strains are temperature sensitive, with no growth at 37 °C. At 22 °C they grow well, but have elevated spontaneous mutagenesis and recombination. The pol3-13 allele is synthetic lethal with the pol32-Δ mutation, leading to the absence of Pol32, the third subunit of yeast pol δ and the fourth subunit of pol ζ. The latter two phenotypes suggest that pol3-13 leads to decreased stability of pol δ. The pol3-13 mutation is synthetic lethal with mutations affecting the synthesis of Fe-S clusters [46] and the complex pathways of biosynthesis of the Fe-S cofactor (e.g. mms19, nbp35, tah18 and others) [47], [48]. It is also lethal with mutations in homologous recombination pathways. Finally, it is lethal in combination with some mutations affecting signal transduction, transcription, and nuclear transport, consistent with a prominent role for pol δ in DNA metabolism.

In this work, we examined induced and spontaneous mutagenesis in pol3-13 mutant yeast strains and its dependence on the REV3 gene, encoding the catalytic subunit of pol ζ. We confirmed that the defect in coordination of the Fe-S cluster in pol δ conferred by the pol3-13 mutation abolishes UV-mutagenesis, but found that it elevates the incidence of spontaneous Rev3-dependent base-substitution mutations and deletions. The results suggest that, unexpectedly, pol δ differentially regulates pol ζ transactions in induced versus spontaneous mutagenesis.

Section snippets

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains

All yeast strains used in the study originate from the parental strain LAN201-ura3Δ (MATa ura3-Δ ade5-1 lys2-Tn5-13 trp1-289 his7-2 leu2-3,112). The LAN201-ura3Δ strain is a derivative of the LAN201 strain [49], where the whole URA3 gene is deleted. To introduce the ura3-Δ allele, the chromosomal region flanking the ura3-Δ cassette of the BY4742 [50] strain was amplified using URA3-F 5′- AAGAAGAGTATTGAGAAGGG and URA3-R 5′- CCTACACGTTCGCTATGC primers. The resulting PCR product was used for

UV sensitivity and mutability of the pol3-13 strains in comparison to the rev3-Δ strains

Single and double mutant strains with pol3-13 and rev3-Δ mutations were constructed, and the effects of these mutations on UV irradiation resistance and mutagenesis were examined. The results were consistent with the data in the literature [45], and further extend them. The pol3-13 mutation sensitizes yeast to the lethal effects of UV, albeit the effect is less pronounced than for rev3-Δ, especially at low and moderate doses of irradiation (Fig. 1A).

The deletion of REV3 is clearly epistatic to

Discussion

Switches between DNA polymerases are critical during TLS and DRIM-like processes. Details of how they occur in vivo are not clear. The absence of any critical component of TLS machinery in yeast (Rev3, Rev7, Rad6, Rad18, etc) results in the elimination of damage induced mutagenesis [5], [16], [24], [58]. Stalling of pol δ and ubiquitylation of PCNA are required for the switch [40]. The scaffold for the TLS complex, pol Rev1, is also required for pol ζ-dependent TLS. The signals that instruct

Funding

This work was funded in part by UNMC Eppley Institute Pilot Grant 2016; NE DHHS LB506 Grant 2010-22; Grant RFBR # 15-04-08625 and Research Grant of St. Petersburg State University #1.38.426.2015.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Kristi Berger for expert editing of the text.

References (77)

  • A.V. Makarova et al.

    Eukaryotic DNA polymerase ζ

    DNA Rep. (Amst.)

    (2015)
  • J.L. Stodola et al.

    Proficient replication of the yeast genome by a viral DNA polymerase

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2016)
  • M. Garbacz et al.

    Fidelity consequences of the impaired interaction between DNA polymerase ε and the GINS complex

    DNA Rep. (Amst)

    (2015)
  • C.M. Wickramasinghe et al.

    Contributions of the specialised DNA polymerases to replication of structured DNA

    DNA Rep. (Amst)

    (2015)
  • A.G. Baranovskiy et al.

    DNA polymerase δ and ζ switch by sharing accessory subunits of DNA polymerase

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2012)
  • V. Bianchi et al.

    Changes of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate pools induced by hydroxyurea and their relation to DNA synthesis

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1986)
  • Y.I. Pavlov et al.

    DNA polymerases at the eukaryotic fork-20 years later

    Mutat. Res.

    (2010)
  • B. Stillman

    Reconsidering DNA polymerases at the replication fork in eukaryotes

    Mol. Cell

    (2015)
  • Y. Gomez-Llorente et al.

    The Architecture of yeast DNA polymerase ζ

    Cell. Rep.

    (2013)
  • E. Johansson et al.

    The Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerase δ contains separable domains for processive replication and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) binding

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • H.M. Siebler et al.

    A novel variant of DNA polymerase ζ, Rev3DeltaC, highlights differential regulation of Pol32 as a subunit of polymerase δ versus ζ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    DNA Rep. (Amst.)

    (2014)
  • P.M. Burgers et al.

    Who is leading the replication fork, Pol ε or Pol δ?

    Mol. Cell

    (2016)
  • E.C. Friedberg et al.

    DNA Repair and Mutagenesis

    (2006)
  • S. Boiteux et al.

    DNA repair mechanisms and the bypass of DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Genetics

    (2013)
  • E.C. Friedberg

    Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.

    (2005)
  • L.S. Waters et al.

    Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance

    Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.

    (2009)
  • J.E. Sale

    Translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis in eukaryotes

    Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.

    (2013)
  • K.J. Neelsen et al.

    Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response: nature reviews

    Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2015)
  • G.N. Gan et al.

    DNA polymerase ζ(pol ζ) in higher eukaryotes

    Cell. Res.

    (2008)
  • L.A. Loeb et al.

    DNA polymerases and human disease: nature reviews

    Genetics

    (2008)
  • L.J. Stallons et al.

    Translesion synthesis polymerases in the prevention and promotion of carcinogenesis

    J. Nucleic Acids

    (2010)
  • V. Pages et al.

    How DNA lesions are turned into mutations within cells?

    Oncogene

    (2002)
  • S. Prakash et al.

    Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: specificity of structure and function

    Annu. Rev. Biochem.

    (2005)
  • Z. Livneh et al.

    Multiple two-polymerase mechanisms in mammalian translesion DNA synthesis

    Cell Cycle

    (2010)
  • O.V. Kochenova et al.

    DNA polymerase ζ-dependent lesion bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is accompanied by error-prone copying of long stretches of adjacent DNA

    PLoS Genet.

    (2015)
  • I.S. Waisertreiger et al.

    Modulation of mutagenesis in eukaryotes by DNA replication fork dynamics and quality of nucleotide pools

    Environ. Mol. Mutagen.

    (2012)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    Hypermutability of damaged single-strand DNA formed at double-strand breaks and uncapped telomeres in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    PLoS Genet.

    (2008)
  • C.W. Lawrence et al.

    Eukaryotic mutagenesis and translesion replication dependent on DNA polymerase ζ and Rev1 protein

    Biochem. Soc. Trans.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Deletion of the DEF1 gene does not confer UV-immutability but frequently leads to self-diploidization in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

      2018, DNA Repair
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results suggest that the propensity for ploidy changes in strains with def1Δ should be taken into account when interpreting the DEF1 role in the control of genome stability. We used S. cerevisiae strains LAN201-ura3Δ (MATa ade5-1 ura3Δ lys2-Tn5-13 trp1-289 his7-2 leu2-3,112) [14], its def1::kanMX and corresponding diploid derivatives. Deletion of the DEF1 gene in haploid strain was made by one-step gene replacement using PCR product amplified from genomic DNA of the BY4742-def1Δ::kanMX strain from yeast YKO collection (Dharmacon, U.S.A.).

    • Iron–Sulfur Clusters in DNA Polymerases and Primases of Eukaryotes

      2018, Methods in Enzymology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This mutant is Ts at 37°C, reflecting defects in DNA replication. These cells also show hypersensitivity to DNA damaging agents, severely decreased levels of induced mutagenesis (Giot et al., 1997), and, surprisingly, high levels of Polζ-dependent spontaneous mutations (Stepchenkova et al., 2017). This highlights the role of Polδ and its cluster in DNA repair and damage-avoidance mechanisms, potentially through its direct participation or through Pol switches required during TLS.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: Department of Biology, Creighton University, USA.

    View full text