Mainstreaming ecosystem services into EU policy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.002Get rights and content

This paper presents a synthesis of the PRESS initiative (PEER7 Research on Ecosystem Services). In support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, this initiative demonstrated a multi-scale mapping and assessment approach of ecosystem services using three case studies. The water purification case studied the impacts of agricultural and water policy scenarios on the capacity of ecosystems to purify water. The conclusion was that greening the subsidies to farmers in Europe would improve water quality and increase the benefits to society as measured via monetary valuation. Yet, scenario based nitrogen reduction levels differed among the different scales (EU and basin scale) suggesting that the assessment of policy measures is scale-dependent, which, in turn, justifies a multi-scale mapping and assessment approach. The recreation case presented evidence that millions of people visited forests several times per year and they expressed their willingness to pay to continue doing so. The visitor statistics that were used in this study suggested that the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum approach is a useful method to identify areas in terms of their accessibility and potential to provide recreation services. Finally, we demonstrated that the coverage and resolution of current datasets are already sufficient to map the potential of ecosystems to provide pollination services. Further research should contribute to better ecological observations of key pollinator species to include important drivers of pollinator abundance in modelling and mapping approaches.

Highlights

► Achieving biodiversity targets requires mainstreaming ecosystem services into policy. ► We synthesize an approach to map and assess ecosystem services at different scales. ► We make a case for water purification, recreation and pollination. ► We provide arguments to include ecosystem services in policy impact assessment.

Introduction

The concept of ecosystem services (ES) is integrated in current biodiversity policies at global and European level [1, 2•]. In particular, the global strategic plan for biodiversity for the period 2011–2020 of the Convention of Biological Diversity complements previous conservation based biodiversity targets with the addition of ecosystem services. Following the global agreement, the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 [2] integrates the sustainable use of ES as underpinning element of human economies to complement the non-utilitarian conservation approach to biodiversity, thus contributing to the Europe 2020 target, in particular through the resource efficiency flagship. The Europe 2020 strategy [3] aims at building smart, sustainable and inclusive growth for the European Union. It establishes resource efficiency as the guiding principle for other EU policies. As a result, the EU water policy and the EU common agricultural policy (CAP) are now aligning their objectives with the target of the Europe 2020 strategy (Figure 1). Importantly, also the EU's regional and cohesion policy now recognizes the importance of investing in natural ecosystems, in particular urban green areas, floodplains and nature for recreation, as a source of economic development [4]. Both agriculture and regional development contribute to over 80% the annual EU budget, so the inclusion of ecosystem services in these policies is considered an important step towards a more sustainable economy.

Mainstreaming of ES into policies means ensuring that the positive or negative impacts of policies on ecosystems and their services are considered during both the policy design and the policy implementation phase [5, 6]. In particular, mainstreaming ES addresses those sectors that are authorised to make decisions about the use of natural resources. Bringing ES to the mainstream requires spatially explicit data and models [7••, 8, 9]. Therefore, the European Commission is setting up a common process towards the mapping and assessment of the state of ecosystems and their services in Europe, taking stock of on-going developments at global and European levels and within the Member States, also known as Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 [2]. This common implementation requires a multi-scale mapping approach where ES are produced and the benefits are appreciated [10, 11]. Furthermore, a better understanding is needed of the ecological production functions, which define how ecosystem structure and function affect the flows of ES, and their specific relationships with biodiversity, which is at the basis of ES [12, 13, 14].

The PRESS initiative (PEER Research on EcoSystem Services; PEER: Partnership for European Environmental Research, www.peer.eu) contributed to the knowledge base developed under Action 5 by advancing methods to map, assess and value ES at multiple spatial scales. In so doing PRESS focused on first, the impact of EU water, agricultural and biodiversity policies on the delivery of ES across Europe at different spatial scales; second, policy impact assessment based on qualitative literature reviews, as well as quantitative, biophysical mapping, valuation and scenario analysis, and third, guidance and recommendations for biodiversity policy development and implementation at the scale of EU and its Member States (Figure 1).

This paper presents a synthesis of the main results of the PRESS initiative [15] and translates the findings into conclusions for mainstreaming ES into EU policies.

Section snippets

Mapping of ecosystem services for policy impact assessment

Figure 1 links the case study-based ES assessments to the policies that were addressed in the project. EU policies are currently in the process of aligning their objectives with the overarching, long-term Europe 2020 strategy [3]. The CAP [16] and the EU Water Policy [17] are thus under revision. Both policies directly impact the use of natural resources and both seek to integrate ecosystem protection and restoration to maintain or enhance the delivery of ES in their objectives or targets. The

Water purification services

Freshwater ecosystems and more specifically the biotic communities in lakes, rivers and wetlands have the capacity to retain, process and remove pollutants, sediments and excess nutrients [19, 20, 21]. This water purification service reduces the quantity of pollutants of downstream waters. To the human settlements in the region, water purification contributes to the availability of clean water for multiples uses [22].

Four cases covering different spatial scales were selected to illustrate how

Recreation services

Cultural ES are the non-material benefits people obtain from ecosystems [33]. Recreation in particular, provides many important benefits, such as physical exercise, aesthetic experiences, intellectual stimulation, inspiration, and other contributions to physical and psychological well-being. Physical contact with ecosystems is essential for recreation in nature. Mapping recreation services thus depends to a great extent on mapping the accessibility of people to ecosystems.

Case studies covered

Pollination services

Crop pollination by animal pollinators is an important ecosystem service with high economic value [45]. The productivity of many agricultural crops depends on the presence of pollinating insects and the ecosystems that support insect populations. Insect pollination is necessary for 75% of the crops that are used directly as human food worldwide [46], and cultivation of pollinator-dependent crops has steadily increased between 1961 and 2006 [47]. An estimated 10% of the total economic value of

Conclusion

The EU has ambitious biodiversity and ES targets. Much of the ambition incorporated in the targets is dependent on mainstreaming biodiversity and ES into other policies that affect the use of natural resources. At the EU policy level, not only the agriculture policy (including forestry), but also regional and environmental policies should be the target for incorporating ES in their decisions. Achieving biodiversity targets requires demonstrating that changes in these policies are beneficial to

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We thank the following colleagues who have contributed to the second phase of the PRESS study: Leena Kopperoinen, Katri Rankinen, Jan Philipp Schägner, Peter Henrys, Iwona Cisowska, Marianne Zandersen, Kurt Jax, Alessandra La Notte, Niko Leikola, Eija Pouta, Simon Smart, Berit Hasler, Tuija Lankia, Hans Estrup Andersen, Carlo Lavalle, Tommer Vermaas, Mohammed Hussen Alemu, Paul Scholefield, Filipe Batista, Richard Pywell, Morten Blemmer, Anders Fonnesbech-Wulff, Adam J. Vanbergen, Bernd Münier,

References (52)

  • P.R. Whitehorn et al.

    Neonicotinoid pesticide reduces bumble bee colony growth and queen production

    Science

    (2012)
  • M. Henry et al.

    A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees

    Science

    (2012)
  • C. Perrings et al.

    Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity

    Front Ecol Environ

    (2011)
  • European Commission: Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244;...
  • European Commission: Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020. Brussels;...
  • European Commission: Regional policy contributing to sustainable growth in Europe 2020. COM(2011) 17. Brussels;...
  • R.M. Cowling et al.

    An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2008)
  • G.C. Daily et al.

    Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver

    Front Ecol Environ

    (2009)
  • P. Kareiva et al.

    Natural Capital. Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services

    (2011)
  • R. Naidoo et al.

    Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2008)
  • C. Layke et al.

    Indicators from the global and sub-global Millennium Ecosystem Assessments: an analysis and next steps

    Ecol Indic

    (2012)
  • S.R. Carpenter et al.

    Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2009)
  • S. Naeem et al.

    The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction

    Science

    (2012)
  • J. Maes et al.

    Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity and habitat conservation status in Europe

    Biol Conserv

    (2012)
  • Maes J, Hauck J, Paracchini MP, Ratamäki O, Termansen M, Pérez-Soba M, Kopperoinen L, Rankinen K, Schägner JP, Henrys...
  • European Commission: Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council establishing rules for...
  • Cited by (85)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    7

    PEER is the Partnership for European Environmental Research; www.peer.eu.

    View full text