Elsevier

Desalination

Volume 167, 15 August 2004, Pages 239-245
Desalination

Membrane autopsy helps to provide solutions to operational problems*

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.133Get rights and content

Abstract

Within the lifetime of most membranes some fouling will adversely affect membrane performance and cleaning will be necessary. The cleaning will depend on the type of deposit such as organic fouling, inorganic scaling or colloidal deposition. However strong the circumstantial evidence as to the identity of the foulant, the only reliable method of determining the true identity of the foulant with confidence, is by membrane autopsy. Different deposits affect the performance of the plant in different ways. Deposits such as organic fouling cause reduced output and increased differential pressure along the membranes and often require higher operating pressure to maintain output. Inorganic deposits can be a cause of irreversibly increase in salt passage. All forms of membrane fouling cause a significant increase in plant downtime and maintenance costs. Following an extensive study of membrane fouling during the autopsy procedure, we can usually recommend a protocol for the most suitable cleaning procedure. Cleaning procedures can be supported by proposals for antiscalant treatments to avoid the formation of deposits and in some cases retard membrane fouling. It is common to find deterioration in the salt rejection layer leading to a significant increase in salt passage. In some cases this is associated with an increase in product flow and may be caused by oxidation of the membrane, deposition of inorganic salts, abrasion or even the tearing of the membrane leaves themselves. If the cause of the fouling can be identified, recurrence of the problem can often be prevented, although in some cases, salt rejection performance maybe irrecoverable. This paper considers the results of some autopsies from plants with different problems and presents a general opinion of current operating practice. Photographic evidence is included showing some of the different forms of scale and fouling. Conclusions are given based on the general experiences of the staff carrying out these autopsies.

References (2)

  • F. del Vigo et al.

    Autopsia de membranas: solucion al problema

  • E.G Darton et al.

    A statistical review of 150 membrane autopsies

Cited by (49)

  • Membrane distillation for wastewater treatment: Current trends, challenges and prospects of dense membrane distillation

    2022, Journal of Water Process Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    In MD, the concentration polarization may aggravate the heterogeneous crystallization as the concentration of the non-volatile material on the membrane surface is higher than that in the bulk solution. The most common inorganic fouling in MD is CaCO3, CaSO4, calcium phosphate, and silicate [85]. However, the compounds can be varied, depending on the composition of the treated water.

  • Integration of Forward Osmosis Membrane Bioreactor (FO-MBR) and Membrane Distillation (MD) units for water reclamation and regeneration of draw solutions

    2021, Journal of Water Process Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Various techniques have been used for fouling analysis in FO. In one study, fouling analysis for forward osmosis has been performed using membrane autopsy, and involved dissection of the membrane to check deposited foulants and surface properties [36]. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has also been used for interfacial force measurements between foulants, and between foulants and membrane [37].

View all citing articles on Scopus
*

Presented at the EuroMed 2004 conference on Desalination Strategies in South Mediterranean Countries: Cooperation between Mediterranean Countries of Europe and the Southern Rim of the Mediterranean. Sponsored by the European Desalination Society and Office National de l'Eau Potable, Marrakech, Morocco, 30 May–2 June 2004.

View full text