Performance of chromia- and alumina-forming Fe- and Ni-base alloys exposed to metal dusting environments: The effect of water vapor and temperature
Introduction
Metal dusting is a catastrophic form of corrosion occurring between 400 and 800 °C in environments for which the carbon activity (ac) is greater than 1. It leads to the disintegration of metallic materials as a result of the formation of a carbon deposit containing metallic particles, carbides and oxides. A large number of studies have been devoted to define which alloys and compositions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] are more resistant to metal dusting. The influence of alloy grain size [3], [9], surface finish, cold working [3], [9], [10], [11], [12] or the addition of a coating [13], [14], [15], [16] on the resistance to such corrosion has been evaluated. Other studies were interested in the effect of parameters defining the metal dusting environment: temperature [12], [17], total pressure [11], [17], [18], [19] or gas composition [19], [20], [21], [22], [23].
Quantifying degradation by metal dusting is complex because there is no single gas mixture, temperature and total pressure encountered in industrial applications. Those parameters differ with the application and process, which results in a wide range of laboratory studies and difficulties comparing experimental results. One relevant observation about laboratory studies is that typical gas compositions creating a metal dusting environment contain little or no water vapor, in general <10% and very few contain ⩾20% of H2O. However, Hoffman et al. [24] reported that industrial applications can contain up to 40% H2O, in addition to being run at a high total pressure. These differences between laboratory and industrial conditions appeared to be significant as laboratory studies tend to highlight the superiority of Ni-base alloys, as shown by Grabke et al. [25], while Hoffman et al. [24] reported better resistance for Fe-base alloys under industrial conditions.
This study surveyed the influence on metal dusting of temperature as well as H2O content and total pressure (expanding initial results published previously [26], [27]). Three sets of tests were defined. The first one was carried out at atmospheric pressure in a given CO2–CO–H2–H2O mixture with the temperature being raised from 550 to 750 °C. The second one was carried out at 650 °C and atmospheric pressure in a CO2–CO–H2 environment in which H2 was replaced by H2O, leading to a decrease in ac. The third one was also performed at 650 °C under the same CO2–CO–H2 environment in which H2O was added from 0 to 28% by keeping the CO/CO2 and CO/H2 ratios constant and raising the total pressure to keep ac constant. Under each metal dusting environment, a wide range of commercial chromia- and alumina-forming Fe- and Ni-base alloys were tested. The test matrix also included a new class of alumina-forming austenitic (AFA) stainless steels, alloys developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to offer both good oxidation and creep resistance [28], [29], [30]. Select alloys were also oxidized at 650 °C in wet air to compare the effect of water vapor in high and low oxygen partial pressures.
Section snippets
Materials
A series of chromia- and alumina-forming Fe- and Ni-base alloys was studied under metal dusting conditions. Their chemical composition is given in atomic percent in Table 1. The alloy specimens were rectangular coupons (typically ≈ 1.5 × 10 × 19 mm), except for 3 mm thick H224 specimens, or 16 mm diameter disks for cast FeCrAlY and NiAl. A hole was drilled close to one end to facilitate their positioning within the rig. Samples were ground to a 600 grit finish with SiC paper on all faces and then cleaned
Effect of the temperature
The mass changes from Tests 1–3 at 550–750 °C are reported in Fig. 2. At 550 °C with the highest ac, all of the Fe-base alloys lost mass (347H was not included), and three Ni-base alloys (601, H224, NiAl) exhibited mass losses. The largest mass losses were encountered for T122 and 800H alloys, which exhibited the largest visual surface degradation, while some degradation around the hole was responsible for the mass loss of the AFA alloy. The mass loss of H224 alloy was associated with the
Effect of the temperature
The decrease in metal dusting degradation observed with the increase in the temperature from 550 to 750 °C is consistent with the decrease in the equilibrium constant of the synthesis gas reaction [32], leading to a decrease in ac, Table 2. This is also in agreement with the works of Grabke and Müller-Lorenz [3], who proposed that a temperature below 600 °C favors metal dusting and the study of Chun et al. [36] who observed a maximum metal dusting rate at 575 °C for iron exposed to a 50%CO–50%H2
Conclusions
A series of chromia- and alumina-forming Fe- and Ni-base alloys were exposed under nine different metal dusting and one air + H2O environments. For a given gas mixture composition, increasing the temperature from 550 to 750 °C at atmospheric pressure reduced the ac, leading to reduced metal dusting attack, as expected. At 650 °C and atmospheric pressure, the replacement of H2 by H2O in a CO–H2–CO2 environment also reduced ac and led to reduced alloy degradation. At 650 °C, the addition of H2O to a
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to J.R. Keiser for guidance on the experimental plan and procedures. T.M. Lowe, G.W. Garner, M. Howell, H. Longmire and T. Jordan assisted with the experimental work. The research was sponsored by the United States Dept. of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office.
References (54)
- et al.
Metal dusting behaviour of Cr–Ni steels and Ni-base alloys in a simulated synga mixture
Corros. Sci.
(2006) - et al.
Metal dusting resistant alumina forming coatings for syngas production
Corros. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Effect of gas composition on cementite decomposition and coke formation on iron
Corros. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
Effect of gas composition on coking and metal dusting of 2.25Cr–1Mo steel compared with iron
Corros. Sci.
(2009) - et al.
Effects of minor alloy additions and oxidation temperature on protective alumina scale formation in creep-resistant austenitic stainless steels
Scripta Mater.
(2007) - et al.
Analysis of thermal residual stresses in duplex-type materials
Comp. Materi. Sci.
(1999) - et al.
Gas phase analysis of CO interactions with solid surface at high temperatures
Appl. Surf. Sci.
(2004) - et al.
Effect of copper on metal dusting of austenitic stainless steels
Corros. Sci.
(2007) - et al.
Contributions of carbon permeation and graphite nucleation to the austenite dusting reaction: a study of model Fe–Ni–Cu alloys
Corros. Sci.
(2012) - et al.
Resistance of 9–20%Cr-steels against metal dusting
Steel Res.
(1997)
Role of alloying elements in steels on metal dusting
Mater. Corros.
Protection of high alloy steels against metal dusting by oxide scales
Mater. Corros.
Alloying with copper to reduce metal dusting of nickel
Mater. Corros.
Coking and dusting of Fe–Ni alloys in CO–H2–H2O gas mixtures
Oxid. Met.
Metal dusting of nickel–aluminium alloys
Oxid. Met.
Effects of grain size, cold working, and surface finish on the metal-dusting resistance of steels
Oxid. Met.
Metald dusting resistance of steels
Mater. Sci. For.
Metal dusting of 9–20%Cr steels in increased pressure environments at 560 °C
Mater. Corros.
Metal dusting corrosion of austenitic 304 stainless steel
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Protective behaviour of newly developed coatings against metal dusting
Mater. Corros.
Metal dusting protective coatings. A literature review
Oxid. Met.
Metal dusting behaviour of alloy 800H in laboratory carbonaceous environments under high pressure
Mater. Sci. For.
Metal dusting of type 316 stainless steel in high pressure environments between 450 °C and 650 °C
Mater. Corros.
Development of Materials Resistant to Metal Dusting Degradation, Technical Report ANL-06/14
Effect of syngas composition on metal dusting of alloy 800H in simulated reforming gas atmospheres
Corrosion
Cited by (33)
Parameters to estimate the metal dusting attack in different gases
2022, Corrosion ScienceCitation Excerpt :Across these studies, the CO/H2 ratio with the highest metal dusting attack varies strongly. Reasons for this might be the differences in test temperature [45], alloys (see the dependence on the alloy composition observed by Park et al. [11]), sample holder and tube material [46]. Hence, the simple method of comparing the CO/H2 ratio across multiple different experiments is insufficient to compare the studies and reflect the different observations.
Interaction of chlorinated hydrocarbons with nichrome alloy: From surface transformations to complete dusting
2022, Surfaces and Interfaces