Elsevier

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volume 41, October 2016, Pages 122-129
Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Stable carbon isotope fractionation as tracer of carbon cycling in anoxic soil ecosystems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2016.07.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Quantification of the relative contribution of different methanogenic pathways.

  • Quantification of the relative contribution of different acetogenic pathways.

  • Quantification of the relative contribution of different substrates (e.g., C3 vs. C4 plants) to the degradation process.

  • Importance of the knowledge of fractionation factors.

While the structure of microbial communities can nowadays be determined by applying molecular analytical tools to soil samples, microbial function can usually only be determined by physiological experiments requiring incubation of samples. However, analysis of stable isotope fractionation might be able to analyse microbial function without incubation in soil samples. We describe the limitations of diagnosing and quantifying carbon flux pathways in soil by using the determination of stable carbon isotope composition in soil compounds and emphasize the importance of determining stable isotope fractionation factors for defined biochemical pathways. Fractionation factors are sufficiently different for some central biochemical pathways in anaerobic degradation of organic carbon. Thus, it is possible to quantify the relative contribution of CH4 production by hydrogenotrophic or aceticlastic methanogenic pathways, and of acetate formation by chemolithotrophic (acetyl-CoA synthase) or heterotrophic (fermentation) pathways. In addition, stable isotope analysis may allow the differentiation between different organic substrates used for degradation, for example, the relative contribution of root exudation versus soil organic matter degradation, provided the different substrates are sufficiently distinct in their isotopic compositions (e.g., mixture of C3 and C4 plants) and the carbon conversion pathways display only small fractionation factors or are identical for the different substrates.

Introduction

Carbon cycling in soil ecosystems is mainly the result of input of carbon substrates by plants and degradation by soil microorganisms. The input by plants is mostly in the form of litter, dead plant material or root exudates. The degradation, however, is achieved by a complex soil microbial community comprising many different biochemical pathways, which depend on the chemical nature of the organic substrate and the environmental conditions (Figure 1). In general, the anaerobic degradation of soil organic matter can be separated in the hydrolysis and fermentation of polymeric substrates to short-chain fatty acids, alcohols, CO2 and H2. Further fermentation results in degradation to acetate, CO2 and H2, which are the dominant precursors of methanogenesis. In anaerobic systems, CH4 and CO2 are stable end products. Oxidation of CH4 usually requires the presence of O2 and methane oxidizing bacteria. Understanding the carbon cycling in soil ecosystems therefore requires knowledge of both the structure and the function of the microbial communities. There has recently been much progress in elucidating the structure of microbial communities by applying molecular analytical tools, in particular sequencing of microbial genes and gene products [1]. These analyses just require sampling of soil and  the sometimes technically demanding  extraction of nucleic acids or proteins. While some information on microbial functioning can be obtained by combining genomic and metaproteomic approaches [2, 3, 4] or using stable isotope probing techniques [5, 6], the in situ functions of the microbial communities usually can only be analyzed by incubation and measurement of the temporal change of analytically accessible variables. However, analysis of stable isotope signatures in soil samples might overcome this problem, since the isotopic signatures partially reflect the microbial functioning [7]. Our review intends to explore the limits of using stable carbon isotopic signatures for elucidating the microbial functional pathways of organic carbon degradation in soil, anaerobic degradation of small organic molecules originating from hydrolysis and fermentation, and methane production in particular.

Section snippets

Isotopic signatures, isotope effects, and fractionation factors

The 13C isotopic signature of a particular carbon compound is given by its ratio R = 13C/12C and is usually denoted relative to a standard (st) as δ13C = 103 (R/Rst  1) [8, 9]. The reactions in a biochemical pathway, especially those involving the cleavage of carbon bonds, often display characteristic fractionation factors (α) or enrichment factors (ɛ = 103[1  α]), which define the extent to which the carbon atoms have been fractionated during the conversion of a substrate to a product. For a reaction

Determination of fractionation factors for microbial pathways

The compound specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA) of δ13C usually requires an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS), which measures the δ13C in CO2. If a particular carbon compound can be isolated (e.g., by chromatography) and converted to CO2 (e.g., by combustion), the average δ13C of all its C atoms can be determined usually using a GC–IRMS or HPLC–IRMS system. For some simple compounds (e.g., CO2, CH4), the δ13C can also be determined using laser-based absorption spectrometry, for

Diagnosis and quantification of carbon flux pathways in soil

The measurement of δ13C of individual soil carbon compounds may allow the diagnosis of particular biochemical pathways that operated until the time of sampling [60, 61, 62]. The usual approach is defining theoretically possible C flux paths that can be differentiated by their fractionation factors and testing them by δ13C analysis of their substrates and products. The crucial point is that the pathways to be discriminated must display sufficiently different fractionation factors, reflected in

Conclusions and future perspectives

Stable isotope fractionation can be useful for distinguishing different carbon flux pathways provided the ranges covered by the fractionation factors associated with the individual pathways do not overlap. This is nicely the case for anaerobic processes involved in the degradation of organic matter, thus allowing the differentiation and even quantification of methanogenesis by hydrogenotrophic or aceticlastic pathways, and of acetogenesis by chemolithotrophic (acetyl-CoA synthase) or

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (91)

  • M. Thullner et al.

    Quantification of organic pollutant degradation in contaminated aquifers using compound specific stable isotope analysis  review of recent developments

    Org Geochem

    (2012)
  • A. Mariotti et al.

    Experimental-determination of nitrogen kinetic isotope fractionation  some principles  illustration for the denitrification and nitrification processes

    Plant Soil

    (1981)
  • K.L. Londry et al.

    Stable carbon isotope fractionation between substrates and products of Methanosarcina barkeri

    Org Geochem

    (2008)
  • J. Penger et al.

    Stable carbon isotope fractionation by methylotrophic methanogenic archaea

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2012)
  • L.M. Games et al.

    Methane-producing bacteria: natural fractionations of the stable carbon isotopes

    Geochim Cosmochim Acta

    (1978)
  • H. Penning et al.

    Variation of carbon isotope fractionation in hydrogenotrophic methanogenic microbial cultures and environmental samples at different energy status

    Global Change Biol

    (2005)
  • J.T. Gelwicks et al.

    Carbon isotope effects associated with aceticlastic methanogenesis

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1994)
  • M.B. Blaser et al.

    Carbon isotope fractionation of Thermoanaerobacter kivui in different growth media and at different total inorganic carbon concentration

    Org Geochem

    (2015)
  • C. Freude et al.

    Carbon isotope fractionation during catabolism and anabolism in acetogenic bacteria growing on different substrates

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2016)
  • S.A. Mancini et al.

    Effects of trace element concentration on enzyme controlled stable isotope fractionation during aerobic biodegradation of toluene

    Environ Sci Technol

    (2006)
  • N. Zhang et al.

    Analyzing sites of OH radical attack (ring vs. side chain) in oxidation of substituted benzenes via dual stable isotope analysis (delta(13)C and delta(2)H)

    Sci Total Environ

    (2016)
  • D.A. Stolper et al.

    Formation temperatures of thermogenic and biogenic methane

    Science

    (2014)
  • D.T. Wang et al.

    Methane cycling. Nonequilibrium clumped isotope signals in microbial methane

    Science

    (2015)
  • H. Yoshioka et al.

    Hydrogen isotope fractionation by Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus in coculture and pure culture conditions

    Geochim Cosmochim Acta

    (2008)
  • P.H. Janssen et al.

    Inhibition of methanogenesis by methyl fluoride: studies of pure and defined mixed cultures of anaerobic bacteria and archaea

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1997)
  • A. Dumig et al.

    The role of lignin for the delta C-13 signature in C-4 grassland and C-3 forest soils

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (2013)
  • M.J. Perkins et al.

    Application of nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes (delta(15)N and delta(13)C) to quantify food chain length and trophic structure

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • N. Blair et al.

    Carbon isotopic fractionation in heterotrophic microbial-metabolism

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1985)
  • K.C. Botsch et al.

    Fractionation of stable carbon isotopes during anaerobic production and degradation of propionate in defined microbial cultures

    Org Geochem

    (2011)
  • R. Conrad et al.

    Stable carbon isotope biogeochemistry of propionate and acetate in methanogenic soils and lake sediments

    Org Geochem

    (2014)
  • H. Penning et al.

    Carbon isotope effects associated with mixed-acid fermentation of saccharides by Clostridium papyrosolvens

    Geochim Cosmochim Acta

    (2006)
  • R. Conrad et al.

    Methanogenic pathway and archaeal communities in three different anoxic soils amended with rice straw and maize straw

    Frontiers Microbiol

    (2012)
  • R. Conrad et al.

    Stable carbon isotope fractionation, carbon flux partitioning and priming effects in anoxic soils during methanogenic degradation of straw and soil organic matter

    Soil Biol Biochem

    (2012)
  • Q. Yuan et al.

    Partitioning of CH4 and CO2 production originating from rice straw, soil and root organic carbon in rice microcosms

    PLoS One

    (2012)
  • V.B. Heuer et al.

    Experimental studies on the stable carbon isotope biogeochemistry of acetate in lake sediments

    Org Geochem

    (2010)
  • F. Musat et al.

    Carbon and hydrogen stable isotope fractionation associated with the aerobic and anaerobic degradation of saturated and alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons

    J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2016)
  • N. Musat et al.

    Tracking microbial interactions with NanoSIMS

    Curr Opin Biotechnol

    (2016)
  • P. Quay et al.

    The isotopic composition of atmospheric methane

    Global Biogeochem Cycles

    (1999)
  • J. Nesme et al.

    Back to the future of soil metagenomics

    Front Microbiol

    (2016)
  • R.J. Ram et al.

    Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm

    Science

    (2005)
  • N.V. Ravin et al.

    Metagenomics as a tool for the investigation of uncultured microorganisms

    Genetika

    (2015)
  • C. Simon et al.

    Metagenomic analyses: past and future trends

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2011)
  • W.A. Brand et al.

    How well do we know VPDB? Variability of delta C-13 and delta O-18 in CO2 generated from NBS19-calcite

    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom

    (2009)
  • I. Nijenhuis et al.

    Stable isotope fractionation of tetrachloroethene during reductive dechlorination by Sulfurospirillum multivorans and Desulfitobacterium sp strain PCE-S and abiotic reactions with cyanocobalamin

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2005)
  • M. Thullner et al.

    Influence of mass transfer on stable isotope fractionation

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2013)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Greenhouse gases emissions and dissolved carbon export affected by submarine groundwater discharge in a maricultural bay, Hainan Island, China

      2023, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The lighter δ13C-CH4 was preferentially consumed for conversion to δ13C-CO2, which corresponded to the peak of δ13C-CH4 and the valley of δ13C-CO2 (Fig. 2). This is consistent with previous studies showing that methane oxidation could lead to an increase in δ13C-CH4 and a decrease in δ13C-CO2 (Blaser and Conrad, 2016; Corbett et al., 2012; Huang and Hall, 2018). Similar to CH4, the pCO2 also displayed a negative correlation with the DO content during high tide, which could be explained by the effect of photosynthesis (Fig. 7).

    • The application and potential non-conservatism of stable isotopes in organic matter source tracing

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The degradation of OM is the main reason for the non-conservatism of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in early diagenesis. In the process of OM degradation, carbon and nitrogen isotope fractionation are mainly affected by kinetic fractionation, microbial growth and metabolic process (Blaser and Conrad, 2016; Yamaguchi et al., 2017). In general, the easily decomposed components of OM are enriched in 13C and 15N.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text