Elsevier

Cortex

Volume 95, October 2017, Pages 222-237
Cortex

Research report
Failing to learn from negative prediction errors: Obesity is associated with alterations in a fundamental neural learning mechanism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Prediction errors (PEs) encode the difference between expected and actual action outcomes in the brain via dopaminergic modulation. Integration of these learning signals ensures efficient behavioral adaptation. Obesity has recently been linked to altered dopaminergic fronto-striatal circuits, thus implying impairments in cognitive domains that rely on its integrity.

28 obese and 30 lean human participants performed an implicit stimulus-response learning paradigm inside an fMRI scanner. Computational modeling and psycho-physiological interaction (PPI) analysis was utilized for assessing PE-related learning and associated functional connectivity. We show that human obesity is associated with insufficient incorporation of negative PEs into behavioral adaptation even in a non-food context, suggesting differences in a fundamental neural learning mechanism. Obese subjects were less efficient in using negative PEs to improve implicit learning performance, despite proper coding of PEs in striatum. We further observed lower functional coupling between ventral striatum and supplementary motor area in obese subjects subsequent to negative PEs. Importantly, strength of functional coupling predicted task performance and negative PE utilization.

These findings show that obesity is linked to insufficient behavioral adaptation specifically in response to negative PEs, and to associated alterations in function and connectivity within the fronto-striatal system. Recognition of neural differences as a central characteristic of obesity hopefully paves the way to rethink established intervention strategies: Differential behavioral sensitivity to negative and positive PEs should be considered when designing intervention programs. Measures relying on penalization of unwanted behavior may prove less effective in obese subjects than alternative approaches.

Introduction

Human obesity has recently been associated with dynamic alterations within the dopaminergic pathways of the brain (Cosgrove et al., 2015, Guo et al., 2014, Horstmann et al., 2015; Kessler et al., 2014, van der Zwaal et al., 2016). The dopaminergic system is a key player in learning and adaptive behavior (Bayer and Glimcher, 2005, Cools et al., 2009, van der Schaaf et al., 2014). Thus, changes in dopaminergic transmission associated with obesity might offer a mechanistic explanation of observed impairments in learning and adaptive behavior (Coppin et al., 2014, Horstmann et al., 2015).

Learning in an uncertain environment is driven by the deviation between our prediction about the outcome of an action and the actual outcome. If the outcome is incongruent with the prediction, most probably behavior has to be adapted and predictions have to be updated. On the neural level, incongruity is paralleled by a prediction error (PE) signal in dopaminergic structures of the midbrain and relayed from there to striatal and prefrontal target regions to drive learning (Schultz, 2002, Schultz et al., 1997). A positive PE signals that the outcome is better than predicted, and a negative PE reveals that it is worse than expected. In rats, extracellular dopamine release in dopaminergic target regions such as the ventral striatum encode both positive and negative PEs on a common scale (Hart, Rutledge, Glimcher, & Phillips, 2014). In humans, both positive and negative PEs are reflected in changes of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activation within striatum (D'Ardenne et al., 2008, McClure et al., 2003, O'Doherty et al., 2003, Pessiglione et al., 2006).

Dopamine mediates learning from positive as well as negative outcomes (Mathar et al., 2017; van der Schaaf et al., 2014), but via two segregated (‘direct’/‘indirect’) pathways (Cox et al., 2015, Frank, 2005, Frank and O'Reilly, 2006, Kravitz et al., 2010). It has been suggested that obesity is predominantly associated with alterations that affect the dopamine receptor D2 dependent ‘indirect pathway’ (Horstmann, Fenske, et al., 2015). In the ‘indirect pathway’ (Gerfen et al., 1990, Surmeier et al., 2007), postsynaptic D2 receptors are sensitive to detecting transient dips within the tonic DA signal (Day et al., 2006, Goto and Grace, 2005). Hence, wrong stimulus-response associations are weakened through D2 receptor activity in the indirect pathway subsequent to negative PEs (Jocham et al., 2009, Jocham et al., 2014, Klein et al., 2007). Importantly, changes in the indirect pathway may therefore alter learning from negative PEs in particular.

Similar to findings in alcohol and nicotine addiction (Chiu et al., 2008, Park et al., 2010), obese subjects might fail to use negative PE-signals in particular to adjust their eating behavior efficiently and thus exhibit uncontrolled, habit-like eating patterns (de Jong et al., 2013, Horstmann et al., 2015, Janssen et al., 2016). A deficiency in incorporating negative PEs into guidance of subsequent behavior might be a mechanism sustaining obesity and, importantly, might also pertain to general implicit learning behavior beyond the food reward context. This deficiency may either result from insufficient coding of PEs or from diminished transmission of this learning signal to higher cortical areas involved in behavioral adaptation.

Here, we tested the hypothesis that obesity is associated with a deficiency in incorporating negative PEs into guidance of subsequent behavior during implicit learning in a non-food context. Lean and obese subjects performed the Weather Prediction Task (WPT) (Knowlton, Squire, & Gluck, 1994) in an fMRI setting. Successful performance in this task heavily depends on dopaminergic transmission, formation and updating of predictions, and the utilization of positive and negative PE-signals in subsequent adaptation of response behavior (Mathar et al., 2017). It has been previously used to study PE-related brain activity (Rodriguez, Aron, & Poldrack, 2006) and associated dopaminergic transmission (Jahanshahi et al., 2010, Mathar et al., 2017, Wilkinson et al., 2014). We hypothesized an obesity-specific impairment in using negative PEs for successful adaptation of behavior.

Section snippets

Subjects

The study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Leipzig. We included 58 healthy Caucasian participants. Subjects were separated into two groups according to their BMI: an obese group (BMI ≥ 30, BMI < 40), consisting of 28 (15 female) subjects, and a lean control group (BMI ≥ 19, BMI ≤ 25), consisting of 30 (15 female) subjects, respectively. Groups of lean and obese subjects were closely matched for gender,

Task performance

Both lean (n = 30) and obese (n = 28) subjects performed the task successfully, gradually improving prediction accuracy over the four task blocks of 50 trials each [F(3,156) = 103.41, p = 6.37*10–37; Fig. 1B]. RTs continuously decreased over the course of the experiment [F(3,156) = 7.46, p = .0001; Fig. 1E]. Obese subjects exhibited a lower learning performance over the entire task compared with lean participants (Table 3; Fig. 1B). This performance difference started to evolve between trial 30

Summary

Our data provide evidence for reduced utilization of negative PEs in the guidance of behavior in obesity in a non-food context. This was mirrored on the neural level by an obesity-associated reduced functional coupling between ventral striatum and SMA specifically following negative PEs. Strength of functional coupling was predictive of task performance measures. Throughout the task, obese compared with lean subjects exhibited less consistent response behavior and a reduced implicit learning

Conclusion

In summary, we demonstrated obesity-related differences in PE-guided behavioral adaptation and fronto-striatal functioning in the absence of food-related stimuli. Future work should focus on longitudinal studies to reveal if the here found alterations are a consequence of overeating or possibly predispose to excess weight. Our results are highly relevant for understanding obesity-associated general alterations in behavior and brain function and for the development of new and non-invasive

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Martijn Meeter for his invaluable help with strategy modeling, Elizabeth Kelly for proofreading the manuscript, Stefan Kabisch and Haiko Schlögl for medical support, Ramona Menger for helping to recruit subjects, Bettina Johst for technical advice regarding the presentation software and Mandy Jochemko, Anke Kummer and Simone Wipper for assisting us during fMRI scanning.

References (107)

  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging

    NeuroImage

    (1997)
  • S. Fulton et al.

    Leptin regulation of the mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway

    Neuron

    (2006)
  • B.M. Geiger et al.

    Deficits of mesolimbic dopamine neurotransmission in rat dietary obesity

    Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • A. Horstmann et al.

    Slave to habit? Obesity is associated with decreased behavioural sensitivity to reward devaluation

    Appetite

    (2015)
  • E. Hoshi et al.

    Distinctions between dorsal and ventral premotor areas: Anatomical connectivity and functional properties

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology

    (2007)
  • M. Jahanshahi et al.

    Medication impairs probabilistic classification learning in Parkinson's disease

    Neuropsychologia

    (2010)
  • R. Keiflin et al.

    Dopamine prediction errors in reward learning and Addiction: From theory to neural circuitry

    Neuron

    (2015)
  • G.F. Koob et al.

    Neurobiology of addiction: A neurocircuitry analysis

    The Lancet Psychiatry

    (2016)
  • M.J.I. Martens et al.

    Increased sensitivity to food cues in the fasted state and decreased inhibitory control in the satiated state in the overweight 1-3

    The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (2013)
  • D. Mathar et al.

    The role of dopamine in positive and negative prediction error utilization during incidental learning – Insights from Positron Emission Tomography, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease

    Cortex

    (2017)
  • J. McClelland et al.

    A systematic review of temporal discounting in eating disorders and obesity: Behavioural and neuroimaging findings

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2016)
  • S.M. McClure et al.

    Temporal prediction errors in a passive learning task activate human striatum

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • D.L. Murdaugh et al.

    fMRI reactivity to high-calorie food pictures predicts short- and long-term outcome in a weight-loss program

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • J.P. O'Doherty et al.

    Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • R. Oldfield

    The assessment and analysis of handedness: The edinburgh inventory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1971)
  • A. Del Parigi et al.

    Sex differences in the human brain's response to hunger and satiation

    The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

    (2002)
  • R.A. Poldrack et al.

    How do memory systems interact? Evidence from human classification learning

    Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

    (2004)
  • K.E. Stephan et al.

    Bayesian model selection for group studies

    NeuroImage

    (2009)
  • D.J. Surmeier et al.

    D1 and D2 dopamine-receptor modulation of striatal glutamatergic signaling in striatal medium spiny neurons

    Trends in Neurosciences

    (2007)
  • M.T. Amlung et al.

    Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: A meta-analysis

    Psychological Medicine

    (2016)
  • G. Ariani et al.

    Decoding internally and externally driven movement plans

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2015)
  • A.R. Aron et al.

    Methylphenidate improves response inhibition in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • D. Benton et al.

    REVIEW a meta-analysis of the relationship between brain dopamine receptors and obesity;: A matter of changes in behavior rather than food addiction?

    International Journal of Obesity

    (2016)
  • R.G. Boswell et al.

    Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: A meta-analytic review

    Obesity Reviews

    (2015)
  • C. Cansell et al.

    Dietary triglycerides act on mesolimbic structures to regulate the rewarding and motivational aspects of feeding

    Molecular Psychiatry

    (2014)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Supplementary motor area exerts proactive and reactive control of arm movements

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2010)
  • P.H. Chiu et al.

    Smokers' brains compute, but ignore, a fictive error signal in a sequential investment task

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • J.J. Cone et al.

    Prolonged high fat diet reduces dopamine reuptake without altering DAT gene expression

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • J.J. Cone et al.

    Ghrelin acts as an interface between physiological state and phasic dopamine signaling

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2014)
  • R. Cools et al.

    Striatal dopamine predicts outcome-specific reversal learning and its sensitivity to dopaminergic drug administration

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • K.P. Cosgrove et al.

    Opposing relationships of BMI with BOLD and dopamine D2/3 receptor binding potential in the dorsal striatum

    Synapse

    (2015)
  • T.D.R. Cummins et al.

    Dopamine transporter genotype predicts behavioural and neural measures of response inhibition

    Molecular Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • J. Daunizeau et al.

    VBA: A probabilistic treatment of nonlinear models for neurobiological and behavioural data. (A. Prlic, editor)

    Plos Computational Biology

    (2014)
  • M. Day et al.

    Selective elimination of glutamatergic synapses on striatopallidal neurons in Parkinson disease models

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • J.W. de Jong et al.

    Low control over palatable food intake in rats is associated with habitual behavior and relapse vulnerability: Individual differences

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • A. Di Martino et al.

    Functional connectivity of human striatum: A resting state FMRI study

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2008)
  • A. Dietrich et al.

    Body weight status, eating behavior, sensitivity to reward/punishment, and gender: Relationships and interdependencies

    Frontiers in Psychology

    (2014)
  • J.P. Dunn et al.

    Relationship of dopamine type 2 receptor binding potential with fasting neuroendocrine hormones and insulin sensitivity in human obesity

    Diabetes Care

    (2012)
  • K. D'Ardenne et al.

    BOLD responses reflecting dopaminergic signals in the human ventral tegmental area

    Science

    (2008)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Reduced sensitivity but intact motivation to monetary rewards and reversal learning in obesity

      2023, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      GEE models were implemented in SPSS 20. Following previous studies (Damiano et al., 2012; McCarthy et al., 2016; McCarthy et al., 2015), reward magnitude was converted to a categorical variable with three levels: small (< $2.00), medium ($2.01-$3.00), and high (> $3.01). Reward probability was also entered as a categorical variable with three levels: small (12%), medium (%50) and high (88%).

    • A Neuroeconomics Approach to Obesity

      2022, Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In learning from passive observation of outcomes without active choice, women with obesity rated both cues that predicted food and those that did not as highly predictive of food (103); no such generalization effect was observed in the monetary domain, where women with obesity acquired correct stimulus-reward associations and were able to flexibly change them (103). The inappropriate generalization of food reward learning in individuals with obesity may result from a failure to learn from negative prediction errors (105). This failure may be part of a general learning abnormality in some individuals (89,102), but a learning abnormality specific to food in others.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Both authors contributed equally to the work.

    View full text