A modified slant shear test designed to enforce adhesive failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.053Get rights and content

Abstract

Presently, there are several tests available to evaluate the adhesion between concrete layers cast at different times. Among these, the Slant Shear Test (SST) has a wide spread use, mainly for being sensitive to the roughness of the interface surface, one of the most influencing parameters in this scope, but also because of the simplicity of the experimental setup. However, the major drawback of this test is the fact of being often obtained cohesive (monolithic) failures, therefore providing a lower bound of the interface strength, which is related with the concrete compressive strength. To definitely solve this issue, i.e., to enforce adhesive (interface debonding) failures in all situations, the ‘Modified Slant Shear Test’ (M-SST) was herein designed and developed. Both numerical and experimental tests have been conducted to validate this new method. All relevant conclusions are presented. In summary, it can be stated that the M-SST always enforces adhesive failure, therefore allowing to accurately assessing the adhesion of concrete-to-concrete interfaces.

Highlights

► The Slant Shear Test (SST) is discussed. ► Major drawbacks are identified: possibility of cohesive failures. ► A Modified-SST is proposed to overcome these disadvantages. ► It is shown that the Modified-SST enforces adhesive failure.

Introduction

Structural concrete-to-concrete interfaces are present in reinforced concrete members when certain strengthening operations of existing structures are performed or when precast concrete members with cast-in-place parts are used. Presently, it is widely accepted that three load transfer mechanisms contribute for the shear strength of the interface between concrete layers cast at different times: (i) adhesion, understood as a chemical connection between old and new concrete and as aggregate interlock after debonding; (ii) friction, which appears when relative slippage between concrete layers takes place in the presence of normal stresses to the interface; and (iii) dowel action, which results from the deformation of the reinforcement crossing the interface due to the relative slippage between concrete layers.

There are several tests available to evaluate the behaviour and/or the strength of concrete-to-concrete interfaces. These tests can be classified according to the stress resultant at the interface in: (i) axial; (ii) bending; or (iii) shear (Table 1) tests.

From all the tests referred to, the Slant Shear Test (SST) (Fig. 1) is the most commonly used to assess the adhesion between concrete layers. In the SST, the interface is subjected to both shear and compressive stress states, which allows a relatively uniform stress distribution at the interface. The wide spread use of the SST is mainly due to the simplicity of the experimental setup and to the high sensitivity of the test to variations in influencing parameters [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], namely: (i) the specimens’ geometry (angle of the shear plane and ratio height/width of the cross section); (ii) the casting procedure; (iii) the preparation of the interface (surface roughness); (iv) the differential stiffness between concrete layers; (v) the differential shrinkage between concrete layers; and (vi) the use of a bonding agent at the interface.

The SST was proposed in 1976 by Kriegh [31] to evaluate the bond strength of epoxy-based resins using cylinder-shaped specimens of 150 mm diameter by 300 mm height and with the interface at 30° to the vertical. In 1978, this test was adopted by Tabor [32] for studying the bond between concrete-to-concrete interfaces using prismatic specimens. Currently, there are several SST standards (see Table 2), using different specimen geometries.

In spite of its popularity, this test presents as major drawback the fact of leading to two possible failure mechanisms: (i) adhesive, interface debonding (Fig. 2); and (ii) cohesive, crushing of the weakest concrete (Fig. 3). In the latter case, only a lower estimate of the interface strength can be obtained, since failure depends on the compressive strength of the weakest concrete.

According to Austin et al. [35], who investigated the SST failure modes, the normal/shear stress ratio is controlled by the interface angle, having for this reason a crucial influence on the SST failure mode and, thus, on the ultimate load. Therefore, it is suggested to test different interface angles, for each surface treatment, in order to obtain a bond failure envelope.

According to Naderi [36], adhesion under zero normal stress can only be estimated with the SST if, at least, three interface angles are considered. Furthermore, this method does not agree with the results of other methods, namely, the friction transfer method. Additionally, it was also stated that the coefficient of variation presented by this method is relatively high.

Although the SST might not be adequate to assess the pure shear strength, it is possible to define bond failure envelope. This envelope can be obtained using SST results in shear (σ, τ) combined with: (i) results of a tensile test (ft,i); and (ii) the pure shear strength (τ0) estimated using the Mohr–Coulomb criterion (Fig. 4). If cohesive failure occurs, the envelope can also be determined, nevertheless the obtained value is a lower bond of the interface strength, as represented by the dashed line in Fig. 4. More details are given in [37].

Clímaco and Regan [26] adopted a Mohr Coulomb failure criterion to select an angle to ensure adhesive failure. 223 specimens have been tested adopting three different angles (0°, 20° and 26.7°). The obtained failure types were divided in three categories: (i) concrete failure, adjacent to the interface; (ii) shear failure, along the interface with simultaneous concrete failure neighbouring the interface; and (iii) cohesive failure with crushing of the weakest concrete. Even though a 20° angle was defined to always obtain adhesive failures, cohesive failures were still reported. Therefore, it can be stated that although the interface angle plays an important role in the failure mode, it is not always possible to obtain adhesive failure only by adequately selecting this parameter.

In Júlio et al. [38], SST specimens were produced in order to verify the influence of differential stiffness in the shear strength of concrete-to-concrete interfaces. Keeping the substrate concrete unchanged with a compressive strength of 30 MPa, three different concrete mixtures were used for the added concrete layer, with the following compressive strengths: 30, 50 and 100 MPa. The surface roughness was increased in all specimens by sand-blasting. All specimens with both halves of the same compressive strength (30/30) presented adhesive failures, whereas all the others (30/50 and 30/100) presented cohesive failures, showing the importance of differential stiffness on the failure mechanism.

In Santos and Júlio [30], two failures mechanisms (cohesive and adhesive) are referred to. It was observed that the number of cohesive failures increases with the surface roughness. It is also stated that the number of cohesive failures increased with the differential stiffness. Differential shrinkage was also analysed by means of different curing conditions and different ages between substrate and added layer. It was also concluded that this parameter influences the failure type.

In summary, according to previous studies [26], [28], [30], [35], [38], it can be stated that the failure mechanism of the SST is mainly influenced by: (i) the interface angle; (ii) the interface roughness; (iii) the differential stiffness between concrete layers; and (iv) the differential shrinkage between concrete layers. Moreover, it can be stated that adhesive failure cannot be prevented only by adequately defining the interface angle.

As it was previously discussed, it is not possible to enforce adhesive failures by exclusively optimising the geometry of slant shear specimens. A different approach is herein presented which consists on a Modified-SST (M-SST), specifically designed to enforce adhesive failure and to ensure a uniform stress distribution at the interface.

Section snippets

Concept

In a structural connection the weakest component has an important role in both the strength and the failure type. In the case of slant shear specimens, made of two concrete layers, three components can be identified: (i) interface; (ii) substrate concrete; and (iii) concrete overlay. Cohesive failure occurs whenever the weakest component is the lowest compressive strength concrete. Therefore, adhesive failures can be only enforced if both parts of the slant shear specimen are strengthened. This

Numerical analysis

In order to check if the stress distribution at the interface is influenced (or not) by the added reinforcement, a simplified numerical study was performed [40]. Two linear elastic plane stress models have been considered (with and without reinforcement) using 492 bilinear finite elements for concrete (Fig. 6a). At the interface, 15 two-node zero thickness finite elements, connecting each half of the specimen, have been introduced. Finally, the reinforcement was simulated with 197 linear truss

Experimental validation

To experimentally validate the efficiency of the M-SST, pointed out by the numerical analysis, the most unfavourable situation has been selected: monolithic specimens.

First, the M-SST specimens were casted considering two situations, plain and reinforced concrete (see Fig. 8). Two specimens were adopted for each situation. The adopted concrete mixture was, by cubic meter: (i) 320 kg of ordinary Portland cement (Type II 32.5R); (ii) 421 kg of fine sand (0–2 mm); (iii) 181 kg of medium sand (0–4 mm);

Summary and conclusions

The Slant Shear Test (SST) has been proposed in 1976. After that, several modifications were introduced by different researchers. Nevertheless, none of these prevent cohesive failures. Even when the geometry of the SST specimen is optimised, namely by adequately defining the interface angle with the vertical, cohesive failures can still be obtained. Aiming to overcome this disadvantage of the SST, i.e. to always enforce adhesive failures, the authors designed an innovative test, called Modified

Acknowledgement

This research project has been funded by the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) with reference PTDC/ECM/098497/2008.

References (42)

  • ASTM C1404. Standard test method for bond strength of adhesive systems used with concrete as measured by direct...
  • CAN/CSA A23.2-6B. Methods of test to determine adhesion by tensile load. Canadian Standards Association;...
  • NP EN 12390-6. Testing hardened concrete – Part 6: Tensile splitting strength of test specimens. Portuguese Institute...
  • ASTM C496. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. American Society for...
  • BS EN 12636. Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures – test methods – determination...
  • NP EN 12390-5. Testing hardened concrete – Part 5: Flexural strength of test specimens. Portuguese Institute for...
  • ASTM C78M-10. 2010. Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete. American Society for Testing Materials;...
  • A. Long et al.

    The pull-off partially destructive test for concrete

    (1984)
  • N.J. Delatte et al.

    Laboratory and field testing of concrete bond development for expedited bonded concrete overlays

    ACI Mater J

    (2000)
  • Ohama Y, Demura K, Nagao H, Ogi T. Adhesion of polymer modified mortars to ordinary cement mortars by different test...
  • Sustersic J, Zajc A. Characteristics of bond between concrete layers. In: RILEM international symposium on adhesion...
  • Cited by (53)

    • Interfacial bond in concrete-to-concrete composites: A review

      2022, Construction and Building Materials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text