Chemical and biological single cell analysis
Introduction
Most cellular research from fundamental cell biology and microbiology to applications in biotechnology is performed using cell populations with high cell numbers. This is convenient, as a huge variety of experimental techniques exist to analyze cell behavior. However, cell population data cover only information of an imaginary average cell (i.e. the average of the microbial culture), and not the mechanistic information of one cell. Properties of single cells within a population can be quantified by flow cytometry, deciphering cell-to-cell differences and thereby elucidating the heterogeneity of the population. Nevertheless, it is a snapshot analysis, reflecting the state of a cell at a certain moment in time. Neither the history nor the temporal development of a cell is traceable. Now, next to flow cytometry, developments are rapid and aim at the ultimate goal: spatiotemporal high-throughput analysis of single cells to mechanistically elucidate cellular functions. The enthusiasm of the field is reflected by the exponential increase of single cell studies and conferences in the last years. The development is pushed by the technical advances in microfluidic chip manufacturing and analytical methods, and pulled by the increasing demand from biologists.
We here define two alternative strategies for single cell analysis, which in the authors’ opinions should be ideally used in parallel as they deliver complementing information about cellular processes. First, live cell (biological) analysis allows the combination of cell cultivation and analysis, with the advantage of spatiotemporal analysis and possibility of subsequent cell retrieval. Single live cell analysis hence increases the toolbox of microbiologists and cell biologists. Second, in chemical analysis cells are lysed and their inventory is (partly) quantified [1••].
After a detailed motivation why to study single cells, we briefly summarize latest technologies for single cell cultivation and analytics. It is important to note that most devices described are prototypes. In addition, we highlight some recent achievements of this emerging field of research.
Cells within populations are not identical and do not necessarily behave alike. For example, cell populations can be subject to rapid environmental changes (often referred to as stress or perturbation). During such changes it was observed that some subpopulations cope better with the new conditions, resulting in higher survival or even growth rates, with the outcome that the subpopulation forms the basis of the subsequent main population. Hence, it was suggested that such cell population heterogeneities secure the existence of species [2]. It is assumed that the cell-to-cell differences persist at all time and become relevant only during environmental perturbations [3]. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria, as an example, can originate from population heterogeneities [4, 5•]. A potential mechanism for cell-to-cell differences is feedback circuits [6], implying that population heterogeneity is actively generated by epigenetic mechanisms to secure higher fitness of the species under ever fluctuating conditions [4, 7]. Another mechanism generating population heterogeneities are stochastic events (also referred to as noise) [8••, 9]. Especially regulatory reaction cascades, in which only a small number of molecules are involved are a potential source of cell-to-cell differences, small changes in absolute numbers can result in high relative changes [10].1 One can speculate that population heterogeneity is indicative of spatiotemporal fluctuations in protein concentration in single cells. Contrary to benign effects of population heterogeneity, very high noise levels can be harmful, since signaling pathways may become nonfunctional [10].
In conclusion, population heterogeneity is an inherent condition of cell populations, possibly as a result of stochasticity in gene expression and protein synthesis, existence of feedback loops, and differences in external stimuli (e.g. differences in the microenvironment). A better understanding of this heterogeneity will give mechanistic insight in cellular processes, ultimately resulting in new strategies for engineering biological systems, by minimizing cell population heterogeneities [11].
Arguably, for measuring cell-to-cell differences, one has to analyze cell functions on the basis of the single cell, as an average readout might blur these differences. In addition, precisely controlled microenvironments have to be used to decipher the individual contributions (e.g. microenvironment, stochasticity) to cell-to-cell differences. Such microenvironments can be realized on lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices as outlined below. Ideally, analytical methods are integrated into the LOC devices, although few examples exist. The nature of analytes in single cell analysis does principally not differ from population analysis. What differs significantly, are the amounts of target molecules available and their variations in time and space. An insight into the small numbers of analytes present in a single cell is given in Table 1. Moreover, the analyte amount is dramatically lower in small bacteria as compared to relatively large mammalian cells. Despite higher total amounts of analytes in large cells, analyte gradients due to diffusion might have to be considered [12].
The targets of interest in single cell analysis are not only specific mRNAs or large numbers of mRNA species, specific proteins or many proteins, metabolites, but also biomass and metabolite production rates as they are evidence for fundamental cellular functions of transcription, translation, biochemical performance, and cellular fitness, respectively. Exemplarily for the latter, we estimated from population data the single cell production rates of lysine (0.2 fmol/cell/s, 1.3 × 108 molecules/cell/s [13]), ethanol (6 fmol/cell/s, 3.8 × 109 molecules/cell/s [14]), and IgG antibody (6 zmol/cell/s, 4000 molecules/cell/s [15]), which are synthesized by a bacterium, a yeast, and a high producing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell, respectively (Table 1). For the latter, the production rate of 15,000 antibodies/cell/s, reported for mammalian lymphocytes [16], is not yet achieved by recombinant antibody production. As indicated, most cellular processes have multiple steps involved (e.g. information transport through a regulation cascade), hence requiring multitarget analyses to elucidate underlying molecular mechanisms. For some cell-to-cell difference studies, analysis of a single target might be sufficient.
The prospects of single cell analysis are plenty, as the challenges are still many and new opportunities will come up with available cultivation and analytical technology. Small total amounts of analytes and fluctuations in concentrations in time and space demand for specialized single cell cultivation devices and appropriate analytical techniques. The latest reports are summarized in the next sections.
Section snippets
Spatiotemporal single cell analysis and single cell cultivation
We focus on devices enabling spatiotemporal single live cell analysis in microenvironments, mainly in LOC devices. LOC devices enable single cell analysis in miniaturized reactors that are comparable in size to the cell of interest (Figure 1). The general aim of all devices is the handling and defined localization of individual cells for subsequent analyses. Furthermore, conditions of the microenvironment on LOCs are better controllable than for example on microscope glass slides. A further
Conclusions and outlook
While the existence and importance of cell-to-cell differences are becoming basic knowledge, relatively few examples exist giving a mechanistic understanding of these differences. One such example is antibiotic resistance, explained by existing cell population heterogeneities due to feedback loops and intrinsic noise [4]. Not only resistance mechanisms were elucidated by single cell analysis, but also a potential strategy to overcome such resistance was identified by monitoring single cell
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the ICA-Project (Leibniz Association/PAKT) and from the Leibnitz Graduate School – Systems Biology Lab-on-a-Chip (S-BLOC). The research is co-financed by the European Union (EFRE) and supported by the Ministry of Innovation, Science, Research, and Technology of North-Rhine Westphalia. PSD. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council (Starting Grant No. 203428, nμ-LIPIDS).
References (47)
- et al.
Single-cell protein induction dynamics reveals a period of vulnerability to antibiotics in persister bacteria
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
(2008) - et al.
Simultaneous determination of gene expression and enzymatic activity in individual bacterial cells in microdroplet compartments
J Am Chem Soc
(2009) - et al.
Bio/abiotic interface constructed from nanoscale DNA dendrimer and conducting polymer for ultrasensitive biomolecular diagnosis
Small
(2009) - et al.
Chemical analysis of single cells
Annu Rev Anal Chem
(2008) - et al.
Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes
Nat Rev Genet
(2005) Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity
Nat Rev Microbiol
(2006)- et al.
Microbial phenotypic heterogeneity and antibiotic tolerance
Curr Opin Microbiol
(2007) - et al.
Phenotypic variation in bacteria: the role of feedback regulation
Nat Rev Microbiol
(2006) - et al.
Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in ‘stress-sensitive’ yeast populations
Mol Microbiol
(2007) - et al.
Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level
Nature
(2006)
Stochastic gene expression in a single cell
Science
Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene
Nat Genet
Noise propagation in gene networks
Science
Live-cell imaging of enzyme–substrate interaction reveals spatial regulation of PTP1B
Science
Isolation and prominent characteristics of an l-lysine hyperproducing strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
Large-scale 13C-flux analysis reveals mechanistic principles of metabolic network robustness to null mutations in yeast
Genome Biol
Enhanced antibody production following intermediate addition based on flux analysis in mammalian cell continuous culture
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng
Pittsburgh 1962/63 revisited: too many antibodies, too few ribosomes?
Scand J Immunol
Towards high-throughput single cell/clone cultivation and analysis
Electrophoresis
Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
Contact-free single-cell cultivation by negative dielectrophoresis
J Phys D Appl Phys
The Envirostat — a new bioreactor concept
Lab Chip
Towards real time analysis of protein secretion from single cells
Lab Chip
Cited by (168)
Single Cell mass spectrometry: Towards quantification of small molecules in individual cells
2024, TrAC - Trends in Analytical ChemistryCellular subpopulations identified using an ensemble average of multiple dielectrophoresis measurements
2024, Computers in Biology and MedicineApplication and outlook of electrochemical technology in single-cell analysis
2023, Biosensors and BioelectronicsLabel-free scattering image-spectro-microscopy for single cell and extracellular vesicle analysis
2023, Sensors and Actuators B: ChemicalMicrobial single-cell mass spectrometry: status, challenges, and prospects
2023, Current Opinion in Biotechnology