Metabolic engineering for bioproduction of sugar alcohols

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.08.002Get rights and content

Sugar alcohols find applications in pharmaceuticals, oral and personal care products, and as intermediates in chemical synthesis. While industrial-scale production of these compounds has generally involved catalytic hydrogenation of sugars, microbial-based processes receive increasing attention. The past few years have seen a variety of interesting metabolic engineering efforts to improve the capabilities of bacteria and yeasts to overproduce xylitol, mannitol, and sorbitol. Examples include heterologous expression of yeast xylose reductase in Escherichia coli for the production of xylitol, coexpression of formate dehydrogenase, mannitol dehydrogenase, and a glucose facilitator protein in Corynebacterium glutamicum for mannitol production from fructose and formate, and overexpression of sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in lactate dehydrogenase-deficient Lactobacillus plantarum to achieve nearly maximum theoretical yields of sorbitol from glucose.

Introduction

Sugar alcohols are a class of polyols in which sugar's carbonyl (aldehyde or ketone) is reduced to the corresponding primary or secondary hydroxyl group. They have characteristics similar to sugar and are used to improve the nutritional profile of food products owing to health-promoting properties such as lower caloric content, noncariogenicity, and low glycemic index and insulin response [1, 2]. Other auspicious qualities as food additives include high enthalpies of solution and lack of reactive carbonyls. Sugar alcohols additionally find many applications in pharmaceuticals, chemicals production, oral and personal care, and animal nutrition [3]. They are found naturally in fruits and vegetables and are produced by microorganisms, serving as carbohydrate reserves, storage of reducing power, translocatory compounds, and osmoprotectants.

Traditional industrial production of most sugar alcohols is accomplished by hydrogenating sugars over nickel catalysts under high temperature and pressure conditions [2]. Biosynthetic routes offer the potential for safer, environmentally friendly production with enhanced product specificity. Enzyme-based processes for the production of sugar alcohols via sugar reduction have been investigated but are not within the scope of this review. However, costs associated with enzyme preparations and cofactor regeneration for in vitro synthesis of sugar alcohols contribute to the general perception that the use of whole cells presents a more attractive biological approach to produce these compounds from crude sugar feedstocks. Here we review recent metabolic engineering efforts to improve microbial production of the common sugar alcohols xylitol, mannitol, and sorbitol.

Section snippets

Xylitol

Xylitol is a five-carbon sugar alcohol obtained from xylose reduction. The annual xylitol market is estimated to be $340 million, priced at $4–5 kg−1 [4]. Xylitol has received the most recent attention of all the sugar alcohols, particularly as it pertains to microbial production and metabolic engineering. As depicted in Figure 1, yeasts naturally produce xylitol as an intermediate during d-xylose metabolism. Xylose reductase (XR) is typically an NADPH-dependent enzyme, while xylitol

Mannitol

d-Mannitol is a six-carbon sugar alcohol with a variety of clinical applications, in addition to its use as a sweetener. It is produced by a variety of organisms including bacteria and plants, and Candida magnoliae has been used for the industrial production of mannitol [29]. Other organisms currently targeted as microbial hosts for mannitol production include lactic acid bacteria (LAB), E. coli, Bacillus megaterium, S. cerevisiae, and Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metabolic engineering efforts

Sorbitol

d-Sorbitol (d-glucitol) is a popular six-carbon sugar alcohol (a stereoisomer of mannitol) with an estimated annual production of over 500,000 tons and finding applications in the food industry and as a building block for pharmaceutical products [3]. Early studies of biotechnological production of sorbitol primarily focused on the bacterium Z. mobilis, which naturally can convert fructose and glucose to sorbitol (via glucose–fructose oxidoreductase) for osmoprotection [3, 43].

The ability of the

Conclusions

Microbial production of xylitol, mannitol, and sorbitol has received considerable attention in recent years, and the metabolic engineering strategies addressed in this review are summarized in Table 1. Although many organisms naturally produce these compounds, genetic modification strategies have allowed for their enhanced production. LAB have been particularly exploited in that regard. Alternately, organisms that do not naturally produce a sugar alcohol have been provided the facilities to do

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgement

We thank the National Science Foundation for financial support (grant no. BES0519516).

References (47)

  • H.W. Wisselink et al.

    Overproduction of heterologous mannitol 1-phosphatase: a key factor for engineering mannitol production by Lactococcus lactis

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (2005)
  • T. Ferain et al.

    13C nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of glucose and citrate end products in an ldhLldhD double-knockout strain of Lactobacillus plantarum

    J Bacteriol

    (1996)
  • A.R. Neves et al.

    Metabolic characterization of Lactococcus lactis deficient in lactate dehydrogenase using in vivo13C-NMR

    Eur J Biochem

    (2000)
  • T.B. Granstrom et al.

    A rare sugar xylitol. Part I. The biochemistry and biosynthesis of xylitol

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2007)
  • H. Schiweck et al.

    Sugar alcohols

    (2003)
  • M.M. Silveira et al.

    The biotechnological production of sorbitol

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2002)
  • K.L. Kadam et al.

    Flexible biorefinery for producing fermentation sugars, lignin and pulp from corn stover

    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2008)
  • C.H. Ko et al.

    Xylitol conversion by fermentation using five yeast strains and polyelectrolyte-assisted ultrafiltration

    Biotechnol Lett

    (2008)
  • T.B. Granstrom et al.

    A rare sugar xylitol. Part II. Biotechnological production and future applications of xylitol

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2007)
  • B.S. Ko et al.

    Enhancement of xylitol productivity and yield using a xylitol dehydrogenase gene-disrupted mutant of Candida tropicalis under fully aerobic conditions

    Biotechnol Lett

    (2006)
  • Y.S. Jin et al.

    Xylitol production by a Pichia stipitisd-xylulokinase mutant

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2005)
  • M. Jeppsson et al.

    The expression of a Pichia stipitis xylose reductase mutant with higher KM for NADPH increases ethanol production from xylose in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2006)
  • A. Saloheimo et al.

    Xylose transport studies with xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing heterologous and homologous permeases

    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

    (2007)
  • Cited by (103)

    • On the interactions of diols and DMPC monolayers

      2022, Journal of Molecular Liquids
    • Homemade explosives

      2021, Counterterrorist Detection Techniques of Explosives
    • Current advances on biological production of fumaric acid

      2020, Biochemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on this, cofactor engineering was taken to enhance ATP and NADH generation. Cofactor regeneration has been proved to be an effective way to maintain the cellular redox balance by altering the intracellular cofactor pool and a number of enzymes have been discovered to directly affect the ratio of NADH/NAD+ or ATP/ADP, such as cytoplasmic H2O-forming NADH oxidase (NOX) [72], mitochondrial alternative oxidase (AOX) [73], phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK) [74], and formate dehydrogenase (FDH) [75]. Therefore, PCK was overexpressed to generate ATP to motivate the RoPYC‐catalyzed carboxylation of pyruvic acid to oxaloacetic acid, and FDH was overexpressed to generate NADH which could be used to drive the RoMDH‐catalyzed reduction of oxaloacetic acid to malic acid.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text